We'll cross the bridge when we get there
The bill, backed by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, seeks to impose 500 per cent tariffs on countries-- including India and China-- that continue to trade with Moscow even after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago.
When asked about potential implications of the bill, Jaishankar said, India will "cross that bridge when we come to it."
"Regarding Senator Lindsey Graham's bill, any development which is happening in the US Congress is of interest to us if it impacts our interest or could impact our interest," the minister said in a press conference in Washington.
"Our concerns and our interests on energy, security have been made conversant to him (Lindsey Graham). So, we'll then have to cross that bridge when we come to it. If we come to it," he added.
Graham, who is sponsoring a tough new sanctions bill on Russia, said the legislation aims to pressure countries like India and China into buying Russian oil and other goods to weaken Moscow's war economy and push Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table on Ukraine and give Trump "a tool" to bring that about.
Amid Western sanctions, countries like India and China have continued buying discounted Russian oil, making them targets of the proposed legislation. India, the world's third-largest oil-importing and consuming nation, traditionally sourced its oil from the Middle East.
However, it began importing a large volume of oil from Russia soon after the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. This was primarily because Russian oil was available at a significant discount to other international benchmarks due to Western sanctions and some European countries shunning purchases.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India's fintech sector ranks 3rd globally in H1 2025 funding round: Tracxn
India's financial technology sector has ranked third in startup funding in the first half of 2025, even as overall capital inflows moderated. According to Tracxn's Geo Semi-Annual India FinTech Report H1 2025, Indian FinTech startups raised $889 million between January and June, behind only the United States and the United Kingdom. At $889 million, the funding figure marks a 26 per cent decline from the $1.2 billion secured in the second half of 2024 and a 5 per cent dip compared to the same period last year. However, early-stage funding climbed 10 per cent from H2 2024 to reach $361 million and a 9 per cent increase compared to H1 last year. In contrast, seed-stage investments slumped to $91.2 million, down 27 per cent from the previous half-year period. 'While the Indian FinTech sector has seen a temporary dip in funding, the steady momentum in early-stage investments and growing acquisition activity indicate that investor interest remains strong, particularly in scalable, innovation-led models,' said Tracxn Co-founder Neha Singh. M&A activity grows, fintech adds one new unicorn India's fintech sector also witnessed more mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity in the first half of the calendar year. The report recorded 16 M&A deals in H1 2025, up 45 per cent from the same period a year ago. Key transactions included Groww's $150 million acquisition of Fisdom and InCred Money's $35 million deal to buy Stocko. Despite the activity, no Fintech IPOs were recorded in H1 2025; however, one new unicorn did emerge during this period. One unicorn had emerged in H2 2024, while none had emerged in H1 2024. Bengaluru leads funding, Accel secures most deals Bengaluru remained the hub of FinTech innovation, drawing 55 per cent of the country's total funding, followed by Mumbai with 14 per cent. Peak XV, Angel List, and LetsVenture were among the most active investors overall. In early-stage rounds, Accel, Bessemer Venture Partners, and Peak XV led activity, while Blume Ventures, Venture Catalysts, and 100Unicorns dominated seed-stage funding. SoftBank Vision Fund, Lathe Investment, and Sofina topped the late-stage investment charts. US-based Accel led with 34 deals, while Blume Ventures expanded its domestic footprint with investments in seven new startups. RBI urges responsible fintech innovation In March, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) called on fintech firms and digital payment companies to pursue 'responsible innovation' while conforming to regulatory standards. RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra's meeting with leaders from the fintech and non-bank payments sector signalled a notable shift in tone, following a period of crackdowns on non-compliant firms under the former governor's tenure. In a sign of regulatory easing, the RBI also reversed some of its previous measures, such as lifting additional risk-weight requirements for bank loans to top-rated non-banking financial companies.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Can India and the US strike a trade deal without clashing over agriculture?
As India and the US push to finalise a trade pact before Trump's July 9 deadline, agriculture has emerged as the biggest roadblock. With disagreements over GM crops, dairy and ethanol, and concerns over rural livelihoods, both sides are locked in a tense standoff. Can they reach a deal without upsetting India's farmers? read more A farm worker holds rice sapling as he prepares to plant them in a field on the outskirts of Ahmedabad, India, July 22, 2024. File Image/Reuters India and the United States are racing to conclude an interim trade pact ahead of President Donald Trump's July 9 deadline but a long-standing hurdle threatens to block progress — agriculture. Despite nearing consensus on various industrial sectors, disputes around farm goods, including genetically modified crops, dairy imports and ethanol remain reportedly unresolved. The issue is not merely economic for India; it touches upon food security, rural livelihoods, and political sensitivities, all of which have major implications for the country's domestic stability. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Why India's agriculture sector is non-negotiable Though farming and allied activities contribute a relatively modest portion — around 16 per cent — to India's GDP, the sector supports nearly half of the country's population of 1.4 billion. The farming community represents a dominant political constituency and has historically influenced policy decisions through sustained mobilisations. In 2021, the Indian government was compelled to withdraw major agricultural reforms following year-long nationwide protests. This past resistance still casts a shadow over current trade negotiations, as New Delhi remains wary of sparking fresh unrest by opening up its agricultural sector to foreign competition. India's farming structure is notably small-scale. The average size of a farm is just over a hectare, contrasting sharply with American agricultural operations, where the mean farm size exceeds 180 hectares. In India, most farms are manually operated or use outdated techniques passed down over generations, while US agriculture is highly mechanised and supported by advanced technology, including AI-based monitoring systems and large-scale machinery. US agricultural demands vs India's red lines A central point of contention is Washington's push for increased access to the Indian market for a range of American agricultural products. The US seeks to expand exports of various farm commodities — among them genetically modified (GM) corn and soybeans, wheat, poultry, dairy, rice, ethanol, and a variety of processed foods including canned peaches, frozen French fries, chocolates, cookies and citrus fruits. While India has indicated some openness to easing tariffs on selected imports such as dry fruits and apples, it has remained firm on rejecting access to GM grains, US dairy products, and ethanol. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Genetically modified crops form a significant part of US agricultural output. However, India does not currently allow the commercial cultivation of GM food crops due to concerns over ecological balance, food safety and the impact on smallholder farmers. Even as India imports edible oils made from genetically modified crops — such as soy and canola — it restricts GM crop cultivation. The commercial release of GM mustard, for example, remains on hold due to pending legal proceedings, and a previous attempt to introduce GM brinjal was blocked in 2010. Nonetheless, some flexibility is being explored. According to Bloomberg, Indian regulators may consider permitting select GM-derived by-products used in animal feed, such as soybean meal or distillers dried grains from corn-based ethanol production. These items would not directly affect human food chains but would still mark a departure from India's long-standing GM restrictions. Why dairy and ethanol are particularly sensitive India's dairy sector employs more than 80 million individuals, a figure that includes small-scale farmers, cooperatives, and vendors. The industry is largely unorganised and depends on herds that typically contain two to three animals per household. In contrast, US dairy farms operate on a vastly different scale, often managing hundreds of cattle with heavy reliance on mechanisation and feed practices that include animal by-products. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This latter point is a major concern in India, where dietary norms and religious sensitivities significantly influence food preferences. The potential entry of dairy sourced from cows fed with animal remnants has been met with strong resistance from Indian consumers and cooperatives like Amul, which have played a key role in shaping the country's self-reliant dairy ecosystem. Similarly, ethanol is another highly sensitive area. India has made substantial progress under its Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) initiative, aiming to reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels by blending petrol with domestically produced ethanol. Most of the ethanol used in India is derived from surplus sugarcane, rice and corn. Allowing the import of US ethanol would not only compromise this strategic energy programme but could also undermine the investments made by Indian distillers and agribusinesses. What each side is willing to concede With the deadline for reciprocal tariffs fast approaching, negotiators from both countries are working to close the deal. Sources indicated that the Indian delegation, led by Special Secretary Rajesh Agarwal, has had to extend its stay in Washington due to ongoing disagreements, particularly over agricultural tariffs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India has shown willingness to discuss reductions on industrial tariffs and provide access to the US in sectors where the political cost is lower — such as in automobiles, a long-standing American request. It has also pushed for broader access to US markets for Indian exports from labour-intensive sectors including textiles, leather, jewellery, plastics, and chemicals. The interim agreement is seen as a stepping-stone towards increasing bilateral trade volumes, with a shared ambition to double total trade to USD 500 billion by 2030 — a goal reiterated by Trump during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's February visit to the United States. Trump, speaking about the potential deal earlier this week, said: 'I think we are going to have a deal with India. And that is going to be a different kind of a deal. It is going to be a deal where we are able to go in and compete. Right now, India does not accept anybody in. I think India is going to do that, and if they do that, we are going to have a deal for much less tariffs.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Why India is not backing down India's resistance to opening its agricultural market is deeply rooted in structural and strategic realities. The rural economy is vulnerable to global market shocks. Even modest tariff relaxations could disrupt domestic pricing and erode the safety net provided by public procurement and the Minimum Support Price (MSP) system — pillars that protect farmers from price crashes. Many experts argue that liberalising agricultural trade too quickly could expose India's fragmented farming community to the volatility of global commodity markets dominated by large multinational agribusinesses. These companies often benefit from generous subsidies and economies of scale unavailable to Indian farmers. Further complicating the negotiations is the demand from US exporters for greater parity. However, India's current agricultural tariff regime — ranging from zero to 150 per cent — is not exceptional. The US, too, maintains steep tariffs on specific imports, such as tobacco at over 350 per cent. Thus, criticisms of asymmetry in trade practices may not be entirely justified. India's position finds some backing under WTO norms, which allow member nations to protect sensitive sectors for reasons such as food security, rural development, and employment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Nonetheless, the final decision may come down to political calculus more than legal boundaries. Farmers and labour unions mount pressure Opposition to agricultural liberalisation is growing beyond policy circles. On July 3, leaders of the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) held a press conference in Hyderabad, reaffirming their call for an all-India strike on July 9. The SKM, in collaboration with trade unions, is staging protests to oppose what it describes as 'anti-farmer, anti-labour, and anti-people' policies. Former Member of Parliament Vadde Sobhanadreeswara Rao voiced strong opposition to including agriculture in any trade agreement with the U.S. He and other SKM leaders also criticised the government's delay in enacting legislation to guarantee MSP as a legal right. The farmers' coalition has called for a full withdrawal of the National Policy Framework for Agricultural Marketing (NPFAM) and warned of further mobilisations if agriculture is compromised in trade talks. A way out? In light of these challenges, a compromise may be possible through selective market access rather than full liberalisation. One such mechanism could involve tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) — a system that allows a limited volume of imports at reduced tariffs, while maintaining higher duties on imports exceeding the quota. This model was recently adopted in the US-UK mini trade pact announced in May, where agriculture was kept out of contentious discussions. India may be open to marginally lowering tariffs on select low-risk items such as almonds, walnuts, apples, raisins, olive oil, spirits and wine — products that pose minimal threat to domestic producers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Such a calibrated approach could allow both sides to claim victory without triggering adverse political fallout in India. However, the extent of these concessions remains uncertain. A NITI Aayog policy paper has suggested tariff cuts on certain US agricultural products, but it is unclear whether this reflects the official stance of the Indian government or is merely a preliminary recommendation. Agriculture remains the thorniest issue in the India-US trade negotiations. With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Beyond France: Europe's air travel system struggles to cope with post-Covid demand
Europe's skies are buckling under pressure as a French air traffic control strike exposes a continent-wide aviation system struggling with staff shortages, outdated infrastructure and fragmented oversight read more A departures information board is seen at Roissy Charles-de-Gaulle airport, outside Paris, on July 3, 2025, as French air traffic controllers launched a two-day strike to demand better working conditions, disrupting travel for tens of thousands of people at the start of a summer holiday season. AFP The two-day strike by French air traffic controllers on July 3–4 has forced the cancellation of over 1,500 flights and disrupted travel plans for nearly 300,000 passengers, is more than just a national labour dispute. As reported by Airlines for Europe (A4E) and corroborated by Reuters, this latest disruption lays bare the deep, systemic weaknesses in Europe's air travel infrastructure. France's disruption is merely the tip of an iceberg — a symptom of a continent-wide crisis of staffing, ageing infrastructure, fractured airspace management and unsustainable demand. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Post-pandemic surge meets pre-existing strain Europe's aviation system, already creaking before 2020, was pushed to the brink during the Covid-19 pandemic. When air travel plummeted in 2020 and 2021, recruitment was halted, training paused and thousands of aviation professionals took early retirement. As the International Air Transport Association (IATA) noted, air traffic in 2023 had recovered to over 94 per cent of 2019 levels, with December traffic alone surpassing pre-pandemic numbers. This rebound, while welcome, has overwhelmed an industry that had not rebuilt its operational base to match this explosive demand. According to IATA data, European carriers saw full-year traffic climb 22 per cent in 2023 versus 2022, and December 2023 even exceeded pre-pandemic benchmarks for the first time. The upsurge in demand has not been met with a corresponding increase in resources, particularly in air traffic control (ATC), where staffing and infrastructure continue to lag. Chronic shortages and the human toll At the heart of the crisis lies a critical shortage of trained air traffic controllers across Europe. According to Politico, the continent is currently missing between 700 and 1,000 controllers, a figure cited by Frederic Deleau of the International Federation of Air Traffic Controllers' Associations. This shortfall stems from a combination of factors: a high number of retirements, a post-Covid-19 recruitment slump, the time-intensive nature of ATC training and growing burnout among existing staff. The European air traffic control system is especially vulnerable because it relies on a small cadre of highly skilled professionals — approximately 15,000 in the EU, according to PwC. Each controller requires two to three years of intensive training, encompassing theoretical coursework, simulation training and on-the-job experience. Many aspiring controllers are deterred by high entry barriers, including stringent health, language and math requirements as well as an upper age limit of 27 in programmes like Eurocontrol's. Professor Marina Efthymiou of Dublin City University highlights another challenge: talent competition. Middle Eastern nations, including the UAE and Qatar, are aggressively recruiting European-trained controllers with attractive relocation packages. As Europe becomes less competitive, it experiences a 'brain drain' that further hollows out its ATC workforce. Burnout loop and a vicious cycle With too few controllers available, those who remain are pushed into overtime and back-to-back shifts. This leads to mounting fatigue, increasing the likelihood of errors and driving even more personnel to leave the profession. The result is a vicious cycle: understaffing leads to overwork, which leads to more understaffing. Strikes like the one initiated by the French UNSA-ICNA union are often rooted in these exact pressures. As reported by the BBC and Euronews, French controllers walked out in protest over chronic understaffing, poor management practices and the planned introduction of a new clock-in system, which unions say reflects a distrustful and overly rigid managerial approach. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ageing infrastructure adds to the woes Compounding the workforce issues is Europe's ageing air traffic control infrastructure. Much of the continent still depends on legacy radar and communication technologies developed decades ago. This outdated system contributes to inefficiencies, such as extended flight paths, increased fuel consumption and more delays. Aviation Today noted that unlike the United States—which benefits from a unified, FAA-run airspace—Europe remains divided into national systems with inconsistent standards. These fragmented technologies struggle to communicate efficiently across borders, reducing the system's resilience to disruptions and increasing the chance of cascading failures. Europe's national sovereignty concerns have prevented similar unification, with countries wary of ceding control over airspace management to a supranational body. Efforts to introduce remote-controlled towers in parts of the UK demonstrate one potential path forward, but the technology remains controversial. As the European Transport Workers' Federation pointed out in their communication with Scottish authorities, remote towers present challenges related to weather resilience, cybersecurity and job security, stoking resistance from unions and local communities alike. The fragmented sky Perhaps the most glaring structural weakness in European aviation is its lack of unified airspace management. Despite the perception of a borderless Europe, airspace is still controlled by national authorities operating in isolation. This fragmented system leads to inefficiencies, bottlenecks and a lack of coordination especially during crises. The recent French strike exemplifies the problem. Because France controls a disproportionately large swath of European airspace, delays and cancellations within French borders have ripple effects across the continent. Ryanair reported that even flights not landing in France—those merely flying over—were grounded or rerouted, causing chaos in the UK, Ireland, Spain and Greece. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD High cost of inaction The economic consequences of this dysfunctional system are substantial. A PwC study commissioned by Airlines for Europe estimates that ATC strikes alone impose massive costs not only on airlines but also on the broader economy. Tourism revenues drop, business travel is disrupted and consumer confidence in flying erodes. The European aviation sector supports approximately 5.5 million jobs and contributes €338 billion annually to the EU economy. Its unreliability now threatens that role. This July, Ryanair alone was forced to cancel over 170 flights, disrupting the holidays of more than 30,000 passengers, the BBC reported. EasyJet and other low-cost carriers have voiced their frustration, emphasising that the current situation is untenable during the peak travel season. A wave of labour unrest across the continent France is far from alone. Across Europe, aviation workers are increasingly turning to strikes to demand better pay, working conditions and job security. According to TimeOut, industrial action is also planned or underway in Italy, Spain, Finland and Greece during July 2025. The growing frequency and coordination of these strikes point to deeper, systemic grievances exacerbated by inflation, cost-of-living crises and stagnant wages. The European economy is still reeling from the cumulative impact of Covid-19, energy shocks and geopolitical tensions. As workers in high-pressure environments demand fair treatment, authorities have failed to deliver coherent, cross-border solutions. Towards a unified sky The idea of a 'Single European Sky' (SES) has long been touted as the solution to many of these problems. Proposed as far back as the early 2000s, the SES initiative seeks to replace Europe's patchwork of national ATC systems with a streamlined, continent-wide network. The goals: cut down on congestion, standardise regulations and implement next-generation technologies. While there has been some progress—such as the creation of Functional Airspace Blocks (FABs) to encourage regional cooperation—full implementation remains elusive. Aviation Today cites bureaucratic inertia and national security concerns as the primary barriers. Unions also resist the change, fearing job losses from automation and consolidation. Nonetheless, with mounting delays and rising demand, calls for urgent reform are intensifying. The SES is no longer a theoretical fix. It is a necessity if Europe hopes to remain competitive in global aviation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A litmus test for Europe's capacity to act Unless decisive action is taken, the pattern of summer travel disruptions will only worsen. Air travel in Europe is now at or above 2019 levels, and the upward trajectory is expected to continue. Without adequate staffing, infrastructure renewal and cross-border coordination, the cracks in the system will deepen. In a continent that prides itself on integration and mobility, air travel should be a showcase of unity and efficiency. Instead, it is becoming a symbol of fragmentation and dysfunction. The challenge is no longer identifying the problem; it is finding the political courage to solve it.
