Jobs. Taxes. Access to women's health care. South Calgary residents share what matters this election
The top issue for voters in Seton isn't tariffs, at least not among the library patrons who stopped by to talk with CBC Calgary's The Homestretch recently.
Tariffs have dominated headlines this campaign. But jobs, taxes and the price of groceries dominated the sticky notes on the CBC's whiteboard at a pop-up engagement effort Thursday afternoon.
What issue matters the most to you this federal election, and why? Share your personal stories with us at ask@cbc.ca.
Homestretch host Jenny Howe broadcast live from the library in Seton all afternoon, and people stopped by to write about the issue that matters the most to them in the federal election, and how it will shape their vote.
Adrian Diaz is a student at the University of Calgary. After writing a few notes, he explained it this way. "The cost of living has gone up. The gas prices have just skyrocketed up. Honestly, I remember when it used to be 70 cents, it was crazy.… Now it's like $1.50. Utilities, groceries, all the simple stuff has gone up, for sure," he said.
"I have an idea of who I want to support, definitely. Because 10 years of the same thing, I think it's time to change."
The Seton library is in the YCMA recreation centre, which is south of the ring road and east of Deerfoot Trail on the southeast edge of Calgary. It's in the Calgary Shepard riding.
In the library, some people had already decided who they are voting for, others were still making up their minds and waiting for the leaders' debate. Many people wrote about wanting lower taxes and to find a way to reduce the price of houses.
One person wrote about wanting tax dollars to go to fighting homelessness and hunger here in Canada before funds are allocated to helping overseas.
But that's not what Lamar Hassan is hoping for. She is 15 and watching the election from the sidelines. She said what she wants is to see the parties focus more on foreign policy and how they can help other places such as Ukraine and Gaza.
"We're able to aid so we should be aiding more," she said. "I feel for people. Everyone deserves to have a good life, and as someone whose parents came here from a different country, they came here for me to have a better life and everyone deserve to have that chance."
Moana Rae Michelbrink Rhynold is now 18 and will be voting for the first time. She said the issues she's following the most are the cost of housing and access to reproductive health.
"I've been busy in my own world but I've heard snippets. The biggest thing is how the Conservative campaign has leaned a lot toward what's been happening in the States in terms of women's access to health care. That's the biggest thing that's scaring me."
On Friday, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre touched on this on the campaign trail. He was asked about a local candidate's views and said that, if elected, a Conservative government would not restrict access to abortion.
Since CBC News was asking "what matters to you," children also stopped by to have their say. Many of them will vote at school in a parallel student election, even though it won't count for the general election.
Jasmine Jones, 8, wrote "focus on the environment" and stuck that to the whiteboard to share with her neighbours.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
5 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Canada's population standstill rattling Vancouver's housing industry
Article content For the first time in 74 years, the population of both B.C. and Ontario dropped by a few thousand people in the first months of 2025. Article content Sounds dramatic. And in some ways it is. Article content Article content That's even though the dip in the total number of people doesn't make a statistical difference for either province. In the first quarter of this year, B.C. had 2,357 fewer residents than at the end of 2024; Ontario lost 5,644. Article content Article content But, as Statistics Canada says: 'While small compared to the size of each province, these were the largest quarterly losses in population for both Ontario and B.C. since comparable records began in 1951. ' Article content Article content In each of the past two years B.C. had added more than 160,000 people, an unprecedented annual growth rate of more than three per cent, almost all of it fuelled by Ottawa's openness to international migration. Article content The fact this year has seen the most significant dip in the two provinces' populations in almost three generations appears to signal the end of Canada's recent ultra-high migration experiment. Article content This new phenomenon, a population standstill, is having repercussions, especially on the housing market. Article content The federal Liberals, after a decade in power, seem to have finally got the public's message that their policies were creating too much demand on housing and rents. As a result, in May Prime Minister Mark Carney said, albeit vaguely, that his government will bring 'overall immigration rates to sustainable levels.' Article content Article content Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, meanwhile, is becoming bolder. Last month he said he wants 'severe limits' on population growth to restore some equilibrium to jobs, social services and housing. Article content Article content Such talk is alarming the property development industry, which is experiencing a softening of demand. Even though many analysts say it's simply part of the real-estate cycle, developers are renewing calls for a return to more foreign buyers in Canadian housing. Article content Coinciding with the change in attitude among Ottawa's politicians, StatCan has just published two reports that highlight the power that vigorous migration rates have had on the cost of housing. Article content Last week a new analysis led by Feng Hou showed that in the 15 years leading to 2021, the rise in immigration was linked to a 21 per cent i ncrease in median house values in 53 of Canada's large cities.
5 hours ago
'Lost Canadians' citizenship bill tabled as court deadline looms
Immigration Minister Lena Diab tabled legislation Thursday to restore citizenship to the lost Canadians after a court found the existing law unconstitutional. The term refers to people who were born outside of the country to Canadian parents who were also born in another country. In 2009, the federal Conservative government of the day changed the law so that Canadians who were born abroad could not pass down their citizenship if their child was born outside of Canada. That law was deemed unconstitutional by the Ontario Superior Court in December 2023 and the Liberal government did not challenge the ruling. The government received its fourth deadline extension to pass legislation to address the issue in April. It applied for a one-year extension, but Justice Jasmine Akbarali set a Nov. 20 deadline, saying that should be enough time for the government to implement remedial legislation if it makes it a priority. Akbarali has criticized the government's handling of the legislation in her decisions to grant extensions, citing the harm that could follow if the Stephen Harper-era law were to be declared invalid without replacement legislation. NDP immigration critic Jenny Kwan said the bill was delayed in the last session of Parliament by the Liberals' failure to act in a timely fashion and a Conservative filibuster that stalled the House of Commons' work for months. The court has given the government yet another extension, and it would be incumbent on this Parliament to make sure that legislation is passed, Kwan said. The previous lost Canadians citizenship bill died on the order paper when the House prorogued earlier this year. The Senate was engaged in an early study of the legislation to help it become law quickly. The new legislation, Bill C-3, proposes giving automatic citizenship to anyone denied citizenship under the current law. It also would establish a new framework for citizenship by descent going forward. The legislation proposes Canadian citizenship could be passed down to people born abroad, beyond the first generation, if their parents spent a cumulative three years in Canada before the child's birth or adoption. Those were the two primary goals of the original lost Canadians bill. David Baxter (new window) · The Canadian Press
Vancouver Sun
7 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Canada's population standstill rattling Vancouver's housing industry
For the first time in 74 years, the population of both B.C. and Ontario dropped by a few thousand people in the first months of 2025. Sounds dramatic. And in some ways it is. That's even though the dip in the total number of people doesn't make a statistical difference for either province. In the first quarter of this year, B.C. had 2,357 fewer residents than at the end of 2024; Ontario lost 5,644. But, as Statistics Canada says: 'While small compared to the size of each province, these were the largest quarterly losses in population for both Ontario and B.C. since comparable records began in 1951. ' Stay on top of the latest real estate news and home design trends. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Westcoast Homes will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. In each of the past two years B.C. had added more than 160,000 people, an unprecedented annual growth rate of more than three per cent, almost all of it fuelled by Ottawa's openness to international migration. The fact this year has seen the most significant dip in the two provinces' populations in almost three generations appears to signal the end of Canada's recent ultra-high migration experiment. This new phenomenon, a population standstill, is having repercussions, especially on the housing market. The federal Liberals, after a decade in power, seem to have finally got the public's message that their policies were creating too much demand on housing and rents. As a result, in May Prime Minister Mark Carney said, albeit vaguely, that his government will bring 'overall immigration rates to sustainable levels.' Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, meanwhile, is becoming bolder. Last month he said he wants 'severe limits' on population growth to restore some equilibrium to jobs, social services and housing. Such talk is alarming the property development industry, which is experiencing a softening of demand. Even though many analysts say it's simply part of the real-estate cycle, developers are renewing calls for a return to more foreign buyers in Canadian housing. Coinciding with the change in attitude among Ottawa's politicians, StatCan has just published two reports that highlight the power that vigorous migration rates have had on the cost of housing. Last week a new analysis led by Feng Hou showed that in the 15 years leading to 2021, the rise in immigration was linked to a 21 per cent i ncrease in median house values in 53 of Canada's large cities. Another StatCan report in May, by Haozhen Zhang and Hou, found immigrants own their own homes at a higher rate per capita than Canadian-born people. 'Immigrants exhibit higher housing use compared with Canadian-born individuals,' it said. 'Immigrants occupy, on average, 310 owned units … per 1,000 people. By contrast, Canadian-born individuals occupy 271 owned units … per 1,000 people.' However, the two studies, which correctly emphasize that other factors, such as interest rates, also impact housing costs, point to just the tip of how Canada's migration iceberg affects real estate. That's partly because the StatCan research primarily focuses on immigrants, defined as those who become permanent residents, which in 2023 amounted to 471,000. Such immigrants these days make up just a fraction of newcomers. There is now an historic high of about three million temporary residents in Canada, mostly international students and guest workers. Just as importantly, the StatCan studies don't look at how foreign money has in the past 15 years infiltrated the housing market. Other researchers have found evidence of the power of transnational capital to skew markets. A new peer-reviewed paper by B.C. researchers Josh Gordon, David Ley and Andy Yan shows foreign capital, especially from China, has been a striking factor in raising B.C. housing values, a fact the authors say is often 'celebrated behind closed doors by the real estate industry.' Given Canada's big cities have some of the most unaffordable homes in the world, Poilievre is responding with a policy position that aims for 'negative growth' in population. 'We're going to need more people to leave than to come for the next several years,' Poilievre told The Hub, an online news outlet. 'We have to have a hard rule … that the growth in the housing stock, job market and availability of doctors must always be higher than the growth in population. 'We can't overload any of those systems for our own people, and it's not fair for the people who come. It's actually a false promise if we invite people here and then they have no place to live.' In the midst of such Tory and Grit rhetoric, what is actually happening to migration rates? The Liberals are marginally dropping official immigration targets to up to 436,000 this fiscal year, which compares with 250,000 before they were brought into power in 2015. Temporary residents remain at 7.1 per cent of the population, compared with three per cent before 2020 . Carney's new goal is five per cent. Even with overall migration rates far above what they were a decade ago, property developers and their allies are telling the public and politicians they're stressed. Big real-estate players, like Wesgroup Properties LP and the Rennie Group, haven't been shy about telling journalists they're laying off staff. The luxury condo marketers at Rennie Group and Michael Audain , owner of Polygon Homes , are also calling for more foreign cash in Canadian housing. So is Anne McMullin, longtime president of B.C.'s Urban Development Institute, which represents developers. She's trying to rouse politicians at all levels into action . Five weeks ago McMullin sent a letter to federal Housing Minister Gregor Robertson arguing 'Canada's multi-family development model depends on pre-selling 60 to 70 per cent of units to secure construction financing.' 'With the departure of both foreign buyers and domestic investors, this model is faltering and choking off the supply pipeline,' she wrote. The recent decline in real-estate market activity has 'shown that (foreign buyers) were a critical componen t of the capital stack needed to get projects off the ground,' McMullin said. Robertson and the Liberal cabinet need to 'amend the foreign-buyer ban to allow foreign investment in newly constructed homes that carry rental covenants or demonstrable housing contributions,' said her letter. 'Looking ahead, the federal government should also consider expanding this allowance to permit foreign buyers to reside in the homes they purchase.' How will Robertson and Carney react? Even though both have received political donations from developers , it's hard to predict. Opinion polls show a firm majority have turned against current migration volumes. But since Carney hasn't said anything more specific than that he wants 'sustainable levels' of migration, he's left the door open to do almost whatever he sees fit to respond to the housing crisis. dtodd@
