Najib denies liability in SRC US$1.1b suit, blames board for fund misuse
Najib's counsel Muhammad Farhan Muhammad Shafee said Najib gave no operative instructions regarding the transfers of SRC International monies into specific fiduciary funds.
Muhammad Farhan argued that, at best, Najib merely chose the financial institution, which at that time was known to be reputable.
He said this in his submission at the close of the defendant's case in SRC International's US$1.18 billion civil suit against Najib and former SRC chief executive Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil, who is currently at large.
'If misappropriation occurred, it was due to the board's own decisions (or dereliction thereof) as even taking the purported instructions of the first defendant at its highest, he ultimately vested responsibility to the board to properly manage the funds (even if it were within the parameters of his directions).'
Muhammad Farhan said the entire chain of events – from SRC International sending RM1.8 billion to SRC BVI to placing them in so-called intermediaries and later moving them to various entities linked to Malaysian businessman-turned-fugitive Jho Low – were carried out by former company chief executive Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil, Low, and former company director Datuk Suboh Md Yassin.
'The first defendant's name does not appear on any of the transactional documents authorising those movements.'
'If anything, Jho Low misrepresented having the first defendant's backing to persuade others, but no evidence shows the first defendant knowingly agreed to such misuse.'
'To take the plaintiff's narrative sets a dangerous precedent that anybody can use the name of the prime minister with impunity to get what they want and then unload all the liability on him,' Muhammad Farhan said.
He said should the court hold Najib liable in any way, the directors – who actually controlled the funds and breached duties – should indemnify him because in equity they are primarily liable for the loss.
'To absolve them would set that 'dangerous precedent' we mentioned, encouraging directors of GLCs to abdicate responsibility whenever a higher official is involved,' he said.
Imprisoned since 23 August 2022, Najib is serving a 12-year jail sentence and an RM210 million fine for his conviction over the misappropriation of RM42 million from SRC International, which has recently been reduced to six years of imprisonment and an RM50 million fine by the Pardons Board.
SRC, under new management, sued Najib and several former directors — Suboh, Datuk Mohammed Azhar Osman Khairuddin, Nik Faisal, Datuk Che Abdullah @ Rashidi Che Omar, Datuk Shahrol Azral Ibrahim Halmi, and Tan Sri Ismee Ismail — in May 2021.
However, five names were later removed from the suit, leaving Najib as the sole defendant.
Additionally, Najib has named the former directors of SRC International as third-party respondents.
SRC, as the plaintiff in the writ of summons, has alleged that Najib abused his power to obtain personal benefits from SRC International's funds and misappropriated these funds.
Najib served as SRC's Emeritus Adviser from 1 May 2012 until 4 March 2019.
Now wholly owned by the Ministry of Finance Incorporated (MoF Inc), SRC International is seeking general damages, exemplary damages, additional interest, costs, and other appropriate relief from the court.
The company seeks a declaration that Najib is liable for the company's losses due to his breach of duties and trust.
It is also seeking an order for Najib to pay US$1.18 billion in losses suffered, along with damages for breach of duties and trust, including an order for him to compensate the US$120 million that entered his bank account.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
7 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Give Anwar space to perform his constitutional duty
From Ibrahim M Ahmad The recent controversy surrounding delays in the appointment of a new chief justice and Court of Appeal president has landed Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim in some difficulty, with many accusing him of interfering with the affairs of the judiciary. Former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat retired on July 1, while ex-Court of Appeal president Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim followed suit one day later. Both retirements were mandated by law, subject only to a maximum six-month extension at the discretion of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, which was not exercised in their favour. Fingers pointed immediately at Anwar, accusing him of flushing out the judiciary for political gain. Last week, Chief Judge of Malaya Hasnah Hashim was appointed acting chief justice, and apex court judge Zabariah Yusof to the number two post. Both judges had their tenure extended earlier this year and are only stop-gap appointments. Hasnah is set to retire on Nov 15 this year, and Zabariah even earlier, on Oct 10. Meanwhile, Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Abdul Rahman Sebli retires on July 24, having already had his tenure extended. Two other senior Federal Court judges will also have to step down soon. Nallini Pathmanathan will turn 66 on Aug 22 this year, and will vacate her office unless her tenure is extended, while Hanipah Farikullah, whose tenure was extended earlier this year, will leave the bench on Nov 22. Of those who remain, Abu Bakar Jais turns 66 on June 27 next year, Lee Swee Seng (Nov 26, 2026), Rhodzariah Bujang (Nov 5, 2027), Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera (Jan 3, 2028), Nordin Hassan (July 13, 2028), and Ahmad Terrirudin Salleh (April 12, 2034). Given Tengku Maimun and Abang Iskandar's retirement and the impending loss of five judges, it would appear that the prime minister has a lot to answer for. Having said that, no one has expressed any disapproval of Hasnah's assumption of the top post, which occurred by operation of law, or her appointment of Zabariah as Court of Appeal president. Neither has Anwar interfered to block either of them from taking office. According to reports, Hasnah has acted swiftly, calling for an immediate meeting of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) last Friday. Even that appeared to raise the ire of some, claiming it violated the notice of meeting provision in Section 13 of the JAC Act 2009, again with insinuations that the prime minister was behind it. The outcome of that meeting has not been disclosed but obviously it would have involved the need to fill vacancies in all three superior courts. Between Jan 1 last year and now, the king has appointed four judges to the Federal Court, 10 to the Court of Appeal, 19 to the High Court, and five judicial commissioners, according to JAC records. As prescribed under Article 122B(1), all appointments were made on the advice of the prime minister. There were no complaints at the time that the JAC was idle. Clearly, it performed its statutory duty of vetting the candidates and recommending their appointment. Neither did anyone accuse the prime minister of impropriety or interference. Once again, the commission will have a lot to do this time round. After all, promotions to the apex court will result in vacancies in the Court of Appeal, which will have to be filled through promotions from the High Court, resulting in even more vacancies at the bottom tier. The primary gripe of many appears to be that Anwar had apparently dismissed recommendations made by the JAC for appointments to the judiciary's top posts during Tengku Maimun's tenure. Conspiracy theorists are also insinuating that Hasnah called for the meeting last week to 'revise' lists approved by the JAC under its previous chairmanship, purportedly on the instructions of the prime minister. Those who know Hasnah will attest she is incapable of that. But my question is more basic: Should Anwar even take the JAC's recommendations for the judiciary's top two positions? Article 122B(1) of the constitution states that all appointments to the top four positions in the judiciary and as judges of the superior courts are made by the king on the advice of the prime minister, and after consulting the Conference of Rulers. Article 122B(2) states: 'Before tendering his advice as to the appointment under clause (1) of a judge other than the chief justice of the Federal Court, the prime minister shall consult the chief justice.' In other words, the prime minister is not obliged to consult a sitting chief justice when considering who to appoint as successor. If that is the case, why should he be obliged to take recommendations from a commission chaired by the chief justice? Even if the sitting chief justice were to stand down, is it proper for the next in line, i.e. the Court of Appeal president or any other judge on the JAC, to helm the commission for the purpose of recommending the next chief justice? After all, they are all likely candidates for the office themselves. Those who remember the 1988 tribunal convened to investigate then lord president Salleh Abas will recall that this was precisely the cry of all and sundry when it was chaired by Hamid Omar, his eventual successor. Ultimately, although not established under the constitution, the JAC can recommend candidates to fill vacancies on the bench, but should not be recommending successors to the top four positions. Such appointments are the prerogative of the king, acting on the advice of the prime minister, who has the people's mandate. And, as controversial as it may sound, the people's mandate is just as important in the appointment of judges. There is no greater example now than in the US, where three Donald Trump appointees have turned a liberal Supreme Court into one that leans heavily in favour of his Make America Great Again agenda. For instance, one of the election promises Trump made during his first term was to overturn Roe v Wade (1973), a landmark ruling establishing a woman's right to abortion. His bench duly delivered on that promise in 2022, when he was out of office! Trump has also chosen to appoint younger judges, in the expectation that they will dominate the bench for years to come. But back to Anwar. Article 122B(2) says the prime minister must consult the chief justice in the appointment of the Court of Appeal president. Given that the Court of Appeal president retired one day after the chief justice, that consultation would have been futile. Yes, the prime minister could have acted earlier. Nobody knows his reasons for not doing so. However, the fact that so many judges were set to leave the judiciary within a short space of time was not down to him. The situation was not engineered by him, it was simply unavoidable. Calls for a royal commission of inquiry are premature, unfair and based entirely on conjecture. Opposition politicians are clearly pushing a political agenda in their attacks. The prime minister must be given a free hand, and space, to identify the right candidate to lead the judiciary on a permanent basis. That is his constitutional duty. But he must also get the right candidates for the top two posts before they are vacated. With Hasnah at the helm, the public should withhold its judgement at least until November, when she steps down. Ibrahim M Ahmad is an FMT reader. The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
The Sun
8 hours ago
- The Sun
Inflation likely to be under control
PETALING JAYA: Bank Negara Malaysia has reaffirmed that the impact of current and upcoming domestic policy reforms on inflation is expected to remain manageable – a view in line with analysts' estimates. OCBC Bank (Malaysia) Bhd global markets research & strategy senior Asean economist Lavanya Venkateswaran said even if the planned rationalisation of RON95 fuel takes effect in October 2025, with a potential price increase of 20–25%, the adjustment is projected to add only 0.5 percentage points to headline inflation, bringing it to around 2.0% for the year. She said this moderate level suggests that inflation will stay within a range that allows BNM to maintain a policy stance supportive of economic growth. 'Our GDP forecast for 2025 stands at 3.9% year-on-year, but we expect growth to slow sharply in the first half of the year to 3.6% from 4.3% if the 25% US tariffs are implemented on August 1 without any exemptions. 'We expect this to weigh on domestic demand, which has remained strong in the first half of 2025. 'With inflation likely to stay under control despite subsidy reforms and slower growth, we forecast that BNM will cut the policy rate by another 25 basis points – either at the Sept 4 or Nov 6 meeting – bringing it down to 2.50% by the end of 2025,' Lavanya said in a report. Meanwhile, BNM has stated that it will continue to take proactive steps to support the country's economic momentum as global growth shows signs of steady expansion. At its latest meeting, the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) decided to cut the Overnight Policy Rate (OPR) by 25 basis points to 2.75% yesterday, aiming to create a more supportive monetary environment. The ceiling and floor rates of the OPR corridor have also been adjusted to 3.00% and 2.50% respectively. The central bank said the decision reflects an effort to sustain domestic economic resilience, in line with global trends showing continued growth – largely driven by strong consumer spending and, to some extent, early demand brought forward by businesses. Further, BNM also noted that the global growth outlook would remain supported by positive labour market conditions, less restrictive monetary policy, and fiscal stimulus. This outlook is weighed down by uncertainties surrounding tariff developments, as well as geopolitical tensions. Increased volatility in global financial markets and commodity prices could also result from these uncertainties. For Malaysia, BNM said the latest developments point towards continued growth in economic activity in the second quarter, underpinned by sustained domestic demand and export growth. Moving forward, the central bank expects resilient domestic demand to support growth. Employment and wage growth, particularly within domestic-oriented sectors, as well as income-related policy measures, will support household spending. 'The expansion in investment activity will be sustained by the progress of multi-year projects in both the private and public sectors, the continued high realisation of approved investments, as well as the ongoing implementation of catalytic initiatives under the national master plans,' it said. Further, the central bank said favourable trade negotiation outcomes, pro-growth policies in major economies, continued demand for electrical and electronic goods, and robust tourism activity could raise Malaysia's export prospects. However, the growth outlook remains vulnerable to downside risks, primarily due to slower global trade, weakened sentiment, and lower-than-expected commodity production. Headline and core inflation averaged 1.4% and 1.9% in the first five months of the year, respectively, BNM noted. Overall, inflation in 2025 is expected to remain moderate amid contained global cost conditions and the absence of excessive domestic demand pressures, it said. Inflationary pressure from global commodity prices is expected to stay limited, helping to keep domestic cost conditions moderate. In this context, the impact of current and upcoming policy reforms on inflation is likely to remain contained. BNM said although Malaysia's economy remains resilient, growth prospects could still be affected by external uncertainties. It said the ringgit's performance will continue to be influenced by global factors, but strong economic fundamentals and structural reforms are expected to provide steady support. Against this backdrop, BNM's recent rate cut is a pre-emptive move to safeguard growth, with the central bank remaining watchful of risks to both inflation and economic momentum.
Free Malaysia Today
8 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
M'sia wants Airbus, Embraer to consider it for MRO, supply chain hub
AirAsia has signed a deal for Airbus 321XLR long-haul aircraft worth US$12.25 billion, to be delivered in 2028. (AFP pic) KUALA LUMPUR : Malaysia wants aircraft supplier companies such as Airbus and Embraer to make the country a hub for maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO), as well as training and supply chain activities if the agreements to purchase dozens of aircraft by AirAsia and Malaysia Airlines are realised. Transport minister Loke Siew Fook said that apart from discussing the potential purchase of aircraft, the government was taking the same approach to ensure that the purchase provides benefits or advantages to Malaysia to attract investment. 'This is the strategy we are using so that these purchases are not just one-way – they also benefit Malaysia in the aerospace sector. 'Of course, our airlines need to have a more diversified purchasing strategy, including Malaysia Airlines which is now also diversified in terms of purchasing aircraft and not just relying on one supplier,' Loke told reporters in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, at the end of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's official visit to Italy, France and Brazil. He said the government had also suggested that France consider Malaysia as a potential location for a final assembly line for the aircraft. 'Presently, Airbus has quite a lot of orders. Many aircraft have not been delivered and many airlines that have ordered Airbus aircraft are facing delays. 'Airbus currently has a backlog of 8,000 aircraft, so it has problems in terms of supply chain and so on to complete these aircraft. Of course, this backlog will continue, and that is why we also hope that Airbus can invest more in Malaysia in terms of securing the supply chain and considering Malaysia as an aircraft assembly destination,' he said. He said this would boost the country's aerospace sector and provide job opportunities for Malaysians. 'This is the strategy we hope for through diplomacy like this and the presence of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim speaking to the French president and the company directly, together with the Airbus management – I think (it) is a proactive diplomatic action from the country,' he said. AirAsia has signed a deal for Airbus 321XLR long-haul aircraft worth US$12.25 billion (RM51.72 billion), to be delivered in 2028. According to Loke, Airbus already operates in Malaysia including through an MRO and training centre. 'For example, they have Airbus helicopter training based in Subang. It is already there but what we want is for them to expand their operations,' he said. Meanwhile, Malaysia Aviation Group (MAG), the parent company of national carrier Malaysia Airlines, has exercised its purchase rights for 20 additional A330neo aircraft through a direct order with Airbus. The new order builds on MAG's initial commitment in 2022 to 20 A330neo aircraft – 10 directly purchased and 10 leased from Avolon – bringing the group's total A330neo commitment to 40 aircraft. Deliveries of the additional batch are scheduled to be made between 2029 and 2031. 'Malaysia Airlines has ordered 20 A330neo aircraft, but so far only four have been delivered. This was ordered three years ago – there are 16 more to go. 'They add on another 20 right now, so all together there will be 40 A330neo aircraft. On top of that, Malaysia Airlines is considering A350 aircraft as well. So that is something they have to decide on soon,' said Loke. Composites Technology Research Malaysia Sdn Bhd, based in Batu Berendam, Melaka, has gained the trust of the world's largest airlines, including Airbus and Boeing, for the production of several aircraft components. Brazilian aircraft manufacturer Embraer meanwhile has nearly 20 operators in the Asia Pacific, collectively operating around 200 E-Jets. Anwar has met with the CEO of Embraer, and airlines AirAsia and Air Borneo have expressed interest in making purchases.
