
Fashion's most influential woman you've never heard of... and the designers who have been stealing from her ever since
That someone is Claire McCardell.
She was once one of the most influential and famous fashion designers in the world. When she died in 1958, the New York Times ran her obituary on their front page and hailed her as the 'All-American designer for the All-American girl.'
Yet despite having more of an impact on women's lives than Coco Chanel and Christian Dior combined, McCardell has been largely forgotten – a name familiar only to the fashion cognoscenti and design historians.
Author Elizabeth Evitts Dickinson is determined to change that. She is seeking to reinstate McCardell in the pantheon of designer greats with her new book, ' Claire McCardell: The Designer Who Set Women Free.'
Because, according to Evitts Dickinson, what McCardell did entirely reinvented the way women dress.
Coming to prominence in the 1930s and 1940s, the designer recognized that women's lives were changing. They were living, moving and working in a modern world.
McCardell turned up her nose at corsetry, high heels and delicate fabrics, and espoused a feminist philosophy that translated into designs she believed a liberated woman would want to wear.
'You have to design for the lives American women lead today,' she noted in an interview with feminist writer Betty Friedan in 1947.
McCardell was born in 1905 in the quiet hamlet of Frederick, Maryland. The daughter of a banker and housewife, as a girl, she railed against the restrictions of female clothing that made climbing trees and stashing apples almost impossible.
She majored in home economics for two years at nearby Hood College before making the bold leap to New York City to earn a degree from the New York School of Fine and Applied Art (now Parsons The New School for Design).
A stint in Paris followed and convinced McCardell that American women deserved better than the poor imitations of Parisian haute couture that filled US stores.
McCardell believed they needed clothes that reflected the pioneering spirit embodied by Charles Lindbergh, who she watched land at Le Bourget Airport on 21 May 1927 after his historic solo non-stop flight from New York to Paris.
Returning to New York and its Seventh Avenue design district – the hub of American fashion production – McCardell secured a job at Townley Frocks, then one of the leading garment manufacturers.
During her tenure she fought for the inclusion of many of what we now consider staple features in womenswear.
Pockets rather than purses was an essential ethos in the McCardell worldview.
Not content with male-driven view that they made the female figure look fat, the designer argued pockets were a necessity for women whose presence in the modern American workforce was becoming ever more important.
Closures were next on her list. Without a husband or maid, how could a woman, McCardell argued, fasten her dress? Without further ado she shifted the zipper on her pieces from the back to the side.
That change embodied how the designer believed women should be allowed to dress – 'independent clothes for the independent working gal,' she proclaimed.
According to her boss at Townley, her pleated 'monastic dress,' created in 1938, looked terrible on the hanger but, when belted at the waist with its spaghetti style ties – another of McCardell's innovations – it embodied functional elegance that made it an immediate bestseller when it hit the ready-to-wear racks.
Four years later, McCardell bested her own record for success when, in 1942, she created the cotton 'Popover' wrap dress.
It was marketed to American consumers as the 'original utility fashion' and sold for $6.95.
The dress was originally made from inexpensive cotton, which McCardell later switched out for denim – a bold move and a novel use of a fabric previously considered the reserve of menswear.
Thirty years before Diane Von Furstenberg repurposed the wrap dress into one made from jersey – claiming she had launched not just a revolution but a symbol of sartorial female independence – McCardell's 'Popover' gave women the benefit of looking good while still being functional.
Lord and Taylor, the famed but now defunct department store, gave the dress an entire window display in its flagship store on New York's Fifth Avenue.
One fashion journalist described the life-altering garment as 'so glamorous that Fifth Avenue and the farm united in their acceptance of it.'
A staggering 75,000 dresses were sold in the first six months, earning McCardell not just fame but her place as the preeminent arbiter of female fashion.
Cut off from the leadership of Parisian fashion houses due to World War II and facing the challenges of wartime shortages, she was allowed to flex the muscles of innovation without the backlash of the conservative male voices that still dominated American fashion.
Trousers with pleats, and yes pockets, became de rigueur for a newly functional face of the female workforce, who also found in McCardell's love of hoods a practical replacement for hats which remained in place only with uncomfortable and unstable pins.
Leggings and other sportswear separates quickly became part of the McCardell repertoire.
Faced with a shortage of leather due to wartime rationing, she had the perfect excuse to abandon the high heel, which she had long thought impractical for a working woman. She pivoted to the ballet flat – soles made of rubber and the shoe made from a fabric matching her designs.
Though she sparked a trend that still flourishes today, her rival Coco Chanel is the one who gets all the credit, despite the fact the French designer didn't launch her own version until 1957.
Trousers with pleats, and yes pockets, became de rigueur for a newly functional face of the female workforce (Pictured: McCardell's trousers in a Neiman Marcus ad)
Four years later, McCardell bested her own record for success when, in 1942, she created the cotton 'Popover' wrap dress (pictured)
Thirty years before Diane Von Furstenberg repurposed the wrap dress into one made from jersey, McCardell's 'Popover' gave women the benefit of looking good while still being functional
But, while McCardell thrived during the war with her penchant for utilitarianism, she found herself distinctly out of step with a post-war return to the whimsy of impractical glamor.
In February 1947, Christian Dior debuted the 'New Look.' Padded shoulders, tightly corseted waists, high heels and impossibly full skirts, filled out a collection that was the antithesis of all that McCardell had worked for in her now two-decade career.
Romantic and ethereal, Dior's designs captured a much-needed emotional rejuvenation after the deprivation of the wartime years.
The post-war resurgence of French couture was still in full swing when, in 1958, McCardell died at the age of just 52.
Buyers of the American fashion emporiums had returned to copying Parisian couture and American talent lay dormant for nearly two decades until a new wave of designers – such as Calvin Klein, von Furstenberg, Halston, Donna Karen and Ralph Lauren – emerged.
But it wasn't just the mood of the time that contributed to McCardell's fall from favor. In truth, she contributed to the end of her own line for the simple reason that, unlike Chanel and Dior, she did not designate a successor.
Head designer, Yves Saint Laurent, carried the Dior label to greatness following Christian Dior's death in 1957.
But McCardell's label, whose ownership reverted to her Maryland-based non-fashion family, died just a few months after she did.
As a consequence, few acknowledge McCardell's place as one of history's fashion greats.
Does Anna Wintour even know her name? Maybe, but my hunch is probably not.
For a woman who has championed fashion at its most exclusive, restrictive and expensive, Wintour would surely find little to admire in McCardell's functional utilitarian designs.
But the reemergence of McCardell's name is a timely reminder that the history of dress is ultimately shaped by how the majority of women have lived in and loved their clothes.
Because she may not have been embraced by the fashion glitterati, but McCardell's legacy is alive and well – and it's woven into the fabric of every woman's wardrobe today.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
7 hours ago
- The Sun
I've splashed £1million to get the world's smallest waist -all my organs moved around because of it but I'm not done yet
A WOMAN has revealed that she has spent over £1 million trying to get the world's smallest waist. Aleira Avendano, 33 has spent two decades cinching her waist down to just 18 inches, 16 inches smaller than the average British woman's. 2 2 The Florida-based yoga instructor has achieved her tiny waist by wearing a corset, and is determined to beat the current record held by 86-year-old Cathie Jung, whose waist is just 15 inches. Aleira's controversial methods have caused her internal organs to "shift and adjust" to new spots. However, despite the dangers, Aleira, who is originally from Venezuela, isn't ready to quit. "I find it challenging when it comes to buying clothes, as nothing fits," she told NeedToKnow. "My sizes are unique, and I have naturally wide hips." "I have to have clothes custom-made for me. It's been a major investment – enhancements, treatments and healthy food. "A huge commitment. Honestly, my body should be insured." As well as spending £1 million on her waist whittling mission, Aleira has also spent £471,000 on cosmetic surgeries, including seven boob jobs, four nose jobs and veneers. Aleira previously claimed that all woman "should have plastic surgery to be truly beautiful." And despite the health risks, Aleira has encouraged others to try and get a waist like hers. The 45-second trick to get a snatched waist that Love Island star swears by At the start of her waist cinching journey, Aleira wore a corset six hours a day, but she has now ramped this up to 23 hours. Wearing a corset comes with a myriad of issues, such as breathing difficulties, organ compression and muscle atrophy. The model has now launched her own brand of shapewear, to help people achieve her "one of a kind look". "My shapewear line will change many lives" she said. What are the dangers of wearing corsets? Wearing corsets, a fashion practice that dates back centuries, can pose significant medical risks despite their aesthetic appeal. One of the primary concerns is the potential for internal organ damage. Corsets, especially when tightly laced, can compress the ribs and exert pressure on internal organs such as the liver, stomach, and intestines. This compression can lead to displacement and deformation of these organs, potentially causing digestive issues, reduced lung capacity, and impaired circulation. Breathing difficulties are another serious risk associated with corset use. The constriction of the rib cage can limit the expansion of the lungs, leading to shallow breathing and decreased oxygen intake. Over time, this can result in respiratory problems and reduced stamina. In extreme cases, prolonged use of tightly laced corsets can lead to conditions like atelectasis, where parts of the lungs collapse due to inadequate ventilation. Additionally, corsets can affect the musculoskeletal system. The constant pressure and altered posture imposed by a corset can weaken core muscles, leading to muscle atrophy and decreased strength. This can result in long-term back pain and poor posture once the corset is removed. There is also a risk of nerve compression, which can lead to numbness, tingling, and in severe cases, nerve damage. While modern corsets are often designed to be less restrictive than their historical counterparts, the potential health risks remain. It is essential for individuals to be aware of these risks and to use corsets sparingly and with caution. Consulting with medical professionals before incorporating corsets into regular wear can help mitigate some of these risks and ensure that any adverse effects are promptly addressed. "It's a gentle product with incredible results, created by me and inspired by the story of my own body." Aleria added: "I don't miss my old figure at all. "People react in different ways. "Some follow me, some feel nervous, and others admire me or see my body as something crazy." She added that men "can't get enough" of her "exotic" figure.


Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
How Gwyneth's perfectionism caused a 'noxious' atmosphere at her controversial lifestyle brand Goop: Final extract from new book reveals how she came up with THAT candle and fell out with Anna Wintour's team
Gwyneth Paltrow may not have known as she headed into Goop's weekly staff meeting one January morning in 2017 that the company was about to be hit by one of its biggest controversies. Goop, which Gwyneth had started as a lifestyle newsletter nearly ten years earlier, sometimes promoted wacky products that attracted headlines and boosted sales.


Daily Mail
10 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Caroline Wozniacki announces major personal news one year on from ex Rory McIlroy's divorce drama
Caroline Wozniacki has welcomed her third child with retired NBA forward and husband David Lee, the tennis star has announced. Wozniacki, 35, shared the heartwarming news on Instagram three months after revealing that she and Lee, 42, were expecting another baby. The loved-up couple, who tied the knot back in June 2019 after getting engaged two years earlier, already have a three-year-old daughter, Olivia, and a two-year-old son, James. And the former Australian Open champion announced Saturday that they have expanded their family again following the birth of son Max. Alongside an adorable photo of her two other children holding the newborn baby in their arms, Wozniacki wrote on Instagram: 'Max Wozniacki Lee, born July 26, 2025! Mom and baby are healthy and our family couldnt be happier!' Wozniacki's latest child with Lee, a former NBA All-Star power forward who played for the New York Knicks and Golden State Warriors amongst others, comes almost a year on from ex-fiance Rory McIlroy 's shocking divorce drama. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Caroline Wozniacki (@carowozniacki) McIlroy was in a relationship with the Grand Slam winner for three years before dramatically breaking off their engagement in 2014 after admitting he was not ready for marriage. Three years later he did tie the knot with current wife Erica Stoll. Last year, however, the five-time major champion filed to divorce Stoll after serving her with papers at their home in Florida, only to U-turn on that proposal less than a month later. Rumors suggested that McIlroy had been having some form of a relationship with CBS Sports' Amanda Balionis while they were both out on tour. None of these rumors have been proven and neither Balionis nor McIlroy have outright addressed them. By June, less than a full month after Stoll was served, the filing was withdrawn and the couple have remained together. A sporting super-couple, McIlroy and Wozniacki were together between 2011 and 2013 before he ended the relationship when he said he was not ready for marriage. The duo had sent out wedding invitations after a New Year's Eve proposal in Sydney and Wozniacki posted: 'Happy New Year everyone! Rory and I started 2014 with a bang! I said YES!!!!' But only months later, McIlroy changed his mind. At the time, he put out a statement, reading: 'There is no right way to end a relationship that has been so important to two people. 'The problem is mine. The wedding invitations issued at the weekend made me realise that I wasn't ready for all that marriage entails. 'I wish Caroline all the happiness she deserves and thank her for the great times we've had. I will not be saying anything more about our relationship in any setting.' Wozniacki has since admitted to being stunned at the way in which the break-up was handled. She previously told Graham Bensinger: 'I was shocked. I thought at least I would get a face-to-face or something, but there was nothing. It was a phone call, and I did not hear from him again. It kind of just ended.