View: India strictly enforced ceasefire, Pak played dirty on May 10 night
While the 12-day war, as President Trump described it, ended following these final assaults, it is notable that Pakistan was not similarly reprimanded by the US, despite continuing to launch drone attacks against India after a ceasefire was declared at 5 pm on May 10. After the Pakistani Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) proposed a ceasefire to his Indian counterpart at 3.35pm on May 10 - and it was accepted by the Indian DGMO - Rawalpindi informed Washington. As a result, President Trump unilaterally took to social media and claimed credit for brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Prime Minister Narendra Modi later clarified to President Trump over the phone that the US had no role in the May 10 ceasefire agreement with Pakistan regarding Operation Sindoor.
The fact remains that while the Pakistani Army continued targeting Indian border cities even after the ceasefire was announced, the Indian Armed Forces strictly enforced the no-fire pact. This discipline was maintained despite serious military provocations by General Asim Munir's army in the Jammu sector, and in the Jodhpur and Bhuj sectors, on the night of May 10 using Turkish-made kamikaze drones. India's adherence to the ceasefire after 5 pm demonstrates the nation's strong command and control - especially when compared to Pakistan's fragmented political and military leadership, which often act out of sync.
Even as a delusional Pakistan claimed victory and promoted Asim Munir to the rank of Field Marshal, its panicked leadership rushed to the US seeking intervention after 11 of its air bases were rendered non-operational and aircraft destroyed by Indian long-range missile strikes in the early hours of May 10.
After PM Modi firmly stood his ground during a May 9 evening call from US Vice President Vance - who warned of a strong Pakistani response - saying that 'India would respond with a bomb to a Pak bullet,' the US State Department's Operational Control Centre scrambled to patch a call between Secretary of State Marco Rubio and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar. Pakistan's desperation became evident as the Centre made multiple calls to reach Jaishankar, who was initially unavailable when the first attempt was made at around 8.45 am on May 10. Calls were made to the Minister's office, the Foreign Secretary, and officers in charge to relay the urgency of Secretary Rubio's request. The call was finally connected at 9.38 am, during which Rubio conveyed Pakistan's offer for a ceasefire. Minister Jaishankar firmly responded that such a proposal must come through the institutionalized India–Pakistan DGMO channel to be considered.
Even as this diplomatic exchange took place, the Indian Armed Forces had already launched three BrahMos missile strikes on Pakistani air bases, the last of which struck Bholari Air Base at noon, destroying a large-bodied military aircraft.
However, once both DGMOs, under instructions from their respective leaderships, agreed to a ceasefire starting 5 pm on May 10, Indian forces held fire. In contrast, Pakistani forces violated the agreement by launching armed drones toward India - revealing poor discipline and command structure.
Had Indian political and military leadership not shown restraint and upheld the verbal ceasefire, the Pakistani port of Karachi would have likely been targeted by the Indian Navy on the night of May 10.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Evening news wrap: Karnataka ASP quits after Siddaramaiah's 'air slap', PM Modi lauds India-Ghana ties; and more
Karnataka ASP NV Baramani resigned after claiming public humiliation by CM Siddaramaiah during a rally. Prime Minister Modi, while addressing Ghana's Parliament, said that a stronger India would contribute to global stability and called for urgent reforms in global governance. Meanwhile on the trade front, India and the US are racing to finalise a deal before Trump's July 9 tariff deadline. Here are the top 5 stories that made headline today Officer cites public slap gesture by CM Siddaramaiah as reason for early retirement ASP NV Baramani has applied for voluntary retirement, citing "severe mental trauma" after being publicly humiliated by Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah during a rally in Belagavi. In a detailed letter, Baramani said he was diligently performing duties when Siddaramaiah made a slap gesture on stage, which went viral. Despite initially choosing silence to avoid further embarrassment, he eventually decided to step down. Meanwhile, BJP also demanded a public apology from the CM. Read full story PM Modi in Ghana: Strong India Vital for Global Stability Prime Minister Narendra Modi, during his visit to Ghana, emphasised that a strong and stable India is essential for a prosperous world. Addressing Ghana's Parliament during his two-day visit, he also highlighted the need for credible and effective reforms in global governance, especially in light of shifting global dynamics. The PM was also awarded the "Officer of the Order of the Star of Ghana" honour, which he described as a responsibility to strengthen India-Ghana ties. Follow live updates India-US trade deal talks drag as Trump's July 9 tariff deadline looms With just days left before US's tariff on Indian goods comes into effect, India and the US are racing to finalise a trade agreement. Despite extending talks in Washington, negotiators have hit roadblocks over unresolved issues. President Trump has indicated that extending the deadline is unlikely but expressed optimism about a possible deal that could reduce tariffs and ensure fairer competition. Without an interim trade deal agreement, Indian industries must prepare for a 26% tariff. Read full story Shooting incident at Chicago nightclub leaves 4 dead A mass shooting outside Chicago's Artis Lounge left four people dead and 14 injured late Wednesday night. The incident occurred during an album release party for rapper Mello Buckzz. Chicago police said three victims are in critical condition, and an investigation is underway. The site had previously witnessed a similar violent incident in 2022 when it was known as Hush Lounge. The recurrence of gun violence at the same location has raised concerns about public safety in the area. Read full story India clears Pakistan hockey team's entry for Asia Cup, Junior WC India has granted clearance for the Pakistan men's hockey team to participate in the Asia Cup in Bihar and the FIH Junior World Cup in Tamil Nadu. Approvals came from the ministries of external and home affairs, aligning with India's commitment to keeping politics separate from sports. Had India disallowed the Pakistan team's participation for the two hockey events, it would have faced sanctioned from the International Olympic Committee (IOC). Pakistan's participation was uncertain after the Pahalgam terror attack and India's cross-border Operation Sindoor. Read full story


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why did Akbar start his own faith, ‘Din-i-llahi'?
Akbar, the greatest Mughal ruler in Indian history and son of Humayun, reigned from 1556 to 1605 and introduced several innovations in administration, culture, and architecture, but most importantly in the religious space of his ruling period. He was the first to introduce the religious policy that was based on Sulh-i Kul (universal peace and harmony) between all his subjects regardless of their social, ethical, or religious identities. His religious policy did not emerge suddenly but evolved during the course of his rule and was heavily influenced by his diverse subjects. According to a study published at Columbia University, under the religious policy, Akbar introduced the Din-i Ilahi (Religion of God), a syncretic religious movement propounded by him in 1582 A.D. It was one of the most effective tactics that reduced the distance between Hinduism and Islam, which was fueled by the previous rulers. But it becomes the question of curiosity: what made him abandon his own religion, Islam, to create a new path of spiritual awakening? Reasons that sparked Akbar's religious questioning Interaction with Diverse Subjects Akbar was a benevolent ruler who extended Mughal power over most of the subcontinent. This wide, expanded ruling allowed him to govern a population of diverse ethnicity, race, and religion. The development of Akbar's religious policy in the course of time was a result of his interaction with not only Muslim society but also other religious groups, as well as local eminent leaders and rulers. Akbar's Rajput views and his contact with Hinduism, on the other hand, made an impression on his imaginative mind. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Meanwhile, the bhakti movement had created a new atmosphere in India. As a result of this movement, a great many rulers in various parts of India adopted a more liberal policy of religious tolerance, attempting to set up communal harmony between Hindus and Muslims from the beginning of the fifteenth century. Debates in Ibadat Khana Akbar established the Ibadat Khan (House of Worship) to learn more about Islamic teaching through debates on various issues. The debates in Ibadat Khana were mostly based on the existence of God, the teachings of the Quran and Hadith, Islamic law, divorce, nikkah, and more. However, when debaters started attacking each other personally. They reacted in anger to different issues, and Akbar went into a state of confusion. In this way these debates compelled him to think about the truth of religion. In a span of time, Akbar let non-Muslim religious scholars of Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Christianity, etc., take part in debates. This served as a significant factor shaping his quest for religious truth. Akbar's break-away from religious practices After being the spectator of the interaction and intellectual debates between religious scholars of different religions, Akbar started deciphering these traditional practices as a medium of diverse formalities. He stopped offering namaz in public and withdrew from religious festivals. He rejected the authority of the Islamic clergy, especially those who used fatwas (religious rulings) to control political life. He believed that many religious scholars of different faiths promoted blind imitation over reason and exclusively over truth. He replaced Arabic with Persian and Sanskrit terms in court prayers. According to the research paper published in the Columbia University Journal, Akbar, in order to gain the support of other religious and social groups, asserted new ideas and enforced some innovations in both religious and imperial fields. Din-i Ilahi: Emergence of a new spiritual path With the establishment of the final religious policy, Din-I Ilahi—a new state religion of 'God-ism,' which is a mix of Islamic, Hindu, Christian, and Buddhist teachings. According to Dabistan-i Mazahib (School of Religions), Din-i Ilahi is a religious association that followed the 10 virtues. Liberality and beneficence Forgiveness of the evildoer and repulsion of anger with mildness; Abstinence from worldly desires; Care of freedom from the bonds of worldly existence and violence, as well as accumulating precious stores for the future, real and perpetual world; Wisdom and devotion in the frequent meditation on the consequences of actions; Strength of dexterous prudence in the desire of marvellous actions; Soft voice, gentle words, pleasing speeches for everybody; Good treatment with brethren, so that they will have the precedence over our own; A perfect alienation from creatures and the material world, and a perfect attachment to the Supreme Being Dedication of the soul in the love of God Din-i Ilahi acted as a personality cult, and the members of this cult, or the believers, were handpicked by Akbar among his courtiers who were spiritually inclined and open-minded. Notable followers like Birbal and Abul Fazi, men with intellect and tolerance, followed this path of a spiritual mindset that has no borders. There were no traditional practices like forced conversion to expand the believers of Din-i Ilahi. Also Read: Can cockroaches crawl into your ear while you're asleep? Here's what you need to know
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
China fumes over US-Vietnam deal targeting trans-shipping, vows to safeguard interests
The agreement with Vietnam reduces tariffs on Hanoi's exports from a threatened 46% to 20%, while maintaining a 40% duty on 'trans-shipped' goods — a measure widely seen as targeting Chinese products re-exported to the US read more A day after President Donald Trump announced a new trade agreement with Vietnam, China on Thursday slammed the deal, amid concerns in Beijing that the US is leveraging its 'liberation day' tariff negotiations with other countries to undermine China's export-driven economy. According to a Financial Times report, the agreement with Vietnam reduces tariffs on Hanoi's exports from a threatened 46% to 20%, while maintaining a 40% duty on 'trans-shipped' goods — a measure widely seen as targeting Chinese products re-exported to the US. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The agreement is the second seen as targeting China since President Trump outlined his 'liberation day' increases in tariffs on April 2, added the report. In May, the US and UK agreed a deal that included strict security requirements for steel and pharmaceuticals that were widely seen as intended to squeeze China out of British supply chains. More from World When asked about the deal with Vietnam, an important trading partner with China, the ministry of foreign affairs in Beijing said trade negotiations should not hurt the interests of 'third parties'. 'Relevant negotiations and agreements should not target or undermine the interests of any third party,' Financial Times quoted the ministry as saying. Dozens of countries are scrambling to secure trade agreements with the US ahead of the July 9 deadline, when President Trump's suspended 'reciprocal' tariffs are set to take effect. For Vietnam — one of the most trade-dependent nations, with the US accounting for 30% of its exports — the urgency was especially high. However, analysts noted that the steep final tariffs and the added levy on trans-shipping highlight the high cost Hanoi paid to strike the deal. Deal aimed at China? 'The new US-Vietnam deal is not just about trade; it is clearly aimed at China . . . it is meant to block the flow of Chinese goods that often move through Vietnam to dodge existing US duties,' Financial Times quoted Julien Chaisse, an expert on international economic law at the City University of Hong Kong, as saying. 'This fits a much wider trend: the US is lining up bilateral deals with countries near China to tighten economic co-operation and, at the same time, [make] it harder for Beijing to stretch its supply chain influence.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Many Southeast Asian nations benefited from the US-China trade war by becoming alternative hubs for Chinese manufacturers avoiding US tariffs. However, this 'China plus one' strategy led to significant trade surpluses with the US. 'The key lesson for other countries from this deal, and that agreed previously by the UK, is that they will be expected to curtail some trade with China,' Financial Times quoted Capital Economics' chief Asia economist Mark Williams and senior Asia economist Gareth Leather as writing in a note. 'That will be seen as a provocation in Beijing, particularly if similar conditions are included in any other deals agreed over coming days.' China's commerce ministry on Thursday also said that it firmly opposed any countries reaching a trade deal at its expense, adding that it would safeguard its rights and interests. According to the report, citing analysts, the Vietnam deal, as well as others that Beijing deems as endangering its interests, could also undermine US-China trade talks. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump recently claimed a tariff truce with Beijing has been signed, but concerns remain over Chinese restrictions on the flow of rare-earth exports and US export controls on advanced technology such as semiconductors. With inputs from agencies