Families file suit challenging Arkansas law that requires Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms
The federal lawsuit challenges a measure Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed into law earlier this year, similar to a requirement enacted by Louisiana and one that Texas' governor has said he'll sign.
The Arkansas law takes effect in August and requires the Ten Commandments to be prominently displayed in public school classrooms and libraries.
'Permanently posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom and library — rendering them unavoidable — unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture,' the lawsuit said.
The suit was filed on behalf of the families by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and the Freedom from Religion Foundation. The lawsuit names four school districts in northwest Arkansas — Fayetteville, Bentonville, Siloam Springs and Springdale — as defendants.
A spokesperson for Fayetteville schools said the district would not comment on pending litigation, while the other three districts did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
A spokesperson for Attorney General Tim Griffin said his office was reviewing the lawsuit and considering options.
Attorneys for the families, who are Jewish, Unitarian Universalist or nonreligious, said they planned to ask the federal judge in Fayetteville for a preliminary injunction blocking the law's enforcement. The attorneys say the law violates longstanding Supreme Court precedent and the families' First Amendment rights.
'By imposing a Christian-centric translation of the Ten Commandments on our children for nearly every hour of every day of their public-school education, this law will infringe on our rights as parents and create an unwelcoming and religiously coercive school environment for our children," Samantha Stinson, one of the plaintiffs, said in a news release.
Louisiana was the first state to enact such a requirement, and a federal judge blocked the measure before it was to take effect Jan 1. Proponents of Louisiana's law say that ruling only applies to the five school boards listed in the suit, but The Associated Press is unaware of any posters being displayed in schools as the litigation continues.
___
Associated Press Writer Sara Cline in Baton Rouge, Louisiana contributed to this report
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Miami Herald
27 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Are legislative districts in US states drawn fairly? Poll shows partisan divide
Americans are divided over the fairness of legislative districts, with Democrats being more likely than Republicans to say electoral maps are drawn unfairly, according to the latest YouGov poll. At the same time, most Americans agree that redistricting efforts should be conducted by a nonpartisan body, as opposed to one political party. The survey, conducted on Aug. 4, comes as several states have moved to reform their legislative districts — areas that determine congressional representation in the House of Representatives — ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. In Texas, for example, the Republican-controlled legislature plans to vote on a newly proposed district map, which would add five new GOP districts. A group of Democratic lawmakers fled the state in an attempt to block the vote. In response, other states, like California, have proposed the possibility of redrawing their own legislative maps as a retaliatory measure, though many blue states face limitations since their redistricting processes are overseen by independent commissions. Here is a breakdown of the poll results. In the survey — which sampled 18,217 U.S. adults — respondents were asked: 'Do you think legislative districts are drawn fairly or unfairly in your state?' Thirty-four percent said they believe their districts are drawn very fairly (9%) or somewhat fairly (25%). A similar share, 35%, said they think their own legislative districts are designed somewhat unfairly (19%) or very unfairly (16%). An additional 31% said they were not sure. On this question, there was a noticeable partisan divide. Forty percent of Democrats said their district was designed in a biased fashion, while 36% of independents and 28% of Republicans said the same. Several studies in recent years have concluded that legislative district maps are often unfairly drawn. For example, a 2024 study from the University of Chicago found that gerrymandering, the process of manipulating electoral boundaries to favor one party, 'occurs in many states and municipalities, leading to less responsive legislatures.' A similar study from the University of Utah concluded that 'Americans are categorized and grouped differently during congressional redistricting depending on who is drawing the lines.' Some of the most gerrymandered states include: Texas, Louisiana, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Wisconsin, according to Newsweek, which compiled a report based on data from the World Population Review. In the poll — which has a margin of error of 1 percentage point — respondents were also asked whether they support requiring redistricting efforts to be handled by a 'nonpartisan redistricting commission.' A majority of respondents, 59%, said they strongly (38%) or somewhat support (21%) this. Meanwhile, just 11% said they somewhat (7%) or strongly oppose (4%) this measure. Thirty percent said they were not sure. On this question, there was a consensus across the political spectrum. Sixty-eight percent of Democrats, 56% of independents and 55% of Republicans said they're on board with restricting being conducted by nonpartisan commissions. Most state legislatures are responsible for redistricting, but 15 states have authorized commissions for the purpose of drawing legislative districts in an effort to reduce gerrymandering, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. These states include: California, Colorado, Hawaii and Michigan. Five other states, including New York, have advisory commissions that assist legislatures in the redistricting process. Redistricting is typically done every 10 years, following the decennial U.S. census, but some states conduct this process more often.
New York Post
27 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dem senator defends working with Trump after Cory Booker's ‘complicity' accusation
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., responded to Sen. Corey Booker's, D-N.J., outburst on the Senate floor last week in an interview with The New York Times. Cortez Masto was asked by the New York Times to respond to Booker's accusations against Democrats that they were 'complicit' with President Donald Trump's agenda. 'I don't need lectures from anyone on how to push back and fight this administration. I've been doing it since I got to the Senate, because I won my Senate race in 2016 and Donald Trump won at the same time. I'm also from a swing state; I've still got to get stuff done on behalf of my state,' Masto told The New York Times. Booker accused his fellow Democratic senators last week of aligning themselves with Trump because they are in favor of passing new police legislation. He claimed that without amendments, the legislation would allow the president to pick winners and losers in terms of who receives the benefits. 5 Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., speaks with reporters at the Capitol subway on July 31. AP 5 President Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Air Force One at Lehigh Valley International Airport. AP 5 Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto speaking at a podium. Fox News 'That is complicity with an authoritarian leader who is trashing our country,' Booker said. 'It is time for Democrats to have a backbone. It's time for us to fight. It's time for us to draw a line, and when it comes to the safety of my state being denied these grants, that's why I'm standing here.' Booker's objection stemmed from a call from Democrats to pass a package of law enforcement-related bills aimed at boosting resources for police, including shoring up death benefits for officers lost in the line of duty, providing greater mental health support for officers, and addressing child exploitation. 5 Booker accused his fellow Democratic senators last week of aligning themselves with Trump because they are in favor of passing new police legislation. Fox News 5 Sen. Cortez Masto makes her way to a Senate Democratic luncheon on Sept. 28, 2022. Getty Images The bills, which eventually passed, were discussed and approved in committee before reaching the Senate floor. Masto thought the legislation would benefit everyone across the country. 'Why would you throw out good legislation that's going to benefit everyone across the country? That doesn't make sense. We still have to have a functioning government. That's part of gaining the trust of Americans again, so they understand there are people that are working on their behalf,' Masto said. 'But most importantly, we have to win. Winning means we've got to win these swing states, and focus on those swing voters and what matters to them and talk to them and that we're addressing the issues they care about.'
Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Can Greg Abbott Kick Out Fleeing Democrats? Experts Weigh In
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Texas Governor Greg Abbott warned on Sunday that Democratic lawmakers who fled the state to break quorum during a special legislative session could be removed from office for abandoning their duties. Abbott cited a 2021 opinion by Attorney General Ken Paxton as justification, asserting that it allows him to declare vacancies and replace absent members. However, a detailed review of Texas law and the attorney general's opinion indicates the governor lacks unilateral authority to take such action. Why It Matters Abbott's threat highlights a broader clash over executive power, legislative independence and due process in Texas politics. While Abbott cites Paxton's 2021 opinion to justify potential removals, the opinion indicates that only courts—not the governor—can determine whether a legislator has abandoned office. If a governor could unilaterally remove legislators for breaking quorum, it would drastically expand executive power and potentially override voters' choices. Texas House members during a hearing at the state Capitol in Austin on July 10, 2021. Texas House members during a hearing at the state Capitol in Austin on July 10, 2021. Tamir Kalifa/Getty What To Know Who Is Greg Abbott? Abbott has served as Texas' governor since January 20, 2015. A former lawyer and Texas Supreme Court Justice (1996-2001), he served as attorney general from 2002 to 2015. A Republican since his state Supreme Court appointment by Governor George W. Bush, Abbott is known for his conservative positions on immigration, gun rights and limiting federal oversight. Who Is Ken Paxton? Ken Paxton, a former state legislator, has been Texas' attorney general since 2015. As the state's top legal officer, he issues advisory opinions like his 2021 KP-0382 and represents Texas in court. In 2023, Paxton faced an impeachment attempt in the Texas House over allegations of corruption, abuse of office and bribery tied to his relationship with a political donor. The Texas Senate held a trial in September 2023 and acquitted him on all counts, allowing him to remain in office. Quorum Breaks Explained A quorum break occurs when enough lawmakers leave a legislative session to prevent official business. Legislative bodies like the Texas House require a minimum number of members present to pass laws—two-thirds in this case. In Texas, a quorum is the minimum number of legislators required for the House (100 of 150 members) or Senate (21 of 31 members) to conduct business. If enough members leave, they can deny a quorum and halt legislative proceedings. The tactic, which is used by Democrats and Republicans, is legal but controversial. What the Paxton Opinion Says Attorney General Opinion KP-0382 was issued during a 2021 quorum standoff. It addressed whether lawmakers could break quorum and whether such actions create a vacancy. The opinion concluded: A vacancy may occur if an official "abandons" office. Determining abandonment is a fact-specific question for a court. A quo warranto action (a legal proceeding used to challenge whether a person has the legal right to hold a public office) must be filed by the attorney general or a district attorney for a court to decide if a legislator forfeited office. The opinion did not rule breaking quorum unconstitutional, nor did it grant the governor power to declare vacancies unilaterally. Historical Context Texas governors have used legal and procedural tools to compel lawmakers back to the chamber but have never removed members for breaking quorum. 1870: Thirteen Texas senators left the Capitol to block a wartime powers bill, denying a quorum. They were arrested, and the bill later passed, establishing quorum-breaking as a tactic in Texas politics. Thirteen Texas senators left the Capitol to block a wartime powers bill, denying a quorum. They were arrested, and the bill later passed, establishing quorum-breaking as a tactic in Texas politics. 1979: Twelve Democratic state senators nicknamed the "Killer Bees" hid for four and a half days to block a vote on presidential primary election rules. Twelve Democratic state senators nicknamed the "Killer Bees" hid for four and a half days to block a vote on presidential primary election rules. 2003: More than 50 Democrats fled to Oklahoma to delay a Republican-backed redistricting plan. The plan ultimately passed after lawmakers returned. More than 50 Democrats fled to Oklahoma to delay a Republican-backed redistricting plan. The plan ultimately passed after lawmakers returned. 2021: More than 50 Democrats went to Washington to protest voting restrictions. Arrests were authorized to compel attendance, and the bill passed after members returned. What People Are Saying Chuck DeVore, chief national initiatives officer at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and a former California lawmaker, told Newsweek on Monday: "The governor has threatened to declare a vacancy, which he can do. This does not require any sort of judicial Article IV, Section 10 of the Texas governor can declare vacancies. "I really think that eventually there will be members that come are members that cannot withstand the financial potentially criminal action, because if it's found out that you took money from somebody in exchange for breaking illegal. "What happened the last time [2021]...the average Texan simply looks at this and says, you're not doing your job. And what ends up happening is the public begins to turn against them." Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston, told the Texas Tribune: "It's a messaging a last resort for Democrats who have run out of options legislatively and even legally." Mark P. Jones, a political science professor at Rice University: "If we're going to follow our current primary schedule, we do need to have these districts approved by the Legislature before the opening of filing [for the 2026 midterms] in November." The Texas House Democratic Caucus, in a four-word statement in response to Abbott's threats: "Come and take it." Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, during a press conference on Sunday: "We're going to do everything we can to protect every single one of them." What Happens Next Abbott ordered Democratic lawmakers to return when the House reconvenes on August 4. While he has threatened to declare their seats vacant, any attempt would almost certainly lead to a court challenge. With no precedent for removal in Texas history, the standoff could prolong legislative gridlock, prompt additional special sessions and potentially set new legal precedent on gubernatorial authority (the legal powers and responsibilities granted to a state governor under a state's constitution and laws) and quorum-breaking tactics.
