
‘Climate change is sexist': We need more women leading the crisis response, experts say
Only eight out of 78 world leaders at the last climate summit were women. How can we fix that?
ADVERTISEMENT
The climate crisis doesn't affect everyone equally - women and girls bear the brunt of the suffering, largely because they make up the majority of the world's poor.
In rural areas, it is women and girls often responsible for securing water, food, and firewood for their families. During drought and floods, women are forced to work harder and walk further.
As climate change exacerbates conflicts, inequalities and vulnerabilities, women also face increased risks of gender-based violence. When extreme weather hits, women and children are 14 times more likely to die than men, and an estimated four out of five people displaced by the impacts of climate change are women and girls.
'Put simply: climate change is sexist,' Helen Pankhurst, senior advisor on gender equality at CARE International UK tells Euronews Green. 'It's a feminist issue which threatens the fundamental rights of women and girls.'
Helen Pankhurst speaks at a march and rally in London in 2018 to celebrate International Women's Day and 100 years since the first women in the UK gained the right to vote.
Guy Bell
Despite the labour burden climate changes places on women, they are on the ground 'leading the charge when it comes to grassroots campaigning and inspiring change,' according to Pankhurst.
'They're pulling together their communities and showing leadership in coming up with solutions, demonstrating resilience and delivering hope for a better future,' she says.
'They are also leading in civil society, fighting back against policies which are doing irreparable harm. There is a groundswell of women standing up and saying things must change; they're just not in seats of political power.'
Only eight out of 78 world leaders at the last climate summit were women
'It is deeply frustrating that the women and girls whose lives are so disproportionately affected are not being heard on the global stage,' says Pankhurst. 'Climate and gender justice go hand in hand; you can't have one without the other.'
Only eight out of 78 world leaders who participated in the most recent COP29 were women. Although delegations at the UN climate conference are consistently increasing in numbers, women's representation has stagnated and even decreased.
Bianca Pitt, co-founder of SHE Changes Climate, a campaign to get women equally represented at international climate negotiations and beyond, tells Euronews why it is vital women be included in climate talks and negotiations.
'When women suffer, everyone suffers,' she says. 'It has a knock-on effect.'
Bianca Pitt, co-founder of SHE Changes Climate, a campaign to get women equally represented at international climate negotiations.
Bianca Bitt
If women - ideally from economically marginalised backgrounds - aren't included in decision making about climate change, then women's lived experiences and perspectives aren't being heard.
'If we only have a select group of people making decisions, the decisions will be incomplete - they won't have the desired outcome,' she adds. 'The majority of decisions are made by men for men and women. That creates a blind spot because we can only make decisions based on our own lived experience in the peer group we are in.'
Women in power leads to stronger climate policies, studies show
Pitt said it isn't 'fair' that women aren't included in the most important discussions being had about our planet, but it isn't just about fairness – it's about what is going to produce the best outcomes.
When decision-making processes incorporate the perspectives of men and women, solutions are more comprehensive and robust.
ADVERTISEMENT
One study on gender and climate change found that female representation in national parliaments across 91 countries correlated with more stringent climate change policies and lower carbon emissions.
Another Italian study found that women leaders prioritise proper waste management, decreasing the misuse of water, energy and resources.
In the private sector, research shows that companies with a bigger share of women on their boards are more likely to improve energy efficiency, reduce firms' overall environmental impact and invest in renewable energy.
Women-led firms make more efforts to curb emissions and have better results for environmental, social and governance indicators.
ADVERTISEMENT
'Research shows the economies in which women participate are more resilient – they're stronger, more productive, and have better outcomes for everyone,' Pitt says.
It's the same for nations and businesses for whom women lead on climate change, she says. When women are involved in making decisions on climate change, policies are more likely to succeed.
Why aren't more women leading on climate change?
'We know that women are leading on climate change at a grassroots level and within civil society; we see it at CARE International through our programmes all over the world,' Pankhurst says.
'Women are leading the climate response in their homes and communities, coming up with innovative and sustainable solutions like leading agriculture cooperatives, encouraging their communities to plant drought-resistant crops, and creating early warning systems that save the lives and livelihoods of women who don't have access to traditional media.'
ADVERTISEMENT
If the evidence so starkly shows the need for women leading on climate change, then why are women still underrepresented as climate change leaders in politics?
'There's definitely a gender bias,' says Pitt. 'It's real and strong.'
Perhaps there is a lurking, unconscious gender bias that distrusts women leaders or thinks they don't display the authority or assertiveness of men, as explored by the BBC when Kamala Harris became the first woman vice president of the United States.
And according to Pitt, lack of female representation about climate on the national level is in part due to lack of representation.
ADVERTISEMENT
'If you don't have women leading, you don't set the example for younger women to take that career,' she says. 'If you don't see women leading these conferences, young girls won't be inspired - they'll think it is just men in grey suits.'
How can more women reach climate leadership positions?
Public bodies, businesses, and governments are starting to realise the unconscious biases toward women in the climate change sector, but there isn't time to wait around for a slow, organic change, the experts argue.
'Organic growth [of women leading on climate change] is not delivering the results,' Pitt says. '50 per cent of delegations of climate negotiations have to be women as per the UNFCCC Gender Action Plan.'
Pitt also urges that women be 'skilled up' to join negotiations, and be given ample amount of speaking time.
ADVERTISEMENT
'If a woman chairs something, the remaining women in the room are more likely to speak up,' she says.
By 'shining a light' on the women already leading in this space, younger girls will be inspired to follow - they will see it's possible to lead.'
Likewise, Pankhurst - who, yes, is the great-granddaughter of British suffragette leader Emmeline Pankhurst - wants to see 'more room made at the table for women and girls to speak into this crisis.'
'We need to fund women-led organisations working in this space; supporting them to thrive and make a real difference at a political level locally, nationally and globally,' she says.
ADVERTISEMENT
And, this International Women's Day (8 March), there's no time to maintain the status quo.
'We don't have time to waste - climate change is here, now. It's not some far off threat,' she adds. 'We don't have the luxury of time.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
15-07-2025
- Euronews
Central Asian countries unite for a Green Corridor to Europe
Officially registered in Baku, Green Corridor Union LLC will coordinate efforts to export surplus renewable electricity from Central Asia to Europe via high-voltage transmission infrastructure. More than a strategic partnership, this initiative signals a geopolitical and economic shift toward interregional cooperation, sustainability, and energy diversification — themes high on the agenda for European institutions and markets increasingly turning toward cleaner alternatives. From vision to action The roots of the project stretch back to COP29 in Baku, where the presidents of all three countries signed a declaration on strategic cooperation in green energy. A few days ago, the vision became reality: Uzbekistan's National Electric Grids, Kazakhstan's KEGOC, and Azerbaijan's AzerEnergy signed the founding documents to create Green Corridor Union LLC. The company is now headed by Farhad Mammadov. The corridor aims to connect solar and wind-rich regions in Central Asia to European energy grids via a complex chain of transmission infrastructure: across Kazakhstan, beneath the Caspian Sea, through Azerbaijan and Georgia, and ultimately into Romania — a plan that would link the Caspian Basin to the heart of the European Union. Azerbaijan: Gateway to Europe Azerbaijan, with its growing renewable capacity and strategic Black Sea access, is set to play the role of final connector in the Green Corridor. From its shores, the power generated in Central Asia would cross the Black Sea via a proposed subsea cable toward Romania, forming what could become the first trans-Caspian green energy link to the EU. 'The unification of our energy systems is both a strategic and historic step,' said Azerbaijan's Energy Minister Parviz Shahbazov. 'This initiative marks the beginning of the Caspian Green Energy Corridor — the first of its kind.' Azerbaijan has already signed a memorandum of cooperation with Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, with plans to conclude an Intergovernmental Agreement on Strategic Partnership in Green Energy during COP29. According to Shahbazov, the countries are now conducting feasibility studies for laying a high-voltage cable under the Caspian Sea and through Georgia into Europe. Azerbaijan's energy capacity stands at 8.4 GW, with renewables accounting for over 21% of that figure. The country exported over 1.2 billion kWh of electricity in the first nine months of 2024 alone. 'This is about more than just power lines,' Shahbazov noted. 'It's about aligning our technologies, policies, and long-term ambitions together with Europe.' Uzbekistan's investment boom Uzbekistan has rapidly accelerated its green energy transformation. According to the Minister of Energy of Uzbekistan, Jurabek Mirzamakhmudov, the country expects to produce more than 135 billion kWh of electricity by 2030, with 10-15 billion kWh available for export, much of it from solar and wind. 'Over just one year, we tripled investment in green energy,' Mirzamakhmudov told Euronews. 'In 2023, €1.2 billion in foreign direct investment was absorbed by the sector. By the end of 2024, we expect that figure to exceed €4.23 billion euros.' These investments are not only building capacity — they are reshaping the energy map of Uzbekistan. The country now has more than 4.2 GW of renewable capacity online, with plans to reach 20 GW by 2030, amounting to 40% of total electricity generation. Solar and wind projects are underway in nearly every region, from the deserts of Navoi to the steppes of Karakalpakstan. The minister emphasized that 'all projects are supported by a reliable legal framework, and the President personally monitors their progress'. According to Mirzamakhmudov, Uzbekistan's renewable output this year has already saved 1.3 billion cubic metres of gas and reduced emissions by 1.8 million tons of CO₂, representing measurable progress toward its COP commitments. Kazakhstan: From transit to transformation For Kazakhstan, the Green Corridor is more than just a passage — it's a strategic investment in regional leadership and green growth. 'This project is one of the most strategically important for our energy sector,' said Kazakhstan's Minister of Energy, Erlan Akkenzhenov. 'It allows us to capitalise on our renewable potential and establish a sustainable export route for clean electricity to Europe.' The country's role as a key transit hub will be supported by KEGOC, which is responsible for national grid operations. While financial commitments are still being negotiated, Kazakhstan has already signed a Memorandum of Understanding with partners and financial institutions including the Asian Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which are supporting the preparation of feasibility studies. 'We don't see insurmountable technical barriers,' Akkenzhenov told Euronews. 'The logistics are clear: energy flows from Uzbekistan to Kazakhstan, across the Caspian, through Azerbaijan and beyond.' He sees the project as a model for future cross-border energy cooperation, not just within Central Asia but between the region and Europe. 'It's a project of the future,' he added. 'One that connects energy, environment, and economic opportunity'. European eyes on the corridor As Europe pushes toward climate neutrality and energy security, initiatives like the Green Corridor are drawing increasing interest. The proposed interconnection would not only boost supply diversification for Europe but also bring long-term geopolitical and economic benefits both to the EU and Central Asia. The project aligns with EU Green Deal objectives and the Global Gateway strategy, which aims to invest in sustainable infrastructure across partner regions. Talks are ongoing with European institutions, and all three countries have expressed interest in attracting European investors and developers to the initiative. While the promise is bold, challenges remain: undersea transmission cables require massive investment and advanced engineering. Political coordination, particularly over transit routes and regional tensions, must be navigated carefully. Financing the multi-billion-euro infrastructure will also require sustained international support. But the foundation has been laid. The joint venture has been formed. Feasibility studies are underway. And momentum is building.


Euronews
10-06-2025
- Euronews
Fossil fuels are being overlooked at UN ocean summit, analysts warn
French President Emmanuel Macron kicked off the United Nations Oceans Conference (UNOC) in Nice yesterday with a speech calling on world leaders to unite for ocean protection. But there was one notable absence from the address, according to campaigners: fossil fuels. The global expansion of offshore and coastal oil and gas development poses profound threats to marine ecosystems, as underscored by a new report from Earth Insight, a data analytics company that tracks fossil fuel and mining activities around the world. 'This glaring omission demonstrates that the impacts of fossil fuel extraction on marine biodiversity and coastal communities continue to be overlooked,' says Tyson Miller, Executive Director at Earth Insight. 'France has an opportunity to seize this historic moment and show leadership once again, as it did in 2015 with theParis Agreement, by calling on countries to end the expansion of offshore and coastal fossil fuel activities.' A major focus of this third UNOC is the ratification of a High Seas Treaty, which will allow nations to establish marine protected areas in international waters for the first time. Even at the UN climate summit last year in Baku (COP29), fossil fuels were scarcely addressed in key documents, despite their usage being the primary cause of the climate crisis. Burning fossil fuels is placing a huge burden on oceans, which absorb the excess heat, leading to a slew of dangerous consequences, from killing coral reefs to fuelling more hurricanes. The new report from Earth Insight exposes the vast physical presence of fossil fuel infrastructure in oceans and the destruction and pollution caused by its encroachment. Much of this expansion is taking place in 'frontier regions' - underexplored areas with significant potential for oil, gas and Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) development. Looking at 11 case studies from around the world, the analysts find that oil and gas blocks cover over 2.7 million km2 in these frontier regions - an area about the size of Argentina. Moreover, 100,000 km2 of these blocks overlap with protected areas, leaving 19 per cent of coastal and Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) at risk across the frontier regions. Coral reefs, seagrass meadows and mangroves are some of the vital ecosystems being threatened by fossil fuel companies. Approximately 63 per cent of seagrass meadows in the frontier case studies - from Barbados to Senegal - are overlapped by oil and gas blocks, the study warns. The researchers propose a range of solutions to tackle the environmental and social harm caused by fossil fuel extraction, starting with stopping expansion in environmentally sensitive regions and removing unassigned oil and gas blocks. International treaties - like the Fossil Fuel Non Proliferation Treaty - should be strengthened to prohibit new coastal and offshore oil and gas expansion, they say. This is where international conferences like UNOC could be used to galvanise action. Brazil and France have just launched a new challenge to countries to put oceans at the centre of climate action. On Monday, at the UN Ocean Conference, the two countries called on all nations to place ocean-focused action at the heart of their national climate plans - also known as Nationally Determined Contributions or NDCs - ahead of the UN climate summit COP30 it is hosting in November. Alongside Brazil and France, an inaugural group of eight countries, including Australia, Fiji, Kenya, Mexico, Palau, and the Republic of Seychelles, has joined the initiative. 'For Brazil, the Blue NDC Challenge represents a key opportunity to strengthen ocean-related climate action and to emphasise the essential role of ocean-based solutions in achieving emission reduction targets,' says Marina Silva, Brazil's Minister for the Environment and Climate Change. 'Through this initiative, Brazil seeks to advance international cooperation on ocean climate action in the lead-up to COP30, and to underscore the need for all countries to fully integrate the ocean into their national climate strategies.' Silva added that in its most recently submitted NDC, Brazil had explicitly included ocean-based climate actions for the first time. That includes commitments like establishing programmes for the conservation and restoration of vital marine ecosystems such as mangroves and coral reefs. 40 per cent of Brazil's territory is located at sea, and it hosts marine ecosystems of global significance - including the only coral reefs in the South Atlantic and the world's largest contiguous mangrove belt along the Amazon coast. NDCs are the centrepiece of countries' efforts to reduce emissions and limit warming to 1.5°C under the Paris Agreement. Countries remain largely off track for meeting the Paris goals, according to the most recent UN emissions gap report, with the next round of climate pledges needing to deliver a 'quantum leap in ambition' to give the world a chance of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Nations were due to submit updated plans in February, but only 11 of the 195 Paris Agreement signatories made the formal deadline. As of early June, just 22 countries have so far delivered their enhanced NDCs. Brazil is one of only five G20 countries that have submitted updated plans alongside the US under the Biden administration, the UK, Japan and Canada. The real deadline is now September, when the plans will be tallied up before COP30. As the world prepares to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the Paris Agreement this year, the Blue NDC challenge is aimed at highlighting the role oceans can play in enhancing these plans. 'Ocean-based climate solutions can deliver up to 35 per cent of the emissions reductions needed to keep 1.5°C within reach,' says Tom Pickerell, global director of the ocean programme at the World Resources Institute and Head of the Secretariat for the High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy. 'But we are running out of time to maximise the ocean's potential. That's why countries must place the ocean at the heart of their climate strategies.' Industrial marine sectors and natural ecosystems are 'underused tools' in addressing climate change, Wavel Ramkalawan, President of the Republic of Seychelles, one of the eight inaugural countries that joined the initiative, added.


Euronews
02-06-2025
- Euronews
Top scientists slam EU plan to allow carbon credits in 2040 goal
The EU's top scientific advisors are urging the bloc not to use international carbon credits to meet its climate targets. In an unprecedented intervention, the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change (ESABCC) has today issued a report rebuking Brussels' expected plan to weaken its 2040 goal. The experts say the bloc must stay the course on cutting domestic greenhouse gas emissions by 90-95 per cent below 1990 levels by 2040, following suggestions last week that it would settle for something less ambitious. 'A 90-95 per cent domestic reduction target for 2040 is both achievable and in Europe's own strategic interest. We need to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels, and the necessary technologies are largely available,' says Prof. Jette Bredahl Jacobsen, vice-Chair of the Advisory Board. Domestic is the operative word; outsourcing our emissions cutting to other countries via carbon credits would be a misguided approach on several levels, the scientists and climate campaigners have emphasised. The EU has pledged to be climate neutral by 2050, and is almost on track to reduce emissions by 55 per cent by 2030. But its interim target for 2040 is yet to be legally fixed. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, alongside climate chiefs Wopke Hoekstra and Teresa Ribera, had previously indicated that the EU would aim to cut its emissions by 90 per cent by 2040. That is at the lower end of what ESABCC recommended in 2023. But after pushback from some governments, Hoekstra has delayed the revision of the European Climate Law until around 2 July. He is reportedly considering ways to make the 2040 goal more flexible, including the use of carbon credits. Under a UN-backed framework agreed at the climate summit COP29 last year, carbon credits enable one country to pay for emissions-cutting projects in another nation, and count the saved CO2 towards its own progress. Supporters claim these transactions are more cost-effective than domestic action and can help poorer countries get funding for climate action. Critics, including scientists on the advisory board, argue that the credits risk diverting resources from domestic investments and could undermine environmental integrity. 'Delaying action or relying on international carbon credits would risk missing vital opportunities to modernise the EU's economy, create quality jobs, and reinforce Europe's position in clean tech leadership,' Bredahl Jacobsen says. The ESABCC - which is an independent body legally tasked with making climate policy recommendations - has never commented on an ongoing political debate in this manner before. Its 60-page report points to research showing that, 'just 16 per cent of credits issued under various carbon crediting programmes to date have delivered genuine emission reductions.' Green NGOs are glad to see the board taking a stand. International offsets are 'a waste of taxpayers' money,' according to Michael Sicaud-Clyet, Climate Governance Policy Officer at WWF EU. 'Why should we pay other countries when we could be investing it in making our own industries more competitive? It's like sending someone else to school and expecting to receive the degree and results yourself.' International carbon credits aren't necessary, the report stresses. A net domestic reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in the range of 90 to 95 per cent is both scientifically feasible and increases the fairness of the EU's contribution to global mitigation. Alongside mitigation, the advisory board is calling for stronger EU action on adaptation to protect citizens from increasing climate risks. Rising greenhouse gas emissions have already driven global temperatures up by 1.3-1.4 °C, fuelling extreme climate events in Europe and around the world. Yet, the authors say, the EU's current adaptation policy lacks measurable goals and a robust legal foundation. 'The risks from climate change are growing, and so is the gap between what's needed and what's in place,' says Prof Laura Diaz Anadon, vice-Chair of the Advisory Board. 'The EU should clarify its vision for climate resilience, and back it with governance, legal tools, and measurable targets. Without a stronger adaptation policy framework, Europe risks falling behind the pace of impacts from climate change.' More than 40 per cent of Europe is currently facing some form of drought, the latest official update reveals. Pockets of south-eastern Spain, Cyprus, Greece, and areas across the south-eastern Balkans are under the highest form of 'alert' according to the European Drought Observatory (EDO)'s report for 11-20 May. But a drought 'warning' is also in place across large swathes of northern and eastern Europe, following a record-breaking hot and dry spring, driven by climate change. March was Europe's warmest on record, and some countries saw their driest March, Europe's Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) previously reported. In total, 1.6 per cent of the 27 EU countries (excluding Madeira, Azores, and Canary Islands) plus the UK is in alert conditions. As per the EDO's classification, this means that vegetation is showing signs of stress, as well as the soil lacking moisture - which places an area under a warning - and less than normal rainfall. The situation is particularly acute in some Mediterranean areas favoured by holidaymakers, such as the Greek islands of Santorini and Mykonos. Here, water is having to be shipped in from Athens or filtered by desalination plants to fill swimming pools and showers. Overtourism is being blamed for exacerbating the issue. "The tourist sector is unsustainable and there is no planning,' Nikitas Mylopoulos, professor of water resource management at Thessaly University, told the UK's Sky News. '[This is] leading to a tremendous rise in water demand in summer.' However, he added, agriculture is a far bigger drain on the country's water resources, amplified by waste and a lack of effective policies. Alert conditions are rapidly emerging in large areas of Ukraine and neighbouring countries, impacting crops and vegetation, EDO warns. Ukraine is one of Europe's fastest-heating countries, hitting 2.7°C above the 1951-1980 average in 2023. As a major exporter of grain, drought here has serious ramifications for global food supplies. Parts of Poland and Slovakia are suffering from the dry spell, too. Alert conditions also persist in western, south-eastern and central Türkiye, northern and western Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine, parts of Jordan, northern Iraq, Iran and Azerbaijan. In northern Africa, alert and warning conditions have clung on for more than a year. According to the EDO's Combined Drought Indicator (CDI), 39.6 per cent of the EU-27 and the UK have a drought warning. This orange patch on the map stretches from Ireland to the northern slopes of the Alps, across to Finland, southern Russia and Türkiye. During the 10-day period from 11 to 20 May, temperatures have been above the seasonal average in northern Europe. As well as the agricultural impacts, there are concerns for hydropower. The International Hydropower Association has said that drought and intense rain - an example of 'climate whiplash' - are pushing power plants to "operate at the limits of their existing equipment". Global warming is exacerbating drought in some parts of the world, including around the Mediterranean. Scientists at the World Weather Attribution found that the widespread drought of 2022, for example, was made 20 times more likely by climate change. It will take time to do a similar study for spring 2025, but there is no doubt that climate change is making droughts worse by increasing temperatures and changing 'precipitation regimes', in the words of Andrea Toreti, coordinator of the Copernicus European and Global Drought Observatories. Regions that would usually have a chance to recover or balance a lack of water in warmer seasons and prepare for summer cannot depend on rainfall in the same way, Toreti previously told Euronews Green. 'Nowadays, this sort of equilibrium has been modified.'