logo
Maresca questions US hosting Club World Cup

Maresca questions US hosting Club World Cup

Yahoo5 hours ago

When asked how the one-hour-53-minute stoppage impacted Chelsea's match against Benfica in the Club World Cup, Enzo Maresca's response was: "This is not football."
The manager seemed to question whether the US was a suitable host for Fifa competitions, like the Club World Cup, one year before the 2026 World Cup is hosted across North America.
Advertisement
Chelsea may have defeated Benfica 4-1 to qualify for the quarter-finals, but the match was the sixth to be suspended because of seasonal summer thunderstorms.
A near two-hour delay looked like it might cost Chelsea, who had not conceded a shot on target and went ahead through Reece James's inventive free-kick, a match they looked set to win.
"For 85 minutes we were in control of the game. We didn't concede anything; we created chances enough to win the game. And then after the break the game changed completely," Maresca said while referring to a shift in momentum in which Angel di Maria equalised from the penalty spot.
"For me personally, it's not football. You cannot be inside for two hours. It is something completely new. I can understand that for security reasons, you are to suspend the game. But if you suspend six, seven games that means that probably is not the right place to do this competition."
Advertisement
Players, staff and supporters were immediately pulled indoors because of extreme weather, in this case because thunderstorms were detected within an eight-mile radius of the venue, in line with US safety regulations.
Chelsea regained control in extra time when Benfica youngster Gianluca Prestianni was sent off, allowing Christopher Nkunku, Pedro Neto and Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall to ensure victory in a match that lasted four hours 38 minute from the opening to final whistle.
When asked to clarify where specifically his anger was aimed, Maresca added: "This is a fantastic competition. The Club World Cup is top; we are happy to be in the last eight.
"It's not normal to suspend a game. In a World Cup, how many games are suspended? Probably zero. In Europe, how many games? Zero."
How Chelsea coped with the stoppage
Chelsea players Marc Cucurella, Levi Colwill and Tosin Adarabioyo were furious when pulled off the pitch - as was Maresca - having been on course to win with only five minutes of normal time remaining.
Advertisement
After re-entering the operations and dressing room area, players took turns to cycle on exercise bikes to keep their muscles warm and did kick-ups to stay fresh at the Bank of America Stadium.
Maresca explained the mood and why it impacted performance, adding: "So two hours inside - people speak with the family outside [to check] if they were good with the security. People eating, laughing, talking on their mobiles. It was two hours. That's why I said it's not football."
James added: "It was quite disruptive when you're in the flow of the game. Lots of substitutions - trying to get warm and stay warm. It was difficult and the climate was very hot and humid."
A senior Chelsea official admitted to confusion and relief around the senior staff after the match.
Is US in the summer suitable?
This was the second longest stoppage of the tournament, with Benfica having had another two-hour stoppage delaying the start of their match against Auckland City.
Advertisement
There have been six similar stoppages in five different cities, including Mamelodi Sundowns against Ulsan HD, which also happened in Orlando, because of heavy rain and storms.
And there were long pauses in the second half of Palmeiras v Al-Ahly in New Jersey (40 minutes), Salzburg v Pachuca in Cincinnati (90 minutes) and Boca Juniors v Auckland City in Nashville (50 minutes).
Chelsea are also one of many teams to fall victim to extreme heat. Maresca said it was "impossible" to conduct a normal training session at their previous base in Philadelphia.
Some of the best stadiums in the US and Canada have roofs, like Atlanta's Mercedes-Benz Stadium, but many do not.
Advertisement
Atlanta is the only ground selected with such a covered roof in the Club World Cup but further stadiums in Vancouver, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles and Toronto are covered for next summer's World Cup.
However, that tournament has been expanded to 48 teams, meaning these events will likely happen next summer.
Possible solutions could include moving the World Cup to winter months, as Qatar did in 2022, but severe cold is also an issue in parts of the US and Canada.
Head of Fifa's technical study group Arsene Wenger addressed stoppages from its base in Miami.
He said: "It's not ideal, I agree, because you want the flow of the game from the first to the last minute but, as well, when you organise a competition you have [to put] security first."
Advertisement
Fifa also issued a statement at the time of the incident which read: "Due to adverse weather conditions in Charlotte, including the risk of lightning in the vicinity of Bank of America Stadium, the Fifa Club World Cup match between SL Benfica and Chelsea FC has been suspended. Fifa will follow the established safety protocols, and the match will resume as soon as it's safe to do so."
Fifa was asked for a response to Maresca's comments.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Report – Genoa Interested In Signing Inter Milan & Argentina Star On Loan
Report – Genoa Interested In Signing Inter Milan & Argentina Star On Loan

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Report – Genoa Interested In Signing Inter Milan & Argentina Star On Loan

Genoa are reportedly interested in signing young Inter Milan and Argentina attacking midfielder Valentin Carboni on loan. This according to today's print edition of Turin-based newspaper Tuttosport, via FCInter1908. Advertisement Inter Milan attacking midfielder Valentin Carboni is currently back at the Nerazzurri. The 20-year-old is part of the Inter squad at the Club World Cup. Carboni has fully recovered from an ACL tear that he suffered in October. That injury had ruled him out of the majority of last season. The Argentine had initially joined Marseille on loan last summer. Reportedly, the French club had a purchase option, whilst Inter had a buyback option. However, the ACL injury completely disrupted any progress Carboni had been making. Genoa Interested In Inter Midfielder Valentin Carboni On Loan MONZA, ITALY – OCTOBER 29: Valentin Carboni of AC Monza gestures during the Serie A TIM match between AC Monza and Udinese Calcio at U-Power Stadium on October 29, 2023 in Monza, Italy. (Photo by) Now the question is whether Carboni will go on loan again, or stay at Inter. Advertisement The Argentine has made appearances at the Club World Cup. And he in fact scored the winner in stoppage time against Urawa Red Diamonds, his first senior goal for Inter. Therefore, it seems entirely possible that Cristin Chivu will give Valentin Carboni his chance next season. But on the other hand, it could also be another loan out for Carboni, who spent the 2023-24 season on loan with Monza. And according to Tuttosport, Genoa are keen on the 20-year-old's signature this summer.

Would the Commanders be an ideal fit for T.J. Watt if he and Steelers can't reach a deal?
Would the Commanders be an ideal fit for T.J. Watt if he and Steelers can't reach a deal?

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Would the Commanders be an ideal fit for T.J. Watt if he and Steelers can't reach a deal?

One of the biggest needs over the offseason for the Washington Commanders was finding a true edge rusher. They brought in Javon Kinlaw and Deatrich Wise Jr., and while they are both capable defenders, the Commanders lack a true game-changing edge rusher. You know, someone like T.J. Watt. Watt becomes a free agent in 2026, but he'd like an extension before that, so he has not participated in any offseason workouts to date for the Pittsburgh Steelers. Similar to the Commanders' situation with Terry McLaurin, both the Steelers and Watt want to see a deal done. In the event that doesn't happen, though, Fox Sports named the Commanders a potential landing spot for the veteran linebacker. Pittsburgh Steelers edge T.J. Watt: Washington CommandersAgain, I'm not buying that the Steelers would do this. Watt is an iconic piece of that franchise — and that word carries weight in Pittsburgh. Furthermore, even with Aaron Rodgers at quarterback, the Steelers' hopes of accomplishing anything this season will still rest on their defense. Advertisement Then, the author suggests trading away one of the Commanders' most loyal players: Scary Terry. Why not indulge one delusional fantasy with another? If Washington were to trade Terry McLaurin, they'd be opening some financial wiggle room to add another lucrative player. They could get at least two, if not three, years of play out of Watt before they have to worry about extending Jayden Daniels. They definitely need the pass rush help. Watt would give Dan Quinn a blue chip player, which he doesn't really have right now, on his Commanders' defense. Adding him to a pass rush that currently includes Frankie Luvu, Dorance Armstrong, Deatrich Wise and Clelin Ferrell would upgrade the Washington pass rush from "so-so" to outright dangerous. Sure, maybe it's a mixed message to hinder the offense by trading McLaurin only to add T.J. Watt. But, with all due respect to Scary Terry, I think it's a bit harder to find a DPOY-level edge rusher than an All-Pro caliber receiver in today's NFL. It doesn't just hinder the offense to trade McLaurin, it hinders Jayden Daniels' development, which is far more important than any pass rusher. Adding T.J. Watt will deplete the Commanders' remaining cap space and require additional financial adjustments to make it happen. But let's be real, letting McLaurin go is not an option the Commanders want to take. Besides, everyone knows Watt isn't leaving Pittsburgh, and McLaurin isn't leaving Washington. Most likely. This article originally appeared on Commanders Wire: Commanders named landing spot for T.J. Watt if Steelers moved him

Crystal Palace or Liverpool? Inside Guehi's intriguing summer
Crystal Palace or Liverpool? Inside Guehi's intriguing summer

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Crystal Palace or Liverpool? Inside Guehi's intriguing summer

Palace signed Marc Guehi, then aged 21, from Chelsea in 2021 for a reported £18m [Getty Images] Marc Guehi officially enters the final 12 months of his Crystal Palace contract on Tuesday and interest is building. It's not often a player of his standing, an England international, enters such a zone of ambiguity. Advertisement As you'd imagine, there are a number of teams keen on taking advantage of the situation. But there is one club who appear to be emerging as strong contenders for the centre-back. BBC Sport reported this month that Liverpool were among the teams interested in signing the 24-year-old. However, there are various factors that will prove crucial in whether Liverpool take steps to formalise their interest. Here's what could make or break a deal that could become one of the most eye-catching of the summer transfer window. Delicacy of whether the price is right Palace's valuation of a player who can leave for nothing next summer will be pivotal. Advertisement If Liverpool don't view Guehi's price as reasonable, don't be surprised to see them park their interest for 12 months and look to strike a free-transfer agreement. But what represents a reasonable price? For a clue, we should look back to last year when Palace rejected multiple offers from Newcastle - the last of which was worth £65m. Common sense dictates the fee this summer will be lower give the looming contract expiry. But how much lower? There is no official word on what Palace would be prepared to accept for their skipper. They've got to balance it all against the prospect of having Guehi in the heart of their defence next season, and helping them remain competitive in the Premier League. Advertisement There have been indications, though, that the south London club may be willing accept a deal worth between £40m and £45m. The issue, however, would be whether Liverpool see it that way. Liverpool's preferred profile for a centre-back in recent years has been younger than the Palace centre-back. In 2023 they were interested in Levi Colwill, who was 20 at the time. Last summer Liverpool were in for 18-year-old Leny Yoro, who eventually joined Manchester United. Prior to their interest in Guehi this summer they explored a move for Dean Huijsen, 19. With that in mind, Liverpool will be looking for what they judge as value to change their approach. Advertisement With Liverpool set to sell centre-back Jarell Quansah to Bayer Leverkusen in a deal worth up to £35m, there is logic to the thought the Merseysiders could aim to break even in any formal bid for Guehi. Perhaps they'd be willing to pay a little extra over the money they recoup for Quansah - but not by much. It's a delicate balance. If Palace value Guehi at a price the Premier League champions deem fair, and Liverpool enter the discussions at a figure the Londoners don't perceive as 'low-balling', then that could open the door towards a successful and amicable negotiation. With that in mind, the first point of formal contact between clubs will likely be crucial towards whether Guehi ends up at Anfield. First-team opportunities and England are key Even if Palace and Liverpool can agree a fee for Guehi, there remains the question as to whether he plays regularly under Arne Slot. Advertisement Virgil van Dijk and Ibrahima Konate formed a formidable central defensive duo last season as Slot's side lifted the Premier League title. But with Konate's future unclear given he is also entering the final 12 months of his contract, the interest in Guehi adds a further layer of intrigue. Would Guehi be interested in a move to Anfield? That's a no-brainer. Liverpool are one of the most exciting projects in European football. Their summer recruitment, including the £116m acquisition of Florian Wirtz, accentuates their allure. But the reality isn't a simple 'yes' or 'no' answer. For Guehi, the environment he steps into has to be agreeable. Advertisement You'd imagine Guehi would like some level of indication of his role in Slot's plans before he gives serious consideration to a move north. He is a regular for Palace and is their captain. With European football - pending Uefa's multi-club ownership investigation - to look forward to with Palace and the prospect of joining Liverpool or another leading European club on a free transfer next season, seeing out his contract has its attractions. But so does joining Liverpool - provided he plays. You'd imagine Guehi's international aspirations will be a factor in his final decision, too, particularly in a World Cup year. Advertisement This time last year Guehi was emerging as one of England's stars of Euro 2024. Fast forward 12 months and there is less certainty regarding his international future. Sir Gareth Southgate has left, Lee Carsley has returned to the Under-21s and Thomas Tuchel is in charge. There's some ambiguity surrounding Guehi's place in Tuchel's set-up. With that in mind, you'd imagine a successful season at Liverpool - and his first steps in the Champions League - could help solidify his place in England's plans before the 2026 World Cup. But if Guehi is left with the impression that he'll spend the season playing second fiddle to Van Dijk and Konate, then the transfer may hit an unsurmountable obstacle. Who could rival Liverpool's interest? If the price is right for all parties, and circumstances acceptable for Guehi, then a switch to Anfield has a good chance of gathering momentum. Advertisement Of course, Palace - if there is no prospect of extending Guehi's current deal - will hope for interest from other clubs to maximise their selling power. There are certainly other sides monitoring Guehi. Arsenal, for instance, have a concrete interest in the centre-back. But the Van Dijk-Konate conundrum would, arguably, be even more complex at Emirates Stadium with William Saliba and Gabriel in possession of the shirts in central defence. Arsenal have made initial enquiries into a potential move for Guehi but have now turned their attentions to Valencia centre-back Cristhian Mosquera. Tottenham tried and failed to sign Guehi during the final hours of the January window and retain an interest. Advertisement Chelsea, who have a 20% sell-on clause for Guehi's new transfer, also explored the possibility of luring their former academy player back to Stamford Bridge in the winter. Then there's Newcastle, who remain keen on trying to complete a deal that they so agonisingly failed to get over the line last summer. But when the champions come knocking it's hard to turn a blind eye - this year or next.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store