'Unusual': the traditions behind parliament's opening
But on the opening day, traditions dating back hundreds of years defined the procedures.
The House of Representatives and Senate met on Tuesday for the first time since Labor's election win, but before any debate on legislation took place, parliamentary rituals had to be taken care of first.
Parliament was opened up by High Court Chief Justice Stephen Gageler, with all MPs and senators packed into the upper house for the occasion, before returning their respective chambers to be sworn in.
Business then turned to electing a Speaker of the House of Representatives and a Senate president.
Traditionally, once a Speaker is elected, they are dragged to the speaker's chair by other MPs.
The dragging tradition dates back to the early days of the British parliament, when people were reluctantly elected to the role due to predecessors being executed or imprisoned due to the monarch not agreeing with the British parliament's outcome.
House of Representatives Speaker Milton Dick took part in the ceremonial dragging when he was appointed to the role in 2022, and retained his prominent role in parliament.
"When (the traditions) occur for the first time, people see them and they may seem a little unusual," he told AAP.
"This is what our democracy has been built on. They signify some of the foundations of our parliament."
Later in the day, the Usher of the Black Rod, will knock on the door of the House of Representatives three times to invite MPs to the Senate for a speech by Governor-General Sam Mostyn.
The address will outline the priorities of the government during the upcoming three-year term.
The speech can't happen in the House of Representatives due to a convention dating back to 1642, when King Charles I went into British parliament and tried to arrest five people but was unsuccessful.
Since then, any figure related to the crown such as the Governor General is not allowed in the lower house.
Despite the British traditions on display on parliament's opening day, Australian customs were also part of the mix.
The day began with a welcome to country and Indigenous smoking ceremony.
Senate president Sue Lines said the Indigenous elements of the day were an important part of parliament's opening.
"It's important for me and very symbolic that we back our own traditions and acknowledge First Nations (people), and we also have the quirky bits of the Westminster system," Senator Lines told AAP.
"These traditions also reinforce the different roles that the House of Representatives and the Senate has, and sometimes that's a bit lost because we get into the argument and debate."
Official business will get under way later on Tuesday with maiden speeches by MPs before proposed laws are debated on Wednesday.
Dragging MPs, knocking on doors with giant rods and senators in the wrong chamber doesn't sound like a usual day at Parliament House.
But on the opening day, traditions dating back hundreds of years defined the procedures.
The House of Representatives and Senate met on Tuesday for the first time since Labor's election win, but before any debate on legislation took place, parliamentary rituals had to be taken care of first.
Parliament was opened up by High Court Chief Justice Stephen Gageler, with all MPs and senators packed into the upper house for the occasion, before returning their respective chambers to be sworn in.
Business then turned to electing a Speaker of the House of Representatives and a Senate president.
Traditionally, once a Speaker is elected, they are dragged to the speaker's chair by other MPs.
The dragging tradition dates back to the early days of the British parliament, when people were reluctantly elected to the role due to predecessors being executed or imprisoned due to the monarch not agreeing with the British parliament's outcome.
House of Representatives Speaker Milton Dick took part in the ceremonial dragging when he was appointed to the role in 2022, and retained his prominent role in parliament.
"When (the traditions) occur for the first time, people see them and they may seem a little unusual," he told AAP.
"This is what our democracy has been built on. They signify some of the foundations of our parliament."
Later in the day, the Usher of the Black Rod, will knock on the door of the House of Representatives three times to invite MPs to the Senate for a speech by Governor-General Sam Mostyn.
The address will outline the priorities of the government during the upcoming three-year term.
The speech can't happen in the House of Representatives due to a convention dating back to 1642, when King Charles I went into British parliament and tried to arrest five people but was unsuccessful.
Since then, any figure related to the crown such as the Governor General is not allowed in the lower house.
Despite the British traditions on display on parliament's opening day, Australian customs were also part of the mix.
The day began with a welcome to country and Indigenous smoking ceremony.
Senate president Sue Lines said the Indigenous elements of the day were an important part of parliament's opening.
"It's important for me and very symbolic that we back our own traditions and acknowledge First Nations (people), and we also have the quirky bits of the Westminster system," Senator Lines told AAP.
"These traditions also reinforce the different roles that the House of Representatives and the Senate has, and sometimes that's a bit lost because we get into the argument and debate."
Official business will get under way later on Tuesday with maiden speeches by MPs before proposed laws are debated on Wednesday.
Dragging MPs, knocking on doors with giant rods and senators in the wrong chamber doesn't sound like a usual day at Parliament House.
But on the opening day, traditions dating back hundreds of years defined the procedures.
The House of Representatives and Senate met on Tuesday for the first time since Labor's election win, but before any debate on legislation took place, parliamentary rituals had to be taken care of first.
Parliament was opened up by High Court Chief Justice Stephen Gageler, with all MPs and senators packed into the upper house for the occasion, before returning their respective chambers to be sworn in.
Business then turned to electing a Speaker of the House of Representatives and a Senate president.
Traditionally, once a Speaker is elected, they are dragged to the speaker's chair by other MPs.
The dragging tradition dates back to the early days of the British parliament, when people were reluctantly elected to the role due to predecessors being executed or imprisoned due to the monarch not agreeing with the British parliament's outcome.
House of Representatives Speaker Milton Dick took part in the ceremonial dragging when he was appointed to the role in 2022, and retained his prominent role in parliament.
"When (the traditions) occur for the first time, people see them and they may seem a little unusual," he told AAP.
"This is what our democracy has been built on. They signify some of the foundations of our parliament."
Later in the day, the Usher of the Black Rod, will knock on the door of the House of Representatives three times to invite MPs to the Senate for a speech by Governor-General Sam Mostyn.
The address will outline the priorities of the government during the upcoming three-year term.
The speech can't happen in the House of Representatives due to a convention dating back to 1642, when King Charles I went into British parliament and tried to arrest five people but was unsuccessful.
Since then, any figure related to the crown such as the Governor General is not allowed in the lower house.
Despite the British traditions on display on parliament's opening day, Australian customs were also part of the mix.
The day began with a welcome to country and Indigenous smoking ceremony.
Senate president Sue Lines said the Indigenous elements of the day were an important part of parliament's opening.
"It's important for me and very symbolic that we back our own traditions and acknowledge First Nations (people), and we also have the quirky bits of the Westminster system," Senator Lines told AAP.
"These traditions also reinforce the different roles that the House of Representatives and the Senate has, and sometimes that's a bit lost because we get into the argument and debate."
Official business will get under way later on Tuesday with maiden speeches by MPs before proposed laws are debated on Wednesday.
Dragging MPs, knocking on doors with giant rods and senators in the wrong chamber doesn't sound like a usual day at Parliament House.
But on the opening day, traditions dating back hundreds of years defined the procedures.
The House of Representatives and Senate met on Tuesday for the first time since Labor's election win, but before any debate on legislation took place, parliamentary rituals had to be taken care of first.
Parliament was opened up by High Court Chief Justice Stephen Gageler, with all MPs and senators packed into the upper house for the occasion, before returning their respective chambers to be sworn in.
Business then turned to electing a Speaker of the House of Representatives and a Senate president.
Traditionally, once a Speaker is elected, they are dragged to the speaker's chair by other MPs.
The dragging tradition dates back to the early days of the British parliament, when people were reluctantly elected to the role due to predecessors being executed or imprisoned due to the monarch not agreeing with the British parliament's outcome.
House of Representatives Speaker Milton Dick took part in the ceremonial dragging when he was appointed to the role in 2022, and retained his prominent role in parliament.
"When (the traditions) occur for the first time, people see them and they may seem a little unusual," he told AAP.
"This is what our democracy has been built on. They signify some of the foundations of our parliament."
Later in the day, the Usher of the Black Rod, will knock on the door of the House of Representatives three times to invite MPs to the Senate for a speech by Governor-General Sam Mostyn.
The address will outline the priorities of the government during the upcoming three-year term.
The speech can't happen in the House of Representatives due to a convention dating back to 1642, when King Charles I went into British parliament and tried to arrest five people but was unsuccessful.
Since then, any figure related to the crown such as the Governor General is not allowed in the lower house.
Despite the British traditions on display on parliament's opening day, Australian customs were also part of the mix.
The day began with a welcome to country and Indigenous smoking ceremony.
Senate president Sue Lines said the Indigenous elements of the day were an important part of parliament's opening.
"It's important for me and very symbolic that we back our own traditions and acknowledge First Nations (people), and we also have the quirky bits of the Westminster system," Senator Lines told AAP.
"These traditions also reinforce the different roles that the House of Representatives and the Senate has, and sometimes that's a bit lost because we get into the argument and debate."
Official business will get under way later on Tuesday with maiden speeches by MPs before proposed laws are debated on Wednesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
29 minutes ago
- West Australian
UK rejects rewarding Hamas after Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Britain would recognise Palestinian state
Britain rejects Israeli criticism that it is rewarding militant group Hamas by setting out plans to recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel takes steps to improve the situation in Gaza and bring about peace. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's ultimatum, setting a September deadline, prompted an immediate rebuke from Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu, who said it rewarded Hamas and punished the victims of the fighters' 2023 attack that triggered the war. US President Donald Trump also said he did not think Hamas 'should be rewarded' with recognition of Palestinian independence. But British Transport Minister Heidi Alexander - designated by the government to respond to media questions on Wednesday - said: 'This is not a reward for Hamas. 'Hamas is a vile terrorist organisation that has committed appalling atrocities. This is about the Palestinian people. It's about those children that we see in Gaza who are starving to death. 'We've got to ratchet up pressure on the Israeli government to lift the restrictions to get aid back into Gaza.' Mr Starmer's decision follows that of French President Emmanuel Macron, who announced last week that Paris would recognise Palestinian statehood in September, becoming the first major Western power to do so, because of the dire humanitarian conditions in the enclave. Previously, Britain and France, like other Western powers, had been committed to Palestinian independence, but as a goal that would best be achieved only at the conclusion of negotiations with Israel. In a televised address on Tuesday, Mr Starmer said it had become necessary to act because the prospect of such a two-state solution was under threat. Britain would make the move at the UN General Assembly in September unless Israel took substantive steps to allow more aid into Gaza, made clear it would not annex the West Bank and committed itself to a long-term peace process that delivered a two-state solution, Mr Starmer said. The Board of Deputies of British Jews, Britain's biggest Jewish advocacy group, raised concerns that similarly clear conditions had not been set out for Hamas, which is still holding 50 hostages it seized in its October 2023 attack. The Muslim Council of Britain, the country's largest Muslim umbrella organisation, said making recognition conditional contradicted the government's stated position that statehood was the inalienable right of the Palestinian people.
ABC News
29 minutes ago
- ABC News
Review into over-representation of First Nations people in ACT justice system makes almost 100 recommendations
A damning review into the over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the ACT criminal justice system has recommended sweeping changes. The more-than-500-page report by the Jumbunna Institute at the University of Technology Sydney made almost 100 recommendations, including "priority" systemic racism reviews of ACT Policing and Canberra's jail, and an inquiry into recent deaths in custody. The ACT has the highest rate of Indigenous imprisonment of any state or territory, and First Nations people in the ACT are more likely to receive a custodial sentence than non-Indigenous defendants found guilty. The Jumbunna review identified systemic racism within ACT schools, government directorates, courtrooms, Canberra's jail, and in ACT Policing's approaches. "Racism occurs at an individual and systemic level, within specific agencies and across broader government approaches: for example, not trusting Aboriginal people to lead solutions to over-representation," the report said. A major criticism of the government was that many approaches to date had not included First Nations people or prioritised their self-determination. ACT Indigenous Affairs Minister Suzanne Orr said the government had made progress, and it would now work on an interconnected response. 'Singling out one thing in isolation isn't actually the best way to proceed, and I think this goes to the point that's made in the report, that it's actually a joined-up response and a coordinated response that's needed,' Ms Orr said. 'We're dealing with some pretty long history here and a lot of responses that we haven't had to grapple with before. "So, we have made progress in sort of parts, and we've not shied away from that, and I've not shied away from that.' The report authors heard evidence that Indigenous people in the ACT "continue to be targeted, and continue to experience excessive use of force" by ACT Policing. "Police target your name because of the history that's involved with, maybe not incarceration, but with contact with police," a First Nations organisation told interviewers. Those interviewed also spoke about a lack of transparency in making complaints about police. Many believed complaints would not be followed up on, or there would be repercussions. "The unique arrangement in the ACT — whereby community policing is contracted out to the Australian Federal Police — was perceived to be a significant contributor to the problems of accountability," the report said. "We recommend the establishment of an independent oversight body with the statutory authority to investigate complaints against ACT Policing, and to compel action in response to its investigations." It also recommended clearer guidelines for the use of body-worn cameras, including that they must be activated when "exercising police powers, or when it is likely that an interaction may lead to the exercise of police powers". Also, it recommended that there be a process for individuals to access relevant footage. The report authors said "urgent attention" was also needed relating to evidence around a perception that child services and ACT Policing had worked together to "punish victim-survivors for 'failing to protect' their children". They heard ACT Policing had placed "the onus on victim-survivors to leave violent relationships and environments". There was also evidence that police were using adverse discretion "in matters such as the use of diversion, use of arrest over summons, access to police bail, the use of minor offences, police stops and use of force". In a statement, an ACT Policing spokesperson said it was aware of the Jumbunna review, but it would not be appropriate to comment ahead of a government response. The report authors recommended that the ACT Education Directorate avoid unnecessary contact with police over school-based incidents, which "increases the likelihood of further contact [for students] with the criminal legal system". The review, which has recommended the "priority" establishment of a First Nations Education Advisory Body, heard evidence of systemic racism in ACT schools. "There were perceptions that First Nations students are more likely to be suspended or excluded than other students. This was seen as being race-based or as poor responses to disability related behaviour," the report found. "And concerns raised during the review process identified Education Directorate staff as over-reporting First Nations students and families to [the Community Services Directorate]." "They used to suspend my son, like, every week. And when they didn't have a reason to actually suspend him, when they weren't allowed to suspend him because it wasn't bad enough, they'd make him sign a mutually agreed leave form," the report authors were told. Interviewees in the ACT's youth detention facility, Bimberi, spoke of interrupted schooling. This prompted a recommendation for day-release options so those in detention can attend school or work. "Consideration should be given too to whether a trade skill centre can be set up at Bimberi," the report suggested. "These opportunities give a young person hope, direction, and break negative cycles." The report highlighted the over-representation of Indigenous ACT children in child protection and out-of-home care systems, and said the issue was linked to racist systems that "continue to position First Nations families as risky". It said children in care were more likely to get attention from police, with the issue dubbed care criminalisation. "Community members spoke at length about a well-established residential care to youth justice to adult incarceration pipeline," the report said. For young people in youth detention, the report recommended increased funding for the Restorative Justice Unit, a specialised children's solicitor, and a requirement for ACT Policing to make public the reasons why diversionary options are not used for young people. It further recommended that the ACT government undertake an independent review of the use of remand for children, particularly First Nations children, to reduce unnecessary custody. The report recommended ACT Corrections Minister Marisa Paterson consider establishing an independent inquiry into the "deaths of seven men in adult correctional custody between February 2023 and February 2025". It further recommended that the ACT government and the ACT coroner expedite coronial investigations into deaths in custody. "It is difficult to imagine an issue of more concern to the First Nations community in the ACT than Aboriginal deaths in custody, particularly when three deaths occurred within the space of seven months," the report authors said. Regarding issues within the prison, the authors said they were "disturbed" to see the rate of discontinued cultural programs within the AMC. The review recommended that the jail introduce more structure to the days of inmates with "purposeful activities" that must meet the cultural needs of First Nations inmates. "The effects of boredom are multifaceted, potentially increasing the likelihood of conflict among detainees and with staff, negatively impacting on self-worth and motivation, increased drug use, and diminishing the likelihood of rehabilitation and preparedness for release," the report authors said. The report said a systemic racism review of the AMC should probe "the use of segregation, the use of force, security classifications, recognition of cultural rights and the interaction of staff with First Nations detainees". It recommended the extension of the weekend bail court to include Sunday to "reduce unnecessary custodies". It further recommended wastewater testing at the jail to gauge the prevalence and type of drug use, as well as a regular civil law clinic to deal with "sleeper issues," including housing matters, child support, and debts. The government is expected to provide an interim response in September.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
What's in a number? New carbon target sparks new climate warfare
Our free Environment newsletter is sent every second Wednesday. Below is an excerpt. Sign up to get the whole newsletter delivered to your inbox. Casual observers of federal parliament might this week have been startled by a sudden resumption of conflict over climate, but the timing was no accident. Australia, like the rest of the world, is due to set its 2035 carbon-emission reduction target under the Paris Agreement. As a result, Canberra is crawling with those who have an interest in influencing that target (or Nationally Determined Contribution, more on which shortly). Setting the scene for many turning their attention to parliament as it resumed for the Albanese government's second term, were Nationals MPs Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack, who introduced a private members' bill to have Australia abandon entirely the effort to cut emissions in line with the Paris Agreement. Also in Canberra this week was Simon Stiell, the UN's chief climate diplomat or, more properly, executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. He has been travelling the world urging nations to submit ambitious targets that will keep Paris Agreement goals within reach. Far too careful a diplomat to recommend an Australian target, he has been making the case that, on economic and security grounds, Australia should be ambitious. 'Bog standard is beneath you … Go for what will build lasting wealth and national security,' he said in a speech in Sydney before travelling to Canberra. 'Go for what will change the game and stand the test of time.' So, what's a Nationally Determined Contribution? When world governments signed the Paris Accord almost a decade ago they agreed that to halt climate change before catastrophic tipping points kicked in, warming needed to be arrested below 2 degrees and as close as possible to 1.5 degrees.
