Another royal abdication? King Philippe to follow in Edward VIII's footsteps?
Seems like yet another royal abdication is on the cards.
But this time, it's not for the British royal family. King Philippe, the monarch of Belgium, recently opened up about when he might renounce the throne for his daughter, Princess Elisabeth, to reign.
Read on to know more.
What's happening?
King Philippe of Belgium recently had some fun while tackling a question about when he might hand over the throne to his daughter, Princess Elisabeth. The 65-year-old monarch shared his thoughts in a cheerful interview released by The Belgian Monarchy, where he responded to 30 out of a whopping 2,614 video messages for his April 15 birthday.
When asked about abdication, King Philippe offered a playful take on the idea: "A King steps back, but is not retired," according to a translation shared by Hola!.
He emphasized that he would continue his royal duties while allowing his daughter the time she needs to enjoy life, grow, and travel the world. "I will continue to work for Belgium, and I must give my daughter time to enjoy her youth, develop herself, and see the world.
I support her 100 percent in that, and I will do everything I can to give her all the time she needs to do," he added.
Now, let's take a look at abidication, as a royal precedent.
Edward VIII's dramatic exit
In December 1936, Edward VIII shocked the world by relinquishing the British throne after less than a year in power. His abdication, driven by an irreconcilable desire to marry Wallis Simpson, a twice-divorced American, defied centuries of monarchical tradition. Reportedly, the King famously told his prime minister: 'I find it impossible to carry the heavy burden of responsibility and to discharge my duties as King….
.without the help and support of the woman I love.' The crisis was swift and seismic; Edward stepped away, becoming the Duke of Windsor, and was succeeded by his younger brother, George VI. His departure set one of the starkest examples of a voluntary surrender of power in modern monarchy, born of personal conviction, not political calculus.
Belgium's history of 'peaceful' abdications
Fast-forward to July 2013: King Albert II of Belgium voluntarily abdicated in favor of his son, Prince Philippe.
After nearly 20 years on the throne, Albert cited age and declining health as his reasons, believing that he could no longer 'fulfil [his] duties as [he] would like to,' and expressing confidence that his son was 'well prepared' to take up the constitutional role. The ceremony was somber yet celebratory – Belgian flags, parliamentary oaths in three languages, and poignant tributes to national unity amid deep linguistic divisions.
King Philippe: The son who inherited the crown
On 21 July 2013 – Belgium's national day – Philippe, then aged 53, was sworn in as the seventh King of the Belgians. An Oxford- and Stanford-trained former military pilot, he pledged to uphold the constitution and act as a unifying figure in a country often split by language and regional identity. His reign, so far, has been quiet, dutiful, and low‑profile – quite unlike the conspicuous drama surrounding Edward VIII's abdication and departure to a more gilded, yet detached, existence.
The modern wave of abdications
Belgium's abdication was neither isolated nor unprecedented. In recent years, a wave of European monarchs has offered their thrones to the next generation. Emperor Akihito of Japan abdicated in 2019 due to age and health – his first voluntary exit in over two centuries. Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands passed the throne to her son in 2013; her successor, King Albert II, followed suit. Queen Margrethe II of Denmark abdicated in early 2024 – likely aiming to ensure her son, Crown Prince Frederik, could begin his reign at full strength amid swirling speculation surrounding his personal life.
While it's near-impossible to think of a similar kind of scenario for King Charles III, the reigning monarch of the United Kingdom – even though he is suffering from cancer – these abdications reflect a modern view: monarchs, living longer and more active lives, may choose to step aside when they feel they can no longer perform ceremonial duties with distinction. It's a renewal strategy – passing the torch while still alive to advise and support.
Paving the path for Princess Elisabeth
A decade before Princess Elisabeth was born, Belgium made a significant change to its succession laws, adopting absolute primogeniture in 1991. This meant that female descendants of King Albert II would inherit the throne based on birth order, breaking the centuries-old rule that favored sons.
King Philippe and Queen Mathilde are raising their four children, including Princess Elisabeth, Prince Gabriel, 21, Prince Emmanuel, 19, and Princess Eléonore, 17, all while balancing their education and royal responsibilities.
At just 23 years old, Princess Elisabeth, who's also known as the Duchess of Brabant, is the first in line to the throne and making history as Belgium's first queen regnant – its first reigning female monarch! True to her royal spirit, Princess Elisabeth is actively juggling her studies with royal duties, frequently returning to Belgium to stay engaged with public life. It'd be premature to draw a conclusion if King Philippe would be renouncing the throne for his daughter, but it's safe to say she's a busy princess making her mark!
Mumbai: Queen Mathilde of Belgium enjoys a splendid musical performance by kids
One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Benjamin Netanyahu rejects report that Israeli soldiers have orders to shoot at Palestinians seeking aid
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz emphatically rejected a report in the left-leaning Israeli daily Haaretz on Friday (June 27, 2025), which claimed Israeli soldiers were ordered to shoot at Palestinians approaching aid sites inside Gaza. They called the report's findings 'malicious falsehoods designed to defame' the military. 'More than 500 Palestinians have been killed and hundreds more wounded while seeking food since the newly formed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began distributing aid in the territory about a month ago,' according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Court rejects Netanyahu's call to postpone graft trial hearings Palestinian witnesses say Israeli troops have opened fire at crowds on the roads heading toward the sites. Reacting to the Haaretz piece, Israel's military confirmed that it was investigating incidents in which civilians had been harmed while approaching the sites. It rejected the article's allegations 'of deliberate fire toward civilians.' The foundation, which is backed by an American private contractor, has been distributing food boxes at four locations, mainly in the far south of Gaza, for the past month. 'GHF is not aware of any of these incidents but these allegations are too grave to ignore and we therefore call on Israel to investigate them and transparently publish the results in a timely manner,' the group said in a social media post. Netanyahu says victory over Iran opens windows to peace Palestinians trying to find food have frequently encountered chaos and violence on their way to and on arrival at the aid sites. Tens of thousands are desperate for food after Israel imposed a 2 1/2 month siege on Gaza, blocking all food, water and medicine from entering the territory pending the setup of the GHF sites. 'The bodies of eight people who died on Friday had come to Shifa Hospital from a GHF site in Netzarim, although it was not immediately clear how they died,' Dr. Mohamed Abu Selmyiha, the hospital's director, told The Associated Press. A GHF spokesperson challenged the report, saying they did not know of any incidents at or near their sites on Friday. 'Twenty other bodies his hospital received Friday came from airstrikes across north Gaza,' he said. Thousands of Palestinians walk for hours to reach the hubs, moving through Israeli military zones where witnesses say Israeli troops regularly open fire with heavy barrages to control the crowds. The Israeli military says it has only fired warning shots. Trump says Israeli PM Netanyahu's trial should be cancelled Mohammad Fawzi, a displaced man from Rafah, told the AP that he was only able to get empty boxes, not food, from the aid site in the Shakoush area in Rafah when he trekked there early Thursday morning (June 24, 2025.) 'We've been shot at since 6 a.m. up until 10 a.m. just to get aid and only some people were able to receive it. There are martyrs and injured people. The situation is difficult,' he said. The group 'Doctors Without Borders' on Friday (June 27, 2025) condemned the distribution system as 'a slaughter masquerading as humanitarian aid' and called for it to be immediately shut down. More than 6,000 people have been killed and more than 20,000 injured in Gaza since the ceasefire collapsed on March 18. Since the war began, more than 56,000 people have been killed and 1,32,000 injured, according to the Health Ministry. Netanyahu's government faces possible collapse as the opposition seeks to dissolve it The Gaza Health Ministry doesn't distinguish between civilians and combatants, but has said that women and children make up more than half the 56,000 dead. Israel says it only targets militants and blames civilian deaths on Hamas, accusing the militants of hiding among civilians, because they operate in populated areas. The Israel-Hamas war started following the Hamas-led attack in southern Israel on October 7, 2023, when some 1,200 people were killed and around 250 taken hostage. About 50 of them still remain in captivity in Gaza. The latest deaths include six people killed and 10 wounded in Israeli strikes on a group of citizens near the Martyrs Roundabout in the Bureij Camp in central Gaza Strip, officials at Awda Hospital in Nuseirat said on Friday (June 27, 2025). The United Nations chief meanwhile urged leaders to show 'political courage' and agree to a ceasefire like the one forged between Israel and Iran. Secretary-General António Guterres also urged a return to the UN's long-tested distribution system for aid in Gaza, where he said Israeli military operations have created 'a humanitarian crisis of horrific proportions..' 'The search for food must never be a death sentence,' Mr. Guterres stressed to UN reporters on Friday.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
14 minutes ago
- First Post
Harvard & Toronto Universities join hands to host international students amid Trump's visa blockade
Harvard University and the University of Toronto came out with a plan that would see some of the Harvard students complete their studies in Canada if visa restrictions prevent them from entering the United States read more A Harvard sign is seen at the Harvard University campus in Boston, Massachusetts, on May 27. Image used for representation. (Source: AFP) Harvard University and the University of Toronto are collaborating to host international students who are facing visa restrictions imposed by US President Donald Trump. Both institutions came out with a plan that would see some of the Harvard students complete their studies in Canada if visa restrictions prevent them from entering the United States. The pact between the two institutions reflects how schools are willing to collaborate to ensure that students are not affected by the tumultuous policies introduced by the current Trump administration. The deal was struck between the Harvard John F Kennedy School of Government and the University of Toronto's Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In a letter to the students, Jeremy Weinstein, the Harvard Kennedy School Dean, noted that the plans were meant to ease concerns. He maintained that a formal program would only be unveiled if there is 'sufficient demand' from students who are unable to come to the United States. 'We are deeply grateful for the support of the Munk School and other partners, who are helping to ensure that we can continue to provide all HKS students with the excellent education they deserve,' he said in his letter. Harvard's struggle with the Trump administration The American university is locked in an acrimonious legal battle with the Trump administration after it claims the Department of Homeland Security improperly revoked its ability to enrol international students. It is pertinent to note that nearly a quarter of Harvard's students come from outside the US, and their students are a key source of funding for the school. So far, Harvard has won two preliminary injunctions against the DHS, probably clearing a path for international students to obtain entry visas. 'These are exceptional times,' Janice Stein, the founding director of the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, said in a statement. 'If Harvard Kennedy School international students are not able to complete their studies in Cambridge, Mass., the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy looks forward to providing shared academic and co-curricular experiences for students from both our schools.' In addition to the HKS at Munk School program, institutes are also announcing HKS Global, which will have both an online and in-person component. The University of Toronto made it clear that Harvard students attending their college will still have to apply for Canadian study permits and will be enrolled as full-time, non-degree students at the Munk School. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The program is only open to students who have already completed a year of study in the United States. Interestingly, Canada has put its cap on international students and curtailed the number of visas it will allow. The University of Toronto said the plan with Harvard 'would not reduce the number of spaces available for U of T students in any academic programs or university housing'.
India.com
15 minutes ago
- India.com
US has more than 750 military bases in 80 countries, but not a single in India due to....
US has more than 750 military bases in 80 countries, but not a single in India due to.... The US has more than 750 military bases in 80 countries around the world not have a single military base in India. Despite having more than 100 bases in Germany, 120 in Japan and 73 in South Korea, the Pentagon has not built a single base in India. Do you know why? What is the reason behind this decision? From Nehru to Modi, all Indian governments have said the same thing: there will be no foreign troops on Indian soil. No matter what agreements or pressures are put in place. According to a report by India Today, India's policy is built with memories of the colonial era and the future in mind. India understands that US military bases are often used not for defense, but for political gain. Why doesn't US have a military base in India? There are many reasons why US does not have a military base in India. The first reason is India's history. India was once a slave of the British. That is why India does not want any other country to rule over it. The second reason is India's strategy. India can protect itself. It has one of the largest armies in the world. It also has nuclear weapons. India does not want to be at enmity with US' enemies India has seen US intervention. In 1953, the CIA engineered a coup in Iran. There were regime changes in Guatemala, Chile and Iraq too. India knows that military bases are often used for political maneuvers. They are not just for defence. Recently, Iran launched a missile attack on Qatar's Al Udeid base. Qatar had nothing to do with the US-Iran conflict. But it was attacked because there was an American base there. India does not want to be pitted against America's enemies. India can protect itself. It has a large army, nuclear weapons, navy and the power to wage cyber war. Therefore, India does not need the protection of any other country. India maintains relations with other countries according to its own will. It does not come under anyone's pressure. India has some military bases in Tajikistan, Mauritius and Bhutan. But these bases are there with the consent of those countries. India does not rule over them. India wants to work together with other countries. It does not want to make anyone its slave. India conducts military exercises with America. US cannot keep its troops in India India has also signed agreements like LEMOA with the US. But it is clear in these agreements that the US cannot keep its troops in India. Indian officials always say that logistical access does not mean base access. That is, India can let the US use its military bases, but the US cannot build its bases there. This policy of India keeps it diplomatically independent. It can maintain relations with Russia, the US, China and other countries simultaneously. It does not need to support any one country.
