RTI revelation exposes massive over-allocation of Hidkal dam water to industries
Mulgund shared a letter from the assistant executive engineer of the Karnataka Niravari Nigam Limited (KNNL), CBC subdivision No. 2, dated July 6, 2024. The letter, addressed to the executive engineer, discloses that only 0.1 tmcft of water was initially allocated to industries under the project report. However, the allocation surged to 0.2 tmcft gradually, and there is an additional fresh demand of 0.5 tmcft under the Bengaluru-Mumbai Industrial Corridor Project, part of the Suvarna Karnataka Corridor initiative.
Crucially, the letter indicates that the excess allocation already far surpassed the sanctioned limit. If the additional 0.5 tmcft is approved, it would come at the cost of irrigation water meant for farmers, a point likely to fuel further unrest among farming communities.
Last month, the Karnataka govt approved the controversial diversion of 0.5 tmcft from Hidkal Dam to industrial areas in Hubballi-Dharwad, sparking widespread protests across Belagavi and neighbouring districts.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Free P2,000 GCash eGift
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
Farmers and civil society groups decried the move, arguing it threatens their livelihood and violates the dam's original purpose.
Earlier, water resources minister MB Patil claimed that the water being diverted was within the allocated limits. However, Mulgund's findings—obtained through the Right to Information (RTI) Act—contradict the minister's statement.
Pipeline construction for the water diversion began over four months ago—without formal approval, tenders, or even informing the local administration, including district minister Satish Jarkiholi.
The work only came to light when local farmers discovered pipelines being laid across their fields. In response, several organisations launched protests under the slogan 'Namma Neeru, Namma Hakku', prompting the Belagavi DC to halt the work temporarily.
Despite the opposition, the project resumed following a green signal from the state cabinet. Activist Mulgund sought further details under RTI—including the tender cost, official approvals, and progress reports—but KNNL denied the information, citing confidentiality.
Constructed in 1961 and named after former prime minister Lal Bahadur Shastri, the Hidkal dam was built to provide irrigation and drinking water. Though it has a storage capacity of 51 tmcft, effective availability is only around 44 tmcft due to siltation and unusable reserves.
Speaking to the TOI, Mulgund criticised the lack of transparency. "The RTI documents clearly prove that more water has already been diverted to industries than originally sanctioned. Any additional diversion will directly impact farmers in Belagavi, Bagalkot and Vijayapura," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How clean energy needs, new tech shape mineral governance in India
— Renuka In a significant policy move, the Ministry of Mines has reclassified minor minerals Barytes, Felspar, Mica, and Quartz as major minerals. These minerals are essential for various new technologies, energy transition, spacecraft industries, the healthcare sector, etc. This reclassification, announced through a Notification dated February 20, 2025, aligns with the government's recent push under the National Critical Mineral Mission, which aims to secure critical and strategic mineral resources for India's clean energy and technological future. It also draws attention to a largely overlooked area in India's mineral governance – the regulation of minor minerals. But what are minor minerals, and how are they regulated? Let's explore. Minor minerals are defined under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (MMDR) Act, 1957, as building stones, gravel, ordinary clay, and ordinary sand. The term 'minor minerals' is often understood to imply a lesser quantity of significance. However, in the Quarry Owners Association vs State of Bihar (2000) case, the Supreme Court clarified that the classification of minerals as major or minor under the MMDR Act is determined by their end use and local importance, rather than by their volume, availability or production levels. The classification is also for the purpose of administrative convenience: while the Central Government retains control over major minerals with national and strategic relevance, like coal, iron ore or bauxite, the regulation and management of minor minerals fall under the purview of state governments. The Central Government also has the authority to declare any other mineral to be a minor mineral. It has thus far notified around 31 minerals as minor minerals such as Gypsum, Mica, Quartz, Clay-based minerals, Sand, etc. Minor minerals play a crucial role in infrastructure, manufacturing and local economies. They are primarily sourced from riverbeds, floodplains, hills, coastal areas, deserts, and open quarries across various states. Extraction typically takes place on a small to medium scale and is governed by state authorities. Silica-rich minerals like Quartz and Silica sand are commonly found in riverbeds and desert regions. They are used extensively in glassmaking and electronics. Sand is a vital component of concrete, mortar, and asphalt, making it essential for buildings, roads, and other infrastructure. Feldspar, Mica, and Kaolin are mostly used in ceramics, paints, and rubber industries. Similarly, limestone derivatives like Calcite, Gypsum and Lime kankar are essential for construction and chemical processing. The barytes, recently classified as a major mineral, is primarily used in oil and gas drilling. These minerals, though locally sourced and often extracted on a small scale, are vital to India's construction boom and industrial growth. However, their unchecked extraction, especially in ecologically sensitive areas, raises serious concerns around sustainability, environmental impact and regulatory oversight. Under the Indian Constitution, states are vested with the power to make laws on mines and minerals under List II (State List) of the Seventh Schedule. However, under List I (Union List), the Central Government can also make laws on the regulation of mines and minerals by declaring it in the public interest. Exercising this authority, the Central Government enacted the MMDR Act in 1957 – a key legislation regulating the mining sector. The Act classifies the minerals into two categories: major and minor and provides the legal framework for the grant of mining leases, royalty collection, and overall management of major mineral resources. Section 15 of the Act delegates the rule-making power to the state governments in relation to minor minerals. It empowers states to frame rules for granting leases, issuing permits, and fixing and collecting rent and royalties from the holders of mining leases and permits. This delegation of rule-making power ensures that states can design regulatory mechanisms to suit local needs. Further, given the significant environmental impact, the minor minerals are also regulated under laws related to pollution, wildlife and biodiversity protection, etc. On the policy front, the Central Government has historically prioritised major minerals, while minor minerals have largely been governed through state-specific policies and rules. However, growing environmental concerns – particularly related to sand mining from rivers and floodplains – have prompted central intervention. In response, the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEFCC) issued Sand Mining guidelines in 2016 and 2020, and the Ministry of Mines released a Sand Mining Framework in 2018. The Supreme Court, High Courts and the National Green Tribunal have played a pivotal role in regulating the mining of minor minerals, especially by mandating Environmental clearances for extracting minor minerals. In the landmark case of Deepak Kumar vs State of Haryana (2012), the Supreme Court took notice of the unscientific and illegal mining of minor minerals and made it mandatory for all mining operations, even below five hectares, to obtain environmental clearances from the appropriate authority. The court also recommended a compulsory mining plan before granting environmental clearance. Notably, through various judgements, the Supreme Court has emphasised the need for the sustainable extraction of minor minerals. Following the apex court's decision in Deepak Kumar vs State of Haryana (2012), the MoEFCC in 2013 notified that the river sand mining project with a lease area of less than five hectares should not be considered for environmental clearance. However, the notification was declared invalid by the National Green Tribunal in Himmat Singh Shekhawat vs State of Rajasthan (2014). Similarly, in Satendra Pandey vs the Union of India (2018), the NGT struck down a notification dated January 15, 2016 on the ground that it diluted the environmental clearance procedure for mining of minor minerals in areas below 25 hectares. The notification exempted such projects from public consultation and environmental impact assessment prior to granting environmental clearance. Despite state regulations and judicial oversight, the mining sector continues to grapple with widespread issues, particularly illegal and unscientific mining. States like Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab and Madhya Pradesh have become the hotspots of illegal sand mining. It is causing severe environmental degradation, such as lowering of groundwater levels in riparian areas, pollution in nearby areas, and disruption of the aquatic ecosystem. Sand and gravel extraction from rivers is one of the leading reasons behind the declining population of the Gharial and Ganges River dolphins. Apart from this, excessive mining of clay from agricultural fields leads to loss of soil fertility and long-term land degradation. Mining has also become a law-and-order issue due to rampant illegal extraction, violent clashes between miners and law enforcement, as well as threats and attacks on activists, journalists and officials attempting to curb the practice. Given the ecological importance of minor minerals, there is an urgent need for strong political and bureaucratic will to ensure their sustainable management. Upholding the Public trust doctrine, the state needs to act as a trustee of these resources and ensure the leasing of mines serves the public interest. Strict law enforcement, adoption of sustainable construction practices and promotion of viable alternatives to natural resource extraction are significant. A comprehensive model regulatory framework across states is needed to harmonise laws, ensure transparency and integrate environmental safeguards with development goals. What are minor minerals, and how are they regulated in India? What is the constitutional division of powers between the Centre and states on the regulation of minerals? How has intervention, particularly by the Supreme Court and the National Green Tribunal, shaped the regulatory landscape for minor mineral mining? What are the ecological consequences of unregulated sand and clay mining, and how effective have existing regulations been in addressing these challenges? How does minor mineral extraction impact biodiversity, particularly endangered aquatic species such as the Gharial and Ganges River dolphin? (Renuka is a Doctoral researcher at Himachal Pradesh National Law University, Shimla.) Share your thoughts and ideas on UPSC Special articles with Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
Mint
8 minutes ago
- Mint
Only tax-verified non-profits can now execute CSR work, says govt
New Delhi: The government has tightened disclosure norms for non-profits executing corporate social responsibility (CSR) projects on behalf of companies, introducing a more detailed registration process to ensure only genuine, tax-compliant entities receive CSR funds. According to a new version of Form CSR-1 issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), trusts, societies, and not-for-profit companies must now submit a more structured application with enhanced disclosures to be eligible to implement CSR activities. The updated form, effective 14 July, reflects a push to align corporate giving with tax law and financial scrutiny. The move aims to prevent shell or bogus entities from accessing CSR funds and ensure that recipient organizations meet the criteria laid out in the Income Tax Act. It also expands the categories of eligible institutions. Over the last few years, the Income Tax Department has raised the reporting requirements for charitable trusts to prevent the abuse of this legal form for tax evasion. The latest move to streamline registration for CSR implementation is part of the overall effort to improve transparency. The updated Form CSR-1 also broadens the scope of entities eligible to register. Under the earlier regime, only those registered under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, which certifies an entity as a genuine charitable institution, could apply. The revised form now allows entities that qualify for tax exemptions under Section 10(23C) of the Act, such as universities and hospitals, to register for executing CSR work as well. The new version of the form includes more elaborate fields compared to the earlier format, explained Subodh Dandawate, associate director, Regulatory Services at Nexdigm, a business advisory firm. A key change in the revised form is the mandatory requirement to furnish a copy of the registration certificate issued by the Income Tax Department under Sections 80G and 12A, as applicable, of the Income Tax Act, said Amit Maheshwari of AKM Global, a tax and consulting firm. 'This effectively means that implementing agencies must obtain income tax registration prior to receiving any CSR funds from corporations,' said Maheshwari. 'The amendment is a progressive step towards greater transparency and regulatory alignment in CSR implementation, ensuring that CSR funds are routed only through tax-verified and credible entities.' This move is expected to enhance stakeholder confidence and promote more effective deployment of CSR funds, enabling companies to engage with credible and mission-aligned partners in their social impact initiatives, Maheshwari said. It also reflects a broader policy direction towards aligning corporate philanthropy with regulatory governance and financial oversight, he said. In FY24, over 27,000 companies spent over ₹ 34,900 crore on CSR, led by HDFC Bank, Reliance Industries Ltd, and Tata Consultancy Services. The number of trusts and other entities implementing CSR projects is not readily available.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
PU to shift out of historic bldg after nearly a century
1 2 3 Patna: Patna University (PU), established in 1917, is set to bid farewell to its iconic administrative building on Ashok Rajpath and relocate to a new G+8 storey complex under construction at Krishna Ghat. Simultaneously, around 18 postgraduate departments under the faculties of humanities and social sciences will shift from the 70-year-old Darbhanga House to a new G+9 academic block adjacent to the administrative complex. Both the administrative and academic buildings, being constructed by the Bihar State Educational Infrastructural Development Corporation (BSEIDC) at a cost of Rs 139 crore, are nearing completion and are expected to be handed over to PU shortly. "The PU office and all PG departments located at Darbhanga House will be shifted to their new buildings by Dec this year," PU engineer Sachin Dayal said. PU's office has had a nomadic history since its inception. For the first five years, it operated from a wing of the then newly built Patna High Court. From 1922, it functioned out of offices near Golghar vacated by the Board of Revenue. In 1928, during the vice-chancellorship of Sir Sultan Ahmad, the university finally moved into its own building on Ashok Rajpath. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Hamburg: GEERS sucht 700 Testhörer für Hörgeräte ohne Zuzahlung GEERS Undo Now, 98 years later, it prepares for another major relocation. Darbhanga House, a former palace built in 1901 on a 15-acre plot, became the home of PU's humanities and social sciences postgraduate departments in 1955. It was handed over to the university by the erstwhile Maharaja of Darbhanga for Rs 7 lakh. The building, with its carpeted wooden staircases, ornamental carved friezes, covered verandas and terraces, has seen only minor alterations since. It was renovated by BSEIDC around a decade ago. However, the structure has long struggled to accommodate the growing number of students enrolled in various courses. "With the considerable increase in the number of students in different courses, the classroom accommodation at Darbhanga House was proving too short for the conduct of smooth academic pursuits. Hence, another academic block was constructed for PU," said development officer Khagendra Kumar. The new G+9 academic block will feature a cafeteria on the ground floor and two departments per upper floor on average. It will also include a library and a dedicated reading room. Once vacated, Darbhanga House is likely to be taken over by Vanijya Mahavidyalaya. The administrative building will accommodate the general, establishment, registration and other essential university departments. It will also house the offices of the vice-chancellor, pro-vice-chancellor, the syndicate, the academic council and a conference hall, the development officer added.
