Do It for Gilda
Gilda Radner was the first performer Lorne Michaels hired for the cast of Saturday Night Live when it launched, in 1975. She was, at the time, one of the stars of The National Lampoon Radio Hour, the only woman in a cast of men destined to be famous. 'I knew that she could do almost anything, and that she was enormously likeable,' Michaels once said of the decision. 'So I started with her.'
Television audiences immediately fell in love with Radner. How could they not? She was magnetic. She sparkled with a kind of anything's-possible energy, and stole every scene she was in. She made everything hilarious, and more daring. That was Radner—the tiny woman with the gigantic hair having more fun than everybody around her.
Radner's charm was so off the charts that practically every character of hers wound up with a beloved catchphrase. There was the bespectacled nerd Lisa Loopner ('So funny I forgot to laugh!'); the poof-haired newscaster Roseanne Roseannadanna ('It just goes to show, it's always something.'); and the little old lady Emily Litella ('Never mind.'). A typical Litella rant on 'Weekend Update' went like this: 'What's all this fuss I keep hearing about violins on television! Why don't parents want their children to see violins on television! … I say there should be more violins on television!' Chevy Chase eventually leans over and corrects her: Violence, not violins. Litella, sheepish: 'Never mind.' Radner based Litella on her own childhood nanny. And the portrayal, like everything she did, was shot through with love.
Radner also appeared in the now-classic 'Extremely Stupid' sketch, which became one of the earliest examples of actors breaking—that is, breaking character and cracking up on live television—in SNL history after the guest host, Candice Bergen, flubbed a line. Radner used the moment to great comedic effect, turning directly to the camera to exaggerate the impeccable delivery of her own lines, while Bergen dissolved into laughter beside her.
Almost every comic who came after Radner—and certainly the ones who wound up on Saturday Night Live—counts her as a formative influence. You can see Radner in the rag-doll chaos of Molly Shannon's character Mary Katherine Gallagher; in the total commitment to the bit of Adam Sandler's singsong gibberish; in the weird imagination of Kristen Wiig's universe of absurd characters (the mischievous Gilly and the tiny-handed Dooneese both come to mind); and in the master-class physical comedy of Melissa McCarthy.
Radner herself was always drawn to classic physical comedy—among her idols were Charlie Chaplin, Lucille Ball, anyone who was, in her words, 'willing to risk it.' So it made sense that Radner parodied Ball—and the legendary chocolate-factory episode of I Love Lucy—in a sketch, alongside Aykroyd, that had her juggling nuclear warheads coming down a conveyor belt. Then there was Radner's wordless dance routine with Steve Martin—in which the pair toggles between all-out slapstick and total earnestness—that remains a higher form of comedy, even 50 years later. Radner's particular charisma came from this blend of bigheartedness and fearlessness. She always went for it. 'There was just an abandon she had that was unmatched,' Martin has said. She'd keep going until she got the laugh, however far that took her. And she could make fun without being mean-spirited. (See: her impressions of Barbara Walters as 'Baba Wawa' and Patti Smith as 'Candy Slice.')
In 1979, Radner gave the commencement speech—fully in character as Roseanne Roseannadanna—to the graduating class at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, part of which wound up on her comedy album Gilda Radner: Live From New York, released that same year. And while the delivery is pure Roseannadanna, listening to it today is also a reminder of the trail Radner herself blazed, along with SNL cast members Jane Curtin and Laraine Newman, as women in comedy in the 1970s. 'Imagine, if you will, an idealistic young Roseanne Roseannadanna, fresh out of the Columbia School of Broadcasting, looking for a job in journalism,' Radner-as-Roseannadanna says. 'I filled out applications, I went out for interviews, and they allll told me the same thing: You're overqualified, you're underqualified, don't call us, we'll call you, it's a jungle out there, a woman's place is in the home, have a nice day, drop dead, goodbye. But I didn't give up.' Radner didn't give up either. But her sense of purpose wasn't about proving a point or being a feminist, but something even more straightforward. If she wanted something, she went for it. Why wouldn't she?
Radner was famously boy-crazy. (She used to joke that she couldn't bring herself to watch Ghostbusters because it starred all of her ex-boyfriends.) She had on-again, off-again romances with Martin Short and Bill Murray (and that was after she'd dated Murray's brother), among others. In her own telling of her eventual marriage to the great Gene Wilder, the two wound up together only because she pursued him so relentlessly. She knew from the minute she saw him that she wanted to be with him forever. He did not share this view, not initially. An interviewer once asked Wilder if it had been love at first sight. 'No, not at all,' Wilder said. 'If anything, the opposite. I said, How do I get rid of this girl?'
He would come around. 'If I had to compare her to something I would say to a firefly, in the summer, at night,' Wilder recalled. 'When you see a sudden flash of light, it's flying by, and then it stops. And then light. And stops. She was like that.' What Wilder meant, in part, was that Radner could have the highest of highs but also the lowest of lows. In moments of lightness, the whole world was illuminated, and everything in sight seemed to bend in her direction. But other times she was anxious and sad. She grieved the death of her father, who died of cancer when she was a teenager, her whole life. She described herself as highly neurotic. She had had eating disorders more or less since she was 10 years old. And she suffered in other ways, too. She never got to be a mother, which she'd desperately wanted. And while she brought untold joy to millions of people, her short life ended tragically. At one point, toward the end, she looked back on the early SNL years and marveled. 'We thought we were immortal, at least for five years,' she wrote in her memoir. 'But that doesn't exist anymore.'
Wilder and Radner were married for only five years before she died, at 42, of ovarian cancer. And today, she is remembered as much for the unfairness of her young death—like Belushi before her and Chris Farley after her—as she is for her originality and spectacular talent. In a gentler world, all three of them would still be with us. Radner and Belushi would be in their 70s, Farley in his 60s. In a gentler world, Radner could have had all the babies she wished for, made all the movies she never got to, and would still be making people laugh. When I think about Radner now, what I think about most is the way she lived, and how that ought to be a lesson to the rest of us. She had a sense of total urgency, and a willingness to do the things that terrified her. Somehow, she made it look easy. 'I don't know why I'm doing it,' she once said in an interview, about why she'd chosen to take her act to Broadway, 'except that for some reason I've chosen to scare myself to death.'
That was Gilda Radner. Gilda, who as a child once overheard her mother saying, 'Gilda could sell ice cubes in winter,' and so set up a little stand outside to do just that. Gilda, who loved work so much that she'd get impatient on the way to NBC Studios and ask her taxi drivers to speed up already. Gilda, who fell in love easily and often, and wasn't afraid to be weird, or look ridiculous. Gilda, who could make anything funny. But her real legacy, it turns out, is something much more profound than her comedy. This is the lesson of Gilda Radner's too-short life: For God's sake, don't bother with fear. Just go for the thing you want, with your whole heart. Each of us gets only so much time on this planet, and none of us knows for how long. Life can be terrible this way, and sad, and it isn't fair at all. But it is funny, anyway. Really, really funny.
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
44 minutes ago
- Forbes
‘The Lawrence Welk Show' Turns 70: A Bubbly TV Flashback
Unspecified: Lawrence Welk appearing on 'The Lawrence Welk Show'. (Photo by Disney General ... More Entertainment Content via Getty Images) 'Wunnerful, wunnerful!.' 'Ah one, and ah two'…let's get started on this TV flashback. Naturally, this tribute is about the legendary Lawrence Welk, the "Champagne Music" maestro, known for his family-friendly show and his signature "A one, and ah two" introduction to musical numbers. Beyond long-running The Lawrence Welk Show, which debuted on ABC on this day in 1955, Welk was a bandleader, an accordion player, and a shrewd businessman synonymous with squeaky-clean (and older-skewing) entertainment. Lawrence Welk (1903-1992), US musician and band leader, smiling while posing with an accordian, ... More circa 1955. (Photo by) Let's go back to July 2, 1955 for the premiere of The Lawrence Welk Show. I Love Lucy finished the season as the top-rated television series in primetime (with a staggering average 49.3 household rating, according to Nielsen). The Jackie Gleason Show at No. 2 led the then overpopulated category of variety. And classic crime drama Dragnet ranked third overall. William Frawley, Vivian Vance, Lucille Ball, and Desi Arnaz out golfing in the television series 'I ... More Love Lucy', 1951. (Photo) UNITED STATES - MAY 15: May 15, 1955, California, Los Angeles, The Jackie Gleason Show, Jackie ... More Gleason and Art Carney(L-R: Art Carney, Jackie Gleason). (Photo by Michael) CIRCA 1955: Star of the TV series "Dragnet" Jack Webb performs in a scene in circa 1955. (Photo by ... More Michael) At a time when the summer was a breeding ground for leftover programming, ABC aggressively brought Lawrence Welk into primetime. Initially billed as the Dodge Dancing Party in 1955 and 1956, The Lawrence Welk Show became a staple for ABC for 16 years, particularly as a Saturday night option. The variety series featured the band, singers, and dancers, all showcasing a range of musical styles from big band to polka. Many episodes included a theme, like songs of the 40s or music from famous groups, with the cast performing related numbers. Segments highlighted individual performers. And then there was the Lennon sisters, who were dubbed "America's Sweethearts of Song." They were…all together now…"Wunnerful, wunnerful!" Unspecified - 1962: (L-R) The Lennon Sisters performing on 'The Lawrence Welk Show'. (Photo by ... More Disney General Entertainment Content via Getty Images) While still a popular option on ABC, The Lawrence Welk Show was a victim of the 'rural purge' in primetime in 1971, which resulted in the demise of series like The Beverly Hillbillies, Green Acres, Hee Haw and Welk's variety series in favor of more modern type storytelling a la The Mary Tyler Moore Show and Norman Lear's All in the Family. Group puiblicity portrait of the cast of the CBS situation comedy 'Mary Tyler Moore' shows (left to ... More right) Gavin McLeod, as Murray Slaughter, Mary Tyler Moore, as Mary Richards, Ed Asner, as Lou Grant, and Ted Knight (1923 - 1986), as Ted Baxter, California, 1971. (Photo by CBS) UNSPECIFIED - CIRCA 1970: Photo of All In The Family Photo by MichaelLife After Cancellation In response to the show's demise, Welk started his own production company and continued producing it for first-run syndication. Fun factoid: The success of Lawrence Welk and Hee Haw in syndication, and the network decisions that led to their premature cancellations, were the inspiration for a novelty song called 'The Lawrence Welk-Hee Haw Counter-Revolution Polka.' After 11 additional seasons (and 30 seasons in total), Lawrence Welk retired and production of the weekly television program ended in 1982. With bubbles floating around accompanied by a sound effect of a bottle of champagne opening at the beginning of most episodes, The Lawrence Show was not the 'coolest' or 'trendiest' television series. But its wholesome, family-friendly entertainment left an indelible impact. And today we remember this 'wunnerful, wunnerful' variety series. Lawrence Welk surrounded by female cast members on 'The Lawrence Welk Show'. (Photo by Disney ... More General Entertainment Content via Getty Images)


Buzz Feed
2 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Travis Kelce Said His Reading Difficulties Made Hosting SNL Hard
Sure, dating Taylor Swift has certainly boosted Travis Kelce's global popularity outside of the sporting world. But it's fair to say he was already pretty famous before they crossed paths — famous enough, in fact, to host Saturday Night Live. Yep, in March 2023, shortly after winning his second Super Bowl, the Kansas City Chiefs tight end followed in the footsteps of many Hollywood stars before him and made his hosting debut on SNL. Joined by Kelsea Ballerini as the episode's musical guest, Travis's turn on the sketch show was met with tons of praise, with viewers hailing him as a natural on the SNL stage. One glowing review from the Guardian said at the time that he massively 'exceeded expectations' and '[knocked] it out of the park' as a comedic performer — not too shabby! You can watch his opening monologue here. Honestly, it still holds up! And so, some two-and-a-bit years later, it turns out that Travis found certain aspects of the experience quite challenging, not that we'd have been able to tell. Speaking on the July 1 episode of the Bussin' With the Boys podcast, Travis reflected on his 'crazy ride' hosting SNL and admitted that he found the table read with the entire cast super challenging as 'a guy that can't really read that well.' 'It was kind of a fucked situation,' he recalled. 'I felt like I was just trying to get through the reading instead of actually, like, acting it out and giving it a voice and giving it a character and things like that. Like, I was just focused on, 'Don't fucking skip this line.'' Describing himself as someone who's 'more of an audio guy,' he said the table read 'was the hardest fucking part' of the entire process. If you've watched SNL for a long time, you'll know that sports stars don't always make the best hosts. With that in mind, Travis said he was eager to impress, especially given that he felt surprisingly 'comfortable' taking on all the comedy and 'silly stuff.' 'There was still a sense of, I need to be a professional here,' he said, looking back. 'I wanna have fun doing it, but I don't wanna look like a loser doing this. I wanna make them respect my approach and how I'm taking it serious.' 'It was just a fun rollercoaster,' he went on. 'You're there all week, fucking up to 2, 3 in the morning every day just trying to knock stuff out, do some of the prerecorded stuff. That was insane. That was a crazy ride. That was fun.' Honestly, I think it's about time they invited him back to host again. Lorne Michaels, if you're reading this…


Los Angeles Times
6 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
What trans people need now
There's a scene toward the end of 'Will and Harper' that I can't get out of my head. I'm referring to the 2024 road-trip documentary where Will Ferrell is reintroduced to his old 'Saturday Night Live' buddy Harper Steele as a trans woman. The two zigzag through several red states, as Ferrell, star of 'Anchor Man,' 'Talladega Nights' and 'Elf,' is his quirky self, posing awkward questions ('How are your boobs?'), donning cartoonish disguises and pulling a series of public stunts, some of which backfire. The goofiness comes to a halt when Harper drives them to Trona, Calif., a tiny town in the Mojave Desert, southwest of Death Valley. She pulls up to a dilapidated house with boarded-up windows on a small dirt plot — sad to even look at. She bought the place six or seven years before, wanting to get away from the world after another holiday season of uncertainty, regret and suicidal thoughts. 'I just hated myself so much,' she says, and breaks down crying. ' I just felt like a monster.' She brings him inside. The house has been vandalized; there's broken furniture, walls full of graffiti, a bare mattress stained and smeared with who knows what. They step out on a small balcony overlooking an empty street with telegraph poles, the desert horizon in the distance. 'I was going to be a woman here,' Harper tells Will. 'That was the plan. … I was just gonna close the curtains and walk around this house and it was a safe space.' That's pretty desolate: an Emmy-winning comedy writer and producer, willing to forfeit everything, just to be a woman residing alone in the middle of nowhere. But the most desolate thing in the scene is Will Ferrell's face, stricken with pathos. He has shifted from curiosity to certainty. Trans identity is real. He gets it. Transgender and cisgender people are the same in this way: We'd sooner die than live outside of our gender. The difference is that cis people don't have to face that predicament, while every trans person has. Earlier this century, mainstream America started to catch on to the same thing about gay people: They're real. They were born this way. Homosexuality isn't a disease that straight people were going to catch. It took decades of LGBT organizing and fighting and (way too much) dying to get to that place. It also required a majority of straight Americans to perceive that gay identities are as real as theirs, to pave the way for marriage equality. Transgender children are equally real, though conservative politicians and Christian nationalist groups have campaigned furiously to convince us otherwise. To be sure, many children go through phases of experimenting with gender expression. The way parents know one of their children is trans is by observing if their urge to transition is consistent, insistent and persistent. Consistent means you watch, insistent means you listen and persistent means you stay patient. These three things will make it quite obvious. There's one other thing. All parents of trans children experience a moment similar to Ferrell's in the desert: They witness a person whose life is on the line, a person they must protect. Red state lawmakers, who know nothing about medicine, want us to think 'do no harm' means stripping trans kids of medical care, lest they make 'permanent' decisions before they're adults. Parents of trans children, and every major American medical organization, know that 'do no harm' means preventing the catastrophe of undergoing puberty in the wrong gender. They also want to prevent suicide, and the nightmare of being forced to live in exile from your identity, which is a living death. Even Ron Burgundy, the Anchor Man, knows that. The Supreme Court Skrmetti decision handed down June 18, upholding a Tennessee law banning healthcare for trans minors, was as contorted as it was predictable. The justices had one thing to decide: Did a law explicitly targeting trans people deserve the heightened scrutiny applied to laws discriminating against protected groups or on the basis of sex? Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the conservative majority, argued that the Tennessee law doesn't 'exclude any individual from medical treatments on the basis of transgender status but rather removes … gender dysphoria, gender identity disorder, and gender incongruence from the range of treatable conditions.' This is like saying we're not targeting diabetics, just removing their insulin. Cisgender kids in Tennessee, however, can still receive hormones and puberty blockers because 'the state has an interest in encouraging minors to appreciate their sex.' Justice Amy Coney Barrett, for good measure, claimed that transgender people don't qualify as a protected group because a) we're too hard to 'define,' and b) we don't suffer from a history of legal discrimination. The Skrmetti decision will go down as discriminatory, deadly and patently false in its claims. After the Trump administration declared trans people nonexistent (then went about trying to eradicate what doesn't exist), the court now sets a precedent and a permission structure for states to do whatever they want to us. In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor effortlessly defined transgender people as a group, then pointed to 'a lengthy history of … cross-dressing bans, police brutality, and anti-sodomy laws' that have criminalized trans people dating back to 1843. 'Those searching for more evidence of de jure discrimination against transgender individuals,' she added, 'need look no further than the present. The Federal Government, for example, has started expelling transgender servicemembers from the military and threatening to withdraw funding from schools and nonprofits that espouse support for transgender individuals.' Under New York state law I could have been arrested for cross-dressing in the 1980s, and instantly have lost my job as a public school teacher. A generation earlier, in San Francisco's Tenderloin district, police often walked into Gene Compton's cafeteria, a gathering place for neighborhood trans women, and randomly arrested customers for 'female impersonation.' Amanda St. Jaymes was one of them. She described repeated arrests, being stripped and locked up for refusing to let them shave her head. 'One girl [spent] 60 days in the hole because she wouldn't let them cut her hair. That's how important it was to us back then.' In 'Screaming Queens: The Riot at Compton's Cafeteria' (another movie worth watching), historian Susan Stryker chronicles, through firsthand accounts, 'the first known instance of collective militant queer resistance to police harassment in United States history.' It started with a police raid on a hot August night in 1966 (three years before Stonewall). When one of the cops grabbed one of the queens, she flung coffee in his face, and a riot erupted. Tables were turned over, people threw everything in sight, plate glass windows were smashed. They kicked and punched and beat the police with their heavy purses. 'The cops retreated outside to call for backup. But cafeteria customers, maybe sixty in all, poured into the streets through the broken doors and windows and kept fighting' — in fearless feminine wrath. 'There was a lot of joy after it happened,' said St. Jaymes. 'A lot of [us] went to jail, but there was a lot of 'I really don't give a damn. This is what needs to happen.'' The Compton's riot demonstrates that transgender identity was as real 60 years ago — before we even had the word 'transgender' — as it is now. 'I just ask you as my friends to stand up for me,' Harper Steele wrote in her coming out letter. I make that same appeal here, and I thank everyone who is standing up for trans people, as well as those who one day will. We're real. We need you. Diana Goetsch is a poet, essayist and journalist and the author of the memoir, 'This Body I Wore.'