Asian markets turn lower as trade war rally fades
With Japan's trade deal with Washington out of the way for now, attention was also turning to European Union attempts to reach an agreement to pare down Donald Trump's threatened tariffs before next Friday's deadline.
Equities have enjoyed a strong run-up for much of July on expectations governments will hammer out pacts, pushing some markets past or close to record highs.
However, while Wall Street hit new records Thursday — S&P 500 chalked up its 10th in 19 sessions — another round of strong jobs data suggested the Federal Reserve might have to wait longer than hoped to cut borrowing costs.
The 217,000 initial claims for unemployment benefits in the week to July 19 was the lowest since mid-April and suggested the labour market remains tight.
The figures followed forecast-topping non-farm payrolls in June and come as inflation shows signs of picking up as Trump's tariffs begin to bite.
Traders are now betting on 42 basis points of rate cuts by the end of the year, according to Bloomberg News. That's down from more than 50 previously.
Meanwhile, a manufacturing survey showed US business confidence deteriorated in July for the second successive month, with companies worried about tariffs and cuts to federal spending.
Trump continued to press Fed chief Jerome Powell to slash interest rates during a visit to its headquarters on Thursday, where they bickered over its renovation cost.
The president, who wants to oust Powell over his refusal to cut, took a fresh dig during the trip, telling reporters: 'As good as we're doing, we'd do better if we had lower interest rates.'
Trump's anger at the Fed and his calls for officials to lower rates has raised concerns about the independence of the central bank.
'While unlikely to yield anything concrete, the optics of a president storming the temple of monetary orthodoxy is enough to put Powell watchers on edge,' said SPI Asset Management's Stephen Innes.
'The risk isn't immediate policy change — it's longer-term erosion of independence, and the signal that Powell may not be sitting as comfortably as markets assume.'
Trade hopes remain elevated, with Brussels and Washington appearing close to a deal that would halve Trump's threatened 30 percent levy, with a European Commission spokesman saying he believed an agreement was 'within reach'.
The bloc, however, is still forging ahead with contingency plans in case talks fail, with member states approving a 93-billion-euro ($109-billion) package of counter-tariffs.
With few positive catalysts to drive buying, Asian markets turned lower heading into the weekend.
Tokyo dipped after putting on around five percent in the previous two days, while Hong Kong retreated following five days of gains.
There were also losses in Shanghai, Sydney, Singapore, Manila and Jakarta. Seoul and Wellington edged up.
The dollar extended gains against its peers as investors pared their rate forecasts.
– Key figures at around 0230 GMT –
Tokyo – Nikkei 225: DOWN 0.6 percent at 41,570.24 (break)
Hong Kong – Hang Seng Index: DOWN 0.7 percent at 25,487.95
Shanghai – Composite: DOWN 0.2 percent at 3,597.77
Dollar/yen: UP at 147.40 yen from 146.94 yen on Thursday
Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.1742 from $1.1756
Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.3498 from $1.3507
Euro/pound: DOWN at 86.99 pence from 87.01 pence
West Texas Intermediate: UP 0.6 percent at $66.43 per barrel
Brent North Sea Crude: UP 0.6 percent at $69.61 per barrel
New York – Dow: DOWN 0.7 percent at 44,693.91 (close)
London – FTSE 100: UP 0.9 percent at 9,138.37 (close)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Iraq Business
2 days ago
- Iraq Business
Beyond Tariffs: Building a Win-Win Relationship with the US
By Ahmed Tabaqchali for the Atlantic Council. Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Iraq Business News. Beyond tariffs: Building a win-win relationship between the US and Iraq Iraq was among the countries that received a letter from US President Donald Trump on July 9th advising its prime minister that Baghdad's trading relationship with Washington was far from reciprocal-and thus its exports to the United States would be subject to a 30 percent tariff starting August 1. This is lower than the initial rate of 39 percent that the Trump administration announced on " Liberation Day " back in April, but higher than the revised 10 percent base rate that applied to all countries when the Trump administration paused "Liberation Day" tariffs for ninety days, allowing room for negotiations that expired in July. Click here to read the full report. To browse our comprehensive library of reports on Iraq, click here.
Memri
2 days ago
- Memri
What Washington Can Learn From The India-UK Free Trade Agreement
India's recent achievement in concluding a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the United Kingdom stands in stark contrast to the tense and protracted negotiations that continue to mark its trade dialogue with the United States.[1] The India-UK FTA, signed in July 2025, is not merely a trade pact, it reflects mutual understanding, strategic alignment, and a shared vision for inclusive growth. It was forged through three years of fractured but ultimately fruitful negotiations between two mature economies that chose pragmatism over posturing. The UK, navigating its post-Brexit economic identity, saw in India not just a market but a partner whose economic ascent could complement its own industrial ambitions. Britain's modern industrial strategy, with its focus on advanced manufacturing, clean energy, and digital technologies, found resonance with India's reform-driven growth trajectory and its aspiration to become a $5 trillion economy by 2027. "US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order for new tariffs on almost 70 countries which is set to go into effect in 7 days. The list includes India which will have to pay a 25% tariff effective 7 days from now. Earlier Trump had announced that India's tariff rate would be effective August 1, but the Executive order signed for 69 countries - with India on the list - says the new tariff rates will be applicable from August 7. He has imposed a 25% tariff on India with an additional unspecified penalty for India's trade with Russia for defense equipment and crude oil…" (Source: Times of India, August 1, 2025) The Indo-U.S. Trade Negotiations Remain Mired In Structural Disagreements The India-UK agreement was not confined to tariff reductions. It offered zero-duty access to 99 percent of Indian exports, streamlined mobility for professionals, and addressed social security contributions through the Double Contribution Convention. It was, in essence, a pact of mutual respect and forward-looking trust. The UK acknowledged India's developmental priorities, its Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSME)-driven economy, and its strategic ambitions. It approached the deal not as a zero-sum game, but as a collaborative opportunity to harness complementary strengths. The result is a framework that promises to double bilateral trade to USD 120 billion by 2030, catalyzing investment, job creation, and industrial competitiveness. In contrast, the Indo-U.S. trade negotiations remain mired in structural disagreements and ideological friction. The disagreements, whether on agricultural subsidies, digital trade, or Special and Differential Treatment at the WTO, are not new. But what exacerbates them is the persistent perception gap. The U.S. views India's insistence on Managed Service Provider (MSP)-based procurement and its digital sovereignty measures as protectionist, while India sees them as essential instruments of social equity and economic resilience. The Equalisation Levy,[2] often dubbed the "Google Tax," a tax introduced in India to tax the digital economy, is emblematic of this clash: a measure born of India's attempt to ensure fair taxation in the digital age, but interpreted by Washington as a targeted affront to American tech giants. Underlying these tensions is a fundamental misreading of India's developmental context. Despite its macroeconomic strength and global ambitions, India remains a country where MSMEs form the backbone of employment, where agriculture is still vulnerable to price shocks, and where per capita consumption lags far behind developed economies. The U.S. administration, in its pursuit of reciprocal concessions, often overlooks these structural realities. It perceives India's rise as a zero-sum game, every gain for India, it fears, comes at the expense of American manufacturing. This mindset not only stifles progress but risks alienating a partner whose strategic alignment with the U.S. is otherwise robust. India's principled stance at the WTO, whether in defending Special and Differential Treatment or opposing plurilateral deals, has often been misunderstood by the U.S. as obstructionism. Yet these positions are rooted in India's historical commitment to the solidarity of developing economies. India's refusal to join the Government Procurement Agreement, for instance, stems from its belief that public procurement is a vital tool for social development. Its opposition to the WTO Moratorium on Customs Duties on Electronic Transmissions is not a rejection of digital trade, but a call for equitable taxation in a rapidly evolving digital landscape. The Divergence In Perception Between The U.S. And India Has Created A Negotiation Environment Fraught With Suspicion And Rigidity The agricultural sector remains a particularly thorny issue. While both countries provide domestic subsidies under WTO-approved provisions, the U.S. argues that India's MSP-based procurement distorts global markets. India, however, sees it as a lifeline for farmers and a bulwark against inflation. The Food Corporation of India's procurement mechanism is not a trade tool, it is a social safety net. The U.S. must recognize that in a country where agriculture employs nearly half the workforce, such mechanisms are not negotiable luxuries but developmental necessities. The digital economy, too, has become a battleground of perceptions. The U.S. views India's Digital Public Infrastructure and initiatives like Atmanirbhar Bharat ("Self-reliant India")[3] as inward-looking, while India sees them as enablers of inclusive growth. Ironically, both countries are global tech hubs with deep investment linkages. Yet instead of building on this synergy, the negotiations have been marred by mistrust and misinterpretation. The root of these differences lies not in the specifics of trade policy but in the broader lens through which each country views the other. India sees itself as a developing economy with legitimate needs for policy space and protective measures. The US, by contrast, sees India's economic rise as a signal that it should relinquish such privileges. This divergence in perception has created a negotiation environment fraught with suspicion and rigidity. The U.S. Has An Opportunity To Reframe Its Engagement With India, Not As A Competitor, But As A Strategic Partner The lesson, then, lies in the UK's approach. Britain did not dilute its interests; it simply chose to engage with India on equal terms, acknowledging its sensitivities and aspirations. The result was a comprehensive, high-quality agreement that promises to unlock significant opportunities for both sides. The US, if it wishes to conclude a meaningful FTA with India, must shed its transactional lens and adopt a more nuanced, empathetic posture. It must recognize that India's insistence on developmental safeguards is not obstructionism, it is a principled stand rooted in lived realities. Trade, at its best, is not a contest of concessions but a choreography of shared growth. The India-UK FTA exemplifies this spirit. The India-U.S. negotiations, if they are to succeed, must rediscover it. The current U.S. administration has an opportunity to reframe its engagement with India, not as a competitor, but as a strategic partner whose growth can amplify shared prosperity. It must move beyond the arithmetic of tariffs and embrace the algebra of trust. Only then can the Indo-U.S. trade deal transcend its impasse and become a beacon of 21st-century economic diplomacy.
Shafaq News
2 days ago
- Shafaq News
Gold set for third weekly loss amid stronger dollar, reduced Fed rate cut hopes
Shafaq News Gold prices held steady on Friday, but is poised for a third consecutive weekly loss pressured by a stronger dollar and diminished expectations for U.S. rate cuts, while uncertainty from U.S. tariffs on trading partners offered support. Spot gold was steady at $3,288.89 per ounce, as of 0733 GMT. Bullion is down 1.4% so far this week. U.S. gold futures edged down 0.3% to $3,339.90. The dollar index hit its highest level since May 29, making gold more expensive for other currency holders. "Gold remains weighed by reduced bets for Fed rate cuts for the rest of 2025. This week's U.S. GDP, weekly jobless claims, and PCE figures also shored up the Fed's reluctance to commit to a rate cut," said Han Tan, chief market analyst at Fed held rates steady in the 4.25%-4.50% range on Wednesday and dampened expectations for a September rate cut. U.S. President Donald Trump slapped steep tariffs on exports from dozens of trading partners, including Canada, Brazil, India and Taiwan, pressing ahead with his plans to reorder the global economy ahead of a Friday trade deal deadline. "The precious metal should, however, remain supported amid the still-uncertain impact from U.S. tariffs on global economic growth," Tan said. U.S. inflation increased in June as tariffs on imports started raising the cost of some goods. Focus now shifts to U.S. jobs data, due later on Friday, as investors assess the Federal Reserve's policy trajectory, with July job growth expected to have slowed and the unemployment rate projected to rise to 4.2%. Gold, often considered a safe-haven asset during economic uncertainties, tends to perform well in a low-interest-rate environment. Physical gold demand in key Asian markets improved slightly this week as a pullback in prices sparked buying interest, though volatility kept some buyers cautious. Spot silver fell 0.7% to $36.50 per ounce, platinum lost 0.8% at $1,278.40 and palladium was down 0.2% to $1,188.28. All three metals were headed for weekly losses.
