Protecting wildlife: South Africa to prohibit new captive lion breeding facilities
Image: Independent Newspapers Archives
In a decisive move to protect South Africa's lions and reinforce ethical conservation practices, the government is set to ban the establishment of new captive lion breeding facilities. This forms part of a broader initiative to phase out commercial intensive breeding of lions and prioritise animal wellbeing.
The Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment said it is finalising a Prohibition Notice that will outlaw the creation of new captive lion facilities in the country. This step follows recommendations from the Ministerial Task Team and supports the Policy Position on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Elephant, Lion, Leopard and Rhinoceros.
The notice comes after animal welfare organisation Four Paws South Africa recently called for government to expedite the implementation of the phase-out plan of the captive lion industry.
Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment, Dr Dion George, said: 'This marks a turning point in our approach to wildlife conservation. By prohibiting new captive lion breeding facilities and addressing critical animal wellbeing provisions in the TOPS (Threatened or Protected Species) Regulations to be published in due course, we are committed to enforcing clear, effective, and legally robust measures that protect South Africa's natural heritage and address concerns raised by the public, conservation experts, and stakeholders.'
The ban will be introduced through updated Threatened or Protected Species (TOPS) Regulations under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEM:BA), 2004.
'The Lion Prohibition Notice implements a key recommendation from the Ministerial Task Team Report and is in line with the objectives of the Policy Position on the conservation and sustainable use of elephant, lion, leopard, and rhinoceros,' said the Department.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
'The Notice prohibits the establishment of new captive lion facilities for commercial purposes, aligning with global conservation standards and ethical wildlife management practices.'
The Notice was tabled before the National Council of Provinces on June 10, 2025 and has since passed the 30-day consideration period. The Department confirmed that it has completed the necessary administrative processes for promulgation.
Additionally, the Department is working with provincial Members of the Executive Council (MECs) under Section 87A(3) of NEM:BA to ensure effective implementation of the ban.
Minister George is expected to provide further updates during stakeholder engagements, including at the upcoming G20 Environment and Climate Sustainability Working Group meeting at Kruger National Park.
'We are building a regulatory foundation that prioritises animal wellbeing, biodiversity protection, and practical enforcement,' said George. 'The Department remains fully committed to finalising and implementing these reforms without delay, ensuring a sustainable future for South Africa's wildlife.'
THE MERCURY
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
KZN Premier Thami Ntuli demands answers from MECs over corruption allegations
KZN Premier Thami Ntuli demands answers from MECs Sipho Hlomuka and Nomagugu Simelane over corruption allegations, vowing swift action once investigations into procurement and contract irregularities are complete. Image: Independent Newspapers Archives KwaZulu-Natal Premier Thami Ntuli has demanded written explanations from two of his provincial executive members following serious corruption allegations, and has promised action 'without fear or favour' once he receives their formal responses. Education MEC Sipho Hlomuka is accused of interfering in the R2.9 billion National School Nutrition Programme bidding process. Allegations have emerged that a company he helped start in 2017 is involved in the current tender process. In an interview with Newzroom Afrika earlier this week, Hlomuka claimed he had long since distanced himself from the company. Hlomuka denied current involvement with a company linked to the tender, stating: "In 2015, I opened the company, and I've been participating in several government and private services, but currently I don't own any company." "I am no longer part of the company. Hence, I'm not aware of its activities. If it has received any tenders, that information will come out in the investigation. Let's wait for the process,'' he said. Ntuli said he had contacted both MECs as soon as he became aware of the claims. 'Indeed, when I received these allegations, I did call to alert them, I would be writing to them so that they give me full information regarding the allegations. Hence, I'm waiting for their response by tomorrow, latest by Monday,' he said. Asked whether he believes Hlomuka, Ntuli said the investigation would determine whether any laws were broken in the procurement process. "There are two things: whether the process itself was conducted with integrity or whether there were violations of the laws that regulate the process. Then if it did not, the problem starts," Ntuli said. 'The process will even in fact, point to who has to be held accountable for what might have happened.' Ntuli insisted his office would not shy away from taking decisive action. 'I will take appropriate actions. As soon as I receive the reports, that will inform me what exactly to do. I'm not afraid to take a step because the allegations are serious,' he told broadcaster Newzroom Afrika. Health MEC Nomagugu Simelane is also under scrutiny over claims that her family business may have benefited improperly from government contracts. Ntuli confirmed he requested a formal explanation. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'The only matter that I requested the MEC to provide information about was the one that links her family to benefiting from the provincial government,' he said. Asked about a separate claim involving Simelane allegedly influencing the dismissal of a radio Vuma FM presenter, Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma, Ntuli said he was only aware of it through 'corridor information' and had received no formal complaint. Ntuli added that Simelane denied any involvement. 'There is no one who complained about that issue. That radio personality never complained, and the radio station never submitted anything to that effect.' Ntuli said he would update the public next week. 'Before the end of next week, I will apprise the public of the appropriate action.' 'There is no space for any wrongdoing in our government. Any acts of maladministration, corruption will always find consequences.' Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL News
IOL News
19-07-2025
- IOL News
Criticism mounts as minister neglects fishing communities
Deputy Minister Narend Singh defended the Department's plans, including R2.8bn for ecosystem restoration and 70 000 new work opportunities, but the legislators slammed the lack of tangible progress for struggling coastal communities. Image: File/Independent Newspapers THE Department of Forestry, Fisheries, and the Environment (DFFE) was subjected to sharp criticism from Parliament's National Council of Provinces (NCOP) over its handling of small-scale fisheries, inadequate ocean patrols, and delays in issuing fishing permits — even as it unveiled a R9 billion budget aimed at climate resilience and job creation. Deputy Minister Narend Singh defended the Department's plans, including R2.8bn for ecosystem restoration and 70 000 new work opportunities, but the legislators slammed the lack of tangible progress for struggling coastal communities. The Department's flagship 'Fishing for Freedom' programme, designed to empower small-scale fishers, came under fire after MPs accused officials of sidelining Parliament and failing to address grievances in Saldanha Bay. 'The Committee visited small-scale fisheries in Saldanha Bay to hear their concerns, but the Department went there without informing us,' the PA's Bino Farmer said. 'These fishers can't live and fish sustainably because they don't have rights — they're forced into poaching. The system is biased toward big business.' Small-scale fishing cooperatives, a critical lifeline for coastal towns, remain in limbo. While the DFFE pledged support for 15 cooperatives this year (out of a five-year target of 50), MPs highlighted bureaucratic delays. The MK Party's Seeng Mokoena demanded answers: 'Why are KZN fishers waiting endlessly for permits while infrastructure crumbles?' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The legislators blasted the Department's target of just four patrols in South Africa's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) this year, warning it leaves the country vulnerable to illegal fishing by foreign vessels. 'Four patrols? That's a joke,' asked the DA's Nicolaas Pienaar. 'Chinese trawlers are pillaging our waters, and budget constraints aren't an excuse.' The Department's own data shows a five-year goal of 20 patrols, but with only four planned for 2025/26, critics say enforcement is critically underfunded. Despite the DFFE's pledge to create nearly 70 000 jobs through environmental programmes, MPs questioned the feasibility. 'How many jobs have actually been created so far?' wondered the DA's Sonja Boshoff, referencing the Department's 2030 target of 1 million jobs. A R100 million youth graduate programme aims to place 4 000 young people in environmental roles, but the FF+'s Hendrik Van den Berg remained sceptical: 'Are these just temporary EPWP jobs, or real, sustainable employment?' The Department's Climate Change Act implementation faces funding shortfalls, while reliance on international donors raises concerns. Deputy Minister Singh admitted: 'Funding is a challenge,' but highlighted expected support from Germany, Italy, and the Global Environment Facility after the US withdrawal. However, the EFF's Meisie Kennedy warned: 'Most municipalities can't manage waste. What's the plan to stop hazardous pollution?' The Department's own targets include 29 municipal clean-up campaigns and 54 000 tons of waste tires processed, but oversight remains weak. Meanwhile, plans to add 100 000 hectares to conservation estates and publish an Elephant Conservation Strategy were met with cautious optimism. In response, Deputy Minister Singh acknowledged frustrations but blamed scheduling conflicts for poor communication with Parliament. 'We'll engage directly with Saldanha Bay's fishers,' he said, adding that recruiting youth into cooperatives was a priority. On climate funding, he confirmed R45 million was allocated for G20 meetings, crucial for securing international investment. 'The people we meet at the G20 are the movers and shakers,' he said. With a clean audit but mounting scrutiny, the DFFE's five-year plan hinges on execution. As Farmer said: 'Officials are the problem.' For now, South Africa's oceans, fisheries, and environmental future hang in the balance, caught between bold promises and the harsh reality of implementation failures. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.
IOL News
16-07-2025
- IOL News
Balancing ambition and action in South Africa's climate adaptation efforts
Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment, Dr Dion George. Image: Dion George/Facebook On Friday, the 27th June, I intently followed the 2025/26 budget vote speech by Minister Dion George of the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE), hoping to hear a decisive shift in how South Africa intends to confront its growing climate crisis, more critically, through climate adaptation to the irreversible impacts already upon us. The speech presented a vision of environmental stewardship, economic inclusion, and climate resilience. While the speech outlined commendable priorities such as biodiversity conservation, green job creation, and regulatory reforms, it sadly fell short in explicitly prioritising and funding climate adaptation measures with the urgency South Africa's vulnerabilities demand. While the DFFE's commitments to mitigation and biodiversity are laudable, adaptation remains underfunded and overshadowed, a critical gap in a country where climate impacts are already destabilising livelihoods. Just weeks ago, devastating floods ripped through parts of Mthatha in the Eastern Cape, tragically claiming a reported 102 lives at last count and displacing countless families some who had built informal homes on floodplains and below flood lines. These are not isolated incidents as floods are firmly becoming the biggest and most frequent climate threat to South Africa. These events are flashing red warning lights, signalingthat adaptation must be elevated to a national priority with the budget to match. Great: A Progressive Environmental Agenda In his speech, the Minister rightly emphasised several key priorities including the enforcement of the Climate Change Act, the revised Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), and Sectoral Emission Targets that demonstrate a structured approach to reducing carbon footprints. The Highveld Air Quality Management Plan is also a necessary step toward holding polluters accountable. Regarding Biodiversity as an Economic Driver, the KISS (Kruger, Kirstenbosch, iSimangaliso) strategy and Biodiversity Economy Strategy, which aims to create 397 000 jobs and inject R127 billion annually by 2036 is a visionary linkage of conservation and economic growth. He also adds the FILLER (Fair Industry for Lions, Leopards, and Rhinos) and Fishing for Freedom, which highlights ethical wildlife management and support for small-scale fishers, crucial for both ecological and social justice. Relating to regulatory and Financial Innovation, the RESET (Regulatory Efficiency Strategy) promises streamlined environmental governance, while the push for carboncredit monetisation could unlock new funding avenues. These initiatives reflect a department attempting to balance ecological protection with developmental needs. However, the speech's silence on concrete adaptation financing undermines its otherwise progressive stance. Not so Great: Where Adaptation was Sidelined The Minister acknowledged budget constraints, a real-term decrease of 1.4% in allocation, yet insisted the DFFE would "do more with less'. However, while cost-saving measures are prudent, adaptation cannot thrive on austerity, it must be prioritised. What is clear is that there is no dedicated adaptation budget line. For instance, the speech mentioned a Climate Change Adaptation Response Plan for coastal regions, but without specific allocations or timelines. There also appears to be an over-reliance on international finance which we should do less of given the current geo-political uncertainties. The Green Climate Fund's $40 million (R717m) for South African National Biodiversity Institute is welcome, but domestic funding for localised adaptation remains Minister praised South African Weather Service for 1 400 severe weather alerts, yet many vulnerable communities still lack actionable response plans. The speech missed an opportunity to allocate funds for local disaster preparedness (e.g., community training, evacuation routes) and the opportunities to integrate traditional knowledge with scientific early-warning systems. The elephant in the room and the unavoidable question then is: If climate change is "here and now" as the Minister says, why is adaptation not a standalone budget priority? If the DFFE is committed to matching its rhetoric with tangible adaptation progress, it must consider elevating adaptation action to a priority stand-alone action, dedicating funding for adaptation, and providing it with the requisite institutional support for success in future budgets. It's too elusive and the light mention gives cool comfort. As a country, we are already paying the price of climate inaction in lives lost, livelihoods destroyed, and un-budgeted resources diverted to emergency response. Adaptation investments are cost-effective and lifesaving, especially when planned and made proactively. Every rand spent on resilient infrastructure saves many more in post-disaster reconstruction. Minister George's speech outlined a bold environmental agenda, particularly inmitigation and biodiversity. However, the lack of detailed, funded adaptation measures risks leaving South Africa's most vulnerable populations exposed to escalating climate shocks. The DFFE must recognize that to achieve a truly resilient South Africa, it requires ambition, budget, and urgency for adaptation in equal measure. This is so worrying that often when I think about adaptation and resilience action it makes me feel like we're playing a game of 'masicashelane' (hide & seek), only now the count is 10 000. Minister let's bring it back to an achievable count to a 10 please... so we can find this missing priority sooner. The Presidential Climate Commission has consistently emphasised through its work on the just transition, adaptation is not only a technical imperative but a moral one, which is central to safeguarding livelihoods, foodsystems, and public infrastructure in the face of escalating climate threats. Initiatives like the Just Adaptation and Resilience Investment Plan demonstrate that a just, inclusive,and locally grounded adaptation pathway is possible. What's needed now is political will and budget. Morwesi Ramonyai Thonga is a Senior Advisor to the Presidential Climate Commission on Adaptation Finance. Image: Supplied Morwesi Ramonyai Thonga is a Senior Advisor to the Presidential Climate Commission on Adaptation Finance. *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL. BUSINESS REPORT
