Will forcing MPs to use public healthcare make it better?
Another day, and yet another suggestion from ActionSA that public officials should be forced to use public services, as if that will somehow make those services better.
If it's not public officials being forced to use public transport, it's that they must send their kids to public schools.
The latest from the Herman Mashaba camp is that public servants should use public healthcare services.
One can nearly hear the internal laughter of Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi at the idea (one that he has publicly supported). Presumably, he has no problem supporting it, given that he's doubling down on the National Health Insurance (NHI). It would be pretty silly to advocate for the eventual blending of private and public healthcare, but demand that his ilk continue to be allowed to use private healthcare.
Perhaps that was the strategy of ActionSA all along: getting Motsoaledi to admit a personal lust toward private healthcare. If that was the reason, it's gone down as well as a quirky Helen Zille tweet.
ALSO READ: Bara hospital: The good, bad and ugly
However, the actual idea of forcing public officials to use public services to create some sort of political investment incentive is not just stupid, it's divorced from any South African context. Maybe that would work in a country where there's some sort of honour, even if it's among thieves, but this is South Africa. This is the country where we dare not even introduce self-service checkouts at grocers because we know how disastrous that would be.
So not only do we have to embrace the imposed moniker of 'Plastique?' but we also have to accept that for the right people, the public purse will get them anything from a fire pool to a trip to the Cannes Film Festival.
How is it that despite the Department of Health never having any money, there are still so many awesome doctors in public hospitals? There may be no medicine for the plebeians, but the lights are still on, and if somebody important or a friend of a friend gets rushed in, throwing somebody out of the ICU to make way for them wouldn't be an issue.
The problem has never been that we don't have the facilities to deal with sick people. The problem has always been that we don't have enough facilities to deal with all the sick people who are not politically important.
ALSO READ: 'I could die before surgery': Cancer patient lost in Gauteng hospitals backlog
I don't think Motsoaledi cares which hospital he ends up in. He could be in a rural clinic in Limpopo, but if they had to fly in the best medical team and equipment, best believe they'll do it. Whether they'd do that for Sam Nje is less likely.
You're dealing with a class of people who can walk into any school and bump their kids straight into the classroom on the day school starts, while the rest of us have to apply in utero just to get on the waiting list. This is why forcing them to use public services is hardly going to make the public services any better.
Remember that strange aunty in your family? The one whose house had a great lounge that nobody was allowed in because it had to be preserved in case the Queen, Nelson Mandela and the Pope decided to come visit — simultaneously.
That's all you'll create when you force public servants to use public services: the white elephant room that will remain vacant in case the deputy minister of transport gets hit by a taxi nearby.
It's a sad state of affairs that one feels the need to incentivise public servants to serve the public. It's an even sadder state of affairs when trying to create those incentives is a losing battle. Maybe the answer should be to appoint public servants who are enthusiastic about public service in the first place. I wonder if they thought about that.
NOW READ: Tshwane mayor faces outrage for Weskoppies Hospital power cut
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
15 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Why Donald Trump's 30% tariff on SA exports could sink the local boat building industry
When you think of the products South Africa exports to the U.S, you probably think of cars, fruit and wine. It turns out though, that one of South Africa's big exports is also boats. There's a growing boat industry centred around the Western Cape, where boats and other vessels are manufactured at much cheaper prices than our competitors. But with the Trump administration slapping further tariffs on South African exports, the boat manufacturing sector in South Africa could be in trouble. Trump's 30% tariff on South African exports is due to come into effect on 1 August. Speaking to Stephen Grootes on The Money Show, Vanessa Davidson, executive head at the SA Boat Builders Exporters Export Council says a 30% tariff would be significantly impactful on the sector.
IOL News
24 minutes ago
- IOL News
A family meeting that became a divorce announcement
. Lorenzo Davids is the Executive Director of Urban Issues Consulting. Image: Supplied President Ramaphosa has just secured his recall by the ANC by December 2025 with this hapless 'family meeting' announcement. He failed to read the national room. He made the country wait 7 days to hold a 10-minute national briefing, for which he is always late, on a matter of grave national concern. He has no understanding of, nor appreciation for, the South African mood or need. He has no appreciation for how tired we are of his failed 'family meetings' and his lateness and tardiness with the urgent business at hand. He has no energy for the mountain of work to be done to fix this country, a country we love, and which he finally broke, after promising us in 2018 that he would love it too and fix it. His entire demeanour on Sunday night spoke of a President who hates his job. He was uninterested in what he had to say. He looked irritated. He spoke for about 10.5 minutes. He kept us waiting for 3 times longer than he spoke for. He has been in the Union Buildings for some 17 years now. He doesn't want to be there anymore. Why was he not in his office earlier to be ready to deliver his address on time? Why did we hear news channels announce to the public at about 7:15pm "The president has just arrived." He is staring a recall in the face. And the saddest part of it all? He would welcome it. Mbeki was recalled 9 months before his term ended when he interfered in judicial processes. Zuma was recalled a year before his term ended when the Constitutional Court found he had violated the Constitution. Cyril on Sunday begged the ANC to recall him. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The President will be recalled before year-end because he failed to lead the ANC to victory in April 2024. He is now certain, after Sunday night's middle finger showing to the citizens of South Africa, to the Police, to Parliament and to his own ANC, to cost the ANC the loss of even more votes in 2029. This is the end of the ANC as we knew it. The once great ANC is finally dead. It won't win an election ever again. The last throes of life of what was once a great ANC movement were encapsulated in a tiny 10-minute address to say to the people, "Stop complaining, can't you see how tired I am? Here's a Commission - it's all we have left to give you - and it will take 3 months, maybe 6 months, or more, I don't know. Anyway, ok bye." And then he left the stage. And with him, the entire ANC left the stage tonight. They had nothing to say to South Africa. The ANC lost a further 1 million votes tonight. I was going to write and say, 'Maybe they lost 100,000 votes tonight.' Reading the comments online across the platforms and listening to the news bulletins, the anger expressed by South Africans, coupled with a severe sadness, tells me the end has arrived. The voter has made up his mind. But more dangerously, Ramaphosa has set South Africa up for a potential coup. He has a very angry security cluster whose police, intelligence and law enforcement structures are all implicated by the allegations made against them. All that infighting will now play itself out on the national stage and will put a firm halt to any serious investigation into any of the real issues. In the absence of stable political leadership, the judiciary will increasingly be called upon to stabilise the sinking ship. But there are limits to what the judiciary can do. It does not interfere with the affairs of the legislative and executive branches of government. It rules on the interactions between these actors and the body of laws. The President and his politicians lead the legislative and executive branches of government. He has also pitted very powerful criminal syndicates and cartels against each other, all of whom are vying for their chosen captured political candidate to assume office so that their payday can begin. He has unleashed more political instability and deepened political opportunism in the wake of his weak and reckless leadership shown to South Africa on Sunday night. This was not a family meeting; it was a divorce announcement. The President divorced his citizens on Sunday night. And then he walked out the door. The ANC now needs a very competent President to replace Cyril Ramaphosa, who must have the skills, intelligence, love, backbone and energy to rebuild what was destroyed and lost under Cyril's presidency over the last 6 years. They don't have until 2029. And they don't have until 2027. The problem, however, is that the cupboard is bare. Cape Argus
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Confronting food insecurity at SA universities during Mandela Month
Dr Kgadi Mathabathe | Published 3 hours ago Contrary to the stereotype of universities as bastions of privilege, studies show a different – and often grim – reality for many South African students. At universities across the country, levels of food insecurity range from 11% to 38% , which means a significant portion of our future leaders are trying to study on an empty stomach or are distracted from their books by worries over where their next meal will come from. As South Africa and the world commemorate Mandela Month and emulate the spirit of giving that characterised South Africa's first democratically elected president, it is an opportune time to throw a renewed spotlight onto a silent crisis that many of us are not even aware of. Food insecurity is not just about empty stomachs: it impacts mental health, concentration, attendance, retention and even dropout rates. For those who have enough to eat, the benefits are clear: students who are not hungry are nearly twice as likely to progress academically. For the up to 38% facing a degree of food insecurity, lack of adequate nutrition deepens the cycle of inequality, especially among African and first-generation students, undermining the very mission of higher education as a ladder for social mobility. As higher education institutions, in partnership with government, corporate donors and the general public, we need holistic, collaborative and sustainable solutions to help all our students focus on their primary task: gaining the education and skills needed to help steer our country and continent into a brighter future. Some ideas include: Scale up and destigmatise food support : We should expand programmes like the University of Pretoria's Student Nutrition and Progress Programme (SNAPP), which includes the distribution of food parcels as well as vouchers for hot meals to bring relief directly to students on campus who need help with access to nutritious food. Research has shown many students are hesitant to apply for help because of the stigma attached to food programmes, so we must normalise participation through discreet access and inclusive promotion. Institutionalise campus food systems : We must establish permanent food gardens, student-run dignity kitchens and farmers' markets to increase access to fresh, affordable food. We should also partner with businesses and NGOs to leverage existing models for coordinated, sustainable delivery. Unlock systemic support : Urgent reform is needed concerning National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) disbursements to ensure that allowances (especially for food) are adequate and paid timeously. We must also advocate for national policy that guarantees the right to food for students, with dedicated budgets, legislation and accountability. Turn surplus food into nourishment : We must partner with non-profit organisations whose core business is the re-directing of good quality surplus food (10 million tonnes are wasted annually, yet 30 million South Africans face food insecurity) into nutritious student meals. Monitor, evaluate and advocate : We should run a national survey to probe student food insecurity, with transparent data to inform targeted interventions and encourage cross-sector dialogue, from learners to policymakers, building on initiatives like the Access to Food for Students Project. As we commemorate Mandela Month, I make a renewed call to all who can help our students, whether through an individual or corporate donation of funds or food, or through your assistance in creating the legislation and/or NSFAS reforms needed to ensure no student goes hungry. Members of the public who can donate can approach a university of their choice and ask about student nutrition programmes and ways of making donations, whether in cash or kind. By sacrificing food for fees or transport, many of our students lose the focus, energy and dignity essential to learning. As stewards of their futures, we must commit to systems that allow every student to thrive, starting with what they need most: their next meal. Let this Mandela Month mark the beginning of a movement: each food parcel, scholarship and advocacy effort bringing us closer to the promise of equitable, hunger-free learning spaces. The University of Pretoria is running its annual UP Giving Month campaign during July to support its Student Nutrition and Progress Programme (SNAPP) and the Vice Chancellor and Principal's Scholarship Fund, which provides scholarships to struggling 'missing middle' students. Dr Kgadi Mathabathe, Director: Student Affairs, University of Pretoria The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Pretoria.
