Save Up to to $1,000 on Our Favorite Pool Cleaners Thanks to Aiper Day Deals
Aiper Day deals last until the end of this month, giving you plenty of time to look for the right pool cleaner for you. Every Aiper robot pool cleaner is waterproof, effortless to use and ensures your pool stays free of dirt, debris and other unwelcome items. Aiper Day deals include this Scuba S1 and Aiper Pilot H2 for just $750, down from its regular price of $1,000. The Scuba S1 works best in in-ground pools and can clean the bottom and sides of your pool so you can spend time relaxing.
Other cool pool cleaner deals include the Aiper Scuba X1 is now down to $990 at Aiper, saving you $510 over its usual price. Amazon Prime members can also grab this deal for the same price. The Scuba X1 includes 16 sensors and has a battery life of up to 180 minutes. It also includes a wireless charging dock so you can be prepared for your next cleaning session.
If you need more power, the Aiper Scuba X1 Max and caddy bundle is now $1,199 off, which brings the price down to $2,100 at Aiper. Amazon Prime members can also score this bundle for the same price. This pool cleaner can clean your surface for up to 12 hours, or your pools floor and sides for up to 5.5 hours at a time. The Scuba X1 Max can park on your surface so you can easily remove it from the pool whenever guests are around.
The entire list of deals at Aiper and Amazon are worth looking at if you want a better way to keep your pool clean all summer long. We've also compiled a list of the best vacuum pool cleaners if you want to check out what else is out there.
Why this deal matters
Aiper's robot pool cleaners include powerful filters, smart features that park these robot pool cleaners on the surface for easy retrieval and a long battery life to ensure every last bit of debris is removed. Though robot pool cleaners aren't known for being cheap, Aiper Day deals can help you save up to $1,000 and provide massive savings on bundles. If you prefer to shop at Amazon, Prime members can also save on some equipment for a limited time right now. These deals last until the end of June, but we suggest acting fast to ensure you get your first choice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US and China to talk in Stockholm on trade with eye on Trump-Xi summit later this year
WASHINGTON (AP) — When top U.S. and Chinese officials meet in Stockholm, they are almost certain to agree to at least leaving tariffs at the current levels while working toward a meeting between their presidents later this year for a more lasting trade deal between the world's two largest economies, analysts say. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng are set to hold talks for the third time this year — this round in the Swedish capital, nearly four months after President Donald Trump upset global trade with his sweeping tariff proposal, including an import tax that shot up to 145% on Chinese goods. 'We have the confines of a deal with China,' Trump said Friday before leaving for Scotland. Bessent told MSNBC on Wednesday that the two countries after talks in Geneva and London have reached a 'status quo,' with the U.S. taxing imported goods from China at 30% and China responding with a 10% tariff, on top of tariffs prior to the start of Trump's second term. 'Now we can move on to discussing other matters in terms of bringing the economic relationship into balance,' Bessent said. He was referring to the U.S. running a $295.5 billion trade deficit last year. The U.S. seeks an agreement that would enable it to export more to China and shift the Chinese economy more toward domestic consumer spending. The Chinese embassy in Washington said Beijing hopes 'there will be more consensus and cooperation and less misperception' coming out of the talks. With an eye on a possible leaders' summit, Stockholm could provide some answers as to the timeline and viability of that particular goal ahead of a possible meeting between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. 'The meeting will be important in starting to set the stage for a fall meeting between Trump and Xi,' said Wendy Cutler, a former U.S. trade negotiator and now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute. 'Beijing will likely insist on detailed preparations before they agree to a leaders' meeting.' In Stockholm, the two sides are likely to focus on commercial announcements to be made at a leaders' summit as well as agreements to address 'major irritants,' such as China's industrial overcapacity and its lack of control over chemicals used to make fentanyl, also to be announced when Xi and Trump should meet, Cutler said. Sean Stein, president of the U.S.-China Business Council, said Stockholm could be the first real opportunity for the two governments to address structural reform issues including market access in China for U.S. companies. What businesses will be seeking coming out of Stockholm would largely be 'the atmosphere' — how the two sides characterize the discussions. They will also look for clues about a possible leaders' summit because any real deal will hinge on the two presidents meeting each other, he said. Fentanyl-related tariffs are likely a focus for China In Stockholm, Beijing will likely demand the removal of the 20% fentanyl-related tariff that Trump imposed earlier this year, said Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Washington-based Stimson Center. This round of the U.S.-China trade dispute began with fentanyl, when Trump in February imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese goods, citing that China failed to curb the outflow of the chemicals used to make the drug. The following month, Trump added another 10% tax for the same reason. Beijing retaliated with extra duties on some U.S. goods, including coal, liquefied natural gas, and farm products such as beef, chicken, pork and soy. In Geneva, both sides climbed down from three-digit tariffs rolled out following Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April, but the U.S. kept the 20% 'fentanyl' tariffs, in addition to the 10% baseline rate — to which China responded by keeping the same 10% rate on U.S. products. These across-the-board duties were unchanged when the two sides met in London a month later to negotiate over non-tariff measures such as export controls on critical products. The Chinese government has long protested that American politicians blame China for the fentanyl crisis in the U.S. but argued the root problem lies with the U.S. itself. Washington says Beijing is not doing enough to regulate precursor chemicals that flow out of China into the hands of drug dealers. In July, China placed two fentanyl ingredients under enhanced control, a move seen as in response to U.S. pressure and signaling goodwill. Gabriel Wildau, managing director at the consultancy Teneo, said he doesn't expect any tariff to go away in Stockholm but that tariff relief could be part of a final trade deal. 'It's possible that Trump would cancel the 20% tariff that he has explicitly linked with fentanyl, but I would expect the final tariff level on China to be at least as high as the 15-20% rate contained in the recent deals with Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam,' Wildau said. US wants China to dump less, buy less oil from Russia and Iran China's industrial overcapacity is as much a headache for the United States as it is for the European Union. Even Beijing has acknowledged the problem but suggested it might be difficult to address. America's trade imbalance with China has decreased from a peak of $418 billion in 2018, according to the Census Bureau. But China has found new markets for its goods and as the world's dominant manufacturer ran a global trade surplus approaching $1 trillion last year — somewhat larger than the size of the U.S. overall trade deficit in 2024. And China's emergence as a manufacturer of electric vehicles and other emerging technologies has suddenly made it more of a financial and geopolitical threat for those same industries based in the U.S., Europe, Japan and South Korea. 'Some enterprises, especially manufacturing enterprises, feel more deeply that China's manufacturing capabilities are too strong, and Chinese people are too hardworking. Factories run 24 hours a day,' Chinese Premier Li Qiang said on Thursday when hosting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Beijing. 'Some people think this will cause some new problems in the balance of supply and demand in world production.' 'We see this problem too,' Li said. Bessent also said the Stockholm talks could address Chinese purchases of Russian and Iranian oil. However, Wildau of Teneo said China could demand some U.S. security concessions in exchange, such as a reduced U.S. military presence in East Asia and scaled-back diplomatic support for Taiwan and the Philippines. This would likely face political pushback in Washington. The Stockholm talks will be 'geared towards building a trade agreement based around Chinese purchase commitments and pledges of investment in the U.S. in exchange for partial relief from U.S. tariffs and export controls,' Wildau said. He doubts there will be a grand deal. Instead, he predicts 'a more limited agreement based around fentanyl.' 'That,' he said, 'is probably the preferred outcome for China hawks in the Trump administration, who worry that an overeager Trump might offer too much to Xi.' ___ Associated Press writer Paul Wiseman contributed to this report Didi Tang And Josh Boak, The Associated Press
Forbes
28 minutes ago
- Forbes
Roth IRA Vs Traditional IRA How Much Will You Withdraw For Retirement?
Woman contemplating Roth IRA vs Traditional IRA decisions Roth IRA vs Traditional IRA retirement savings decisions are some of the most important financial choices you'll make when planning for retirement. Choosing between these two types of accounts can significantly impact their future income, tax burden, and financial flexibility. That said, there are two retirement phases to consider regarding this decision: saving up for retirement and how much you will spend in retirement on a.k.a. withdrawals, a.k.a. distributions a.k.a. decumulation. In this first part of a two-part series, I will start with the end in mind, spending. In this article, we'll explore the implications of withdrawals in each type of account, why the tax differences matter, and how aligning your strategy with your values, such as passing on savings to heirs or making charitable contributions can help you retire with both peace of mind and IRA vs Traditional IRA: Understanding Traditional IRA Taxes The first step in retirement planning if you have a long-time horizon is deciding how much income you want to spend. As horizons shorten, the question becomes how much income will my resources and current savings allow me to spend? Distributions from Traditional IRAs are taxed as income, while Roth IRA withdrawals are tax-free. While there are many potential retirement income strategies, to simplify the tax analysis, we will assume a flat annual income. Let's consider a simple scenario: Provisional Income determines how much of your Social Security is taxable: Provisional income = Half of your Social Security + Other taxable income = 50% × $25,000 + $X (Traditional IRA/401(k)/403(b)/457/TSP withdrawals) Provisional Social Security Income Because you'll be withdrawing at least $50,000, currently 85% of your Social Security will be taxed. 85% × $25,000 = $21,250 taxable Social Security Withdrawals from these accounts tax both the original savings any matching contributions and all of the growth. Assume $63,000 gross withdrawal from IRA/401(k)/403(b)/457/TSP: 2025 tax brackets for single filer (estimated): Federal income tax brackets Single filers for scenario Total federal tax = $1,160 + $4,266 + $4,708 = $10,134 Income Realized After Tax on Social Security and Withdrawals Ultimately, to net the $50,000 you had to pull more than what you IRA/401(k)/403(b)/457/TSP Tax Scenario Traditional IRA Federal Tax Scenario This calculation does not include state taxes. Depending on where you reside in retirement you may have to increase IRA vs Traditional IRA: Understanding Roth IRA Taxes If all your retirement savings are in Roth accounts (Roth IRA or Roth 401(k)), the outcome is very different from the Traditional IRA/401(k)/403(b)/457/TSP scenario. Here's a detailed breakdown of how much you'd need to withdraw to get $75,000 in post-tax income, assuming $25,000 from Social Security and needing $50,000 from your Roth accounts. Current Federal Tax RulesSocial Security Provisional Income Calculation Provisional income = Half of Social Security + taxable income = 0.5 × $25,000 + $0 = $12,500 Roth IRA tax scenario That means you need less in Roth savings to achieve the same spending power as you would in IRA/401(k)/403(b)/457/TSP. As you know, retirement is not a point in time but over time. Unfortunately, a time period that is unknown as my 96-year-old mother approaches her 97th birthday. Inflation has changed her spending needs since she retired at 62. Wish you had more money in Roth accounts? In 'Use Roth IRA Conversions to Cut Your Taxes and Boost Retirement Income' I explore how conversions can help manage taxable income and reduce Medicare IRMAA (Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount) IRA vs Traditional IRA: Required Minimum Distributions Traditional IRAs have RMDs whereas Roth accounts do not. With RMDs, the government says that you have had a tax holiday for quite a while and we need to start collecting revenue. This can speed up the depletion of your accounts for your own use, much less for heirs that you may have hoped would reap the rewards of your unused funds. For more on IRA withdrawal rules, visit the IRS Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) IRA vs Traditional IRA: Income Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA) In addition to this consideration, you should also consider Medicare's IRMAA. This adjusts the monthly premium on your Medicare premiums. While IRMAA has a tiered system similar to the tax brackets, it is not as kind. Medicare Income Related Monthly Adjustment Allowance First, once you hit the tier, you are in that tier, there is no averaging of the brackets. Furthermore, if you are 1$ over, you are in the next bracket. In this case, your required minimum distribution, not your needed income, could push you into this new IRMAA bracket. I know a few people where their RMD pushed them into a higher IRMAA IRA vs Traditional IRA: Taxes Over a 30-year period Consider the following assumptions of a 30-year period Roth vs. Traditional IRA comparison assuming:30-Year Account Depletion Comparison (Inflation-Adjusted) If you were to fully deplete each account over 30 years to meet your retirement income goal (adjusted 3% annually for inflation): Roth IRA vs Traditional IR Account depletion You can easily see that you would need $1.39 million more in Traditional IRA/401(k)/403(b)/457/TSP than in Roth to generate the same after-tax income over 30 years. Roth accounts provide a major advantage in tax efficiency and simplicity, especially in retirement years with predictable income Thoughts Roth IRA vs Traditional IRA Savings All of the Roth IRA vs Traditional IRA scenarios were simplified in order to highlight the difference in savings from a future tax perspective. While many financial professionals have suggested diversifying the savings approaches. Under the scenario that I have laid out, clearly there is one winner. Many mistakenly believe that there IRA savings gives them a much larger current deduction than it already does. If you target the zero tax of Roth, you are taking tax increase risk off of the table. Also, your cognitive powers are likely going to decline somewhere during a long retirement period. This may nullify the great tax diversification you had developed during your younger days. All of this said, I don't believe in one size fits all. Your circumstances may be unique. I hope that this article on Roth IRA vs Traditional IRA encourages you to build your own scenarios and to stress test and build your own and stress test them.
New York Times
28 minutes ago
- New York Times
For Trump, E.U. Trade Deal was Badly Needed
For months, President Trump's penchant for overhyping the speed at which he could negotiate complex trade deals has been the butt of Washington jokes. 'Ninety days ago, Donald Trump promised the world that his tariffs would lead to 90 deals in 90 days,' the Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, said earlier this month, adding: 'By my count, he's about 88 trade deals short.' So on Sunday, when Mr. Trump announced a trade agreement with the European Union, it was not only his biggest trade deal to date, but also, politically, his most badly needed. After going months without securing deals, Mr. Trump is now coming off his most productive stretch of trade negotiations, landing agreements in recent days with the Philippines, Japan and Indonesia as well as the European Union, which represents 27 countries. The deal with the European Union, at least upon first impression, seemed to give Mr. Trump much of what he wanted. 'I'm very surprised how the European Union gave in to Trump's demands,' said Douglas Irwin, a professor of economics at Dartmouth College. 'I thought the E.U. would be the most prone to retaliation. And yet, they didn't do it. They really gave in to most of what Trump wanted.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
