logo
Foreign aid cuts will lead to more HIV infections and deaths, study suggests

Foreign aid cuts will lead to more HIV infections and deaths, study suggests

Independent27-03-2025

HIV infections and deaths will rise as a result of cuts to foreign aid, according to a study.
Researchers said that funding cuts could undo decades of progress.
A new report says that infections and deaths could surge to levels not seen for more than two decades.
Experts, led by academics from Australia, estimate there could be up to 10.8 million additional HIV infections by 2030 in low-and-middle income countries as a result of the cuts.
And there could be up to 2.9 million HIV-related deaths between 2025 and 2030 if funding cuts proposed by the top five donor countries, including the USA and the UK, are not mitigated.
Sir Keir Starmer recently slashed overseas aid spending to fund defence commitments he said were necessary to protect the UK amid uncertainty over the Ukraine war and its implications for European security.
Anneliese Dodds resigned as international development minister over the decision, which will see the budget cut from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3% in the next two years.
After taking up post in January, US president Donald Trump announced a pause in most US foreign aid spending. He also announced that the US would withdraw from the World Health Organisation.
A paper, published in The Lancet HIV, highlights how international donors have contributed to 40% of all HIV funding in low-and-middle income countries since 2015.
The USA, UK, France, Germany, and the Netherlands together account for more than 90% of international funding, but they have each recently announced plans to implement significant cuts to foreign aid, the article adds.
It is estimated that these plans will lead to a 24% reduction in international HIV funding by 2026.
As a result, the team modelled the human cost of the cuts.
They estimated there could be between 4.4 million to 10.8 million additional HIV infections by 2030 in low-and-middle income countries.
And between 770,000 to 2.9 million HIV-related deaths in children and adults could occur in the same time frame.
'Unmitigated funding reductions could significantly reverse progress in the HIV response by 2030, disproportionately affecting sub-Saharan African countries and key and vulnerable populations,' the authors wrote.
It comes after the UN programme for combating HIV and Aids, UNAids, said that daily new HIV infections around the world could almost double without the aid provided by the United States.
'The United States has historically been the largest contributor to global efforts to treat and prevent HIV, but the current cuts to Pepfar (the US President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief) and USaid-supported programmes have already disrupted access to essential HIV services including for antiretroviral therapy and HIV prevention and testing,' said co-lead study author Dr Debra ten Brink of the Burnet Institute (Australia).
'Looking ahead, if other donor countries reduce funding, decades of progress to treat and prevent HIV could be unravelled.
'It is imperative to secure sustainable financing and avoid a resurgence of the HIV epidemic which could have devastating consequences, not just in regions such as sub-Saharan Africa, but globally.'
And reports suggest that the Trump administration is planning to end funding for Gavi, the vaccine alliance.
Responding to the reports, Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, director of the Oxford Vaccine Group at the University of Oxford, said: 'The funding cuts in the first three months of this year affecting USaid, ODA, WHO and now Gavi are suffocating global health.'
Commenting on the study, the National Aids Trust said it is 'extremely alarmed' by the potential impact of proposed cuts.
Daniel Fluskey, director of policy, research and influencing at the charity, said: 'These funding cuts will have a devastating impact for millions of people across the world as well as threatening the progress that has been made, both globally and in the UK, on ending the HIV epidemic.
'Like any virus, HIV does not stop at international borders. We will not reach the goal of ending new transmissions by 2030 in the UK with a resurgence of HIV across the world.'
Anne Aslett, chief executive of the Elton John Aids Foundation, added: 'This report demonstrates the critical and urgent need for donors to recognise the cumulative impact of their decisions to cut aid budgets.
'If funding for the global HIV response falls away to the extent this report suggests it could, millions more people will get sick, and health budgets will simply not be able to cope.'
A Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office spokesperson said: 'The UK provides significant funding to the global HIV response, supporting work to end Aids-related deaths and prevent new HIV infections.
'We remain firmly committed to tackling global health challenges, not only because it is the right thing to do, but also because it will help us deliver on our Plan for Change in the UK by supporting global stability and growth.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NHS keeps public away and patients are seen as 'inconvenience', health service's new boss says
NHS keeps public away and patients are seen as 'inconvenience', health service's new boss says

Daily Mail​

timea day ago

  • Daily Mail​

NHS keeps public away and patients are seen as 'inconvenience', health service's new boss says

The NHS has built 'mechanisms to keep the public away' as patients are seen as an 'inconvenience', its new boss has said. Sir Jim Mackey, who was made chief executive of NHS England on March 31, has publicly criticised the health service for often being 'deaf' to criticism and retaining 'fossilised' methods of working that are outdated. Ahead of the implementation of a 10-year health plan set to be published by the UK Government next week, Sir Jim told The Daily Telegraph that in recent years, the NHS has often 'made it really hard' for people to receive care. He added: 'You've got a relative in hospital, so you're ringing a number on a ward that no one ever answers. 'The ward clerk only works nine to five or they're busy doing other stuff; the GP practice scramble every morning. 'It feels like we've built mechanisms to keep the public away because it's an inconvenience.' Sir Jim also warned that if the growing disconnect between NHS services and the public is not rectified at 'pace', it could result in the loss of the public health service altogether. He said: 'If we lose the population, we've lost the NHS. For me, it's straightforward. The two things are completely dependent on each other'. It comes ahead of the Government's 10-year plan for the NHS, set to be unveiled next week. Aimed at improving services, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is reportedly set to link doctors' and nurses' pay to their success in bringing down waiting lists. Under the proposed plans, NHS patients could also be contacted several weeks after receiving treatment and asked if it was good enough for the hospital to get paid in full. If the patient says no, roughly 10 per cent of 'standard payment rates' are set to be diverted to a local 'improvement fund', the Times previously reported. The major revamp is also set to relocate patient care from hospitals to community-based health centers. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said on Wednesday that the plan will aim to 'address one of the starkest health inequalities', which he claims is the unequal access to information and choice when it comes to healthcare. For Sir Jim, the health service, first created in 1948, is in urgent need of a 're-orientation', with a shift in mindset from "it's going to be a pain if you turn up because I'm quite busy" to 'how do we find out what you need and get it sorted.' Having started his career in the NHS in 1990, Sir Jim also revealed that his concerns about the health service are predominantly driven by his own childhood experience, after his father died in a hospital 'known for its poor standards of care'. Adding that he will carry the trauma of his father's death 'for the rest of my life', the NHS England boss previously vowed to MPs that he would 'pick up the pace of reform' and tackle the widespread 'inefficiency'. In April, MailOnline revealed how Sir Jim is 'running the NHS from a train carriage' as he was caught watching Netflix in the middle of the afternoon before snoozing off. Sir Jim, who commutes 1,200 miles a week between the office in London and his Northumberland home, was also found by a Mail exclusive investigation to have left his laptop unlocked while using a train toilet. He openly displayed documents including one revealing details of an 'NHS leadership' meeting. And the health service chief slept half an hour - through an alert on his device reminding him of an online meeting. In response, former Conservative leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith said: 'You couldn't make it up. 'It's not a great lesson in efficiency when you waste so much time travelling and falling asleep. You can't run the NHS from a train carriage. If you want to do the job properly, you've got to be in the office. It's what most businesses would demand.' But Health Secretary Wes Streeting backed his hire to lead the NHS, declaring: 'Jim is proving to be worth his weight in gold.' Sir Jim was initially appointed to oversee a dramatic cut in waste and inefficiency across the NHS, with the Government saying it wants to axe 50 per cent of corporate management jobs and use the savings of hundreds of millions of pounds to improve frontline services. It comes ahead of the Government's 10-year plan for the NHS, set to be unveiled next week. Aiming at improving services, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is reportedly set to link doctors' and nurses' pay to their success in bringing down waiting lists. (File image of an NHS waiting room) The transition' period under the Labour government is expected to take two years, with Sir Jim due to be the helmsman until then. In a bid to take pressure off hospitals and cut down waiting lists, the Government previously announced that 85 new mental health emergency departments will be built across England. The 85 units will be funded by £120million secured in the Spending Review, the Department of Health and Social Care said. Open 24 hours a day, seven days a week, they will be staffed by specialist nurses and doctors. Maternity wards are also expected to be among the first parts of UK hospitals to be placed under the microscope, after Streeting launched a full review into services across the country, saying that women had been 'ignored, gaslit [and] lied to' by the NHS. Previous plans unveiled by Mr Streeting revealed a diversion of more than £2billion in NHS spending to working class communities.

Obamacare Supreme Court decision: What it means for RFK Jr.
Obamacare Supreme Court decision: What it means for RFK Jr.

The Herald Scotland

timea day ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Obamacare Supreme Court decision: What it means for RFK Jr.

The suit started in Texas where two Christian owned business and individuals argued that health insurance plans they buy shouldn't have to cover medical tests and drugs they object to on religious grounds, such as the HIV-prevention drug PrEP. But the legal issue at the heart of the Supreme Court case was whether USPSTF is so powerful that, under the Constitution, its members must be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the 6-3 majority that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. can remove task force members at will and can review their recommendations before they take effect. "The Task Force members are removable at will by the Secretary of HHS, and their recommendations are reviewable by the Secretary before they take effect," he wrote. "So Task Force members are supervised and directed by the Secretary, who in turn answers to the President preserving the chain of command." The Health and Human Services Secretary has always appointed USPSTF members and ratified their recommendations, said MaryBeth Musumeci, teaching associate professor of health policy and management at George Washington University's Milken Institute School of Public Health. But the ruling expanded on that authority by clarifying that the secretary could also remove members and block recommendations, she said. Given that Kennedy had recently fired all 17 original members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, another expert panel that issues health recommendations, Musumeci said "there is reason to be worried." The secretary has never removed access to preventive services that have been proven to help people stay healthy nor have they "sought to shape the membership of our expert panel in any way," USPSTF chair Dr. Michael Silverstein said in a statement emailed to USA TODAY. "While the HHS Secretary has long had authority over the USPSTF, historically they have only acted to increase access to preventive care, occasionally going beyond the evidence to secure enhanced coverage for preventive services," he said. "Given our shared focus on preventing cancer and chronic disease, we certainly hope that the Secretary will allow our current work to continue unimpeded, as it has thus far." Surprise move? RFK Jr.'s vaccine committee votes to recommend RSV shot for infants Katherine Hempstead, senior policy officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a health nonprofit, praised the SCOTUS decision because it meant that millions of Americans still have access to preventive care such as mental health screenings, cancer screenings, STI testing and important medications. But she also called the ruling both an "ending and a beginning." "It's the ending of the challenge but now it's the beginning of something that's going to unfold where we're going to see someone exercise control over this expert panel that has very strong opinions about... many aspects of medical care," she said. More details: Supreme Court rejects conservative challenge to Obamacare health coverage If Kennedy plans to target USPSTF, it's unclear what preventive services could be at risk, Musumeci said. But insurance companies ultimately have the final decision. Even if the secretary vetoes a new recommendation or revokes an existing one, insurance companies can still decide to cover the preventive service. America's Health Insurance Plans, a trade association representing health insurance companies, plans to closely monitor the ongoing legal process but affirms that the SCOTUS ruling will not impact any existing coverage, according to an emailed statement sent to USA TODAY. Contributing: Maureen Groppe and Bart Jansen, USA TODAY; Reuters. Adrianna Rodriguez can be reached at adrodriguez@

RFK Jr. on fluoride bans: Probably 'more cavities'
RFK Jr. on fluoride bans: Probably 'more cavities'

The Herald Scotland

timea day ago

  • The Herald Scotland

RFK Jr. on fluoride bans: Probably 'more cavities'

Fluoridation is not banned in Europe, according to a 2018 fact sheet from the American Dental Association (ADA). However, adding fluoride to drinking water is not as widespread in European countries as in the U.S. Some European countries fluoridate their water, while others do not and the reasoning and result of those actions varies, according to BBC reporting. USA TODAY has reached out to ADA for more information. Kennedy's response came after anchor Harris Faulkner asked him how removing fluoride from public drinking water would affect children who don't have access to dentists or proper oral healthcare. Kennedy has been pushing to ban fluoride in public drinking water. In April, during a meeting with President Donald Trump, he said that kids get "stupider" the more fluoride they take in. Kennedy's remarks were met with backlash, as the study he pulled from was criticized for inadequate statistical rigor and other methodological flaws. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond for additional comment when contacted by USA TODAY on Friday, June 27. Fluoride bans: Two states have now passed fluoride bans. These other ones introduced bills. What is fluoride? Fluoride is a naturally-occurring mineral found in many foods and water and has been long thought to help prevent tooth decay, according to the Cleveland Clinic. Throughout the day, the protective outer layer of our teeth, called enamel, breaks down. Natural minerals within the enamel are broken down by bacteria, plaque and sugar. This is called demineralization. To gain these minerals back, people must consume food and water that contains chemicals like fluoride, calcium and phosphate, the Cleveland Clinic states. This is known as remineralization. The Cleveland Clinic says with too much demineralization and not enough remineralization, tooth decay may begin. Exclusive: As RFK Jr. targets fluoride, Texas is coming for kids toothpaste When was fluoride introduced in the US? Fluoride was first introduced in Grand Rapids, Michigan in 1945, according to the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC). Where is fluoride banned in the U.S.? Utah and Florida have banned fluoride from public drinking water - Utah in March and Florida in May. Kennedy has championed these states, and others looking to pass bans, including Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Nebraska, South Carolina, North Dakota, Arkansas, Tennessee, Montana and New Hampshire. American Dental Association responds to fluoride bans After Utah passed its fluoride ban in March, the ADA released a statement saying dentists "see the direct consequences fluoride removal has on our patients." "It's a real tragedy when policymakers' decisions hurt vulnerable kids and adults in the long term. Blindly calling for a ban on fluoridated water hurts people, costs money and will ultimately harm our economy," ADA President Dr. Brett Kessler said in a news release. The ADA has also pointed to studies, like one 2024 study conducted by the University of Queensland, which found that children exposed and not exposed to fluoride showed no difference in IQ testing. Contributing: Natalie Neysa Alund, Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy and Mary Walrath-Holdridge, USA TODAY Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store