Philadelphia nonprofit has concerns about Trump administration's plan to dismantle CDC's HIV prevention division
defund critical HIV prevention initiatives
.
The Trump administration is reportedly considering dismantling the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's division dedicated to HIV prevention, a move that could shift its responsibilities to another department within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
This potential restructuring has drawn strong condemnation from health organizations across the country, particularly those in the LGBTQ+ and HIV communities, who fear it could jeopardize years of progress in the fight against HIV/AIDS.
David Fair is a long-time HIV/AIDS advocate in Philadelphia and played a key role in the city's early response to the epidemic.
Fair, who co-founded organizations such as the Philadelphia Lesbian and Gay Task Force and Lavender Health (now known as the Mazzoni Center), warns that dismantling the CDC's HIV programs would undo decades of work and could result in a resurgence of new infections and unnecessary deaths.
"If the president gets what he's looking to do, we're going to have more people dying from AIDS," said Fair. "I believe at a rate that we haven't seen for years and years and years because there simply won't be the infrastructure."
Fair's involvement with the HIV/AIDS crisis dates back to the 1980s, when the disease was still largely misunderstood and stigmatised, and its effects were devastating the gay community.
"We called it the gay cancer," Fair recalls, remembering how those diagnosed with HIV often faced death within a few months. At the time, there were few treatment options, and the response from public health officials was slow and reluctant.
Despite the overwhelming challenge, Fair and others in Philadelphia worked to create a robust system of care for people living with HIV, including specialized programs for those dealing with mental illness, drug addiction, and other vulnerabilities.
"We didn't just take a public health approach; we took a comprehensive approach," Fair said. This approach, which focused on addressing the complex needs of people with HIV, has continued to shape the city's HIV care system to this day.
Fair's personal connection to the epidemic has only grown stronger over the years. He recently lost his husband, Rudy, to kidney disease complicated by HIV, a painful reminder of the ongoing struggles of people living with the virus.
One organization that could be significantly impacted by changes to federal HIV funding is the Mazzoni Center, serving the LGBTQ+ community and others for 45 years. With an estimated 18,000 people living with HIV in Philadelphia, the Mazzoni Center plays a pivotal role in providing HIV care, treatment, prevention and education.
Dr. Stacey Trooskin, the Chief Medical Officer at Mazzoni, expressed deep concern about the potential loss of federal funding.
"HIV prevention dollars make all of the programmatic work possible," Trooskin said. "Without those dollars, we'll be at a true disadvantage."
She added that many of their patients are already worried about losing access to crucial HIV medications, such as PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis), as well as treatment options for those already living with HIV.
"There are many patients coming in right now who are scared," Trooskin explained. "They're scared they won't have access to their HIV medications, and they won't have access to the support they need to stay healthy."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
3 critical signs of cardiac arrest in the wake of Hulk Hogan's death
Hulk Hogan has wrestled his last match — taken down not by a rival in the ring, but by one of America's top killers: cardiac arrest. News broke Thursday morning that the wrestling icon, born Terry Gene Bollea, had died after weeks of declining health. 'He was suffering from shortness of breath, got tired easily, had lost a lot of weight and was on oxygen as his life ebbed away at his mansion in Clearwater, Florida,' an insider alleged to the Daily Mail. 6 Getty Images While Hogan, 71, may have built his legacy surviving body slams and steel cages, cardiac arrest proved to be one opponent even the handlebar-mustachioed marvel couldn't overpower. Globally, the condition claims more lives each year than colorectal cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, pneumonia, car crashes, the flu, HIV and house fires combined, according to the American Heart Association. In the US alone, cardiac arrest kills more than 436,000 Americans every year — making it one of the nation's deadliest health threats. Here's everything you need to know about this heart-stopping emergency and how to act before it's too late. What is cardiac arrest? It's a deadly medical emergency where the heart suddenly stops beating — or beats so erratically that it can't pump blood at all, according to the Cleveland Clinic. 6 Anciens – When that happens, oxygen stops flowing to the brain and vital organs. Within minutes, the body starts shutting down — and without immediate help, the chances of death are high. Despite common confusion, cardiac arrest is not the same as a heart attack. A heart attack is a circulation problem caused by a blocked artery that cuts off blood flow to the heart muscle. Cardiac arrest, by contrast, is an electrical malfunction. The heart's rhythm goes haywire, and the muscle flatlines. Who's at risk for cardiac arrest? The most common cause of sudden cardiac arrest is an irregular heart rhythm called ventricular fibrillation, which keeps the heart from pumping blood effectively, according to the Mayo Clinic. Certain heart conditions — like coronary artery disease, heart valve problems, and a history of heart attacks — can increase the risk of this dangerous rhythm. But cardiac arrest can also strike people with no known heart issues. Other factors that may increase your chances include: Smoking or heavy alcohol/drug use High blood pressure or cholesterol Low potassium or magnesium levels Obesity Diabetes Sleep apnea Chronic kidney disease A sedentary lifestyle A family history of heart disease or cardiac arrest While the risk of cardiac arrest increases with age, it can strike at any time — even in children. In fact, sudden cardiac arrests happen in about 1 in every 70 schools each year, often impacting young athletes. 6 Hulk Hogan had faced a slew of health issues and suffered from a 'weak heart' in the lead-up to his death. George Napolitano / Men generally face higher odds of cardiac arrest, but women's risk rises after menopause. Warning signs to watch for 'The typical signs of a cardiac arrest include abrupt loss of consciousness with eyes rolled back, seizure-like activity due to lack of oxygen flow to the brain, and irregular, labored or no breathing,' Dr. Irfan Asif, professor and chair of the Department of Family and Community Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham, said in an interview. He added that someone suffering cardiac arrest may have a very weak pulse — or no pulse at all. 6 A sudden collapse is usually the first noticeable sign of sudden cardiac arrest. Rainer Fuhrmann – Other warning signs that can come before cardiac arrest include chest discomfort, shortness of breath, weakness and heart palpitations like a fast-beating, fluttering or pounding heart. But here's the kicker: Sometimes there are no warnings at all. That's why knowing how to respond can mean the difference between life and death. What should you do if someone goes into cardiac arrest? 'If you are experiencing a cardiac arrest, try to get to a place where you are not alone, or signal to someone you are in distress before you are incapacitated,' Dr. John Bozinovski, a cardiac surgeon at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, told HuffPost. If you see someone collapse and suspect cardiac arrest, act fast. First, check if they're responsive by loudly asking, 'Are you okay?' and gently shaking their shoulders. Look for a pulse and check if they're breathing normally, according to the University of California, Davis. 6 AED's are commonly found in public places like airports, schools, shopping malls, office buildings and sporting venues. brostock – If others are nearby, assign someone to call 911 and another to find an automated external defibrillator (AED), which can shock the heart back to rhythm. If you're alone, call 911 yourself and put the phone on speaker. For children, start CPR right away. For adults, get the AED quickly, as it's usually a heart issue. To perform CPR, lay the person on their back on a firm surface, tilt their head back to open the airway, and check for breathing. If they're not breathing, begin chest compressions: place your hands, one on top of the other, in the center of the chest, pressing hard (about 2 inches deep for adults) at 100–120 compressions per minute. 6 CPR can help maintain blood flow and oxygenation until emergency responders arrive. THANAGON – Use the AED as soon as it arrives and follow its prompts. Alternate CPR and AED use until help arrives or the person wakes up. Every minute without intervention after a cardiac arrest lowers survival chances by 10%. Yet fewer than half receive timely help, according to the American Red Cross. While CPR or AED use can double or triple survival odds, studies show bystanders use an AED only 7% of the time and perform CPR 42% of the time when witnessing a public cardiac arrest. Experts are urging everyone to learn CPR to boost those numbers. 'Everyone should take an in-person CPR course at least once, with a refresher every two to three years,' Dr. Eric Goralnick, associate professor of emergency medicine at Harvard Medical School, advised. 'You could save the life of a family member, friend, or even a stranger,' he added, noting that many CPR classes also cover first aid and AED use.
12 hours ago
As ADA turns 35, groups fighting for disability rights could see funds slashed
TOPEKA, Kan. -- Nancy Jensen believes she'd still be living in an abusive group home if it wasn't shut down in 2004 with the help of the Disability Rights Center of Kansas, which for decades has received federal money to look out for Americans with disabilities. But the flow of funding under the Trump administration is now in question, disability rights groups nationwide say, dampening their mood as Saturday marks the 35th anniversary of the landmark Americans with Disabilities Act. Federal dollars pay for much of their work, including helping people who seek government-funded services and lawsuits now pushing Iowa and Texas toward better community services. Documents outlining President Donald Trump's budget proposals show they would zero out funds earmarked for three grants to disability rights centers and slash funding for a fourth. Congress' first discussion of them, by the Senate Appropriations Committee, is set for Thursday, but the centers fear losing more than 60% of their federal dollars. The threat of cuts comes as the groups expect more demand for help after Republicans' tax and budget law complicated Medicaid health coverage with a new work-reporting requirement. There's also the sting of the timing: this year is the 50th anniversary of another federal law that created the network of state groups to protect people with disabilities, and Trump's proposals represent the largest potential cuts in that half-century, advocates said. The groups are authorized to make unannounced visits to group homes and interview residents alone. 'You're going to have lots of people with disabilities lost,' said Jensen, now president of Colorado's advisory council for federal funding of efforts to protect people with mental illnesses. She worries people with disabilities will have 'no backstop' for fighting housing discrimination or seeking services at school or accommodations at work. The potential budget savings are a shaving of copper from each federal tax penny. The groups receive not quite $180 million a year — versus $1.8 trillion in discretionary spending. The president's Office of Management and Budget didn't respond to an email seeking a response to the disability rights groups' criticism. But in budget documents, the administration argued its proposals would give states needed flexibility. The U.S. Department of Education said earmarking funds for disability rights centers created an unnecessary administrative burden for states. Trump's top budget adviser, Russell Vought, told senators in a letter that a review of 2025 spending showed too much went to 'niche' groups outside government. 'We also considered, for each program, whether the governmental service provided could be provided better by State or local governments (if provided at all),' Vought wrote. Disability rights advocates doubt that state protection and advocacy groups — known as P&As — would see any dollar not specifically earmarked for them. They sue states, so the advocates don't want states deciding whether their work gets funded. The 1975 federal law setting up P&As declared them independent of the states, and newer laws reinforced that. 'We do need an independent system that can hold them and other wrongdoers accountable,' said Rocky Nichols, the Kansas center's executive director. Nichols' center has helped Matthew Hull for years with getting the state to cover services, and Hull hopes to find a job. He uses a wheelchair; a Medicaid-provided nurse helps him run errands. 'I need to be able to do that so I can keep my strength up,' he said, adding that activity preserves his health. Medicaid applicants often had a difficult time working through its rules even before the tax and budget law's recent changes, said Sean Jackson, Disability Rights Texas' executive director. With fewer dollars, he said, 'As cases are coming into us, we're going to have to take less cases.' The Texas group receives money from a legal aid foundation and other sources, but federal funds still are 68% of its dollars. The Kansas center and Disability Rights Iowa rely entirely on federal funds. 'For the majority it would probably be 85% or higher,' said Marlene Sallo, executive director of the National Disability Rights Network, which represents P&As. The Trump administration's proposals suggest it wants to shut down P&As, said Steven Schwartz, who founded the Center for Public Representation, a Massachusetts-based organization that works with them on lawsuits. Federal funding meant a call in 2009 to Disability Rights Iowa launched an immediate investigation of a program employing men with developmental disabilities in a turkey processing plant. Authorities said they lived in a dangerous, bug-infested bunkhouse and were financially exploited. Without the dollars, executive director Catherine Johnson said, 'That's maybe not something we could have done.' The Kansas center's private interview in 2004 with one of Jensen's fellow residents eventually led to long federal prison sentences for the couple operating the Kaufman House, a home for people with mental illnesses about 25 miles (40 kilometers) north of Wichita. And it wasn't until Disability Rights Iowa filed a federal lawsuit in 2023 that the state agreed to draft a plan to provide community services for children with severe mental and behavioral needs. For 15 years, Schwartz's group and Disability Rights Texas have pursued a federal lawsuit alleging Texas warehouses several thousand people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in nursing homes without adequate services. Texas put at least three men in homes after they'd worked in the Iowa turkey plant. Last month, a federal judge ordered work to start on a plan to end the 'severe and ongoing' problems. Schwartz said Disability Rights Texas did interviews and gathered documents crucial to the case. 'There are no better eyes or ears,' he said.
Hamilton Spectator
15 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
As the ADA turns 35, groups fighting for disability rights could see their federal dollars slashed
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Nancy Jensen believes she'd still be living in an abusive group home if it wasn't shut down in 2004 with the help of the Disability Rights Center of Kansas, which for decades has received federal money to look out for Americans with disabilities. But the flow of funding under the Trump administration is now in question, disability rights groups nationwide say, dampening their mood as Saturday marks the 35th anniversary of the landmark Americans with Disabilities Act. Federal dollars pay for much of their work, including helping people who seek government-funded services and lawsuits now pushing Iowa and Texas toward better community services. Documents outlining President Donald Trump's budget proposals show they would zero out funds earmarked for three grants to disability rights centers and slash funding for a fourth. Congress' first discussion of them, by the Senate Appropriations Committee, is set for Thursday, but the centers fear losing more than 60% of their federal dollars. The threat of cuts comes as the groups expect more demand for help after Republicans' tax and budget law complicated Medicaid health coverage with a new work-reporting requirement. There's also the sting of the timing: this year is the 50th anniversary of another federal law that created the network of state groups to protect people with disabilities, and Trump's proposals represent the largest potential cuts in that half-century, advocates said. The groups are authorized to make unannounced visits to group homes and interview residents alone. 'You're going to have lots of people with disabilities lost,' said Jensen, now president of Colorado's advisory council for federal funding of efforts to protect people with mental illnesses. She worries people with disabilities will have 'no backstop' for fighting housing discrimination or seeking services at school or accommodations at work. The potential budget savings are a shaving of copper from each federal tax penny. The groups receive not quite $180 million a year — versus $1.8 trillion in discretionary spending. Trump's administration touts flexibility for sta tes The president's Office of Management and Budget didn't respond to an email seeking a response to the disability rights groups' criticism. But in budget documents, the administration argued its proposals would give states needed flexibility. The U.S. Department of Education said earmarking funds for disability rights centers created an unnecessary administrative burden for states. Trump's top budget adviser, Russell Vought, told senators in a letter that a review of 2025 spending showed too much went to 'niche' groups outside government. 'We also considered, for each program, whether the governmental service provided could be provided better by State or local governments (if provided at all),' Vought wrote. Disability rights advocates doubt that state protection and advocacy groups — known as P&As — would see any dollar not specifically earmarked for them. They sue states, so the advocates don't want states deciding whether their work gets funded. The 1975 federal law setting up P&As declared them independent of the states, and newer laws reinforced that. 'We do need an independent system that can hold them and other wrongdoers accountable,' said Rocky Nichols, the Kansas center's executive director. Helping people with disabilities navigate Medicaid Nichols' center has helped Matthew Hull for years with getting the state to cover services, and Hull hopes to find a job. He uses a wheelchair; a Medicaid-provided nurse helps him run errands. 'I need to be able to do that so I can keep my strength up,' he said, adding that activity preserves his health. Medicaid applicants often had a difficult time working through its rules even before the tax and budget law's recent changes, said Sean Jackson, Disability Rights Texas' executive director. With fewer dollars, he said, 'As cases are coming into us, we're going to have to take less cases.' The Texas group receives money from a legal aid foundation and other sources, but federal funds still are 68% of its dollars. The Kansas center and Disability Rights Iowa rely entirely on federal funds. 'For the majority it would probably be 85% or higher,' said Marlene Sallo, executive director of the National Disability Rights Network, which represents P&As. The Trump administration's proposals suggest it wants to shut down P&As, said Steven Schwartz, who founded the Center for Public Representation, a Massachusetts-based organization that works with them on lawsuits. Investigating allegations of abuse and pushing states Federal funding meant a call in 2009 to Disability Rights Iowa launched an immediate investigation of a program employing men with developmental disabilities in a turkey processing plant. Authorities said they lived in a dangerous, bug-infested bunkhouse and were financially exploited. Without the dollars, executive director Catherine Johnson said, 'That's maybe not something we could have done.' The Kansas center's private interview in 2004 with one of Jensen's fellow residents eventually led to long federal prison sentences for the couple operating the Kaufman House, a home for people with mental illnesses about 25 miles (40 kilometers) north of Wichita. And it wasn't until Disability Rights Iowa filed a federal lawsuit in 2023 that the state agreed to draft a plan to provide community services for children with severe mental and behavioral needs. For 15 years, Schwartz's group and Disability Rights Texas have pursued a federal lawsuit alleging Texas warehouses several thousand people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in nursing homes without adequate services. Texas put at least three men in homes after they'd worked in the Iowa turkey plant. Last month, a federal judge ordered work to start on a plan to end the 'severe and ongoing' problems. Schwartz said Disability Rights Texas did interviews and gathered documents crucial to the case. 'There are no better eyes or ears,' he said. ___ Hunter reported from Atlanta.
