
A convicted priest is back at work. Child advocates want Pope Leo to act.
Capella, a 58-year-old Italian priest, was investigated by U.S. and Canadian authorities for almost two years for gathering and sharing child pornography while a senior diplomat at the Holy See's embassy in Washington. In 2017, the U.S. State Department asked the Vatican to waive his diplomatic immunity, a request it denied. Instead, Capella was recalled to Rome, where he admitted to tracking down 'repugnant' images and, in a rare Vatican criminal trial a year later, was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison.
In recent weeks, reports have emerged on Catholic blogs of his 2022 release and quiet return to work at the Holy See's Secretariat of State. His restoration to the powerful department has outraged advocates for the survivors of abuse by Catholic clerics. They insist that even though he was never accused of sexual abuse, a convicted priest who consumed child pornography has no place in a prominent Vatican office.
'Why not give him a job scrubbing floors, or bathrooms, at the Vatican,' said Peter Isely, a member of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, known as SNAP. 'Why is he still an official member of the state department? It's wrong on every level.'
As Pope Leo is confronted with demands to act, he becomes the fourth pontiff since the 1990s to face scrutiny, and potentially judgement, over how he handles the still-emerging cases of sexual crimes committed by clerics.
Pope John Paul II faced both contemporary and posthumous criticism for his handling of abuse cases. The issue dogged Benedict XVI even more, with a chorus of complaints seen as one of several factors contributing to his historic decision to retire. Pope Francis enacted reforms aimed at addressing the scandals, yet survivor groups routinely took him to task for failing to adopt a policy of zero tolerance including mandatory reporting to civil authorities.
Now advocate groups are looking to Leo to chart a different course, and even reverse Francis on the Capella case.
Capella's attorney, Roberto Borgogno, said in an interview that his client was released a year early, in the first part of 2022, for 'good behavior' and resumed work at the secretariat in January 2023. Pope Francis, Borgogno said, approved Capella's return and had at least one direct post-release conversation with him about his contrition.
'These are certainly decisions made logically, rationally, by the pontiff at the time,' Borgogno said.
The direct involvement of Francis and the specifics of Capella's living arrangement and monitoring have not been previously reported.
Capella, whose work is limited to checking translations and doing archival work, now lives just outside the Vatican, in a center for retired diplomats, his lawyer said. His work computer is monitored by Vatican officials, though he has an unmonitored personal cellphone.
Borgogno noted that while Capella had not been defrocked, Vatican authorities stripped him of his elevated title of monsignor. Though he returned to the secretariat in 2023, Capella was considered to be 'on probation' and only recently appeared on the Holy See's official personnel registry.
'It's merely a desk job,' Borgogno said. 'He won't be carrying out pastoral work; he won't be in contact with people on the outside.'
Through Borgogno, Capella declined an interview request.
The renewed focus on Capella comes as Archbishop Guy de Kerimel of Toulouse, France, faces criticism for appointing a priest, convicted of raping a 16-year-old boy in 1993, to the senior post of archdiocesan chancellor, citing the moral imperative of forgiveness. Victims groups are now calling on Leo to intervene in both instances.
'This is a test,' said Anne Barrett Doyle, co-director of BishopAccountability.org, a watchdog group that tracks abuse cases in the Catholic Church. 'To me, it brings up bigger questions of the Vatican's continued rejection of zero tolerance for sex offenders. I think these two things together really put all eyes on Pope Leo. We're all wondering if he will be tougher on sex abusers than Pope Francis was.'
The Secretariat of State did not respond to a detailed request for comment. A senior Vatican official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter said he didn't know whether Leo had been briefed on the cases or intended to take specific action.
It's hardly unheard of for a pope to reverse a predecessor's decision — Francis, for instance, curbed use of the traditional Latin Mass after Pope Benedict XVI had relaxed restrictions on it.
'The pope clearly has jurisdiction in the matter … it will all be up to him,' said Giovanni Maria Vian, former editor of the Vatican's newspaper, L'Osservatore Romano, and a historian of early Christianity. 'He's likely aware of the [Capella] case. It wouldn't be unusual if he took action.'
The official described Capella's job as one in which he has minimal contact with the public and can 'earn his keep.' His return to work is a chance for Capella to 'redeem' himself, the official said, arguing that no punishment for such priests will ever 'be enough' for some victims advocates.
If everyone who does wrong 'gets shunned,' the official said, 'few of us would still be standing.'
The Washington Post reported in 2021 that Capella had been allowed to participate in a work-release program in which he spent mornings at the small Vatican office that sells certificates of papal blessings for personal occasions.
Now, Capella's case is once again underscoring how the Holy See routinely approaches wrongdoing by clerics — from the religious standpoint of mercy and a spirit of Catholic atonement. That vision has clashed with that of victims advocates, who see Capella's return to the secretariat in any capacity, as well as the senior appointment of a convicted rapist in France, as evidence of an overly lenient approach.
The demands for action have raised questions about how the new pope will handle perhaps the thorniest issue facing the faith he leads: tainted priests.
Under Francis, the Vatican sought to address widespread allegations of church complicity. In 2019, he convened an unprecedented summit on clerical sexual abuse, later imposing a sweeping law requiring church officials to report accusations of abuse or official cover-ups to their superiors.
But the law did not require allegations to be reported to civil authorities, and victims groups have pointed to more-recent scandals in Switzerland and elsewhere as evidence that not enough has changed. They say Leo should remove Capella from the secretariat and overturn the recent French appointment to show his commitment to zero tolerance.
Leo has a mixed record on handling abuse cases.
As a bishop in Peru, for instance, he won praise for moving against the Sodalitium Christianae Vitae — a secretive, archconservative Catholic group that expanded from Lima to several countries and was accused of systematic sexual and psychological abuse. At the same time, he was accused of lax oversight in the handling of abuse allegations by three women in his diocese of Chiclayo.
Last month, in a note honoring a Peruvian journalist whose work helped expose sexual abuse within the Sodalitium group, Leo called for a cultural shift inside the church.
It is necessary to instill 'throughout the Church a culture of prevention that does not tolerate any form of abuse: abuse of power or authority, of conscience or spirituality, of sexual abuse,' he wrote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
7 hours ago
- Forbes
Italian Authorities Levy $4 Million Fine Against Giorgio Armani For False Ethical Statements
The Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) has levied a $4 million (€3.5 million) fine against the Giorgio Armani Group for allegedly making 'ethical and social responsibility statements that were untruthful and presented in a manner that was unclear, unspecific, inaccurate and equivocal,' Reuters reported. The privately-held company has vowed to appeal, as it expressed 'disappointment and bitterness' in the ruling and stated, 'Giorgio Armani has always operated with the utmost fairness and transparency toward consumers, the market and stakeholders, as demonstrated by the group's history.' The AGCM's assessment questioning the integrity of the company and its luxury-leaning Giorgio Armani, Emporio Armani and Armani Exchange brands couldn't come at a worse time. It is celebrating its 50th year in business with numerous high-profile events and product releases. The company generated $2.4 billion last year, according to Forbes. Held To Account The AGCM's investigation into company statements in the Armani Code of Ethics and the Armani Values website followed the Armani Group being put under judicial administration by the Milan Court for alleged worker abuse and unsafe working conditions among contractors hired by the the company's GA Operations manufacturing arm. The court's judicial administration was lifted earlier this year. Nonetheless, the AGCM held the company to account. Its ruling repeated allegations uncovered in previous investigations where safety devices had been removed from machinery to increase production and sanitary and hygiene requirements did not meet legal standards. The AGCM asserted that GA Operations officials were aware of unsafe working conditions, citing a company document from 2024 that stated, 'In the best of the situations observed, the working environment is at the limit of acceptability; in other cases, there are serious concerns regarding its adequacy and health standards.' While Armani claims the lifting of the Milan court's judicial administration should provide cover, the AGCM is sanctioning the company for misleading customers about the company's 'strong emphasis on their commitment to sustainability – particularly social responsibility, including worker welfare and safety – which has become a marketing tool used to meet growing consumer expectations.' 'Made In Italy' Under Scrutiny The AGCM's ruling against Giorgio Armani is the latest blow against the 'Made In Italy' fashion industry. Other prominent brands have come under court scrutiny for allegations of workplace abuse throughout their supply chains, including LVMH's Dior and Loro Piana brands, as well as the privately-held Valentino and leather goods brand Alviero Martini. In May, the Prefecture offices in Milan introduced a 'memorandum of understanding for the legality of procurement contracts in the fashion production supply chains.' It spelled out the principles of 'legality, fairness and transparency' to protect the prestige of the 'Made in Italy' label. Numerous fashion industry trade associations, trade unions and legal authorities have signed the non-legally binding memorandum. All of which is well and good, but the 'Made in Italy' label has become tarnished and it's going to take more than company promises, value statements and non-binding legal agreements to restore its place-of-origin integrity, especially as brands and industry stakeholders demand more output from the Italian supply chain. 'Made in Italy has always been considered added value for fashion and luxury brands and a symbol of excellence, thanks to the great expertise of Italian artisans and production techniques that start from tannery and textiles and arrive as finished products,' shared Susanna Nicoletti, industry insider and publisher of the SUN DeLuxe newsletter. 'Made in Italy has always justified high prices because of the industry's specific know how and skills,' she continued. Profits Before People Nicoletti believes that over the last 15 years, brands have shifted to putting financial expectations and forecasts first, and let quality standards slide with the industry's workers collateral damage. 'To increase margins, brands and groups simply reduced the quality of products and their cost of production. As brands and groups were forced to pursue infinite growth to match shareholders' expectations, the excellence of Made in Italy declined,' she said and believes that other revered brands are likely to face similar allegations of bad practices in their supply chains as have Armani, Dior, Loro Piana, Valentino and Alviero Martini. How deep the corruption in the Made in Italy supply chain goes is anyone's guess, but the suspicion is that the practices which have come to light through the current investigations are only the tip of the iceberg. These allegations are bad enough and more reveals will be devastating not just to the individual brand's reputation but the wider reputation of goods bearing the Made in Italy label. As Warren Buffett famously said, 'It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it.' The clock is ticking on the gold-standard that used to be the Made in Italy label.

Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Italy arrests 13 people in nationwide raids against Chinese mafia groups
By Alvise Armellini ROME (Reuters) -Italian police arrested 13 people following a nationwide sweep against Chinese mafia groups, on charges including involvement in crimes such as drug dealing, sex trafficking and aggravated robbery, they said on Monday. Raids were conducted in 25 provinces, including Milan, Rome, Florence, Prato and Catania, anti-organised crime police official Andrea Olivadese said. Police reported a further 31 people to judicial authorities without arresting them, and seized 550 grams (1.2 pounds) or around 5,500 doses of "shabu" crystal methamphetamines, and checked hundreds of shops and vehicles. The gangs' crimes tend to exclusively target fellow Chinese, and, like traditional mafias, they "resort to intimidation and/or violence to achieve their goals" and seek to dominate the territory where they operate, police said. The Chinese mob groups operate "with a deeply rooted concept of revenge that can take the form of a feud," they added. In April, a senior figure in the Chinese underworld and a companion were shot dead in Rome, in what police suspected was part of a turf war within Chinese criminal networks in Italy. Chinese gangs use the informal Hawala payment system to transfer money, and are "in constant dialogue" with other criminal organisations in Italy to share business and zones of influence, police said. The gang members tend to hail from the same region in China and have a stronger foothold in parts of Italy with more Chinese residents, such as Tuscany, police noted. Prato, a Tuscan city famous for its textile industry and its large Chinese community, has a long-running problem with labour exploitation, particularly among undocumented immigrants. The arrests announced on Monday follow separate investigations exposing alleged worker abuse among Italian but Chinese-owned workshops in the supply chain of luxury brands such as Valentino, Giorgio Armani and Loro Piana.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Giorgio Armani fined $4m for misleading trade practices
The Italian Competition Authority has fined fashion giants Giorgio Armani and its unit GA Operations €3.5m ($4m) for engaging in deceptive commercial practices. The sanction follows the authority's investigation into the companies' claims about their ethical and social responsibility, which it found to be inconsistent with the actual conditions at their suppliers and subcontractors where the majority of Armani-branded leather bags and accessories production was outsourced. The companies were found to have made false statements from 22 April 2022 to 18 February 2025 regarding their commitment to ethical standards and social responsibility. These claims were deemed unclear, unspecific, inaccurate and ambiguous by the authority, violating consumer protection laws under the Consumer Code. The authority's investigation revealed that Giorgio Armani and its unit promoted their dedication to sustainability and social responsibility, particularly concerning worker safety, as a key aspect of their marketing strategy to align with increasing consumer expectations. This approach was evident in the title of their corporate website, Armani Values, and in documents procured during inspections. The companies outsourced a significant portion of the production of their leather bags and accessories to suppliers who subcontracted the work. Investigations at several subcontractor sites revealed that safety devices had been removed from machinery to boost production, endangering workers' health and safety. These sites were marred by poor sanitary conditions, and there were instances of workers being employed off the books or under informal arrangements. The severity of the situation was underscored by an incident in which a GA Operations employee responsible for quality control admitted to regularly visiting one such subcontractor's facility during an inspection conducted by the Judicial Police. This admission suggested company awareness of the substandard conditions faced by workers producing Armani-branded products. An internal document from Giorgio Armani dated 2024, which surfaced before the commencement of judicial administration proceedings initiated by the Public Prosecutor's Office of Milan, acknowledged that 'in the best of the situations observed, the working environment is at the limit of acceptability; in other cases, there are serious concerns regarding its adequacy and health standards'. In June 2024, the Court of Justice in Milan suggested a nationwide initiative for luxury brands to enhance their oversight of suppliers. The aim is to guarantee compliance with labour laws throughout their supply chains. "Giorgio Armani fined $4m for misleading trade practices" was originally created and published by Retail Insight Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data