Louisiana execution recharges debate on death by nitrogen gas
Jessie Hoffman is set to be executed March 18, but his attorneys are asking a judge for a preliminary injunction to prevent it due to the secrecy of how the execution will be carried out.
The inmate will present his arguments during a hearing on Friday, during which he is expected to testify.
Hoffman was convicted of first-degree murder in the 1996 rape and murder of 28-year-old Mary 'Molly' Elliot.
Hoffman's lawyers say that he was informed Feb. 20 that he will be killed using nitrogen gas, but state officials have not yet provided a detailed execution protocol, which the lawyers say is necessary to meet his constitutional rights.
'The State wants to roll out this new gas protocol but keep it hidden from the public and even from the man they seek to kill,' Samantha Kennedy, executive director of the Promise of Justice Initiative, who is representing Hoffman, told NewsNation.
'Jessie Hoffman has a right to know how he's going to be killed, and we have a right as his attorneys to be able to determine if it's going to be a constitutional.'
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill has defended the state's decision to utilize nitrogen hypoxia, a method used to suffocate a person by denying them oxygen and allowing them to only inhale nitrogen gas.
'On March 18, 2025, the State of Louisiana will execute Hoffman by nitrogen hypoxia for Molly's murder. We have and will continue to vigorously defend the State's obligation to carry out this sentence and bring justice to the family and friends of Molly Elliot,' Murrill said in a statement.
Murrill told Nexstar affiliate WVLA that she hasn't personally spoken to the victim's family.
The country's first execution using nitrogen gas was carried out last year in Alabama, which has now been used to execute four people in the state. If Hoffman's execution doesn't get halted, Louisiana will become the second state to utilize the method on death row inmates.
All of the men executed in Alabama using nitrogen shook or gasped to varying degrees on the gurney as they were being put to death, according to media witnesses, including The Associated Press.
Rev. Jeff Hood, the spiritual advisor for Kenneth Smith, who was the first person to be killed using nitrogen, witnessed his execution and called it 'a slow, painful means of torture.'
Smith's execution was 'the most violent thing that I have ever witnessed or engaged with,' Hood told Catholic news outlet OSV. 'It was absolutely … incredibly disturbing to see a human being suffocated to death.'
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall has maintained the method as 'painless and humane.'
After convicted murderer Alan Miller settled a lawsuit against Alabama over the use of nitrogen gas in 2024, Marshall stated, 'The resolution of this case confirms that Alabama's nitrogen hypoxia system is reliable and humane.'
Alabama's nitrogen executions prove even more how untested this method is, Kennedy said.
'It's impossible to know if somehow Louisiana Department of Corrections has fixed all the problems that happened in Alabama, where every single time they killed people with gas, it was absolutely a torturous, gruesome, horrific experience,' she said.
'Jessie Hoffman and the public have a right to know what is the process that Louisiana is engaging in, and … if they're upholding everyone's constitutional rights,' Kennedy added.
Currently, four states allow nitrogen gas executions: Louisiana, Alabama, Oklahoma and Mississippi.
An Arkansas bill that would allow nitrogen on death row inmates passed the state House on Tuesday and will now advance for a full vote.
Louisiana had paused executions for 15 years due to an inability to secure lethal injection drugs, but with a nitrogen gas execution protocol finalized last month, the state has been eager to proceed.
'For too long, Louisiana has failed to uphold the promises made to victims of our State's most violent crimes, but that failure of leadership by previous administrations is over,' Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry said in a statement.
Louisiana scheduled two executions on consecutive days in March, but inmate Christopher Sepulvado, who was scheduled to be executed one day before Hoffman, died on Feb. 23 of an illness.
Hoffman had initially challenged Louisiana's lethal injection protocol in 2012 on the grounds that the method was cruel and unusual punishment.
U.S. District Judge Shelly Dick dismissed the lawsuit in 2022 because the state had no executions planned but reopened the case last month, saying that the scheduled executions were 'extraordinary circumstances' that warranted more scrutiny.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay in Dick's ruling while it considers an opposition from Murrill.
The Associated Press contributed to this story.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
39 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP rep says he believes Epstein files were destroyed
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) said Wednesday he believes a so-called 'client list' associated with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein once existed but was 'destroyed' by the Biden administration. 'I think the files existed at one time,' Burchett said in an interview on NewsNation's 'On Balance' with host Leland Vittert. 'I think they were destroyed in the previous administration.' The Justice Department (DOJ) released a memo earlier this week concluding that Epstein did not keep such a list that was allegedly used to blackmail high-profile individuals — contradicting conspiracy theories circulating for years that suggested otherwise. The memo also concluded that the convicted sex offender died in his New York City jail cell in 2019 by suicide, refuting other claims that he died under suspicious circumstances. Burchett pushed back on suggestions by former Trump adviser Elon Musk and other media influencers that the president was among the individuals whose names were included in the files associated with Epstein. 'I think if they'd ever had anything on Trump, it would have been out day one under the Biden administration,' the Tennessee Republican said. 'I think there's some very prominent people. There's Hollywood people,' he added. 'I mean, I think there's world leaders too. And would it have caused economic disruption around the globe? maybe. But I don't really care. I want to bury those dirtbags.' Asked why Attorney General Pam Bondi would not simply say that the evidence has been destroyed, Burchett said, 'She doesn't have any proof of it.' 'I'm just telling you what I think. I've been around this town enough,' the lawmaker continued. 'I think she got over her skis pretty much saying all this stuff, the files are on my desk, I'm going to release it, and then she releases stuff that I knew.' 'I think they all got out there, got a little excited, and I don't think they exist,' he added, referring to the files. The interview comes amid backlash from segments of the right-wing media ecosphere following the release of the DOJ memo. Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino, in particular, have come under scrutiny from prominent voices in the MAGA movement who have questioned whether the government is covering up salacious information surrounding Epstein. Patel and Bongino are among those who had pushed such ideas before joining the government. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said earlier this week that DOJ's conclusion is the result of an 'exhaustive review of all of the files related to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and his death.' She noted there was some material the Trump administration did not release due to its graphic nature. Epstein was federally charged in 2019 on allegations that he led a sex trafficking operation involving underage girls from 2002 to 2005. He died in prison a month later, before the case could go to trial. He had earlier pleaded guilty to separate sexual misconduct charges.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
O'Reilly: Trump said ‘a lot of names associated with Epstein' had nothing to do with his conduct
Former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly said he discussed the Jeffrey Epstein case in March with President Trump, who told him that there are 'a lot of names associated' with the disgraced financier for innocuous reasons. 'I talked to President Trump, man to man, eye to eye, on St Patrick's Day about this… And he said — and I agree — 'there are a lot of names associated with Epstein that had nothing to do with Epstein's conduct,'' O'Reilly said Wednesday during an appearance on NewsNation's 'CUOMO.' 'They maybe had lunch with them or maybe had some correspondence for one thing or another,' he told host Chris Cuomo. 'If that name gets out,' O'Reilly continued, 'those people are destroyed — because there's not going to be any context. Media doesn't care about context, so you can't do that. You can't destroy a human being by putting out the files, whatever they may be.' The news veteran argued that, instead, Attorney General Pam Bondi should host a press conference where she addresses the Epstein case head-on and shares with the public everything she can about the case. 'You certainly can have Attorney General Bondi say, this is what we know, and, you know, we're going to protect the innocent, and he's a heinous individual,' he said, adding that former Attorney General Merrick Garland — who served in the Biden administration — should sit next to her during the presser. The interview comes amid fierce backlash from segments of the right-wing media sphere and others after the Justice Department on Monday released a memo concluding the convicted sex offender did not keep any client list used to blackmail high-profile individuals, contradicting conspiracy theories circulating for years that suggested otherwise. The memo also concluded that Epstein died in 2019 by suicide, refuting other claims that he died under suspicious circumstances. The Trump administration has pushed back on those claims and has stressed its commitment to truth and transparency. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday that the memo is the result of an 'exhaustive review of all of the files related to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and his death.' She noted there was some material that DOJ 'did not release because, frankly, it was incredibly graphic and it contained child pornography, which is not something that's appropriate for public consumption.' Trump grew exasperated on Tuesday during a Cabinet meeting when a reporter tried to ask Bondi questions about the memo. 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?' the president said. 'This guy's been talked about for years. You're asking — we have Texas, we have this, we have all of the things. And are people still talking about this guy? This creep? That is unbelievable.' 'I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this where we're having some of the greatest success and also tragedy, with what happened in Texas,' he added. 'It just seems like a desecration.'
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
‘We can't eat 30% of the cost.' Price hikes from Trump's tariffs are coming for back-to-school and holiday shopping.
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Jimenez wouldn't say how many pairs she sold, only that it was fewer than last year. Advertisement 'I've never raised my price, so it was really hard on me because I know they don't have to buy my socks. They can literally go to Target and buy $3 socks,' said Jimenez, who predominantly sells to Catholic school students and has eaten most of the tariff increase. 'It was just because of a horrible decision by our government, and that is making it so hard for us.' Consumers around the country are starting to face a similar tariff reckoning while business owners wrestle with the same disheartening decision: whether to raise prices, and by how much, or delay inventory heading into the back-to-school and holiday shopping seasons. Advertisement A promotional photo for Scholar Sox, which contributes a portion of each sale to scholarships. Scholar Sox Most imports must be ordered months in advance because of lengthy shipping times. That has led to a delayed reaction to The April 9 pause was set to expire on Wednesday, but 'A lot of folks took the opportunity to frontload and bring product in to kind of stock up before tariffs were put in place, and a lot of that inventory is starting to run out or has run out,' said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation trade group. 'As that stock gets replenished, that new inventory is coming in and has that tariff rate tied to it. So that's when you'll start to see some of those price increases.' Trump has falsely claimed that exporting countries pay the tariffs when they are actually paid by US importers when the goods arrive here. He has also asserted any costs will not be passed on to US customers. In May, 'The administration has consistently maintained that the cost of tariffs will be borne by foreign exporters who rely on access to the American economy, the world's biggest and best consumer market,' White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement. He cited a Advertisement But the Federal Reserve and many economists are forecasting an acceleration in inflation in the second half of the year as tariff-related price hikes begin taking effect. 'It takes some time for tariffs to work their way through the chain of distribution to the end consumer,' Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said in June. 'We're beginning to see some effects, and we do expect to see more of them over coming months.' Spencer Murdock poured cumin into a grinder, nicknamed 'Bertha,' at the Curio Spice Co. factory in Winchester. Craig F. Walker/Globe Staff The Still, even after moving up purchases, Curio Spice doesn't have enough on hand at its factory in Winchester to make it through the rest of the year. That includes the crucial October-through- December holiday season when Curio Spice also has a pop-up shop at the The spices it's ordered since then could be hit by higher tariffs that kick in before the shipments arrive. 'We're trying really hard not to raise prices,' Olivari said. 'Our products are already not the most inexpensive products in the world, and we want to be able to continue to support those farmers in that manner.' Advertisement So Curio Spice is looking at a combination of some price increases and reduced inventory the rest of the this year. 'If we run out of something, my hope is that people can understand,' said Claire Cheney, the company's founder and the 'blender-in-chief.' She also will suggest substitutes, such as allspice berries or clove buds instead of bay leaves, to try to keep customers. 'I don't think we're going to go out of business,' Cheney said. 'But it will severely impact our growth and our opportunity to introduce new products and to develop new blends.' Claire Cheney, founder and blender-in-chief at the Curio Spice Co. factory in Winchester. Craig F. Walker/Globe Staff Jim Rooney, chief executive of the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce, said the tariff uncertainty is adding up to a lost year for many businesses when it comes to expanding or hiring. He noted that toymaker 'There's an expectation, maybe grounded in hope, that . . . six months, a year from now, this will all be over,' Rooney said of the tariffs. 'But there's no guarantee of that.' Trump has said the tariffs are partly designed to lure more manufacturing back to the United States. But some products just can't be made here. Shortly after Jimenez started her company 11 years ago, she looked into producing her socks in the United States. But it was much more expensive given the handiwork and she would have had to charge nearly triple the price. Advertisement President Trump announced new tariffs in April. Mark Schiefelbein/Associated Press George White, chief executive of 'They're all handmade. It's super labor intensive,' he said. 'There's nowhere else to make them in the world.' The company does about a quarter of its business during the holiday shopping season and placed its order in May, not knowing what the tariffs on China ultimately would be. In early May, 'We are assuming that we're going to have a 30 percent tariff when it comes in,' White said. But given Trump's continual shifts, the actual tariffs when the products arrive between mid-August and mid-October are anyone's guess. Given the weekslong overseas shipping times, the tariffs can be dramatically different when the products arrive compared to when they were ordered. Containers and cargo ships at the Port of Ningbo-Zhoushan in Ningbo, in China's eastern Zhejiang Province. HECTOR RETAMAL/AFP via Getty Images Then it's up to US business to decide how much of that cost to pass on to customers. White said he's boosting prices about 10 percent — assuming the 30 percent tariff. 'We can't eat 30 percent of the cost,' he said. Neither can Jenn Luna, owner of Advertisement Manufacturers are eating some of the cost, but Luna said she's still looking at increasing her prices by 7 percent to 10 percent. And all of that could change if Trump revises the tariffs again. 'Stuff that's on the water now, when it arrives, maybe it's going to be 100 percent, maybe it'll be zero,' Luna said. 'Nobody really knows. So we're all just doing the best we can.' Jim Puzzanghera can be reached at
