Cork Airport crowned best regional airport in Europe
It previously won the award in the 2017 and 2019, with Taoiseach Micheál Martin describing the accolade as a 'prestigious honour'.
'This recognition is thoroughly deserved. The airport team has worked tirelessly to enhance operational efficiency, offer exceptional passenger experience, and deliver on ambitious environmental and sustainability goals,' said ACI Europe Director General Olivier Jankovec.
"Their success is clearly reflected in increased air connectivity and passenger numbers which means a growing contribution from the airport to the regional economy, tourism and competitiveness."
The airport recently added four new routes to Corfu, Izmir, Bilbao and Bordeaux, with passenger numbers on track to reach beyond 3.4 million passengers this year.
It welcomed 3.2 million passengers last year, a 10pc growth year-on-year.
A €200 million investment by the DAA Group in the development of infrastructure at the airport plans to include a new mezzanine floor for an expanded security area, a larger duty-free shop, a bigger executive lounge, additional car park spaces, more boarding gates, new aircraft stands, and a new pier.
Cork Airport's Managing Director Niall MacCarthy said the award is 'a fantastic endorsement of the incredible people who make Cork Airport what it is—from our frontline teams to those behind-the-scenes, and everyone in between'.
"It's also a reflection of the strong partnerships we've built with all our stakeholders, and the loyalty of our passengers who continue to choose Cork Airport. We're immensely proud to win this award for the third time and we're committed to continuing to grow our contribution to the south of Ireland.'
Meanwhile, Kenny Jacobs, the CEO of DAA, said the award is 'a huge recognition of the brilliant team on the ground who deliver for passengers every single day'.
"This award's not just for the airport - it's for Cork, for Munster, and for Ireland. We have big plans for Cork, and this is a great boost.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Extra.ie
5 hours ago
- Extra.ie
Why couples on €100k can't afford vast bulk of three-bedroom semi-Ds
Property prices are now so high that a couple on a combined income of more than €100,000 will only be able to afford an average-priced new three-bed semi in one of five locations nationwide, a new housing report shows. The couple also need a minimum 10% deposit under the Central Bank's lending rules. Adding to the burden, estate agents expect prices to increase by an average of 5% over the next 12 months. Up to 70% of agents report that low supply is the main driver of house price inflation. Some 60% believe prices are increasing but will level off soon, while another 18% believe they have peaked. Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin and Fine Gael leader Simon Harris. Pic: Sasko Lazarov/ Some 88% of estate agents describe current residential property prices as 'expensive' or 'very expensive' – that's up from 83% in January. The Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland (SCSI) Residential Mid-Year Market Monitor 2025 report highlights that affordability challenges have intensified for first-time buyers. The average typical listed price for a three-bed semi in the first six months of this year is €357,850, 12.3% higher than a year previously and 40% higher than at the onset of Covid. In the most expensive counties outside Dublin, a couple will face a shortfall of €65,200 in Wicklow and €22,000 in Kildare for that house type. The current rate of inflation in the market is the highest seen in the decade since mortgage market rules were introduced. The surge in inflation is relatively broadly based, with the Dublin figure of 12.3% in line with the average for the rest of the country, according to the latest House Price Report. In the rest of Leinster, the annual increase in prices is 14.3%, whereas inflation is close to the national average in both Limerick city at 12.8% and Galway city at 12.5%. In Waterford city, the rate is higher again at 15.2%, while in Cork city the increase in prices is slower, at 8.6%. Areas around the country highlighted by the report show that prices in Dublin stand at €467,913, up 12.3%. A Galway city average house costs €426,348, which is up 12.5%, followed by Cork city at €369,938 – up 8.6%. Limerick city stands at €311,086 – up 12.8%. The rest of the country has average house costs reaching €309,954 which is up 12.5%. Pic: Shutterstock SCSI president Gerard O'Toole said the report indicated mounting concern over the supply of housing and a recent slowdown in home-building. He said a total of '51% of agents in our survey cite lack of supply as the main factor driving price inflation, up from 46% a year ago. 'In 2023, the figure was 35%, so we can really see the impact the lack of supply is having on house prices. At the same time, 70% of agents are reporting low stock levels of new and second-hand homes, again underscoring the persistent challenge of limited supply in the market. 'Over the past five years more than half of agents have consistently highlighted low stock levels, stressing that constrained supply remains a fundamental issue affecting the market,' he added. 'With the ESRI forecasting that 37,000 new homes will be built this year, well short of the Government's target of 41,000, the urgent need to address infrastructural shortcomings and for the Housing Activation Office to become fully operational as soon as possible can't be overstated. 'The other main factors, which 20% of our members believe are influencing price movements, include the state of the economy. 'A further 16% said the continued availability of Government support schemes such as Help to Buy and First Home Scheme are influencing house prices. 'We have had 12 years of continuous price growth and the level of increases we have seen in recent years is just not sustainable. 'In the medium to long term, the only way to ensure prices stabilise is to ramp up supply,' Mr O'Toole said.
RTÉ News
18 hours ago
- RTÉ News
First kite of pre-budget season flew over Leinster House
Bird watchers sometimes herald the sighting of the first swallow of the year as the start of spring. And, not to be outdone, political anoraks have a similar phrase too. The first kite of the pre-budget season flew high and mighty over a quieter than usual Leinster House this week, as the beginning of the Dáil's summer recess was interrupted by a potentially serious political row gliding into view. Not for the first time, it involved a once cast-iron pre-election promise whose carefully choreographed landing now risks becoming a victim of some not exactly unexpected post-election economic turbulence. And, not for the last time, the planned flight trajectory could yet be replaced by an all too public nose dive as the Coalition checks its political radar for signs of how to navigate its way between two competing financial priorities. Hospitality tax cut The reason for the situation is a Programme for Government promise which is now at real risk of being delayed. In the January document, which outlines what Government intends to do in power, the Fianna Fáil-Fine Gael-Independents Coalition confirmed that the existing 13.5% hospitality VAT rate would be reduced. That commitment, which was one of Fine Gael's key commitments in last November's General Election, was widely seen as indicating but did not explicitly point to this October's Budget as the moment the 13.5% rate would be cut to 9%. Such a move would support struggling restaurants, bars, cafes, pubs and hotels, and therefore help protect jobs. "Our Budget decisions could change depending on the economic environment we find ourselves in." But its near €1 billion price tag would mean less financial space for cost of living supports for the wider pubic, an issue that was made crystal clear as Government outlined its immediate economic plans this week. During a press conference at Government Buildings on Tuesday, Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Tánaiste Simon Harris, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe and Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers announced the Coalition's National Development Plan and Summer Economic Statement. The former outlined a €275bn capital projects war chest for the coming decade, including aspirational promises and dazzling numbers like €36bn for housing, €22bn for transport infrastructure such as the long-delayed Dublin Metro, and almost €10bn for health. But the latter was more pragmatic, detailing in practical terms how much money Government actually has to play with in its coffers right now - and, specifically, space for €1.5bn worth of tax cuts in Budget 2026. The figure may seem like a lot, and it is, but it still does not pay for everything voters want. And, inevitably, that means difficult choices for the coalition to make, including when it comes to promises previously given. Despite both Mr Martin and Mr Harris saying in recent months that the cut will happen, Mr Donohoe told reporters that the expected hospital VAT reduction from 13.5% to 9% was not as certain as previously indicated. Rarely one to misspeak, Minister Donohoe explained that if the hospitality VAT rate is reduced it is important "to be open" about the fact "trade offs" with other sections of society may be necessary. "I have always made clear my intention with regard to that [the hospitality VAT cut]," he said. His use of the word "intention" rather than anything stronger peaked the interest of attending reporters. "But I have also said there are trade offs, and there are consequences to that," he said. "And there are therefore other things that we are not going to be able to do. "If you were to bring forward a tax package that was to fund a full year measure that was in relation to the VAT, the cost of that would be nearly a €1bn." "And then if I was to add to that other measures we've done in the past, we would have a tax package that is far bigger than what I believe would be safe," he said. He added: "Our Budget decisions could change depending on the economic environment we find ourselves in." A pre-budget kite, in other words. And one that has caused if not a split, then certainly some friction, within the Coalition as competing political priorities have emerged. Internal Coalition friction While Minister Donohoe's comments were likely designed to point out the reality of the dilemma for Government rather than specifically rule out the hospitality tax cuts this year, they did open the door to the prospect within at least some sections of the coalition. By Wednesday, several Government sources had indicated privately that the cut should be delayed until July 2026, with Fianna Fáil members - including the wily long-time Limerick City TD Willie O'Dea - among those to publicly nudge forward the argument. Speaking on Friday on RTÉ's Morning Ireland programme, Deputy O'Dea said given the limited scope for tax reductions in the upcoming budget, he would "like to see it [the €1.5bn in available tax cuts] more equitably divided", with "an increase in tax credits and tax bands in line with inflation" his priority. Asked if this is because it would be difficult to convince voters to support helping the hospitality sector first, given a disputed reputation for price gouging by some businesses in that sector, Deputy O'Dea said: "It's not just a question of would it be hard to sell to the public, it's would it be good for the economy." Responding to suggestions of friction in the Coalition over the situation, he added: "I wouldn't describe it as friction, people have different views and that's what Coalition government is about." "I don't understand what kind of kites the Government are flying in relation to this cut for the hospitality industry, the Government are sewing massive seeds of confusion on this yet again." Deputy O'Dea's view was echoed privately by numerous Fianna Fáil TDs, and a smaller number of Fine Gael colleagues, who questioned how prioritising help for businesses instead of cost of living supports for the wider public might play out. And senior Government sources did little to kill off the suggestion when asked. But Fine Gael TD and Minister for Enterprise and Tourism Peter Burke - the politician responsible for the sector - had a different view during a hastily organised press briefing at Government Buildings on Thursday. Asked if he would acknowledge the hospitality VAT tax rate cut will now be delayed until next summer, Minister Burke responded: "Absolutely not acknowledging that, any negotiations will form part of the budget. "We're now still in July and it's very important to note the Budget will consider all options in every different sector." Opposition criticism The opposition, it is fair to say, were less than impressed over the apparent confusion over whether the hospitality tax cut would still go ahead on 1 January or be delayed until at least next July. Labour TD Duncan Smith said bluntly: "I don't understand what kind of kites the Government are flying in relation to this cut for the hospitality industry, the Government are sewing massive seeds of confusion on this yet again." That view was shared by other opposition TDs, including Sinn Féin's Donnchadh O'Laoghaire who said the Coalition needs to find a way to help both the hospitality sector and the wider public through cost of living supports. And it was echoed too by non-political groups representing those in the sector, which became locked in a war of words over what should happen next. Responding to the watering down of the previous tax cut promise, Restaurants Association of Ireland Chief Executive Adrian Cummins said: "If the VAT rate doesn't reduce to 9% from January 1, you'll see more and more closures" and resulting job losses, noting more than 200 restaurants have already closed this year. However, the view was countered by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions general secretary Owen Reidy. "The proposal to cut the VAT rate at a time of huge economic uncertainty flies in the face of all available evidence, and would amount to nothing less than economic vandalism," he said. "The Government has identified many laudable priorities as part of its programme for Government: housing, reductions in child poverty, and investment in disability services. "Given that ministers have been giving serious warnings about economic uncertainty, why would they prioritise a corporate handout costing almost €1bn?" Government dilemma That latter point goes to the heart of the difficulty now facing Government, and in part helps to explain the early nature of this week's at times contradictory pre-budget kite flying. While there is a strong argument for the need to protect businesses, and therefore jobs, in the hospitality sector during a period of intense global financial uncertainty, few politicians would want to be seen to be doing so at the expense of supports for households during that same economic turbulence. In that context a calculated delay to the hospitality VAT rate cut plans makes some sense, as it would allow Government to continue to argue it will - eventually - keep its promise while giving itself more short-term financial space to protect the wider public. That plan, however, comes with a significant catch, in that the hospitality sector is insistent a delay to the tax cut will see people lose their jobs. But, more than one Government TD has privately noted this week, not delaying the tax cut in order to have more space for wider public cost of living supports would put households at risk and give opposition parties an obvious line of attack the coalition could do without. The first kite of the pre-budget season has now soared into view. Depending on which way the economic and public wind blows, it could yet lead to an unexpectedly bumpy political ride.
The Journal
2 days ago
- The Journal
Election pledge by Micheál Martin to double Renters' Tax Credit will cost €160m
DOUBLING THE RENTERS' Tax Credit to €2,000, something Taoiseach Micheál Martin pledged to do before the general election, will cost €160 million, according an expert advisory panel at the Department of Finance. The Tax Strategy Group papers which advise the government prior to the government, sets out that increasing the tax credit would incur varying costs to the Exchequer depending on how much the credit is raised. In an interview with The Journal , prior to the election, Martin outlined some of his party's housing priorities, pledging to boost the Renters' Tax Credit to €2,000 per person. Currently, the credit amounts to €1,000 per person or €2,000 per couple claiming. Advertisement Promise to double credit 'at a minimum' Martin said that people needed to have some financial pressure alleviated and the tax credit would help, stating: At a minimum, we would like to double it in the next government. Fine Gael, in its election manifesto promised to increase Rent Tax Credit to €1,500 per renter or €3,000 per couple, to support tenants in managing expenses. In the programme for government, there is a commitment to progressively increase the Rent Tax Credit. Revenue estimates that increasing the credit by €100 for single people and €200 for jointly assessed couples would cost the Exchequer approximately €20 million annually, the newly published tax papers set out. A larger increase of €500 for single people and €1,000 for jointly assessed couples would cost €95 million annually, while doubling the value of the credit to €2,000 for single people and €4,000 for jointly assessed couples would cost €160 million, the review states. The Summer Economic Statement set out that this year's €9.4bn budget includes a €1.5bn tax package. Related Reads No protections against rising rents for students leaving private tenancies at end of year New rental regulations will allow landlords increase rents if previous tenant leaves voluntarily Rental prices rising at near 20-year high as Limerick rents shoot up towards Dublin levels The largest group of claimants of the tax credit are young adults between 21 and 30 years old, the tax experts state. This is followed by individuals aged between 31 and 40 years old. 'This indicates a strong uptake of the relief and likely a larger renting population in this cohort. 'The difference between the amount of credit claimed and the amount of credit used is higher for the younger cohort; the difference tends to decrease as the claimants' age increases. This is likely to reflect lower incomes and hence less tax paid in the younger cohorts,' the review reports. Majority who claim earn less than €40k More than half of the Renters' Tax Credit claimants have a gross income lower than €40,000, while claimants reporting a gross income larger than €100,000 account for 7% of all claimants. Claimants with lower gross incomes also show lower rates of credit used over the total amount claimed, with the report stating that this is most likely because they have not paid sufficient income tax to fully absorb the tax credit. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
