Germany tells Apple, Google to block DeepSeek as the Chinese AI app faces rising pressure in Europe
One of Germany's data protection watchdogs on Friday said DeepSeek's app illegally sends user data to China and asked Google and Apple to consider blocking the artificial intelligence service.
Berlin's data protection commissioner Meike Kamp said in a statement that DeepSeek's transfer of German user data to China is "unlawful."
There is not a readily available way to get in touch with DeepSeek. CNBC has reached out to DeepSeek's privacy team.
Chinese firm DeepSeek made waves this year when it launched an AI model that it claimed was created at a fraction of the cost of competitors, using less advanced Nvidia chips.
The company also has its own global chatbot AI app, which has been downloaded millions of times, garnering scrutiny.
If the German case against DeepSeek progresses, it could lead to a European Union-wide ban for the app, some experts say.
"It is certainly possible that this incident could lead to an EU-wide ban because the rules that apply in Germany are the same elsewhere in the EU and also in the UK," Matt Holman, specialist AI and data lawyer at Cripps, told CNBC by email. There are a few steps before this would become reality, however.
"DeepSeek has not been able to convincingly demonstrate to my authority that the data of German users is protected in China at a level equivalent to that of the European Union," Germany's Kamp said, according to a CNBC translation. "Chinese authorities have extensive access rights to personal data within the sphere of influence of Chinese companies."
Under the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation — the bloc's huge data protection law — companies are prohibited from sending data outside the region unless specific safeguards are in place at the countries of arrival. Those safeguards must meet GDPR requirements in Europe.
In short, the Berlin data protection commissioner is concerned that Chinese authorities could access German user data sent by DeepSeek to China.
The Berlin data watchdog on Friday said it had informed Apple and Google of DeepSeek's alleged violations and expects the U.S. tech giants to carry out a "timely review" about whether to ban the app or not from their respective app stores.
It's unclear if Google and Apple will comply. CNBC has reached out to both companies for comment.
Cripps' Holman said that while and EU-wide ban is possible, there needs to be consensus among the bloc's regulators first that this would be an appropriate step.
If Apple and Google remove DeepSeek from their app stores, this would effectively amount to an EU-wide ban, Holman said.
"The implications for Deepseek could be, unsurprisingly, quite stark. Access to German citizens' data will be curtailed. In short order this could expand to the remainder of the EU if other national regulators follow suits meaning EU — and potentially UK — markets will be curtailed if Apple and Google disables the app," Holman said.
This is not DeepSeek's first run-in with regulators in Europe. Italian data protection authorities in February ordered DeepSeek to block its app in the country. Meanwhile, Irish authorities in January asked DeepSeek for information on its data processing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Backs Meta in Dispute Over Canada's Digital Services Tax
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. It looks like Mark Zuckerberg is finally seeing some return for his support for U.S. President Donald Trump, though not quite in the way he would have hoped. Today, President Trump has announced that the U.S. will cease all trade discussions with Canada in response to the Canadian government seeking to impose what amounts to unfair taxes on U.S. technology platforms, including Meta. Well, really, primarily Meta, though the 'taxes' in this case are not really new. Back in 2023, Canadian officials introduced the 'Online News Act,' which is ostensibly designed to address imbalances in the local news ecosystem, by forcing large online platforms, like Meta and Google, to pay Canadian publishers for news content that's shared across their platforms. But both Meta and Google pushed back against the bill, saying that the proposed regulations don't accurately reflect the state of the modern news ecosystem, but the Canadian government pushed ahead anyway, which eventually saw Meta block all Canadian news outlets in its apps. That ban remains in place, which means that Meta's not currently paying any of these imposed costs put in place by the bill. In order to address this, last year, Canadian officials introduced an alternative 'Digital Services Tax,' which will see digital services operating in the region that bring in more than $20 million per annum charged a 3% tax on their local earnings (above that $20m threshold). That means that Meta, even if it isn't using local news publisher content, will still have to pay to operate in the region. The first payments are due next week. Which has now seemingly been brought to the attention of Trump, who's responded with reciprocal penalties for what he sees as penalties that unfairly target U.S. tech platforms. As per Trump (via Truth Social): 'We have just been informed that Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with, including the fact that they have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products, has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country. They are obviously copying the European Union, which has done the same thing, and is currently under discussion with us, also. Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately.' Trump further noted that the White House will let Canada know the tariff that they'll have to pay 'to do business with the United States' within seven days. Which is another addition to the tariffs and penalties that Trump has already imposed on Canada trade, and as such, it seems unlikely that this will have much impact on the Canadian government's actions on this front. But still, it does seem surprising that Trump's only just realized that this bill exists, given that Meta blocked news in its apps in Canada almost two years ago, and that the Digital Services Tax was announced last year. But even so, this is the exact reason why Zuck and Co. have sought to cosy up to the second Trump Administration, in order to call on the White House to push back against penalties like this, as well as regulations in Europe, which it believes unfairly focus on its business. Indeed, over the past few years, EU regulators have fined Meta, on average, around $1 billion per year due to breaches of its increasingly complex Digital Services Act. Zuckerberg has repeatedly criticized these penalties, noting in an interview earlier this year that: 'The EU has fined the tech companies more than $30 billion over the last, I think it was like 10 or 20 years, so when you think about it, what it really adds up to is this kind of EU-wide policy for how they want to deal with American tech. It's almost like a tariff, and I think the US government basically gets to decide how they're going to deal with it.' Zuckerberg says that the American technology industry is 'a bright spot in the American economy,' and as such, it's of strategic advantage for the U.S. Government to defend that. Which is where he's hoping his fealty to Trump will benefit Meta, in pushing back against EU regulations specifically. And while Canada is a lesser consideration on this front, the fact that Trump is taking a stand would clearly be music to the ears of Meta's executive team. But will Trump be as willing to push back against EU penalties? The Trump administration has flagged that it will take a stand. Earlier this year, for example, the chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) publicly criticized the European Union's Digital Services Act (DSA), which he says is 'incompatible with America's free speech tradition.' Vice President JD Vance also criticized EU regulations, while Trump himself has also threatened European imports with tariffs in penalty for tech regulations that harm U.S. companies. Though Trump has stopped short of taking specific action against European regulators as yet. In this sense, Canada is a softer target, and one that Trump is already beating up on with other tariffs and penalties. So it's not quite what Meta wants, but if it does end up saving the company from more penalties, and big fines from such, it could still be worth the PR hit that Zuckerberg has taken in re-aligning Meta's approach in line with Trump's wishes. But it's the EU rules that Meta really wants the White House to push back on. And with European officials looking to impose even more fines on the company, we'll see if Meta gets the full benefit of its new political allegiance. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
EU and US optimistic about trade deal before July 9 tariff deadline
-- The European Union and the United States are expressing confidence about reaching a trade agreement before the July 9 deadline, when significant tariffs are set to take effect on both sides. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told EU leaders during a closed-door summit on Thursday that she believes a deal can be secured before the deadline, according to a report from Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter. This would prevent an economically damaging escalation between the two major trading partners. Von der Leyen informed leaders that the Trump administration had presented a new proposal this week. During discussions, EU leaders reportedly showed greater willingness to accept some imbalance in a potential trade agreement to avoid a tariff war. If no agreement is reached by July 9, the US plans to impose a 50% tariff on nearly all EU products, while the European bloc is prepared to implement its own set of countermeasures. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick shared similar optimism in a Thursday interview with Bloomberg TV. Lutnick noted that the EU had accelerated negotiations in recent weeks, establishing groundwork that could lead to an accord. Related articles EU and US optimistic about trade deal before July 9 tariff deadline - Bloomberg Deutsche Bank sees limited grounds for Spirit's JetBlue-United objection Jefferies starts Armada Hoffler at Buy, says dividend-cut sell-off is overdone
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
These Are the Best Stocks You Can Buy With $1,000 Right Now
Nvidia looks overvalued only if you don't consider how quickly earnings could grow over the next few years. Lam Research is a semiconductor equipment manufacturer that has a big hand in the production of high-bandwidth memory. ASML Holding is the only company producing the lithography equipment required to print the advanced semiconductors that artificial intelligence applications rely on. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › The stock market has recovered nearly all the losses that were sparked by fear of a new trade war. The benchmark S&P 500 index finished June 25 less than a percentage point below its all-time high. Despite a big recovery for the overall stock market, several top tech stocks with a hand in the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution have been trading for attractive valuations. Demand for AI-related products hasn't translated into profits for the most popular large language model (LLM) providers, but sales of semiconductors and equipment required to produce those LLMs keep surging. Lately, Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), Lam Research (NASDAQ: LRCX), and ASML Holding (NASDAQ: ASML) have been trading at attractive valuations. If you have $1,000 -- or any amount -- available to invest in these stocks now, there's a good chance you'll realize market-beating gains over the long run. If you follow the AI space, you probably heard that DeepSeek in China ignored CUDA, Nvidia's software development kit (SDK), to produce a competitive LLM using inferior graphics processing units (GPUs). The important thing for everyday investors to take from this event is that the vast majority of AI application developers aren't as capable and all but a handful of developers still rely on CUDA to build AI applications. Nvidia's software advantage allowed its fiscal first-quarter sales to surge 69% year over year to a whopping $44.1 billion. With demand for AI computing on the rise, and a software advantage that keeps competitors at bay, several more years of rapid growth isn't a wild expectation. On the surface, Nvidia stock looks expensive at 36 times earnings expectations. But once you consider how fast earnings are growing, the stock actually looks like a bargain right now. The forward price/earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio divides the trailing price-to-earnings ratio by the rate of earnings growth Wall Street expects in the year ahead. Anything below a 1.0 is considered undervalued, so Nvidia's recent forward PEG of 0.79 suggests now is a good time to buy. AMD and Intel are furiously trying to overcome Nvidia's software advantage. But even if they succeed, they'll still likely employ advanced etch and deposition equipment from Lam Research, a leader in the space. Now that advanced semiconductors are spacing nodes just a few nanometers apart, stacking semiconductor components is the way forward. As a leader in the verticalization processes, Lam Research could remain a vital equipment provider in the decade ahead. Its equipment is used to manufacture high bandwidth memory (HBM), which is an increasingly important component of AI processing. Strong demand from Nvidia helped Lam Research report first-quarter earnings that rose 12% year over year. Even if Nvidia unexpectedly loses its software advantage in the years ahead, the next leader in the semiconductor space will likely employ Lam's etch and deposition equipment to produce HBM, too. Shares of Lam Research have been trading for just 24 times earnings estimates. This valuation is extremely low for a highly profitable company that could continue raising earnings at double-digit percentages for many years to come. With $1,000, you could buy many shares of Nvidia or Lam Research. Advanced lithography system producer, ASML Holding is more than 25% off its previous peak, but you'll need at least $815 to buy one share at recent prices. (Don't get hung up on price, though. Price and value aren't the same thing, and fractional shares are available.) Like Lam Research, ASML is a niche producer of semiconductor manufacturing equipment. Its enormous lithography machines contain hundreds of thousands of components and require months to ship and assemble. When it comes to advanced chips that AI applications rely on, an ASML lithography machine is the only option. ASML's already entrenched business requires heaps of capital, engineering knowledge, and relationships with semiconductor manufacturers. These sustainable advantages allowed earnings per share to rise by 16% annually over the past five years, and the gains could continue. At the midpoint of management's guided range, top-line sales are expected to climb by 14.8% this year. Without any competitors capable of marketing similar equipment, continued growth at a double-digit annual percentage seems likely. A stock market aware of ASML's competitive position rarely allows its stock price to fall into deep value territory. At recent prices, it's been trading for about 30 times forward-looking earnings expectations. This is a steep valuation, but it isn't one that ASML can't grow into. Adding some shares to a diversified portfolio to hold over the long run looks like a smart move for most growth-oriented investors right now. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Cory Renauer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends ASML, Advanced Micro Devices, Intel, Lam Research, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: short August 2025 $24 calls on Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. These Are the Best Stocks You Can Buy With $1,000 Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
