Covid-19 cases in Selangor increase 36 per cent, no deaths reported
24 Jun 2025 02:41pm
Selangor has seen a 36 per cent rise in Covid-19 cases in ME24/2025, prompting continued vigilance from health authorities as they monitor infection trends across districts. - Bernama file photo
SHAH ALAM - The Covid-19 situation in Selangor saw a 36 per cent increase to 1,082 cases in Epidemiological Week (ME) 24/2025 compared to 795 cases in the previous week.
State Public Health and Environment Exco Jamaliah Jamaluddin said, however, the number involved was still below the warning level set based on the trend of cases in Selangor for 2022 to 2024, apart from not involving any deaths so far. Selangor has seen a 36 per cent rise in Covid-19 cases in ME24/2025, prompting continued vigilance from health authorities as they monitor infection trends across districts. - Bernama file photo
"In Selangor, a total of 7,582 Covid-19 cases were recorded from ME 1 to ME 24 of 2025 (ending on June 14, 2025), compared to 18,231 cases recorded in the same period in 2024," she said in a statement today.
Jamaliah said that based on ME 1 to ME 24 this year, Petaling district recorded the highest number of cases, which is 2,475 cases, followed by Hulu Langat (1,435 cases), Klang (974 cases), Gombak (927), Sepang (615), Kuala Selangor (499 cases), Kuala Langat (372 cases), Hulu Selangor (148 cases) and Sabak Bernam (137 cases).
"Based on the findings of the Selangor State Health Department (JKNS), adults aged 31 to 59 years old are the most frequently infected group, which is 44 per cent, followed by youth aged 18 to 30 years old (27 per cent) and children aged one to six years old, which is nine per cent," she said.
Commenting further, Jamaliah said that for 2025, a total of 7,582 individuals had undergone Covid-19 screening tests, of which 353 people had been admitted to the ward for further treatment.
"On ME24, a patient was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) due to being pregnant and also infected with dengue fever but was also informed that the patient was transferred to a regular ward on June 17," she said. - BERNAMA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
2 hours ago
- Daily Express
Vape bans in Malaysia risk fuelling black market, resurgence in smoking, experts warn
Published on: Tuesday, August 05, 2025 Published on: Tue, Aug 05, 2025 Text Size: As Malaysia continues to refine its tobacco control strategy, the message from experts is clear - good intentions should not override evidence and experience. - Bernama pic for illustration only. Kota Kinabalu: Experts have warned that ramping up restrictions on vaping, especially moves tantamount to a ban, could trigger unintended and potentially harmful consequences, even as more states move in that direction. States like Johor and Kelantan, which have banned the sale of vape products since 2016 and 2015, respectively, continue to record high user numbers, with more than 150,000 users in Johor and over 30,000 in Kelantan. The availability of illicit vape products in the two states has raised concerns not only because they point to ineffective enforcement, but also the health issues that come with illicit product use, including the possibility of drug abuse. Malaysia is not alone in facing issues related to illicit vape use. A similar pattern has been observed in neighbouring Singapore, the country renowned for strict enforcement, but also where a complete ban on vaping has failed to curb its usage. A survey by Milieu Insight found vape usage among Singaporeans rose from 3.9 per cent to 5.2 per cent between late 2021 and 2023. For context, the island republic's vape ban has been in place since 2018. Advertisement Back in Malaysia, several states, namely Terengganu, Perlis, Pahang, and Kedah, have implemented bans or stopped issuing new licenses for vape businesses. A health expert and economist say the trend of illicit vape use illustrates a core weakness in prohibitionist approaches: they often do not reduce demand, but instead shift it to illegal and unregulated channels. In a perfect world, a complete ban is ideal. But realistically, it has several repercussions,' said Professor Dr Sharifa Ezat Wan Puteh, a lecturer at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 'We're already seeing a rise in black market tobacco and vape products. These are untaxed and unregulated, making them more dangerous to users.' Sharifa said that in countries burdened by high smoking rates and low success with traditional nicotine replacement therapies (NRT), there may be a role for tobacco harm reduction (THR) products such as e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products (HTPs), and oral nicotine pouches. She said some recalcitrant smokers who find it hard to quit with traditional NRT may benefit from alternatives, though the effectiveness depends on product quality and enforcement capabilities. She cited countries like Sweden and Norway, which use snus and nicotine pouches and are projected to reduce tobacco smoking rates below 5 per cent in the coming years. These nations also have among the lowest rates of lung cancer and cardiovascular disease in the EU. In Japan and South Korea, the use of HTPs has coincided with a decline in smoking prevalence. In contrast, Australia's tightly regulated medical-vaping model is struggling. Under rules introduced in October 2024, vapes can only be sold via pharmacies with a prescription. But data from The Daily Telegraph revealed that just one in every 1,686 vape sales occurred through legal channels. Meanwhile, major suppliers, including Philip Morris, have exited the market, citing unsustainable regulatory burdens. The stricter controls have had a paradoxical impact. A month later, the same daily reported that more than one-in-10 of Australians aged 18 to 24 are now smoking cigarettes, a 36 per cent surge in less than a year. 'Policies don't always produce the desired results,' said Dr Carmelo Ferlito, chief executive of the Centre for Market Education. 'We've seen this in prohibition-era America and communist countries. Restrictions shift consumption underground rather than eliminate it.' Ferlito argues that heavy-handed bans fail to account for economic realities and consumer behaviour. He said that when in-demand products are banned, people would just find a way to procure them from illegal sources, and this was why 'good intentions' were not enough when it came to policy-making. 'Often, policies are designed as wishlists, ignoring the 'laws' of economics. 'For example, I could proclaim that I could fly and jump out a window. But if I do so, ignoring the laws of gravity, I could jump out of the window, but I won't be able to fly. That's the reality.' Ferlito said he believes regulation should facilitate reputable suppliers to bring in products legally, lowering the risk of counterfeit products. This should be accompanied by education and awareness on the trade-offs involved in the consumption of alternatives to cigarettes or stopping altogether. Sharifa said two Cochrane reviews, which are internationally recognised as the highest standard in evidence-based health care, have shown the benefits of THR in smoking cessation. 'Vaping was never intended for youth use, but weak regulation, lax enforcement, and irresponsible vendors have enabled widespread abuse. 'The situation has been further compounded by black market imports from abroad.' As Malaysia continues to refine its tobacco control strategy, the message from experts is clear - good intentions should not override evidence and experience. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
AI can be used to spread health disinformation
Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed many fields of human activity, including healthcare. It is increasingly used to analyse complex medical and healthcare data, and has the potential to diagnose diseases, develop personalised treatment plans, and assist clinicians' decision-making. While AI has the potential to enhance patients' care in their healthcare journeys, there are unresolved issues related to data privacy, bias and the need for human expertise, which has to be addressed for the responsible and effective use of AI in healthcare. The public obtains substantial health information from multiple electronic sources and this has been propagated by social media. AI has led to negative impacts on individual and public health. This column addresses AI and health misinformation and disinformation. Infodemic of misinformation and disinformation The World Health Organization (WHO) distinguishes misinformation from disinformation. 'Misinformation is the spread of false information without the intent to mislead. 'Those who share the misinformation may believe it is true, useful or interesting, and have no malicious intent towards the recipients they are sharing it with. 'Disinformation is designed or spread with full knowledge of it being false (information has been manipulated), as part of an intention to deceive and cause harm. 'The motivations can be economic gain, ideological, religious, political or in support of a social agenda, among others.' The harmful effects of misinformation and disinformation include threats to individual and public health, the environment, or security. The Covid-19 pandemic was the perfect storm for the proliferation and spread of disinformation. There was global fear, uncertainty and doubt. It occurred at a time in history when there was extensive global access to, creation of and sharing of information, including misinformation and disinformation. As the pandemic spread, social media postings and the virus' spread stoked fear; uncertainties about treatments and the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions like social distancing, masking etc; and the safety and effectiveness of the new vaccines, among others. This caused societal turmoil and fear, protests in some countries, and delayed or no vaccine uptake, as well as increased death rates in some countries or regions. During the pandemic, the WHO introduced the term 'infodemic', which is 'too much information, including false or misleading information, in digital and physical environments during a disease outbreak. 'It causes confusion and risk-taking behaviours that can harm health. 'It also leads to mistrust in health authorities and undermines the public health response. 'An infodemic can intensify or lengthen outbreaks when people are unsure about what they need to do to protect their health and the health of people around them. 'With growing digitisation – an expansion of social media and internet use – information can spread more rapidly. 'This can help to more quickly fill information voids, but can also amplify harmful messages'. AI and health disinformation The benefits of AI have been touted by many policymakers and healthcare professionals. Advancements in AI, particularly for large language models (LLMs), are impacting on public health, with millions turning to AI tools for health-related advice. But how reliable is the health advice from these tools? Researchers from the University of South Australia (UniSA) and Flinders University in Australia, Harvard Medical School in the United States, University College London in Britain and the Warsaw University of Technology in Poland reported in the Annals of Internal Medicine on June 24 (2025), how easy it is to exploit the weaknesses in machine learning systems by using disinformation tools that the public have access to. The researchers evaluated five foundational and most advanced AI systems developed by OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Meta and X Corp to determine whether they could be programmed to operate as health disinformation chatbots. Using instructions available only to developers, the researchers programmed each AI system (designed to operate as chatbots when embedded in web pages) to produce incorrect responses to health queries and included fabricated references from highly reputable sources to sound more authoritative and credible. The 'chatbots' were then asked 10 health-related questions. The researchers reported that: 'Of the 100 health queries posed across the five customised LLM API chatbots, 88 (88%) responses were health disinformation. 'Four of the five chatbots (GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Llama 3.2-90B Vision and Grok Beta) generated disinformation in 100% (20 of 20) of their responses, whereas Claude 3.5 Sonnet responded with disinformation in 40% (eight of 20). 'The disinformation included claimed vaccine-autism links, HIV being airborne, cancer-curing diets, sunscreen risks, genetically-modified organism conspiracies, attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and depression myths, garlic replacing antibiotics, and 5G causing infertility. 'Exploratory analyses further showed that the OpenAI GPT Store could currently be instructed to generate similar disinformation. 'Overall, LLM APIs and the OpenAI GPT Store were shown to be vulnerable to malicious system-level instructions to covertly create health disinformation chatbots.' Study lead author and UniSA pharmacy lecturer Dr Natansh Modi said: 'If these systems can be manipulated to covertly produce false or misleading advice, then they can create a powerful new avenue for disinformation that is harder to detect, harder to regulate, and more persuasive than anything seen before. 'This is not a future risk. It is already possible, and it is already happening.' He added that effective safeguards are technically achievable. 'However, the current protections are inconsistent and insufficient. 'Developers, regulators and public health stakeholders must act decisively, and they must act now. 'Without immediate action, these systems could be exploited by malicious actors to manipulate public health discourse at scale, particularly during crises such as pandemics or vaccine campaigns.' Take these actions The message from the study is clear, i.e. 'Trust your doctor, not the chatbox.' The comment in the New England Journal of Medicine 's Journal Watch on July 1 (2025) is unambiguous: 'The danger is clear and present: Anyone can create AI chatbots that generate authoritative answers with fabricated peer-reviewed references and disseminate false health information – no coding required. 'What can we do? ... writers remind us of the SIFT method: 'Stop and think; 'Investigate sources; 'Find other sources; and 'Trace claims to their origins. 'Critical thinking is our defence against AI misinformation and can help us build a culture of informed scepticism before harm is done.' Individuals can do much on their own to address health misinformation and disinformation, such as: Getting accurate health information from your doctor and other healthcare professionals, and/or from websites of regulators and professional organisations Looking out for emotional red flags online Using fact-checking tools Doing reverse image search by copying the image or the image's URL into the search bar of an image search tool Spotting spoof websites Spotting fake social media accounts Countering the misinformation or disinformation by not sharing it, correcting it, debunking it and reporting it Engaging with friends, colleagues and family to deal with the problem of health misinformation and disinformation Addressing health misinformation and disinformation in the community. Regulators have a vital role in addressing health misinformation and disinformation. Their actions can include: Ensuring there are robust screening and accountability safeguards to ensure public health safety with rapidly evolving digital technologies Addressing the public health impact of health misinformation and disinformation Establishing best practices for prevention by ensuring their websites provide current and accurate health information Sharing toolkits from other regulators Investing in research on misinformation and disinformation Modernising public health communications Increasing resources to help states and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to better address questions, concerns, misinformation and disinformation Expanding efforts to build long-term resilience to misinformation and disinformation like educational programmes. In summary, there is an urgent need for regulators, especially the government, to address the use of AI in health misinformation and disinformation. Dr Milton Lum is a past president of the Federation of Private Medical Practitioners Associations and the Malaysian Medical Association. For more information, email starhealth@ The views expressed do not represent that of organisations that the writer is associated with. The information provided is for educational and communication purposes only, and it should not be construed as personal medical advice. Information published in this article is not intended to replace, supplant or augment a consultation with a health professional regarding the reader's own medical care. The Star disclaims all responsibility for any losses, damage to property or personal injury suffered directly or indirectly from reliance on such information.
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
'Worrying' study shows how few of us wash our hands after the toilet
New research suggest a surprisingly large number of people completely skip washing their hands after going to the loo. — Photo: Monika Skolimowska/dpa Nearly half of people don't wash their hands after using the toilet in a hospital, a recent study has found. Researchers from the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom found that 43.7% of toilet users in a Danish hospital did not use the sink after relieving themselves. In some weeks, this figure even rose to 61.8%. This raises "serious concerns about hygiene compliance in high-risk environments," the university stated in its announcement. "Despite the emphasis on hand hygiene during the pandemic, the findings suggest that regular handwashing is still not a consistent habit – even in places where cleanliness is vital for preventing infection spread." For the study, sensors were installed in two publicly accessible toilet facilities at Bispebjerg Hospital in the Copenhagen region of Denmark, according to the researchers. These sensors were placed directly on the toilets and on the pipes of the sinks. Their usage was monitored over 19 weeks. If the taps were not used two minutes before or four minutes after flushing the toilet, this was recorded as a failure to wash hands. "People may assume handwashing is second nature by now – especially in hospitals and post-Covid-19," explained the study's lead author, Pablo Pereira-Doel. "But our data paints a different picture." He and his co-author, Benjamin Gardner, are now calling for public awareness campaigns. Professor Carrie Newlands from the University of Surrey's School of Medicine commented that the findings were "worrying, but not surprising," noting that "in hospitals, lapses like these can have serious consequences – for patients and for the wider healthcare system." Health officials advise not only always washing hands after using the toilet but also doing so thoroughly. Handwashing should last at least 20 to 30 seconds – roughly the time it takes to hum "Happy Birthday" twice. Experts also say that it's best not to open and close taps with your bare hands in public toilets, including those in hospitals. A disposable paper towel or an elbow can help reduce the spread of germs. – dpa
