logo
Australians are working more than ever. But skipping breaks isn't healthy

Australians are working more than ever. But skipping breaks isn't healthy

Do you ever feel like it's tough to take a break at work?
If you're busy, or in the zone, it can be easy to do. But what happens if we consistently don't take our breaks?
"At a basic biological level, your body will slowly start to break down," Kira Schabram, assistant professor of management and organisation at Pennsylvania State University, tells ABC Radio National's This Working Life.
Dr Schabram likens the impact of not taking enough work breaks on the body to "deferring maintenance" on important infrastructure.
"So you can defer maintenance for quite a while," she says.
"But at some point, you're going to have a catastrophic breakdown."
So, how do we snap the no-break habit, and achieve a healthier work/life balance?
Australians are working more hours than ever before, according to a recent report by the Productivity Commission. But that hasn't equated to an increase in productivity.
Dr Schabram says the main reason why many of us don't take enough breaks is internal, "the sense that I can always give more". This is combined with external pressures like demands from a manager or client.
She says that many of us equate breaks with slacking and believing our work is "too valuable".
A study that examined people who work at animal shelters, co-authored by Dr Schabram, found that workers who viewed work as "their calling" were often the ones who wouldn't take breaks.
"A lot of them feel this moral compulsion to keep working, to keep self-sacrificing. And that profession has a really high turnover rate because of it," she says.
The research found that staff who took breaks and viewed work as a team effort were more likely to thrive.
"A lot thought, 'I care more than anyone else, I have to keep doing this'. Whereas others thought: 'We're in this together, so I can rely on other people to take over when I clock out'."
Vanessa Miles, an organisational psychologist, says there are three categories of symptoms to look out for when you are due for a break:
She suggests that when these symptoms appear, you can apply a strategy called "habit stacking".
Habit stacking is a technique to help individuals build new habits by attaching them to existing routines.
"For example, every time you go to put the kettle on, you might do a quick body scan," Ms Miles says.
She explains this could involve taking a moment to check for any tension in your body.
It could also include applying the 5-4-3-2-1 exercise, which consists of asking yourself a series of questions.
"What are five things that I can see right now? What are four things I can hear? Three things that I can touch? Two things that I can smell? And one thing that I can taste. Really simple," she says.
"You're just taking a couple of seconds, but the habit stacking is what actually encourages you to do it because it's anchored onto something that you're doing already."
Dr Schabram's research identified three different strategies workers use to take breaks.
The first is taking "hidden breaks", when employees step away from work in secret.
"People recognise they need a break, and they also understand that there's too much pressure for them to look busy, so they feel they have to hide it," she says.
Her research found that hidden breaks are common, but lack any benefit.
"People don't come back from those breaks feeling more restored … and they often express negative emotions," she says.
The second strategy involves employees finding a compromise in their work schedule so they can take a break when they need to, and have more autonomy over their workflow.
Dr Schabram says that for a long time, it was believed the only effective work break was a "complete break", such as a walk or doing a leisure activity.
But research has shown that employees are more productive when they have autonomy over their schedules.
"Compromise strategies really seem to be maximally effective, and individuals aren't just more productive afterwards. They also report greater well-being," Dr Schabram says.
The final break strategy is status, which means people take their break without compromising or hiding it.
This can be implemented by leaders in workplaces to define the culture around breaks.
"As a leader, taking overt breaks and role-modelling that's OK can make all the difference," Dr Schabram says.
So if you're starting to snap at colleagues who chew loudly in the office, or you have a neck ache that won't go away, it's probably time to implement more breaks in your day.
Feeling tired after returning to work?
Mel Kettle is a leadership communication strategist and she uses work meetings to achieve this.
"When I have meetings, I try to schedule them for 25 or 45 minutes so that I can have a break in between," she says.
"I will always aim to keep 30 mins free between meetings so I can go for a walk or just take a break when I need to."
When it comes to changing our mindset, Dr Schabram says we need to ask ourselves what type of break we need.
"The way I would suggest you think about breaks is [to ask yourself]: 'What is depleted?' And what are you trying to refill with that break?'"
Depending on your answer, you may need to start small by implementing micro-breaks, says Ms Miles.
"You don't have to go for half-hour walks every time you take a break. Just a short, frequent break of two to three minutes is effective too."
She adds that looking at your schedule and finding natural points in your day is key to retraining yourself.
But more work breaks may not be the solution.
For those experiencing the symptoms of burnout (exhaustion, inefficacy and cynicism), Dr Schabram says a "transformative break" may be needed.
"You have to do that off the treadmill."
Whatever your needs may be, Ms Miles says it's important to prioritise things that make you happy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Suicide prevention leader and senior researcher outline why lived experience is vital for national strategy
Suicide prevention leader and senior researcher outline why lived experience is vital for national strategy

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

Suicide prevention leader and senior researcher outline why lived experience is vital for national strategy

When it comes to suicide prevention, Samantha McIntosh knows more than most. With a lived experience of suicidality, a long career in suicide prevention and a recent foray into academia on the subject, the Darwin woman has seen multiple facets of what she described as a still highly stigmatised issue. As opposed to coming from a purely clinical perspective, she says having both personal and professional experience of suicidality — defined as the risk of suicide, indicated by suicidal ideation — can be crucial to engaging with patients and devising solutions. Ms McIntosh has long advocated for people with lived experience to be central when it comes to drafting strategies and other prevention efforts. And governments and independent commissions are starting to agree. According to a June 2025 report from the Productivity Commission, the federal government's National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Agreement is failing to meet the mark. While the expenditures of governments on mental health has grown by around 30 per cent over the past 10 years, suicide rates over that period of time remain unchanged. The Productivity Commission recommended greater inclusion of people with lived and living experience of suicidality in drafting and implementing policy. For Ms McIntosh, the recommendations present a rare opportunity for change. At the other end of Australia — in the regional Victorian town of Warragul — Anton Isaacs, a senior lecturer at Monash University's School of Rural Health, has been helping bring Ms McIntosh's ideas to life. "It's rare for somebody to have the kind of expertise that Sam has," he said. "She has the lived experience of suicidality, she has supported people who have attempted to take their lives, she has been a suicide prevention worker and she worked in leadership positions in programs." The pair recently co-authored a peer-reviewed perspective paper on challenges to suicide prevention, merging Dr Isaacs's experience of drafting strategies with Ms McIntosh's experience of navigating them. It focuses on broadly on stigma surrounding suicide, diving specifically into the careless reporting of suicide in news media, access points of care, and a general lack of understanding in the community when it comes to helping at-risk individuals access services. Dr Isaacs said the work being done is just the beginning, but he noted that integrating lived experience into suicide prevention would require the sector to confront some "basic truths". "Suicide has traditionally fallen under the remit of mental health services, which are clinical services. In clinical medicine, the focus is to arrive at a diagnosis and treat it," he said. "In suicide prevention, the focus is not on arriving at a diagnosis and treating, the focus is care and compassion — that is not clinical. Ms McIntosh agreed, and said the key to effective suicide prevention was a matter of striking the right balance. "That combination of clinical and lived experience doesn't exist in a lot of places," she said. Last month, the Mental Health Commission published its National Suicide Prevention Strategy for the next 10 years, which emphasised the inclusion of people with lived experience in prevention efforts. "People with lived and living experience have the greatest insights into what works, what does not work, and what is missing in suicide prevention," it reads. But Dr Isaacs and Ms McIntosh explained that such inclusion must be considered and meaningful, rather than a "tick-box exercise". "If people don't consider lived experience to be central or core to their work, then they don't give it the importance that they need," Dr Isaacs said. "If that happens, the people with lived experience at the table will feel disillusioned or could be re-traumatised." Ms McIntosh also said any plan to centralise lived experience in prevention efforts would have to be tailored to the needs of various communities, especially in a unique landscape like the NT. "The geographical layout of the territory itself poses problems," she said "We know that there's workforce challenges across the [NT] in all sectors and being able to support the diversity of the territory and communities is also something that we face." While the obstacles to change are numerous, she said there was plenty of support across the sector to make lived experiences central to new prevention strategies. "I think that they would be more successful, I think that they would be more achievable, and I think you would have higher client rates," Ms McIntosh said.

Family that had three organ transplants advocates for more donors
Family that had three organ transplants advocates for more donors

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

Family that had three organ transplants advocates for more donors

The anxious wait for an organ transplant is something no family wants to experience, but the Stolker family has endured it three times. Joe Stolker has had a kidney transplant and his wife Leonnee and their son Levi have both had heart transplants. She said waiting for an available organ and undergoing transplant surgery were incredibly difficult and having to watch her child go through the same process was even harder. But after three successful organ transplants, the Stolkers say they've been given a new lease on life. The Tamworth family is campaigning for organ donation awareness for the 1,800 other Australians who remain on the transplant waitlist. In 2011, Ms Stolker began suffering heart failure just weeks before giving birth to her son. Doctors informed her she would require a heart transplant after she gave birth. "We spent almost six weeks in the hospital after Levi was born, doctors couldn't figure out why a young fit mum suddenly had heart failure," Ms Stolker said. She said she could barely nurse her newborn as doctors searched for a new heart. It took roughly eight months after Levi was born for a suitable heart to be found. "It was scary, there was lots of unknowns, what was causing it or why," Ms Stolker said. "I almost felt selfish in a way. You are so looking forward to that call but at the same time, you know what needs to happen for that organ to become available. "You definitely feel the grief, excited isn't the right word, but it gives you a chance at a future." Ms Stolker later underwent genetic testing in 2016 and was diagnosed with a rare genetic mutation of the phospholamban (PLN) gene in the heart. The condition occurs when the heart is missing an essential protein, making it pump harder and become enlarged. Ms Stolker's sister was also diagnosed with the rare condition and had to have a heart transplant. Ms Stolker said it was likely their father died from the same disease. Earlier this year, Ms Stolker and her husband discovered Levi was suffering from similar heart failure symptoms. Ms Stolker found out her son Levi had inherited the mutation. "I always hoped I would never have to go through it again with Levi … emotionally it's different when it's your own child," she said. Levi had experienced shortness of breath after a school hike, prompting a visit to the hospital where doctors told him he would need to be placed on the transplant list. "It was pretty scary, I was anxious, but I felt like I was more confident it would be fine after having two parents who were transplant patients," Levi said. Ms Stolker said the doctors gave them a timeframe of 12 to 18 months for a new heart. Luckily, it only took a fraction of that time. "We tried to suppress our emotions [during the wait], just so we could be there for Levi and support him," Ms Stolker said. After undergoing the lifesaving transplant in May, the 14-year-old is checking off recovery milestones quicker than anyone could have expected. A keen rugby union player, Levi hopes he'll be back on the football field as early as next month. "I love being active, getting around, playing sports and just getting amongst it all," he said. Mr Stolker knows all too well the experience of an organ transplant, not only from watching his wife and son go through it, but from his own experience having a kidney transplant in 2017. He had focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), which led to kidney failure and being placed on dialysis for six years. "My kidneys basically deteriorated over time … it might have been hereditary, it might have been because of a knock to the kidneys," he said. Mr Stolker said the entire family was incredibly grateful to the people who donated their organs and the medical staff who ensured they had successful transplants. Mr Stolker said the family wanted to raise awareness of the life-changing impact an organ donation could have and encourage Australians to be donors. The Stolkers are launching a rugby union match next month in Tamworth, with all the proceeds going towards Transplant Australia. Not-for-profit organ donation awareness organisation DonateLife said just a small conversation could lead to amazing stories like the Stolker family's. "On average, 50 people a year will die whilst waiting on the transplant list," said Juliana Celcer, DonateLife's director of nursing. She encouraged people to have a conversation with their family about becoming an organ donor. When a family member is a registered donor, eight out of 10 families agree to donation.

NT Police urged to prioritise mental health screenings: Inquest into constable's death
NT Police urged to prioritise mental health screenings: Inquest into constable's death

ABC News

time4 hours ago

  • ABC News

NT Police urged to prioritise mental health screenings: Inquest into constable's death

Warning: This story contains references to suicide and self-harm and will be distressing for some readers. An expert in trauma and suicide has urged the Northern Territory Police Force to conduct yearly mental health screenings, telling a coronial inquest into the death of a veteran officer that better checks would likely have flagged him as an "officer at risk". At 44 years old, after more than two decades on the front line and stints in remote communities, Constable Michael Deutrom took his own life in April 2022, devastating colleagues and casting a stark light on the toll long years in the service could take. His death was one of three NT police suicide deaths in the first half of 2022. Earlier in the inquest, which began in May, the coroner heard Constable Deutrom was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression around the time of his death — after years of exposure to traumatic jobs, false allegations of sexual assault against him and anxiety over losing his job. On Friday, when the inquest continued in the Darwin Local Court, it was heard that while working in the NT remote community of Kintore, Constable Deutrom had reported he was sleeping just three hours a night, was "virtually on call 24 hours a day" and was burnt out and feeling isolated. A year before his death in 2022, he and a colleague submitted an incident report to the NT Police Force (NTPF) stating that crime in the community was "starting to take its toll" and that he was having "adverse mental wellbeing effects" — triggering the NTPF Support and Wellbeing Unit to reach out. According to court documents, Constable Deutrom was referred to an outside psychologist in Darwin and attended "two or three" sessions. However, PTSD expert Professor Alexander McFarlane testified on Friday that Constable Deutrom had likely been grappling with underlying mental health issues for far longer than recognised, which underscored the need for routine psychological screening within the NTPF. In particular, Professor McFarlane emphasised the importance of support both before and after deployment to a remote community, where isolation was especially acute. The NTPF currently employs a single clinical psychologist, supplemented by a team of social workers and counsellors. But the court heard that level of resourcing was inadequate to meet the mental health screening and support needs of the force. Speaking outside court, Nathan Finn, the president of the Northern Territory Police Association, said that while NTPF policy called for officers to undergo an annual "well check", he had not received a single one during his more than two decades on the front line. He said that despite grappling with his own job-related trauma, he was never offered a mental health check-up, and fear of being seen as unfit for duty kept him from seeking help on his own. Above all, he said, the stigma surrounding mental health was deeply entrenched during his tenure and remained "alive and well" in the force today. During his testimony, Professor McFarlane told the court that — while the police force started off with an "unusually healthy group of people", after many are ruled out during the initial screening process — police officers who worked more than 10 years were almost twice as likely to experience psychological distress, and six times more likely to experience symptoms of PTSD. He said police officers were often symptomatic for "some time" before they simply could not function but, because the job typically attracted people who "naturally walk towards danger" and pride themselves on their ability to function, they often minimised health problems. He said that given the duration of Constable Deutrom's service and exposure to traumatic jobs, the NTPF should have taken his incident report more seriously. "There were other facts in his records … that would have pointed to him potentially being an officer at risk," Professor McFarlane told the court. "If an officer was significantly depressed and had suicidal ideation, I think that's a circumstance where a psychiatrist should immediately be involved. The court heard that numerous reports on suicide prevention had been handed down over the years — including the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide, which last year recommended improved access to timely and quality mental health screenings — yet rates of police suicide had doubled across all Australian jurisdictions over the past eight years. When asked why the rates had continued to climb, Professor McFarlane told the court that the Productivity Commission had uncovered a range of "bureaucratic inefficiencies". "Often there is more than enough information to know about problems, but bureaucratic organisations are essentially very bad at … effectively implementing the necessary systems of care," he said. On top of urging the introduction of routine mental health screenings, Professor McFarlane recommended that officers serving six-month stints in remote communities receive a minimum of three weeks' leave, comparable to the periods defence force personnel receive after overseas deployments. The inquest continues this month.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store