logo
Posh Virginia private school that allegedly praised Hitler expelled three Jewish students who faced antisemitic bullying: complaint

Posh Virginia private school that allegedly praised Hitler expelled three Jewish students who faced antisemitic bullying: complaint

New York Post01-07-2025
A Northern Virginia private school celebrated as one of the best in the country allegedly expelled three Jewish siblings who endured relentless antisemitic harassment in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023 terror attack on Israel — all while their community celebrated Hitler as a 'strong historical leader.'
The Brandeis Center filed the complaint on behalf of the children's parents, Brian Vazquez and Ashok Roy, against the Nysmith School for the Gifted, a K-8 academy located just an hour outside of Washington, DC, and its headmaster, Kenneth Nysmith.
The complaint asserts that the couple's 11-year-old daughter faced a 'campaign of ostracizing' led by a handful of 'popular students' on the sole basis that she is Jewish during the 2024-2025 school year.
Advertisement
3 The Nysmith School for the Gifted allegedly expelled three Jewish students in March.
The students, in an apparent gross misunderstanding of the conflict, cruelly taunted the girl for the death of her uncle, telling her they were glad he 'died in the October 7th attack,' according to the complaint.
Her uncle died years earlier with no relation to the terror attack.
Advertisement
Some students mocked her for being 'Israeli' and dubbed Jews as 'baby killers,' unabashedly saying that 'they deserve to die because of what is happening in Gaza,' the complaint stated.
Others doubled down and insisted that 'everyone at the school is against Jews and Israel, which is why they hate you,' according to the complaint.
One middle school social studies project tasked the students to sketch a child-sized drawing including 'six traits of a leader' following their studies of Niccolo Machiavelli's 'The Prince,' according to an email from the Nysmith School.
The Frankenstein amalgam included weaponry associated with rulers from Machiavelli's time and a tie typically worn by modern-day businessmen or politicians.
Advertisement
The drawing's face, though, depicted a man's face with Adolf Hitler's unmistakable toothbrush mustache and slicked-back hair.
3 The school had a middle school project centered around their studies of Niccolo Machiavelli in which one group highlight Adolf Hitler as a strong leader.
Vazquez and Roy reported the repeated incidents to Nysmith, who promised to take action. Weeks passed and no changes were made, according to the complaint.
If anything, all change moved swiftly away from protecting Vazquez and Roy's daughter as the school soon thereafter cancelled its annual talk hosting a Holocaust survivor to speak with the student body about antisemitism.
Advertisement
Vazquez and Roy had one final meeting with Nysmith on March 11 to address how the harassment escalated ever since the school hung up a Palestinian flag in the school gym mere days after nixing the Holocaust talk.
The Palestine flag hung alongside dozens of others for different countries, including Israel. The parents didn't take any issue with the Palestine flag being displayed, but were concerned that some students were using it to bolster their claims that 'nobody likes [Jewish people],' the complaint stated.
Nysmith, having seemingly run out of patience, abruptly told the couple that their daughter should 'toughen up,' the complaint stated.
3 The school's headmaster and namesake, Kenneth Nysmith, allegedly told the bullied daughter's parents
that she just needed to 'toughen up.'
Linkedin
Two days later, the parents received an email from the school notifying them of their children's expulsion, effective immediately in spite of their consistent involvement with the community and exemplary grades.
'A healthy partnership is required to help guide and nurture young children through tumultuous times and complex current events. I do not see a path forward without trust, understanding, and cooperation. In our meeting, I felt very clearly that you do not think Nysmith is the right school for your family,' Nysmith wrote.
Vazquez and Roy never anticipated the expulsion and had already paid tuition for the following academic year, the complaint said.
Advertisement
Nysmith's email noted that the family would receive a check in the mail within two weeks for all fees paid that year and for the following year. It is unclear if the check was ever sent.
'Through [the Nysmith School's] actions, the administration sent a clear message: bullying is acceptable, as long as it's against Jewish families. We must all emulate the strength of these parents and their children and stand up to anti-Semitism and its perpetrators, as difficult as it may be,' Kenneth L. Marcus, chairman of the Brandeis Center, wrote in a statement.
The complaint is seeking compensatory damages for a slew of costs such as the children's online courses and the inclusion of annual antisemitism training for the Nysmith school community.
Nysmith rejected the allegations and asserted that the information circulating online is not complete in an email he forwarded in response to a message seeking comment from The Post, in which he also claimed he was 'not aware of any legal action involving the school.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Museums Lobby Against Strengthening a Holocaust Art Recovery Law
Museums Lobby Against Strengthening a Holocaust Art Recovery Law

New York Times

time28 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Museums Lobby Against Strengthening a Holocaust Art Recovery Law

An effort in Congress to extend a 2016 law meant to help Holocaust victims and their heirs retrieve artworks stolen by the Nazis is pitting Jewish organizations that want to strengthen the law against major museums that have been quietly lobbying to keep it as it is. The law, which is set to expire at the end of next year if it is not renewed, was intended to loosen the statute of limitations to help people recover art that was looted or sold under duress more than 80 years ago. It gave people a new window of up to six years to file lawsuits from the time they discover the location of the artwork and can show their right to it. The law has been used successfully in some high-profile cases, including to recover valuable works by Egon Schiele. But in some cases, courts have ruled that the passage of so many decades had unfairly hindered the ability of the current owners of disputed artworks, including major museums, to mount effective defenses. A bipartisan bill in the Senate aims to strengthen it by explicitly barring defenses based on the passage of time. 'The intent of this act is to permit claims to recover Nazi-looted art to be brought, notwithstanding the passage of time since World War II,' states the new bill, whose sponsors include Senator John Cornyn of Texas, a Republican, and Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, a Democrat. Those changes have drawn the support of a number of prominent Jewish organizations, which say that they are necessary to make sure that people with valid claims to confiscated artworks are not prevented from recovering them just because so much time has passed. 'Hundreds of thousands of pieces of artwork were taken from the Jewish people during the Holocaust, and survivors in the United States should not be unfairly barred from claiming artwork that is theirs,' Senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, a Republican, said in a statement. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Finally, the Dam Shoring Up Support for Israel Seems to Be Breaking
Finally, the Dam Shoring Up Support for Israel Seems to Be Breaking

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Finally, the Dam Shoring Up Support for Israel Seems to Be Breaking

Something seems different now. After 22 months of seemingly endless genocide in Gaza carried out by the Israeli military, suddenly there is a sense of heightened outrage around the world, including from voices that have thus far held off from being more critical of Israel's actions. The images of starving children in Gaza, victims of a calculated Israeli policy to restrict the entry of humanitarian aid and desperately needed medicine and supplies, have rocketed around the world across the covers of mainstream newspapers and in nightly broadcasts. If there is a defining characteristic of the genocide in Gaza, the most live-documented genocide in history, it is that every time you think you have seen the most horrifying image you can possibly imagine, there is a worse one the next day. But why is this happening now? Why is it that only now does it seem a critical mass of consciences around the world have been stirred? Have we not seen enough before this? Was the little body of the massacred 6-year-old Hind Rajab, after she was fired at over 300 times, not enough to shock us? Was the systematic destruction of Gaza's civilian infrastructure, from its hospitals to its universities, not enough cause for alarm? Has the constant stream of images of mutilated bodies of children, courtesy of American-made Israeli-dropped bombs not been enough? These questions should forever haunt us. This week, a U.S. Army Green Beret who worked for the 'Gaza Humanitarian Foundation,' the organization concocted by Israel to supplant the United Nations and other humanitarian aid delivery mechanisms toward the purpose of starving and forcibly displacing the remaining population in Gaza, began to tell all about the war crimes he witnessed in Gaza. His firsthand testimony is nothing short of remarkable and required listening for every American taxpayer funding this all. He detailed how a young Palestinian boy walked several kilometers to get the littlest bit of food from the distribution site he was working at. The boy thanked and kissed him, and after leaving was gunned down by the Israeli military who had fired into the crowds. At the same time, Israel's two best-known human rights organizations publicly concluded that Israel was committing genocide in Gaza, broadening the already well-established consensus among human rights organizations and scholars about the nature of the crimes being carried out against Palestinians. Numerous European states have spoken out about the starvation in Gaza with harsher language than before and in a concerted fashion. Several have also announced intentions to recognize a state of Palestine, signaling their severe disapproval of Israeli actions. Perhaps it is a cumulative effect. Perhaps the images of children reduced to skin and bones was the final straw. Whatever the reason ultimately is, the critical question is: Now that we are here, what is going to be done about it? And action is needed more urgently than ever. For far too many in Gaza, it is too late. Over 60,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza in these 22 months, according to local health authorities, but many believe this is likely a significant undercount. Even those who have not been killed yet face irreparable harm from starvation and malnutrition, particularly the most vulnerable members of society; children in developmental stages, the elderly, and the sick. Now it seems the Israeli government is moving toward annexing parts of the Gaza Strip after declaring the vast majority of it an annihilation zone where anything that moves can be destroyed. Meanwhile, in the West Bank, the situation also only continues to turn for the worse. Israeli settler violence is setting new records on a regular basis. Earlier this summer, a Palestinian American from Florida was beaten to death by Israeli settlers in the village of Sinjil. This week, an Israeli settler shot and killed a Palestinian man who had played a key role in the production of the Oscar-winning film No Other Land. That settler, previously sanctioned by the Biden administration, only to have sanctions on him lifted by Trump a few months later, shot and killed Awda Hathaleen in broad daylight and on camera. He has already been released by Israeli authorities. The Israeli government, drunk on impunity for war crimes, is eyeing annexation in the West Bank as well. A nonbinding resolution in the Knesset around annexation of the West Bank passed overwhelmingly this month, laying the political groundwork for the next formal steps. Inside Israel, hateful rhetoric and attacks on its Palestinian citizens are escalating to a fever pitch. In recent weeks a campaign to oust Palestinian Knesset member Ayman Odeh got 73 votes, and while it failed to reach the very high threshold of 90, it succeeded in ginning up mob violence against him. He was attacked in his car, which was surrounded by violent, screaming thugs. Arab cafeteria workers at a Jerusalem cinema were attacked by a racist mob of patrons. Not long before that, an Arab bus driver was mercilessly beaten by a mob of Jewish bus riders. In all these cases, the mobs break out into a common chant: 'Death to the Arabs,' a genocidal slogan their military is implementing daily. Polls show that alarmingly large swaths of the Israeli public are supportive of war crimes, with a significant majority of Jewish Israelis supporting the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in Gaza and nearly half supporting the idea that the Israeli military 'when conquering an enemy city, should act in a manner similar to the way the Israelites acted when they conquered Jericho under the leadership of Joshua, namely, to kill all its inhabitants.' Israel's government and society seem to have lost any sense of logic or decency and are on a fast track toward increasing violence in all directions. Polls of Americans, however, show growing alienation and disgust with what Israel is doing in Gaza. The latest numbers from Gallup show that only 32 percent of Americans support Israel's actions in Gaza now, the lowest since November 2023. These numbers are driven by Democrats and independents, among whom support for Israel's actions in Gaza are at 8 percent and 25 percent, respectively. Netanyahu, who fancies himself a glorious man of history, is also hitting new lows among Americans. History is of course littered with famed villains, and Netanyahu is on track to take his place among them in the American imagination. The longer-term impact of all of this cannot be overstated, especially given the demographic divide so clear in these numbers. The younger you are, the more likely you are not just to disapprove of Israel's actions but also to see them as genocidal. Unlike their parents, who grew up thinking about Israel in the context of genocide and seeing it as a historic victim, the generations that will inherit America see it as a perpetrator. This is the new public context in which U.S.-Israel relations will take shape in the years to come. Perhaps this is finally the Abu Ghraib moment, where public unease crosses the line into public anger and opposition over our actions. If Zohran Mamdani's primary election victory in New York is any indication, the genocide in Gaza, and American support for it, will also help shape Democratic Party politics in the years to come, and probably national politics as well, given that independents trend much more closely with Democrats on this issue than with Republicans. The Democratic race for the nomination in 2028, much like 2008, might hinge on how right a candidate is perceived to have been on the most pressing moral question facing this generation: the genocide in Gaza. For the children of Gaza, however, who are being starved and bombed to death every day, there is little time to waste wondering how this will play out in the years to come. They need immediate action now. Gimmicks like airdrops or performative recognition of Palestinian statehood are mere distractions. Real and urgent action from Western leaders in the form of ending all support for the Israeli military and imposing sanctions on its leaders is needed to bring an end to this monstrous genocide. The entire world has now seen the fruit of our support for Israel in the images of children's spines protruding from their deliberately starved bodies, and it leaves us with only one question: When will our leaders find their backbones? Solve the daily Crossword

Canada says it plans to recognize Palestine as a state, joining the U.K. and France
Canada says it plans to recognize Palestine as a state, joining the U.K. and France

CBS News

time41 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Canada says it plans to recognize Palestine as a state, joining the U.K. and France

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said Canada will recognize Palestine as a state in September at the United Nations General Assembly, following similar announcements from the United Kingdom and France. "The deepening suffering of civilians leaves no room for delay in co-ordinated international action to support peace, security, and the dignity of all human life," Carney said in a statement Wednesday. Canada has had a long-standing position supporting the idea of an independent Palestinian state existing alongside Israel, but has said recognition should come as part of a negotiated two-state solution to the conflict. Carney said Wednesday that prospects of a two-state solution "have been steadily and gravely eroded." "Preserving a two-state solution means standing with all people who choose peace over violence or terrorism, and honouring their innate desire for the peaceful co-existence of Israeli and Palestinian states as the only roadmap for a secure and prosperous future," Carney said. Canada said its recognition is "predicated on the Palestinian Authority's commitment to much-needed reforms, including the commitments by Palestinian Authority President [Mahmoud] Abbas to fundamentally reform its governance, to hold general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can play no part, and to demilitarize the Palestinian state." Hamas must also immediately release all hostages taken in the Oct. 7, 2023, terror attacks on Israel, disarm and "play no role in the future governance of Palestine," Carney reiterated. "Canada will always steadfastly support Israel's existence as an independent state in the Middle East living in peace and security. Any path to lasting peace for Israel also requires a viable and stable Palestinian state, and one that recognizes Israel's inalienable right to security and peace," the prime minister said. The Israeli Foreign Ministry denounced Canada's decision on Wednesday, calling it "a reward for Hamas." "Israel rejects the statement by the Prime Minister of Canada," the Israeli Foreign Ministry said on social media. "The change in the position of the Canadian government at this time is a reward for Hamas and harms the efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza and a framework for the release of the hostages." President Trump reacted to the announcement with a post on his Truth Social platform. "Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine. That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' Canada!!!" Mr. Trump said. Carney said the decision to recognize Palestine as a state came after he discussed the crisis with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The United Kingdom and France each decided this month to recognize a Palestinian state as pressure has mounted on Israel to allow more aid into Gaza. Starmer said the U.K. will recognize Palestine as a state unless Israel takes "substantive steps" to end the "appalling situation in Gaza," including the establishment of a ceasefire in Gaza, a commitment to halting the annexation of territory in the West Bank and a pledge to work toward a peace process involving a two-state solution. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu criticized the decision, saying in a statement posted on X that "Starmer rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism & punishes its victims." "Consistent with its historic commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, I have decided that France will recognize the State of Palestine," French President Emmanuel Macron said. "The urgent priority today is to end the war in Gaza and to bring relief to the civilian population." Netanyahu said Israel "strongly" condemned France's decision and that it "rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became." In response to "growing European initiatives to recognize a Palestinian state," the Hostages and Missing Families Forum, which represents the families of those taken hostage in Hamas' Oct. 7 terror attack, on Wednesday said, "Recognizing a Palestinian state while 50 hostages remain trapped in Hamas tunnels amounts to rewarding terrorism. Such recognition is not a step toward peace, but rather a clear violation of international law and a dangerous moral and political failure that legitimizes horrific war crimes." Some 1,200 people were killed in Hamas' 2023 terrorist attack on Israel, mostly civilians. Israel says 251 people were taken hostage, with 50 still being held in Gaza, including one abducted before the Oct. 7 attack. Since then, more than 60,000 people have been killed in Israel's war in the Gaza Strip, most of whom are women and children, according to the Hamas-run Ministry of Health, which does not distinguish between civilian and combatant deaths. Food security experts warn that the entire population of Gaza is facing famine unless unfettered humanitarian aid is immediately allowed into the territory. "If the international community truly desires peace, it must join U.S. efforts by demanding first the release of all hostages, followed by an end to the fighting. Recognition of a Palestinian state before the hostages are returned will be remembered throughout history as validating terrorism as a legitimate pathway to political goals," the Hostages and Missing Families Forum said. Israel over the weekend announced daily humanitarian pauses in fighting in parts of Gaza and airdrops in order to provide more humanitarian aid. More than 140 countries recognize a Palestinian state, but the United States is not among them. Emmet Lyons and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store