
Professors stare at shut doors in Punjab, govt silent
The top court found the recruitment process — touted at the time as a revival of govt colleges after two decades of hiring freeze — violated University Grants Commission (UGC) norms and lacked procedural integrity. The ruling has affected 1,091 assistant professors and 67 librarians who had joined more than 150 colleges across Punjab, some as recently as six months ago, others nearing the end of their probation.
The fallout is most acute in Ludhiana district, where 116 teachers now face termination.
"This affects 116 families here alone," said Jaspreet Sivian, a senior member of the teachers' coordination committee. "Across the state, it's a thousand homes. People who waited years, met every eligibility rule — NET, PhD, teaching experience — are now being told none of it matters. It's heartbreaking."
The Supreme Court held that bypassing the Punjab Public Service Commission (PPSC) and omitting key academic assessments, including viva voce, invalidated the appointments.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Why seniors are rushing to get this Internet box – here's why!
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
The teachers, however, argue that the blame lies squarely with flawed govt procedure, not the candidates. "Why should we pay the price for bureaucratic shortcuts?" asked a professor from a Ludhiana college. "We cleared every bar the system set for us.
Now we're being punished for the state's mistakes. And the worst part? Not a single word yet from the Punjab govt."
Many affected teachers say they have now aged out of eligibility for future recruitment.
Saurabh Kumar, a Hindi professor with 12 years of experience, had cleared NET (National Eligibility Test) and earned a PhD. But now, at 38, he exceeds the general category age limit of 37. "I was regularised finally after years of part-time work. And now, I may never be eligible again," he said.
The pain is amplified by silence. "The verdict came yesterday. Still, the govt hasn't announced a single step, not a plan, not even an apology," said another member of the faculty.
"The silence is deafening." Several teachers had already left private jobs to join govt posts under the impression of long-term stability. Institutes that saw hope for academic revival finally — like Ludhiana's SCD Govt College, which had only 6 permanent teachers before 2021 — now face returning to those conditions.
The committee representing the affected teachers has announced its intention to file a review petition, and if needed, a curative one — the last legal recourse available.
"Until then, no terminations should be issued," Sivian pleaded. "The Punjab govt should stand with us. Over a thousand families are now in crisis after two decades of waiting and years of honest service."
The ruling has also drawn condemnation from alumni and education advocates. Brij Bhushan Goyal, alumnus and office-bearer of SCD College's alumni association, said: "This is not just the loss of jobs. It's the collapse of morale in our academic institutes.
The state failed to defend its decision in court, and the victims are our teachers. What a pity. What a waste."
What do you tell a teacher who taught through illness, who moved cities, who hung family hopes on a govt seal? What do you tell a scholar who has aged out of a professionthat never let her in properly? What do you tell a student who sees his classroom grow silent as staff rooms empty and chalkboards wait in vain? With campuses now facing staffing chaos and hundreds of careers on the brink, the verdict has not just ended appointments — it has reopened a crisis in public higher education that Punjab had only just begun to address.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump says Coca-Cola agreed to use ‘real' cane sugar for Coke in US; Does it have any real health benefits?
Donald Trump is on his way to shake up the bottle of Coke now! On July 16, the US President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that he had persuaded Coca‑Cola to return to using 'REAL Cane Sugar' in its US flagship drink– echoing the sweet, nostalgic taste favored in Mexico and abroad. 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so. I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better,' Trump wrote in his Truth Social post. However, Coca-Cola hasn't confirmed Trump's claim. This comes after James Quincey, the CEO of Coca-Cola, presented the US President with a custom Diet Coke bottle for his January inauguration, continuing a tradition since 2005 where commemorative bottles mark presidential transitions. Trump, who is a known Diet Coke enthusiast, revealed that he consumed up to 12 cans daily during his first term. He previously received a standard Coca-Cola bottle in 2017 before the company corrected it to his preferred diet version. Although Trump's announcement of Coke supposedly agreeing to shift toward using 'real' cane sugar has already sparked widespread discussion about taste, and trade – one aspect remains more vital than the rest – the nutrition. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo Beyond the buzz, this raises a more grounded question: does cane sugar actually offer any health advantages over the uber-popular high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) currently used in American sodas? Let's delve into that discussion. What is cane sugar? Cane sugar is made from sugarcane, a tropical grass that's cultivated worldwide, particularly in Southeast Asia and India. It's made by crushing sugarcane, extracting the juice, boiling it to concentrate into syrup, and then allowing crystals to form, sometimes spun to remove molasses. There are three main forms: Unrefined (e.g., jaggery, muscovado): high molasses content, dark color, richer flavor. Raw (e.g., turbinado, demerara): lightly processed, golden crystals with some molasses flavor. Refined (typical cane-sourced granulated sugar): nearly identical to regular white sugar, but labeled as from cane. Is cane sugar good for health? Cane sugar is essentially sucrose, a molecule composed of glucose and fructose. It provides calories and carbohydrates but very few, if any, other nutrients. While cane sugar, like other sugars, can be part of a balanced diet when consumed in moderation, it's generally not considered "good" for health due to its potential negative impacts on weight, blood sugar levels, and overall well-being. In fact, keeping the idea of moderation in mind, the American Heart Association recommends limiting added sugars, including cane sugar, to less than 6 teaspoons (24 grams) per day for women and 9 teaspoons (36 grams) for men. The health debate: Cane sugar vs. HFCS Historically, US Coke switched from sugar to cheaper high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in 1984 due to Reagan-era sugar import quotas that doubled domestic sugar prices. Now, switching to cane sugar, as Trump has claimed, might have some economic impact. However, healthwise, we can break down the impact as follows: Nutritional parity: Scientifically, both cane sugar (sucrose) and HFCS are roughly equal in carbohydrate density and contribute similarly to calorie intake. Both contain around 4 calories per gram. Cane sugar is 50 % glucose/50 % fructose, while HFCS (typically HFCS‑55 ) is roughly 45–55 % fructose/glucose. Both are roughly equal in carbohydrate density and contribute similarly to calorie intake. So, there's no scientific evidence to support the claim that cane sugar would be healthwise 'better' than HFCS. Metabolic and health effects: High consumption of added sugars, no matter the type, is linked to obesity, type 2 diabetes, fatty liver, and metabolic syndrome. As per extensive research , only minimal metabolic or health differences have been found between sucrose and HFCS when consumed equally. Studies have linked high fructose consumption to insulin resistance , metabolic syndrome , obesity, and type 2 diabetes. Additionally, ultra‑processed fructose still contributes to fatty liver, metabolic syndrome, obesity, and diabetes. However, studies have also shown HFCS to be occasionally linked to slightly higher inflammation markers . The 'natural' perception: Many consumers might think of opting for cane sugar due to its image as less processed or artificial, despite HFCS being generally safe and FDA-approved. This 'natural' preference often overshadows hard science when it comes to health outcomes. Furthermore, Harvard nutritionist Frank Hu noted HFCS isn't inherently worse than table sugar: 'We should worry about sugar in general.' Historical and economic context Since the 1980s, US bottlers, including Coca‑Cola since 1984, have used HFCS instead of cane sugar, largely due to cheaper corn subsidies and sugar import tariffs. Switching to cane sugar would likely increase costs, reduce domestic corn demand, and require importing more sugar, raising concerns about trade deficits and job losses. In fact, reverting to cane sugar would significantly raise costs: Mexican Coke (made with cane sugar) sells at premium prices, with 12-packs costing $15-$20 versus $6 for HFCS-sweetened Coca-Cola. While Trump's announcement supports Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' campaign, aiming to reduce processed additives and sweeteners, merely switching sweeteners, as scientific research and data have shown, does not curb sugar consumption. True health improvement won't come from what we sweeten our cola with, or from switching to a supposed diet drink of the same kind – but from drinking fewer sugary beverages altogether. From a health standpoint, the real victory lies in moderation – consuming less sugar, regardless of its source, remains the most impactful step. Biden attacks Trump on virus as new milestone nears


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Sniper unit fired upon convoy': 27 Pakistani troops killed in separate attacks by Baloch fighters; IEDs also used
AI-generated image used for representation Over the past two days, Baloch insurgent groups have claimed responsibility for a string of deadly attacks on Pakistani military forces in Balochistan, reportedly killing at least 27 soldiers, according to The Balochistan Post. The Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) said its Fateh Squad targeted a military transport bus in Kalat's Nimargh Cross area, killing 27 troops and injuring several others. The bus was reportedly ferrying personnel from Karachi to Quetta. BLA spokesperson Jeeyand Baloch stated that civilians, including qawwali performers on board, were not intended targets, though Dawn reported three civilian deaths, including two qawwals. In another incident, the BLA claimed to have killed two soldiers and injured seven with a remote-controlled IED in Quetta's Hazarganji area. The Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) also announced two separate operations. On Tuesday, it said an IED blast in Kalat's Khazina area killed four soldiers. On Wednesday, it claimed to have ambushed a military unit in Awaran's Gujro Kor area, killing six, including Major Syed Rab Nawaz Tariq from Muzaffarabad. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Later, a sniper unit fired upon a nearby military convoy, forcing a retreat The BLF denied state media reports that three of its "fighters" were killed, alleging that Pakistani forces may have staged fake encounters. Balochistan has witnessed a decades-long insurgency by separatist groups seeking independence from Pakistan, with Islamabad claiming the rebellion has been largely suppressed -- a claim challenged by continued militant violence.


New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
SC asks Delhi government to issue order declaring Lodhi-era 'Gumti of Shaikh Ali' protected monument
In a significant step, the Supreme Court on Wednesday directed the Delhi government to issue a fresh notification to declare the historic, Lodhi-era monument "Gumti of Shaikh Ali" as a protected monument under the law. The two-judge bench of the top court, headed by Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, passed the direction to the Delhi govt after hearing an appeal filed by Defence Colony resident Rajeev Suri, who sought a direction to declare the Gumti as a protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 (AMASR Act). Suri had knocked the doors of the apex court after his plea was earlier dismissed by the Delhi High Court. During the course of the hearing on Wednesday, the top court went through some report filed by the Delhi government, including a notification and clarified that it was not 'happily (properly) worded'. 'Let the notification (to declare the monument as a protected one under the law) be re-issued by the Delhi government,' the bench told the Delhi govt. Making it clear that there should not be any illegal structures or encroachments near the area, the court asked the authorities to demolish the illegal structures, if any, inside the monument site. It directed the court commissioner to visit and inspect the concerned area and apprise the bench about the work undertaken in pursuance of the directions issued.