India's factory growth hits 14-month high on exports surge, PMI shows
The HSBC India Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index, compiled by S&P Global, climbed to 58.4 in June from May's 57.6 and in line with a preliminary estimate released last week.
The PMI threshold of 50.0 separates growth from contraction in activity.
'Robust end-demand fuelled expansions in output, new orders, and job creation,' said Pranjul Bhandari, chief India economist at HSBC.
Factory output grew at its fastest pace since April last year, supported by strong demand.
Incoming new orders increased at the steepest rate in nearly a year, with international demand providing significant momentum.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Export orders recorded the third-highest growth rate since data collection began in March 2005, with US markets frequently cited as a source of strength.
The latest positive readings come amid rising uncertainty from US tariffs as India's trade talks with the largest economy in the world have hit a roadblock ahead of the July 9 deadline due to disagreements on duties for auto components, steel and farm goods, according to government sources.
Strong demand prompted manufacturers to hire additional staff at an unprecedented pace - the fastest since the survey began over two decades ago.
Price pressures for manufacturers eased in June, with input cost inflation slowing to its lowest level in four months despite some increases in iron and steel prices. The moderation was significant when compared to historical trends.
At the same time, companies continued to raise their selling prices markedly - albeit at a softer pace than in the previous month - passing on expenses such as freight, labour and material costs to customers.
Business confidence remained positive but dipped slightly to an eight-month low as some manufacturers expressed concerns about competition, inflation and potential shifts in consumer preferences. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Market Focus Daily: Wednesday, July 2, 2025
Asian markets mixed as trade deal cut-off looms; Singapore's STI hits new high as investors flock to safe havens amid global risks; Hong Kong central bank intervenes to stabilise the Hong Kong dollar; Asian CFOs brace for downtur n, but eye expansion. Synopsis: Market Focus Daily is a closing bell roundup by The Business Times that looks at the day's market movements and news from Singapore and the region. Written and hosted by: Emily Liu (emilyliu@ Produced and edited by: Chai Pei Chieh & Claressa Monteiro Produced by: BT Podcasts, The Business Times, SPH Media --- BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Follow Market Focus Daily and rate us on: Channel: Amazon: Apple Podcasts: Spotify: YouTube Music: Website: Feedback to: btpodcasts@ Do note: This podcast is meant to provide general information only. SPH Media accepts no liability for loss arising from any reliance on the podcast or use of third party's products and services. Please consult professional advisors for independent advice. Discover more BT podcast series: BT Money Hacks at: BT Correspondents at: BT Podcasts at: BT Branded Podcasts at: BT Lens On:
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Trump's 35% tariff threat feeds Japan's worst-case scenario fear
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump threatened Japan with tariffs of up to 35 per cent as he ramped up tensions for a third straight day, fuelling fears of a worst-case scenario among market players and raising doubts over Tokyo's tactics in trade talks. Japan should be forced to 'pay 30 per cent, 35 per cent or whatever the number is that we determine, because we also have a very big trade deficit with Japan,' Trump said, again flagging the possibility that across-the-board tariffs could go much higher than the 24 per cent initially pencilled in for Jul 9. 'I'm not sure we're going to make a deal. I doubt it with Japan, they're very tough. You have to understand, they're very spoilt.' Market participants and analysts warned against taking Trump's comments at face value and suggested that some kind of deal will eventually get done. But they also warned that Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's government may need to change tack from a friendly and firm stance that is now leading the two sides to brinkmanship. 'There is some risk of a US tantrum that results in higher punitive actions by Washington this month,' said Kurt Tong, a former senior US diplomat in Asia who's now a managing partner at the Asia Group. 'If that happens, Japan may have no choice but to hit back with its own specific countermeasures.' Trump's latest threat fits in with a high-pressure deal-making strategy that sometimes results in big last-minute concessions on both sides, as seen with China, but market players still need to game out how to position themselves should talks founder. While few analysts see Japan's stocks collapsing on a no-deal scenario, some of them forecast the Nikkei 225 to fall into the 38,000 range, a decline of more than 4 per cent, rather than rallying above 40,000 if there's an agreement. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The Nikkei 225 edged down 0.6 per cent to close at 39,762 on Wednesday (Jul 2) while the yen was trading at 143.88 against the US dollar, down around 0.3 per cent. Japan has so far stood firm in negotiations over across-the-board reciprocal tariffs, insisting that they be removed along with additional sectoral tariffs on autos, steel and aluminium. The car duties are particularly painful for Japan as the industry contributes the equivalent of almost 10 per cent of gross domestic product and employs around 8 per cent of the workforce. Tokyo has insisted that a 'win-win' deal must encompass all the tariffs in one go with Ishiba preferring no deal to a bad deal ahead of a Jul 20 upper house election. The prime minister on Wednesday reiterated his view that focusing on jobs and investment in the US was the way forward, just like it was for Nippon Steel as it patiently sought to change Trump's view and take over US Steel. 'Japan is the biggest global investor in the US and the world's biggest contributor to US jobs,' Ishiba said in Tokyo on Wednesday. 'That means Japan is different from other countries.' But as Jul 9 gets closer, some observers say more needs to be done to convince the US to back off. 'We have to work on Trump himself, to first try to avoid the tariffs to be imposed from Jul 9,' said Ichiro Fujisaki, former Japanese ambassador to the US, adding that the president's remarks show that Tokyo hasn't brought enough to the table yet. 'We don't have something like rare earths but the US is dependant on Japanese industry as well. About half of materials for making semiconductors come from Japanese industry,' Fujisaki said, pointing to a possible area of leverage, too. In the meantime, market players are evaluating the potential scale of the fallout. 'There is a lot more risk of things falling apart than is being priced in by the market,' said Zuhair Khan, a fund manager at UBP Investments. 'There is always the risk of a policy blunder by either side.' He points to the 32,000 Nikkei level on the day Trump first announced the reciprocal tariffs. 'If the probability of a no deal is 25 per cent then the Nikkei should be at 38,000.' 'If Japan is ultimately forced to pay reciprocal tariffs at those rates, on top of the 24 per cent rate announced on 'Liberation Day' – currently suspended at 10 per cent – the macroeconomic fallout would be sizable,' Taro Kimura, economist for Bloomberg Economics said. 'Our estimate through a model of global trade suggests a medium-term GDP hit of around 1.2 per cent, roughly double the 0.6 per cent drag expected under the current levy.' The point of imposing a deadline in negotiations is to create an opportunity for leverage, so it's not surprising to see Trump pushing high tariffs as a threat to push for better deals as the date approaches, said Phillip Wool, head of portfolio management at Rayliant Global Advisors. 'There's also an element of political theatre here, as Trump's narrative to American voters is that the US has been bullied on trade for so long, and there's clearly a desire to look 'tough' on trade,' Wool said. 'But there has to be a face-saving deal at some point so that it looks like the negotiation was truly a success as opposed to the mutually assured destruction of impasse and perpetually high tariffs.' Like some other market players, Wool is wary of an overly pessimistic knee-jerk response to each remark Trump makes. If there is a big sell-off in a worst-case scenario, Wool sees it as a great buying opportunity for long-term, active investors. Strategists are split on how a bad scenario might play out for the yen. While some such as SBI Liquidity Market's Marito Ueda see the possibility of risk aversion sparking a strengthening of Japan's currency to the 138 range against the US dollar, others see a weakening as more likely. A stalemate in trade talks would likely delay the Bank of Japan's next interest rate hike, especially if it led to tariffs of up to 35 per cent in the meantime, said Akira Moroga, chief market strategist at Aozora Bank. Movement would slow after the 145 mark, making a push past 147 difficult, he said. Still, the consensus is that a deal will be reached sooner or later, and that Japan will have to concede more ground to achieve it. 'If it's concluded I don't think it's going to be a win-win situation,' said Fujisaki. 'Maybe a capital-letter 'WIN' for US, but a small letter 'win' for Japan.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Three insurance policies worth over S$500,000 to be part of bankrupt estate of OK Lim's son, rules court
[SINGAPORE] A granddaughter of fallen oil tycoon Lim Oon Kuin has failed to persuade the court that three insurance policies that named her as the insured and worth half a million should not be part of her father's bankrupt estate. High Court Judicial Commissioner Mohamed Faizal on Tuesday (Jul 1) dismissed the application of Michelle Lim to declare that the three insurance policies in question are held on trust for her sole benefit by her father Lim Chee Meng, who became bankrupt in December 2024. Lim Chee Meng's bankruptcy stems from his agreement together with those of his father – better known as OK Lim – and sister in September 2024 to pay US$3.5 billion to the court-appointed liquidators of insolvent oil trader Hin Leong Trading and top creditor HSBC after a 50-day civil trial. They were sued in August 2020 for US$3.5 billion in debt and US$90 million in dividends that they allegedly paid themselves, even though their firm was already insolvent. In the settlement reached by both parties in the civil suit, the Lims agreed without acknowledging liability to pay US$3.5 billion plus interest accrued from April 2020 to the date of payment, on top of costs. They, however, did not have enough assets to pay all the claimants that have taken legal action against them, and applied for bankruptcy. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Leow Quek Siong and Seah Ron Lin, the private trustees of Lim Chee Meng's bankrupt estate had asked him and Michelle Lim whether a third party would pay the bankrupt estate the surrender value of the three policies in question, which was about S$521,000 as at Jan 16. The bankrupt estate's trustees would proceed to surrender these policies to AIA Singapore if no third party would pay for them. Michelle Lim contended that her father intended to hold these policies on trust for her until she turned 21 years old, after which he would transfer the policies to her name. Thus, she insisted that these policies do not form part of the 55-year-old's bankrupt estate and are not available to any of his creditors. Lack of evidence The court noted that there was no legal documentation that formalised the arrangement for Lim Chee Meng to hold the policies for the benefit of Michelle Lim. Her policy documents also did not show any evidence of any trust arrangement between the father and daughter. Although Michelle Lim adduced four documents as evidence, the judge found that they were either self-interested representations or mere assertions. First, she referred to a letter in October 2021 from her father to carve out these policies, purportedly held on trust, from other assets subjected to a freezing order in the US$3.5 billion civil suit. Also, she cited another letter, purportedly from a personal wealth manager from AIA dated October 2021, claiming that these policies and five other policies with no surrender value were held on trust for her by her father. And, she relied on an e-mail dated March 2025 from Lim Chee Meng to the private trustees as well as a portion of his affidavit filed earlier for his bankruptcy proceedings and attached to the e-mail, in which he asserted that he held the policies on trust for her. The younger Lim claimed that her father had transferred other insurance policies to her two elder siblings when they each became old enough to hold the policies in their names. He did not surrender, assign or deal with the three policies without her consent or direction, even though he had financial needs before the bankruptcy, she argued. While Michelle Lim was named as the insured, the private trustees pointed out that she was not named as a beneficiary in the policy documents. They contended that the documents she submitted were all bare assertions, and that Lim Chee Meng did not transfer the three policies to Michelle Lim when she turned 21 years old in 2024 despite him having been reminded by AIA. The judge noted that all four pieces of documentary evidence relied on by Michelle Lim were dated after the commencement of the civil suit and her father's bankruptcy proceedings. The court should treat with caution assertions that valuable properties are held on trust for another, the judge added, especially when such assertions are made after legal proceedings have begun as the proceedings might result in bankruptcy or insolvency. 'Assertions, no matter how firmly expressed, cannot take the place of evidence; and in this case, the core claims comprised entirely of conclusions untethered to any corroborating factual account,' he commented. The judge also pointed out that the lack of direct evidence from Lim Chee Meng or Michelle Lim's elder siblings regarding the insurance policies he purportedly took out with her elder siblings as the named insured severely weakened her case.
