
Common chemicals in plastic linked to over 350,000 deaths from heart disease
Phthalates are a set of chemicals that are added to plastic to make it more stretchy, soft, or flexible. In lotions, shampoos and perfumes, phthalates can be used to retain
scents. But the chemicals, which are so common
that some researchers call them 'everywhere chemicals,' have attracted widespread concern from scientists.
Advertisement
In epidemiological studies, phthalates have been linked to male fertility problems, heart disease, obesity, and ADHD. The United States allows nine kinds of phthalates to be used in food packaging. They are an example of what scientists call 'endocrine-disrupting chemicals,' which can tweak and change the hormones in the body, causing multiple health problems.
Advertisement
'We already know that phthalates are toxic chemicals,' said Tracey Woodruff, a professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive health at the University of California at San Francisco, who was not involved in the study. In recent years, she pointed out, scientists and environmental organizations have pushed lawmakers to get phthalates out of food packaging, and other plastics. 'This just shows why that's a good idea,' Woodruff added.
Kevin Ott, the executive director of the Flexible Vinyl Alliance, which represents the makers of polyvinyl chloride, said in an email that many studies on the health risks of phthalates do not meet the highest standards of evidence. The Food and Drug Administration confirmed as recently as 2018 that phthalates are not clearly linked with any health effects, Ott added.
The new study drew on surveys from around the globe that evaluated exposure to DEHP, one particular type of phthalate, through urine samples. Researchers then matched exposure to the chemical to increased risk of cardiovascular death.
They found that phthalates contributed to 13 percent of all deaths from heart disease in people between ages 55 and 64 globally. In the United States, it was around 10 percent. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide: In 2021, an estimated 20 million people died because of heart disease.
Trasande says that while 13 percent may seem like a high number, phthalate exposure may overlap with and exacerbate other risks. Phthalates are believed to create excess inflammation in the body, and they are linked with other conditions that increase heart disease mortality, such as obesity and high blood pressure. Some of the increased risk of heart disease from obesity, for example, could be from phthalates.
The chemicals are also found more commonly in highly processed foods, another risk factor for death from heart disease.
Advertisement
Scientists estimate that air pollution, which also can contain tiny plastic particles, is linked to 20 percent of all cardiovascular deaths globally.
Recent research — albeit with a small sample size — has also found that the presence of microplastics or nanoplastics in the carotid artery increases the risk of heart attack, stroke, or death. Researchers are trying to understand the extent to which those tiny plastics can carry chemicals like phthalates with them.
But people with more phthalates in their bodies are probably more exposed to plastics, and therefore to microplastics and nanoplastics as well, Trasande said.
'It could be the chemicals that are being delivered, or it could be the micro and nanoplastics,' said Trasande. 'And that's really where the field needs to go scientifically.'
Other research looking at deaths from phthalates has come to similar results. One study published late last year found that phthalates were responsible for about 164,000 deaths worldwide in 2015, most due to heart disease and high blood pressure. That study examined just 40 countries, while the new study looked at around 190.
While animal studies have also found connections between phthalates and heart disease, some researchers say more human studies would help solidify the link. 'It would be important to have someone do a systematic review on phthalates and cardiovascular events,' said Woodruff. 'But it's just a new area.'
For now, scientists continue to push for more monitoring of the chemicals in plastic. In most countries around the world, companies are not required to reveal chemical additives to plastics, which include things like phthalates, BPA, and flame retardants. Many of those plastics end up in low-income countries along with mountains of plastic waste for recycling or disposal.
Advertisement
'They are the receivers of all the plastic garbage,' Woodruff said. 'And the phthalates are going to be there, too.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
a day ago
- UPI
FDA closes investigation into deadly listeria outbreak
The Food and Drug Administration has closed an investigation into a listeria outbreak. It was responsible one death and at least 10 people being sickened. File Photo (2020) Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA July 24 (UPI) -- The Food and Drug Administration has closed an investigation into a listeria outbreak that killed one person and sickened 10 in several western states, health officials announced Thursday. People were sickened by the outbreak after consuming products produced by California-based Fresh & Ready Foods, officials announced Thursday. The recall applied to Ready-to-Eat products sold in Arizona, California, Nevada and Washington. Illnesses have been reported in California and Nevada. Dozens of items have been recalled, ranging from sandwiches and protein snacks to pasta dishes and croissants. "FDA is working with Fresh & Ready Foods on corrective and preventive actions," the FDA said in a statement. The recalled products were distributed between April 18th and April 28th in vending machines and breakrooms in corporate offices, medical buildings and healthcare facilities, the FDA said. The products had "Use By" dates between April 22nd and May19th. The FDA said it made the discovery during environmental testing at a production facility that turned up listeria on a piece of equipment. "Fresh & Ready Foods has taken immediate corrective actions including removing equipment to address this issue to ensure ongoing food safety and compliance with FDA guidelines," the statement continued.


Politico
a day ago
- Politico
Trump is all-in on AI sandboxes. Do they work?
With help from Anthony Adragna Among the many, many ambitious ideas baked into his AI Action Plan, President Donald Trump wants to inculcate a 'try-first' culture for innovation in the U.S. The plan, released Wednesday, includes a strong push for industries to hurry up with adopting AI — arguing that 'many of America's most critical sectors,' notably health care, have been slow to integrate it into their operations. And when it comes to the nitty-gritty of how this is supposed to happen, the White House suggests a classic tech-world mechanism: Regulatory sandboxes. 'Sandbox' is a term that gets thrown around a lot in tech, usually referring to a closed environment to test software. When talking about policy, a sandbox is a little different: It essentially gives companies a temporary hall pass on pre-existing regulations — like those for medical devices or data privacy — to pilot new technologies to the public. The idea is that, based on data collected during the trial period, companies can adjust their product designs, and governments can tailor their technology regulations. Federal agencies have previously implemented sandboxes for emerging tech, most notably in financial services. The action plan calls on the Food and Drug Administration and other agencies to establish similar programs for AI — though it's unclear where the funding will come from. Sandboxes for AI systems have already popped up in various states. Last year, Utah enacted a law that has allowed companies to run some tryouts: The ElizaChat platform got approval for a 12-month trial of mental health chatbots, and a firm called Dentacor was allowed to test AI-enabled radiograph diagnostic tools. Texas signed similar legislation into law in June, as did Delaware on Wednesday. To many free-marketers, sandboxes can achieve multiple aims — developing technology, and also putting pressure on regulations to adapt. 'Just because we've been regulating one way for a long, long time doesn't mean we always have to,' Adam Thierer, senior fellow at the R Street Institute, told DFD. 'We can try to find ways to innovate within boundaries – that's what sandboxes are.' Others are skeptical of the whole argument that somehow industry is slow-rolling AI, and needs a government-sanctioned space to try things out. 'Companies aren't held back by lack of permission to test AI,' said Lexi Reese, a former Google VP who ran for Congress in California on a tech-centric platform in 2023. 'They're already deploying it without oversight.' Sandboxes have also been used in the fintech sector for at least a decade, allowing institutions like banks to test out digital systems with real customers. Trump's action plan notably pushed forward on this as well, urging the Securities and Exchange Commission to develop more programs to allow financial firms to test out AI. Hilary Allen, a law professor at American University who specializes in sandboxes, considers herself a skeptic: She said the fintech experience indicates that the downsides of sandboxes outweigh the potential benefits for AI innovations, since they often lead to regulatory capture. 'Sandboxes have been a disappointment, and a lot of regulatory agencies are moving away from them in the fintech space,' she told DFD. She said there's little evidence that these regimes, which are expensive to implement, lead to more sophisticated policies. Instead, what ends up happening is that these sandbox periods stretch on indefinitely, since pilot businesses may grow to a point where agencies are hesitant to shut them down by reinstating regulations. Effectively, the experiment becomes permanent, even without guardrails. (She suggests that clear rules for sunsetting the experiments could help to mitigate the problem.) 'Regulators are in an awkward position,' she said, 'because they become sort of a cheerleader for the firm they have selected, and that leads to natural capture dynamics. Plus, AI companies often skirt regulations in the first place. What the sandboxes really do, said Allen, is attract investors, who get interested because it indicates that an AI company is getting favorable legal treatment. Victoria LaCivita, a spokesperson for the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy, did not respond directly to Allen's concerns when asked by DFD. But she said in a statement that the administration was fostering 'a pro innovation environment that will foster positive, transformative uses of AI.' Despite the skeptics, sandboxes are still a go-to tool for governments around the world. Even the tech policy hardliners in the European Union have included a sandbox provision in the otherwise strict AI Act. 'The fact that the U.S. is following suit is a wonderful sign,' said Kevin Cochrane, CMO of the global cloud company Vultr. 'Every national government needs to accelerate up policy around AI.' COTTON'S PUSH ON CHINESE ENGINEERS AT DOD The Republican chair of Senate Intelligence is demanding answers from the Defense Department after Microsoft was found to be using China-based engineers to support DOD cloud computing, as ProPublica reported In a letter obtained Thursday by POLITICO, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) told Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, 'we must put in place the protocols and processes to adopt innovative technology quickly, effectively and safely.' Specifically, Cotton asked Hegseth for details on a two-week review of the Defense Department's current cloud contracts; all security classification guides given to Microsoft or other subcontractors; and plans for an agency-wide review of contracting practices to ensure against 'leveraging loopholes' that place systems at risk. Microsoft declined to comment on Cotton's letter. The Defense Department did not immediately respond to POLITICO's inquiry. TikTok won't get more extensions Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick says that TikTok will have to go offline in the U.S. if China doesn't accept the administration's deal for the app's sale. 'You can't have Chinese control and have something on 100 million American phones,' Lutnick told CNBC Thursday. He added that the proposed deal has been sent to Chinese officials, and that TikTok is an 'unofficial' part of current trade negotiations with Beijing. TikTok did not immediately respond to DFD's inquiry. The app has been a perpetual headache for Trump since he took office. He thrice extended a deadline that Congress set in 2024 for buyers from a nonadversarial country to take majority ownership of TikTok. The administration has been negotiating for months with China and ByteDance, TikTok's Beijing-based parent company. They almost reached a deal in April, but Chinese officials walked away when Trump announced a slew of new tariffs on the country. Trump has reportedly gathered a consortium of U.S. buyers like Oracle for the deal, though Blackstone withdrew its involvement in July. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@

Epoch Times
a day ago
- Epoch Times
HHS, FDA, and USDA Address Chronic Disease Epidemic Brought About by Ultra-Processed Foods
Multiple federal agencies are uniting in an effort to tackle the health risks posed by ultra-processed foods to Americans, according to a July 23 joint statement. The joint effort is a collaboration between the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Food and Drug Administration, and the Department of Agriculture (USDA). The initiative is aimed at addressing the 'growing concerns around ultra-processed foods and the current epidemic of diet-related chronic disease that is plaguing America.'