Hawaii DOE looking for input on cell phones in school
Banning cellphones in schools gains popularity in red and blue states
'Yes, recently some other school districts across the nation have limited the use of cell phones in schools, and so there's been a lot of questions about whether or not Hawaii should follow suit,' said Teri Ushijima, the Assistant Superintendent with the DOE's Office of Curriculum and Instructional Design. 'Although a bill putting a blanket policy on limiting cell phone use in schools died in the legislature, there's still definitely a growing public interest on how cell phone use in schools shapes educational experiences. A large majority of campuses have already established their own school-level rules and guidance to manage cell phone use. A Department-wide policy could help bring consistency, but we also want to be mindful of flexibility to accommodate different communities' needs. Age level may also be a consideration. So with that in mind, we've launched a multi-phase effort to gather stakeholder input ahead of any policy recommendations.'
The survey is also available for principals. It is relatively quick, consisting of about 16 questions for parents. It went live on April 21 and is available through May 5.
'Students in grades 3-12 were sent the survey through their Department accounts,' Ushijima said. Schools are helping to distribute the surveys to staff and families. The surveys, which are being administered via a third-party platform called Panorama, have been open since April 21 and will remain open until this coming Monday, May 5. We highly encourage parents and guardians to take the time to submit their valuable feedback on this topic, as it could really impact future planning and policies.'If you haven't received your survey link, the link is available here.
'The results will help inform HIDOE's understanding of perspectives and experiences around mobile phone use in classrooms and guide future decision-making and potential policy development. We look forward to working with our Board of Education on the next steps.' Ushijima said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
SCOTUS Judges Tear Into Court's ‘Indefensible' Decision to Help Trump ‘Break the Law'
Liberal justices on the conservative-majority Supreme Court have torn into the decision allowing Donald Trump to continue gutting the Department of Education. In the latest win for the president from the nation's highest court, the justices voted to lift a pause on a lower court's decision that blocked the Trump administration from laying off nearly 1,400 DOE workers and shifting its functions to other agencies as part of federal cost-cutting plans. As is standard in emergency applications, the Supreme Court offered no reasoning for its decision and did not disclose how each justice voted. But the divide was clear in a blistering 19-page dissent by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. 'Only Congress has the power to abolish the department,' Sotomayor wrote. 'When the Executive publicly announces its intent to break the law, and then executes on that promise, it is the Judiciary's duty to check that lawlessness, not expedite it.' Sotomayor blasted the conservative majority's decision to intervene in lower court rulings halting the mass firings at the DOE amid ongoing litigation. 'That decision is indefensible,' she said. 'It hands the executive the power to repeal statutes by firing all those necessary to carry them out. The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naive, but either way, the threat to our Constitution's separation of powers is grave.' The Supreme Court, which includes three justices nominated by Trump—Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—has effectively paved the way for the entire department to be dismantled by allowing the administration to slash about one-third of its 4,100 workers. By law, the DOE, created in 1979, cannot be shuttered entirely without the approval of Congress, which is unlikely since it would require 60 votes in the Senate, and that would need some Democratic support. Trump and Education Secretary Linda McMahon have instead sought to vastly downsize the DOE and shift its responsibilities elsewhere to avoid congressional approval. The Supreme Court has already permitted Trump to continue his mass firings of federal workers, without consulting Congress first, and to freeze around $65 million in education funding intended to address teacher shortages and promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Removing DEI programs and gutting the DOE were both proposed in Project 2025, a controversial 922-page manifesto by the conservative Heritage Foundation, outlining how a Republican administration could overhaul the federal government. Trump has repeatedly denied that his policies are influenced by Project 2025, despite multiple members of his Cabinet helping draft it. Trump praised the latest favorable SCOTUS ruling on Truth Social. 'The Federal Government has been running our Education System into the ground, but we are going to turn it all around by giving the Power back to the PEOPLE,' the president wrote. 'America's Students will be the best, brightest, and most Highly Educated anywhere in the World. Thank you to the United States Supreme Court!'
New York Post
5 days ago
- New York Post
Thank the Supreme Court for helping Trump return power over America's schools to parents
The Supreme Court's decision to let Team Trump fire hundreds of Education Department employees hands him — and the nation — a double-barreled win. First, it reinforces the concept, underscored by another high-court ruling last week, that the executive branch has a fundamental right to hire and fire employees who work for . . . the executive branch. Second, planned layoffs of more than 1,300 of the agency's 4,000 employees will significantly help President Donald Trump achieve his goal of dismantling it entirely. This is terrific news for students, parents — and taxpayers. The department, after all, has spent billions of taxpayer dollars and produced close to no improvement in learning — with much of that loot going to blue states and teachers unions. If anything it's saddled schools with woke agendas, forcing boys into girls' sports and locker rooms, for example, and kowtowed to labor. Though many of the programs it administers wouldn't be affected even if the agency were to be scrapped entirely (other agencies would simply take on the task), the hope is for less red tape and a less bloated workforce. And removing education-policy decisions from the federal government. Remember, the DOE didn't even exist at all until 1980. Its creation was the result of a cheap deal Jimmy Carter made for the National Education Association's endorsement. Yet for most of the nation's history, educational policy has rested in the hands of states, towns, school boards — and parents. True, to formally abolish the department, the prez would need Congress' approval. That may be an uphill battle for Republicans, but it's one worth fighting. In the meantime, if Trump can rein in DOE's headcount — and narrow the scope of its work — that alone will be a tremendous victory.
Newsweek
5 days ago
- Newsweek
Education Department Launches Investigation Into University of Michigan
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Department of Education (DOE) on Tuesday announced that it's opening a "foreign funding" investigation into the University of Michigan. Newsweek reached out to the university for comment via email on Tuesday. What To Know "Today, the U.S. Department of Education's Office of the General Counsel (OGC) opened a foreign funding investigation into the University of Michigan (UM) after a review of the university's foreign reports revealed inaccurate and incomplete disclosures," the DOE said in a news release. Paul Moore, the chief investigative counsel, issued a statement accompanying the news release accusing the state school of "downplaying its vulnerabilities to malign foreign influence," adding that "recent reports reveal that UM's research laboratories remain vulnerable to sabotage" by Chinese foreign nationals. Moore specifically pointed to recent criminal charges that the Department of Justice brought against two Chinese nationals accused of conspiracy and smuggling material into the U.S. that could be a "potential agroterrorism weapon." "As the recipient of federal research funding, UM has both a moral and legal obligation to be completely transparent about its foreign partnerships," Moore said. He added: "OGC will vigorously investigate this matter to ensure that the American people know the true scope of foreign funding and influence on our campuses." A detail view of the University of Michigan Wolverines "Go Blue" logo prior to an NCAA college football game between the University of Michigan Wolverines and the Michigan State University Spartans on Saturday, Oct. 7,... A detail view of the University of Michigan Wolverines "Go Blue" logo prior to an NCAA college football game between the University of Michigan Wolverines and the Michigan State University Spartans on Saturday, Oct. 7, 2017 in Ann Arbor, Mich. More Aaron M. Sprecher via AP This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
