India Trade Pact Nears, US Beef Floods In--What Investors Should Watch Next
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with TSN.
That optimism is surfacing just as India finalizes a major agreement with the UK and bilateral trade with Australia hits nearly A$50 billion ($32.9 billion) in 2023. Farrell said the structure of a final deal with India is likely to be incremental, owing to political realities on both sides. Still, with Canberra actively seeking to diversify away from Chinaits top trading partnera more comprehensive agreement with India could be a meaningful next step. For investors eyeing agri-exporters, particularly in grains and dairy, the next phase of negotiations could shape longer-term access to one of the world's fastest-growing consumer markets.
In a separate move with potential ripple effects, Australia just lifted all remaining restrictions on US beef importsa long-standing ask from the Trump administration. The announcement triggered a celebratory post from President Trump on TruthSocial, but Farrell was quick to tamp down the political narrative, stating the decision was based on science and years of internal review. We haven't done this to win favorwe think the Americans should trade with us anyway, he said. Whether this opens the door to a broader trade pact with the US remains to be seen, but the development is unlikely to go unnoticed by investors in US meat giants like Tyson Foods (NYSE:TSN) or Brazil's JBS, both of which could stand to benefit from expanded market access.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Do NRW Holdings' (ASX:NWH) Earnings Warrant Your Attention?
The excitement of investing in a company that can reverse its fortunes is a big draw for some speculators, so even companies that have no revenue, no profit, and a record of falling short, can manage to find investors. Sometimes these stories can cloud the minds of investors, leading them to invest with their emotions rather than on the merit of good company fundamentals. Loss making companies can act like a sponge for capital - so investors should be cautious that they're not throwing good money after bad. In contrast to all that, many investors prefer to focus on companies like NRW Holdings (ASX:NWH), which has not only revenues, but also profits. While profit isn't the sole metric that should be considered when investing, it's worth recognising businesses that can consistently produce it. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. How Quickly Is NRW Holdings Increasing Earnings Per Share? Generally, companies experiencing growth in earnings per share (EPS) should see similar trends in share price. So it makes sense that experienced investors pay close attention to company EPS when undertaking investment research. It certainly is nice to see that NRW Holdings has managed to grow EPS by 17% per year over three years. If growth like this continues on into the future, then shareholders will have plenty to smile about. One way to double-check a company's growth is to look at how its revenue, and earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) margins are changing. EBIT margins for NRW Holdings remained fairly unchanged over the last year, however the company should be pleased to report its revenue growth for the period of 14% to AU$3.1b. That's encouraging news for the company! The chart below shows how the company's bottom and top lines have progressed over time. Click on the chart to see the exact numbers. View our latest analysis for NRW Holdings Of course the knack is to find stocks that have their best days in the future, not in the past. You could base your opinion on past performance, of course, but you may also want to check this interactive graph of professional analyst EPS forecasts for NRW Holdings. Are NRW Holdings Insiders Aligned With All Shareholders? Insider interest in a company always sparks a bit of intrigue and many investors are on the lookout for companies where insiders are putting their money where their mouth is. This view is based on the possibility that stock purchases signal bullishness on behalf of the buyer. However, insiders are sometimes wrong, and we don't know the exact thinking behind their acquisitions. In the last twelve months NRW Holdings insiders spent AU$46k on stock; good news for shareholders. While this isn't much, we also note an absence of sales. On top of the insider buying, it's good to see that NRW Holdings insiders have a valuable investment in the business. Given insiders own a significant chunk of shares, currently valued at AU$88m, they have plenty of motivation to push the business to succeed. This would indicate that the goals of shareholders and management are one and the same. Does NRW Holdings Deserve A Spot On Your Watchlist? If you believe that share price follows earnings per share you should definitely be delving further into NRW Holdings' strong EPS growth. Not only that, but we can see that insiders both own a lot of, and are buying more shares in the company. Astute investors will want to keep this stock on watch. It is worth noting though that we have found 1 warning sign for NRW Holdings that you need to take into consideration. The good news is that NRW Holdings is not the only stock with insider buying. Here's a list of small cap, undervalued companies in AU with insider buying in the last three months! Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US-EU trade deal wards off further escalation but will raise costs for companies, consumers
FRANKFURT, Germany (AP) — President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen have announced a sweeping trade deal that imposes 15% tariffs on most European goods, warding off Trump's threat of a 30% rate if no deal had been reached by Aug. 1. The tariffs, or import taxes, paid when Americans buy European products could raise prices for U.S. consumers and dent profits for European companies and their partners who bring goods into the country. Here are some things to know about the trade deal between the United States and the European Union: What's in the agreement? Trump and von der Leyen's announcement, made during Trump's visit to one of his golf courses in Scotland, leaves many details to be filled in. The headline figure is a 15% tariff rate on 'the vast majority' of European goods brought into the U.S., including cars, computer chips and pharmaceuticals. It's lower than the 20% Trump initially proposed, and lower than his threats of 50% and then 30%. Von der Leyen said the two sides agreed on zero tariffs on both sides for a range of 'strategic' goods: Aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, and some natural resources and critical raw materials. Specifics were lacking. She said the two sides 'would keep working' to add more products to the list. Additionally, the EU side would purchase what Trump said was $750 billion (638 billion euros) worth of natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel to replace Russian energy supplies, and Europeans would invest an additional $600 billion (511 billion euros) in the U.S. What's not in the deal? Trump said the 50% U.S. tariff on imported steel would remain; von der Leyen said the two sides agreed to further negotiations to fight a global steel glut, reduce tariffs and establish import quotas — that is, set amounts that can be imported, often at a lower rate. Trump said pharmaceuticals were not included in the deal. Von der Leyen said the pharmaceuticals issue was 'on a separate sheet of paper' from Sunday's deal. Where the $600 billion for additional investment would come from was not specified. And von der Leyen said that when it came to farm products, the EU side made clear that 'there were tariffs that could not be lowered,' without specifying which products. What's the impact? The 15% rate removes Trump's threat of a 30% tariff. It's still much higher than the average tariff before Trump came into office of around 1%, and higher than Trump's minimum 10% baseline tariff. Higher tariffs, or import taxes, on European goods mean sellers in the U.S. would have to either increase prices for consumers — risking loss of market share — or swallow the added cost in terms of lower profits. The higher tariffs are expected to hurt export earnings for European firms and slow the economy. The 10% baseline applied while the deal was negotiated was already sufficiently high to make the European Union's executive commission cut its growth forecast for this year from 1.3% to 0.9%. Von der Leyen said the 15% rate was 'the best we could do' and credited the deal with maintaining access to the U.S. market and providing 'stability and predictability for companies on both sides.' What is some of the reaction to the deal? German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal which avoided 'an unnecessary escalation in transatlantic trade relations" and said that 'we were able to preserve our core interests,' while adding that 'I would have very much wished for further relief in transatlantic trade.' The Federation of German Industries was blunter. "Even a 15% tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry," said Wolfgang Niedermark, a member of the federation's leadership. While the rate is lower than threatened, "the big caveat to today's deal is that there is nothing on paper, yet," said Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macro at ING bank. 'With this disclaimer in mind and at face value, today's agreement would clearly bring an end to the uncertainty of recent months. An escalation of the US-EU trade tensions would have been a severe risk for the global economy," Brzeski said. 'This risk seems to have been avoided.' What about car companies? Asked if European carmakers could still sell cars at 15%, von der Leyen said the rate was much lower than the current 27.5%. That has been the rate under Trump's 25% tariff on cars from all countries, plus the preexisting U.S. car tariff of 2.5%. The impact is likely to be substantial on some companies, given that automaker Volkswagen said it suffered a 1.3 billion euro ($1.5 billion) hit to profit in the first half of the year from the higher tariffs. Mercedes-Benz dealers in the U.S. have said they are holding the line on 2025 model year prices 'until further notice.' The German automaker has a partial tariff shield because it makes 35% of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the U.S. in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, but the company said it expects prices to undergo 'significant increases' in coming years. What were the issues dividing the two sides? Before Trump returned to office, the U.S. and the EU maintained generally low tariff levels in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, with some 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in annual trade. Together the U.S. and the EU have 44% of the global economy. The U.S. rate averaged 1.47% for European goods, while the EU's averaged 1.35% for American products, according to the Bruegel think tank in Brussels. Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more from European businesses than the other way around, and has said the European market is not open enough for U.S.-made cars. However, American companies fill some of the trade gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services. And some 30% of European imports are from American-owned companies, according to the European Central Bank. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Terrifying super reality facing 4.3 million Aussies: 'Underprepared'
Millions of Australians are facing a bleak retirement, as they don't have enough savings to support a comfortable life. New data from Finder has found that many will be forced to work well into their 60s and 70s to build up their nest eggs before they can finally enjoy their twilight years. The consumer group discovered 20 per cent, equivalent to 4.3 million people, said their superannuation won't fully fund their retirement dreams. A further 20 per cent said they'll only be able to get by later in life if they cut back on their spending now. Some Aussies could have an even shakier financial future in retirement if they haven't paid off their mortgage or they are renting, which can be at the whim of price hikes. Finance expert Ben Nash told Yahoo Finance there are two main things you can do now to ensure you have the biggest nest egg possible. RELATED Top 10 superannuation funds revealed as Aussies receive 'double-digit' returns Major warning after Aussie receives random $350 payment in her bank account Aussie 'appalled' by $4,000 ATO tax bill after common deductions rejected How can I grow my superannuation balance now? Nash said a quick health check on your account should be your first port of call. "Make sure your super is in a good fund with good investments," he said. "You want the money to be working hard for you, and not just for your super company. "There are a lot of great super funds out there these days that can be far cheaper, better options for the majority of people... you don't need a self-managed super fund (SMSF) to get great performance."You can log in to your superannuation account to see where your money is invested and some funds have financial advisors who can guide you into an arrangement that suits your age and risk appetite. myGov also has a handy tool that allows you to compare your super fund with others in the market, which can give you a broad look at how your money might perform. Nash added that if you're worried about being behind on your super balance, you can make additional contributions with your spare cash. Say you had $60,000 in your super right now, and contributed just $10 per week to your account. Over 20 years, you would have contributed $10,400. But thanks to compound interest, your super account would have been boosted by $319,091, based on a 9 per cent rate of return and monthly compounding. The Pivot Wealth founder said you should chat to a financial advisor to see if additional super contributions to your employer's would be a good idea for your circumstances. How much super do I need for a comfortable retirement? This figure can differ depending on who you ask, but the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (AFSA) suggested it's $595,000 for singles, and $690,000 for couples. The Association said if you live a modest life as a single person, you'd need around $33,386 per year. That goes up to $52,383 if you want a comfortable retirement. For couples, a modest retirement would require $48,184 per year, while comfortable twilight years would need $73,875 per year. According to data from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), the average Aussie has just $172,835 in their super account at the moment. The median, which can be a much better snapshot because it takes out the highest and lowest performers, super account balance was $60,037. Pascale Helyar-Moray, Finder's superannuation literacy expert, said it's worth doing everything you can while you're working to ensure your nest egg will get you through retirement. She said if you don't, it could be a dire future ahead for many. 'More and more people are worried that retirement will arrive before the money does, leaving them underprepared," she said. 'Super earnings below $30,000 are taxed at a maximum of just 15 per cent, which means salary sacrificing into super could help grow your wealth while also lowering your tax. 'You won't be able to access your super until retirement, so it's wise to ease into it – $100 a month may not sound like much, but it can make a real impact over time.' Some who don't have enough in their super might be forced to apply for the Age Pension to get by. However, Helyar-Moray said you shouldn't bank on this as your ticket to financial freedom. "The Age Pension isn't guaranteed – your assets could disqualify you from receiving it," she said.
