logo
Rural schools in US struggle as Trump admin cuts mental health grants

Rural schools in US struggle as Trump admin cuts mental health grants

In parts of rural upstate New York, schools have more than 1,100 students for every mental health provider. In a far-flung region with little public transportation, those few school counsellors often are the only mental health professionals available to students.
Hennessey Lustica has been overseeing grant-funded efforts to train and hire more school psychologists, counsellors and social workers in the Finger Lakes region, but those efforts may soon come to end a casualty of the Trump administration's decision to cancel school mental health grants around the country.
Cutting this funding is just going to devastate kids, said Lustica, project director of the Wellness Workforce Collaborative in the Seneca Falls Central School District. The workforce that we're developing, just in my 21 school districts it's over 20,000 kids that are going to be impacted by this and not have the mental health support that they need.
The $1 billion in grants for school-based mental health programs were part of a sweeping gun violence bill signed by President Joe Biden in 2022 in response to the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas. The grants were meant to help schools hire more psychologists, counsellors and other mental health workers, especially in rural areas.
Under the Biden administration, the department prioritised applicants who showed how they would increase the number of providers from diverse backgrounds, or from communities directly served by the school district. But President Donald Trump's administration took issue with aspects of the grant programmes that touched on race, saying they were harmful to students.
We owe it to American families to ensure that taxpayer dollars are supporting evidence-based practices that are truly focused on improving students' mental health, Education Department spokesperson Madi Biedermann said.
School districts around the US cut off training and retention programmes
Lustica learned of her grant's cancellation in April in a two-page letter from the Education Department, which said the government found that her work violated civil rights law. It did not specify how.
Lustica is planning to appeal the decision. She rejected the letter's characterisation of her work, saying she and her colleagues abide by a code of ethics that honours each person's individuality, regardless of race, gender or identity.
The rhetoric is just false, Lustica said. I don't know how else to say it. I think if you looked at these programmes and looked at the impact that these programs have in our rural school districts, and the stories that kids will tell you about the mental health professionals that are in their schools, it has helped them because of this programme.
The grants supported programmes in districts across the country. In California, West Contra Costa Unified School District will lose nearly $4 million in funding. In Alabama, Birmingham City Schools was notified it would not receive the rest of a $15 million grant it was using to train, hire and retain mental health staff.
In Wisconsin, the state's Department of Public Instruction will lose $8 million allocated for the next four years. The state had used the money to boost retention and expand programmes to encourage high schoolers to pursue careers in school-based mental health.
At a time when communities are urgently asking for help serving mental health needs, this decision is indefensible, state superintendent Jill Underly said in a statement.
In recent House and Senate hearings, Democrats pressed Education Secretary Linda McMahon on the end of the grants and the impact on students. McMahon told them mental health is a priority and the grants would be rebid and reissued.
Anyone who works or spends time with kids knows these grants were funding desperately needed access to mental health care services, American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten said in a statement. Cancelling the funding now is a cruel, reckless act that puts millions of children at risk.
Grant programmes put more mental health specialists in schools
The strains on youth mental health are acute in many rural school districts.
In one upstate New York district, half the students have had to move due to economic hardship in the last five years, creating instability that can affect their mental health, Lustica said. In a survey of students from sixth through 12th grade in one county, nearly half reported feeling sad or depressed most of the time; one in three said their lives lacked clear purpose or meaning.
We've got huge amounts of depression, huge amounts of anxiety, lots of trauma and not enough providers, Lustica said. School is the place where kids are getting a lot of the services they need.
Some families in the region are unable to afford private counselling or are unable to get their children to appointments given transportation challenges, said Danielle Legg, a graduate student who did an internship as a school social worker with funding from the grant programme.
Their access to mental health care truly is limited to when they're in school and there's a provider there that can see them, and it's vital, Legg said.
In the past three years, 176 students completed their mental health training through the programme Lustica oversees, and 85 per cent of them were hired into shortage areas, she said.
The programme that offered training to graduate students at schools helped address staffing needs and inspired many to pursue careers in educational settings, said Susan McGowan, a school social worker who supervised graduate students in Geneva City School District.
It just feels, to me, really catastrophic, McGowan said of the grant cancellation. These positions are difficult to fill, so when you get grad students who are willing to work hand in hand with other professionals in their building, you're actually building your capacity as far as staffing goes and you're supporting teachers.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why is Barron Trump facing calls to join the US Army? Netizens say ‘be a patriot'
Why is Barron Trump facing calls to join the US Army? Netizens say ‘be a patriot'

Hindustan Times

time18 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Why is Barron Trump facing calls to join the US Army? Netizens say ‘be a patriot'

Following President Donald Trump's strike on Iran's nuclear sites, a new storm is brewing on social media. This time, it's not just about foreign policy or military strategy. It's about 19-year-old Barron Trump, and the internet has thoughts. After Trump's military strike on Iran, social media users are questioning why Barron Trump isn't enlisting in the military, citing his father's past deferments. (Photo by ANGELA WEISS / AFP)(AFP) Following Trump's decision to deploy B-2 bombers to drop 'bunker buster' bombs on Iran's key uranium enrichment facilities, Fordow, without congressional approval, netizens began calling on the youngest Trump son to enlist in the U.S. military. ALSO READ| Barron Trump got rejected by Harvard? Claims surface after university's SEVP revoked Netizen demand Barron to enlist in US Army 'Don't panic, MAGA; not a single Trump 'male' will be anywhere near the fighting,' one person posted on X. 'If Trump decides USA should get involved in a ground war in Iran, I assume Barron will be enlisting since Trump family has so much love and support for our troops? Be a patriot!' another said. 'Barron trump should be the first young American to be deployed in donald trump's war against Iran,' one posted. 'Don't panic, MAGA; not a single Trump 'male' will be anywhere near the fighting. Barron already has developed preemptive fake bone spurs,' another mocked, alluding to Donald's 'bone spurs' deferments. Notably, the POTUS received five deferments during the Vietnam War, four for education and one for alleged bone spurs. That final deferment however has long been questioned, with former Trump attorney Michael Cohen testifying before Congress in 2019 that Trump admitted the injury was faked. 'He told me not to answer the specific questions by reporters but rather offer simply the fact that he received a medical deferment,' Cohen recalled, per CNN. 'He finished the conversation with the following comment: 'You think I'm stupid, I wasn't going to Vietnam.'' ALSO READ| Who is Barron Trump's mystery girlfriend with whom he 'hangs out a lot' on NYU campus? 'There is no reason why Barron is living in NYC with his Step Daddy Hank, living life like a normal 19-year-old. He should be in boot camp right now. Or, get deported back to the country of which he sprung with his Mother,' another user outpoured his frustration against Trump family.

‘Is my baby going to be a citizen?': US Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship triggers fear among immigrants
‘Is my baby going to be a citizen?': US Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship triggers fear among immigrants

First Post

time30 minutes ago

  • First Post

‘Is my baby going to be a citizen?': US Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship triggers fear among immigrants

The US Supreme Court's landmark ruling blunting a potent weapon that federal judges have used to block government policies nationwide during legal challenges was in many ways a victory for President Donald Trump, except perhaps on the very policy he is seeking to enforce. read more The US Supreme Court's decision on Friday has sown confusion and anxiety among immigrant families particularly those with expectant mothers over the future of birthright citizenship in the country. The ruling, delivered by the court's conservative majority on Friday allows an executive order by President Donald Trump to partially move forward. The order, issued on his first day back in office this January seeks to end the automatic granting of US citizenship to children born on American soil unless at least one parent is a US citizen or legal permanent resident. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Though three lower court judges had blocked the measure nationwide, citing constitutional concerns, the Supreme Court did not directly rule on the order's legality. Instead, it curbed the ability of judges to issue broad, nationwide injunctions, opening the door for the policy to take effect in some states while legal battles continue in others. That partial green light has created uncertainty about how the ruling will be applied and who it will affect, particularly in the 28 states that did not challenge the executive order. Immigration attorneys and advocacy groups have since reported a surge in calls from worried parents and expectant immigrants trying to understand what the decision means for their children's citizenship. One of them is Lorena, a 24-year-old Colombian asylum seeker living in Houston and due to give birth in September. After scanning news reports, she told AP she was left more confused than reassured. 'There are not many specifics. I don't understand it well,' she said. Her main concern: what if her baby is born without any nationality? 'I don't know if I can pass on my citizenship. I also don't know if I can add her to my asylum claim. I just don't want her to be stateless.' Trump has framed his crackdown on birthright citizenship as part of a broader immigration reform agenda, arguing that current policies serve as a 'magnet' for migrants seeking to give birth in the U.S. 'Hundreds of thousands of people are pouring into our country under birthright citizenship, and it wasn't meant for that reason,' he said at a White House briefing. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Legal experts, however, warn that the current situation risks creating a fragmented and chaotic system. Kathleen Bush-Joseph of the Migration Policy Institute cautioned that different states could now interpret and apply the order differently. 'Would individual hospitals have to determine the citizenship of babies and their parents? It's an extremely confusing patchwork,' she said. In response to the ruling, advocacy groups filed an amended lawsuit in Maryland federal court on Friday afternoon seeking class-action protection for individuals who may be denied citizenship under the new policy. The fear is already palpable on the ground. Lynn Tramonte of the Ohio Immigrant Alliance recounted receiving a call from a man on a temporary visa whose pregnant wife was due soon. Worried that Ohio wasn't among the states challenging the policy, he wanted to know how he could safeguard his child's citizenship. Some groups—such as CASA in Maryland and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project, remain shielded from the policy under prior court rulings, but it remains unclear whether people in other states could join these organizations to gain the same protection. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For US-born Betsy, a recent high school graduate from Virginia and a CASA member, the policy feels deeply personal. Her Salvadoran parents were undocumented when she was born. 'It targets innocent kids who haven't even been born yet,' she said, asking to withhold her full name for safety. Others are also grappling with the implications. Nivida, a Honduran asylum seeker in Louisiana and a member of the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project, recently gave birth. On Friday, she got a call from a pregnant friend—also undocumented—terrified about what might happen under Louisiana's Republican administration. 'She asked, 'If my baby is born here, will she still be a citizen?' As the legal process unfolds and enforcement details remain murky, expectant immigrant parents are left in limbo unsure whether their US-born children will be granted the very citizenship once considered a constitutional birthright. With inputs from agencies

Iran must tread carefully in framing post-ceasefire strategy
Iran must tread carefully in framing post-ceasefire strategy

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Iran must tread carefully in framing post-ceasefire strategy

As a Persian proverb warns, 'Bravado without power is like a lion's roar from a sheep's throat,' Iran's defiance may echo loudly, but it risks being drowned out by the consequences of its own overreach read more The ceasefire notwithstanding, Iran has a brand new strategic mix for the near future. The first part of Iran's war strategy includes threatening traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint through which a fifth of the world's oil flows. This is a high-stakes gamble rooted in the sea denial principles of the British naval theorist Julian Corbett. Yet, despite its calculated bravado, Iran's approach is likely to lead to a protracted conflict it cannot win, exposing its strategic vulnerabilities and risking regional escalation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Corbett's sea denial theory, which emphasises disrupting an adversary's control of maritime routes without seeking outright naval dominance, is evident in three facets of Iran's strategy. First, Iran deploys fast-attack boats armed with anti-ship missiles, designed to harass and deter larger naval forces through asymmetric hit-and-run tactics. Second, its naval assets, including submarines and mine-laying vessels, aim to create uncertainty and raise the costs of operating in the Strait. Third, Iran leverages its coastal geography, studded with missile batteries and radar stations, to project power over the narrow waterway, threatening commercial and military shipping alike. These tactics align with Corbett's vision of a weaker navy frustrating a stronger opponent's freedom of movement. Yet Iran's strategy extends beyond the Strait. It is likely to be flanked by the continued threat of missile strikes on American air bases in Qatar, Bahrain, and Iraq, targeting the US military presence that underpins regional security. These attacks, however, are unlikely to yield decisive results. US bases are fortified, with advanced missile defence systems like Patriot and Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) capable of intercepting most threats. Moreover, such strikes risk galvanising American resolve and international condemnation without significantly degrading US operational capacity. A critical flaw in Iran's plan lies in the geography of the strait itself. Iran controls only the northern half; the southern half is Oman's jurisdiction. This bilateral control severely limits Iran's ability to enforce a complete blockade without provoking Oman or other Gulf states, which would escalate the conflict into a broader regional war. The US Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, further tilts the balance. With its carrier strike groups, destroyers, and air superiority, the fleet possesses overwhelming firepower to counter Iran's naval and missile threats. While Iran's asymmetric tactics may cause temporary disruptions, they cannot match the sustained power projection of the US Navy. The Fifth Fleet's ability to secure the Strait, supported by allies like Israel, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, ensures that any Iranian blockade would be short-lived. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Iran's strategy also risks self-inflicted wounds. By threatening to close the Strait, Iran endangers its own energy exports, which account for a significant portion of its revenue. China, Iran's largest oil buyer, would view such disruptions with alarm, as Beijing relies on stable Gulf energy supplies. Unlike Saddam Hussein, who recklessly attacked oil infrastructure during the Iran-Iraq War, Iran is unlikely to repeat this mistake, aware that alienating China and other trading partners would compound its economic woes. Compounding Iran's challenges is its weakened regional position. Its proxies, Hamas and Hezbollah, are diminished, with the former reeling from Israel's campaigns and the latter constrained by Lebanon's internal chaos. Iran's influence in Syria and Iraq has waned, eroded by local resistance and external pressures. Domestically, Iran's military is hamstrung by sanctions, outdated equipment, and a lack of air superiority—a critical disadvantage against the US and its allies. Yet this weakness makes Iran dangerous. With its prestige at stake, Tehran may feel compelled to double down and break the ceasefire at the earliest. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Iran's gambit in the Strait of Hormuz is thus a paradox: a bold strategy born of vulnerability. As a Persian proverb warns, 'Bravado without power is like a lion's roar from a sheep's throat.' Iran's defiance may echo loudly, but it risks being drowned out by the consequences of its own overreach. The writer is a senior journalist with expertise in defence. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store