logo
Mom Has a Startling Realization About her Son's Initials 4 Years Too Late

Mom Has a Startling Realization About her Son's Initials 4 Years Too Late

Yahoo5 hours ago
A mom says she didn't realize her son's initials were controversial, until she monogrammed his school backpack.
'I posted a photo ... and someone said, 'Oh my God,'' Laura Elizabeth Graham, a mother of three in Tennessee, tells TODAY.com.
The mom's 4-year-old son is Liam Foster Graham, the initials of which spell out the slang acronym, 'LFG.' It means 'Let's F------ Go' or 'Let's Freakin' Go,' according to Urban Dictionary.
'Parents, remember to think about initials when naming your baby,' Graham, a lifestyle content creator, said in a TikTok video with almost 5 million views. 'My son's initials are LFG.'
TikTokers revealed their own memorable initials or those of people they know, including, 'SEX' 'HOE,' 'BS' and 'A--,' along with less spicy initials that still spell out words, like 'EAR' and 'ARM.'
'My youngest is STD.'
'CEO: Destined for greatness.'
'My son's initials are IRS.'
'My mom is RAT.'
'My daughter is BLT.'
'My daughter's initials are SAD. And her last name is Downer.'
'My oldest is BBL.'
'My son's initials are BRA.'
'My initials are EW.'
'My husband is BAM. After getting married, my initials are now BAM, too. We're BamBam.'
'My son's are ZAK and his name is Zach.'
'My initials are MNM, like M&Ms.'
'My husband's initials are FAT.'
'My initials are CPS.'
'My cousin's Adam's initials spell out ADAM.'
Graham, whose own initials are 'LEG,' tells TODAY.com that the name ''Liam' is after his uncle 'William,' while 'Foster' is her maiden name.
'I don't think it's that big of a deal,' Graham tells TODAY.com. 'It's nothing that I care too much about — it's just so funny that it never crossed my mind.'
'The simple fact is that initials are not typically part of everyday discussion,' Sherri Suzanne, the founder of My Name for Life, tells TODAY.com in an email.
'All parents want a problem-free baby name,' says Suzanne, 'but sometimes it takes a back seat to a meaningful name set.'
Suzanne gives the example of 'Paulette Isabelle Grand.'
'Parents may be thrilled to find a vintage name to honor grandpa Paul but worry their daughter's luggage will be emblazoned with 'PIG,' she explains.
Suzanne says initials that seem random now, can make for an unfortunate email convention. And its hard to foretell which initials might spell the slang word of the day.
Even when you give your child a plain set of initials, says Suzanne, they could change if they take the name of their future spouse.
'Ultimately, the answer is to raise children to be proud of who they are,' says Suzanne. 'No name is completely immune to teasing. Always pick the most dignified name you can, but find some joy and humor in unintended consequences while you consider ways to work around a problem.'
She adds, 'It's good advice for any challenge.'
This article was originally published on TODAY.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Learn About: NASA's Lucy Spacecraft Flyby With Asteroid Donaldjohanson
Learn About: NASA's Lucy Spacecraft Flyby With Asteroid Donaldjohanson

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Learn About: NASA's Lucy Spacecraft Flyby With Asteroid Donaldjohanson

Learn more about the Lucy mission "fly past 52246 Donaldjohanson -NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center Dan Gallagher: Producer/Narrator Adriana Manrique Gutierrez: Animator Kel Elkins: Animator Johathan North: Animator Michael Lentz: Animator/Art Director Walt Feimer: Animation Lead Nancy Jones: Public Affairs Katherine Kretke: Public Affairs Universal Production Music: 'Nico's Journey' by Nicholas Smith [PRS]; 'Knowing Half the Future' and 'Temporal Timings' by Lee John Gretton [PRS]; 'Poly Propulsion' by Alfie Solo [PRS]

Creative litigation versus creative instigation
Creative litigation versus creative instigation

Fast Company

time36 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Creative litigation versus creative instigation

I imagine that—like me—many of us got into advertising because it beat the alternatives. No real rules. No 'right way to do it.' No boxes you have to check. That sense of creative freedom chirped and blinked like an EXIT sign in the smoke-filled hallway of career choices. We ran to that EXIT, bypassing doors leading to more stringent, structured careers like lawyer or accountant or 'business consultant.' And before technology and analytics usurped advertising—like it has other entertainment-based industries like sports and film—that creative freedom drove the industry. Look at how analytics has all but eliminated the creativity in the mid-range game in the NBA and the subsequent Finals ratings. Advertising is in a similar state: seeking ideas that feel like predictable, analytically defensible, 'high-value' shots. This thinking is now making us operate more and more like those stringent, structured industries we avoided in the first place. BRAND STRATEGISTS AS CREATIVE LITIGATORS Take brand strategy for instance. Our main role now is 'creative litigator.' We gather stakeholder interviews like depositions, review client's internal documentation and data like evidence discovery, and research competitor companies and culture like case histories, statutes, and laws that give us the precedents to build off of. Then, ultimately, we piece together findings into a cohesive story like an opening statement that lays out the case for creative work. That's great for stakeholders, but not so much for viewers. People are paying $100+/month to avoid the 'disruption and irritation of advertising.' However, being disruptive or irritating shouldn't be the worry for brands. They should worry about being boring. THE RISK OF BEING BORING Jon Evans estimates the ' cost of being boring ' at $189B for brands in the U.S. Creators and influencers know this. Their freedom to 'just shoot' and develop an understanding of 'how not to be boring' enables them to run circles around ad agencies in terms of engagement and efficacy. In fact, a recent Deloitte study showed 56% of Gen Z and 43% of millennials find user-generated social media content 'more relevant than traditional TV shows and movies.' WHAT BRAND STRATEGISTS REALLY NEED TO DO In short, boring inputs result in boring outputs. To change that, in the case of brand strategists, we need to be thinking more often like creative instigators and agitators than just litigators. We need to approach our work like a journalist or a stand-up comedian. Because we're after 'interesting,' not justice. And you don' t get to 'interesting' by filling in funnels or bogus 'white space' quadrants or any assortment of rectangles in a framework. You get there by passively observing rather than actively 'working a case' at all times. Allowing anomalies to appear and not just looking for commonalities. Not looking for white spaces, but for colorful ones. Being able to 'explain the situation like I'm five,' but being able to ask questions like a 5-year-old first. Why? Why? Why? Getting the time to be the dumbest in the room, not the smartest. To be able to find something and show it to someone and say, 'Is this anything?' With the advertising industry's current landscape and dominant forces as they are, the sell of creative work will always require litigation. But it's much easier to sell creative work when the decider is focused on the tears in their eyes and not whether the idea is 'ownable' or 'culturally relevant' or 'shareable' or whatever analytics creativity is foolishly judged against today. Great creative ideas deserve to exist and shouldn't live and die based on their ability to fit in Meta, Alphabet, or Amazon's 'predictable' boxes. Come to think of it—maybe we are after justice after all?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store