Trump letting in white South Africans into U.S. draws backlash
The Trump administration's decision to grant refugee status to 59 white South Africans is causing controversy among immigrant communities and civil rights advocates.
Critics argue that there is no genocide against white people in South Africa, and the decision reflects hypocrisy and racism.
Supporters of President Trump defend the decision, while others call for kindness and equality regardless of skin color.
At Spice Salon, a beauty shop in Mid-City Los Angeles, the chatter isn't about haircuts — it's about headlines.
"Every client that comes in, that's all they talk about," said Kehinde Ololade, the owner of Spice Salon and a Nigerian immigrant.
The focus of the conversation: the Trump Administration's move to grant refugee status to 59 white South Africans. The decision is drawing sharp criticism from immigrant communities and civil rights advocates alike.
"It's hypocrisy mixed with a nice cup of racism," said a woman getting her hair styled at the salon.
Hair stylist Terry Holloway added, "I think it's very unfair that he wants to deport other people, but wants to bring in others... that doesn't make any sense to me."
When pressed by reporters about why this group is being welcomed while others fleeing war and famine from places like Sudan and the Congo are being turned away, President Trump defended the decision.
"It's a genocide that's taking place that you people don't want to write about," Trump said. "But it's a terrible thing, farmers are being killed... they happen to be white."
But immigration advocates and fact-checkers say that claim doesn't hold up. Nana Gyamfi, executive director of the Black Alliance for Just Immigration, pushed back strongly.
"There is no genocide going on against white people in South Africa — there never has been," she said. "Some white South Africans may be struggling to adjust to the changes since the end of apartheid, but that doesn't mean they're being persecuted. No, they can no longer enslave Africans and live the way they did during apartheid — that doesn't qualify them for refugee status, which has very specific criteria. And they absolutely do not qualify."
Still, supporters of the president are defending his decision. Roxanne Hoge, chair of the Los Angeles County Republican Party, said: "There comes a time when you realize everything President Trump does is going to be roundly criticized by the usual suspects. Immigration is the purview of the federal government, and President Trump is doing what he believes is best for Americans."
Back at Spice Salon, owner Ololade has this message for the president: "I would tell him to be kind to everyone. Regardless of their skin color, whether they're disabled, whether they have or they don't — just be kind."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Epstein scandal erupts on Trump live on Fox! MSNBC Breakdown
There are new signs of broad dissatisfaction from voters about how President Trump is handling the ongoing Epstein scandal. Republicans are also warning that Trump is in treacherous political territory. MSNBC's Ari Melber reports and is joined by The New York Times' Michelle Goldberg. (Subscribe to Ari's YouTube now:

an hour ago
Ex-Trump prosecutor Jack Smith faces investigation by independent political watchdog
BRIDGEWATER, N.J. -- BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — An independent watchdog agency responsible for enforcing a law against partisan political activity by federal employees has opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the Justice Department special counsel who brought two criminal cases against then-candidate Donald Trump before his election to the White House last year. The Office of Special Counsel confirmed Saturday that it was investigating Smith on allegations he engaged in political activity through his inquiries into Trump. Smith was named special counsel by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland in November 2022 and his special counsel title is entirely distinct from the agency now investigating him. The office has no criminal enforcement power but does have the authority to impose fines and other sanctions for violations. It was not clear what basis exists to contend that Smith's investigations were political in nature or that he violated the Hatch Act, a federal law that bans certain public officials from engaging in political activity. Sen. Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican, had earlier this week encouraged the office to scrutinize Smith's activities and had alleged that his conduct was designed to help then-President Joe Biden and his vice president Kamala Harris, both Democrats. Smith brought two cases against Trump, one accusing him of conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and the other of hoarding classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. Both were brought in 2023, well over a year before the 2024 presidential election, and indictments in the two cases cited what Smith and his team described as clear violations of well-established federal law. Garland has repeatedly said politics played no part in the handling of the cases. Both cases were abandoned by Smith after Trump's November win, with the prosecutor citing longstanding Justice Department policy prohibiting the indictment of a sitting president. There was no immediate indication that the same office investigating Smith had opened investigations into the Justice Department special counsels who were appointed by Garland to investigate Biden and his son Hunter. The White House had no immediate comment on the investigation into Smith, which was first reported by The New York Post. The office has been riven by leadership tumult over the last year. An earlier chief, Hampton Dellinger, was abruptly fired by the Trump administration and initially sued to get his job back before abandoning the court fight. Trump selected as his replacement Paul Ingrassia, a former right-wing podcast host who has praised criminally charged influencer Andrew Tate as a 'extraordinary human being' and promoted the false claim that the 2020 election was rigged. A Senate panel was set to consider his nomination at a hearing last month, but it was pulled from the agenda. Trump's trade representative, Jamieson Greer, is serving as acting head of the office. ___


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Trump, Murdoch agree to pause WSJ case deposition until after dismissal ruling
President Trump and Rupert Murdoch reached a deal Monday to postpone the media mogul's deposition in a libel lawsuit related to the Wall Street Journal publishing a report on an Epstein birthday book, per court filings. Why it matters: Trump's lawyers had raised concerns about Murdoch's age and health when they asked a federal court in Florida last week to expedite the 94-year-old's deposition, but the deal postpones this until after the outlet's upcoming motion to dismiss the case. Now, neither Murdoch nor the 79-year-old Trump are likely to be deposed for months, per Politico's Josh Gerstein, who first reported on Monday's filing in Miami. Zoom in: "Until Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is adjudicated, the Parties agree not to engage in discovery," according to the filing. If the WSJ's motion to dismiss Trump's lawsuit is denied, Murdoch would appear in person for a deposition within 30 days of such a ruling. Murdoch must provide a sworn declaration about his current health condition within three days of a court order approving the agreement and the Australian-born mogul has agreed to provide regular updates on his health, per the filing. Driving the news: Trump is suing Murdoch, the WSJ, its owner Dow Jones, its parent company News Corp. and others over the Journal report last month about a " bawdy" birthday letter" that the outlet said bore the president's name.