Florida man offers police booze during car chase: 'Don't know if he was expecting us to just say ‘cheers''
A Florida man casually offered pursuing deputies a vodka spritzer in the middle of a car chase after he allegedly stole several items from a convenience store, authorities said.
Deputies with the Highlands County Sheriff's Office responded to the Spring Lake Market on Saturday after Richard Christopher Smith, 39, allegedly took items from a market, including several alcoholic beverages, and walked out.
Florida Woman Poses As Ice Agent To Kidnap Wife Of Ex-boyfriend From Work, Authorities Say
When the deputies arrived, Smith fled in a vehicle, prompting a pursuit, the sheriff's office said.
"It was during this pursuit when Smith held a can of Ketel One vodka spritz out the window as he drove by a deputy trying to get him to stop, telling the deputy 'I was just going to give you a drink, that's it' as he passed," the sheriff's office said. "We don't know if he was expecting us to just say 'Cheers!' and let him go, or what."
Read On The Fox News App
The chase ended a few minutes later in the parking lot of a business at the Sebring Regional Airport.
Investigators Reveal New Details On Fsu Shooting
After his toast, Smith, who is a Miami resident, tried to ram two patrol vehicles as all four of his tires were flattened by spike strips, police said.
He was unfazed as he calmly tried to walk away from the scene – which was surrounded by deputies – while puffing on a cigarette, authorities said.
"You guys had fun, though, right?" he asked them.
He was eventually Tased in the middle of his smoke break and arrested.
Smith is charged with two counts of aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer, battery on a law enforcement officer, two counts of resisting arrest, DUI, refusal to submit to a DUI test and petit theft.
His bond was set at $120,000.Original article source: Florida man offers police booze during car chase: 'Don't know if he was expecting us to just say 'cheers''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump, 79, Demands Murdoch, 94, Is Deposed in Epstein Suit in Case He Dies
President Donald Trump, 79, wants The Wall Street Journal's 94-year-old billionaire owner and frenemy Rupert Murdoch deposed immediately—for fear Murdoch may die. In a motion filed on Monday in Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against Murdoch and the Journal, Trump's lawyer, Alejandro Brito, urged the court to depose Murdoch within the next two weeks, noting the Australian media tycoon has suffered a bevy of health issues in recent years. 'Murdoch is 94 years old, has suffered from multiple health issues throughout his life, is believed to have suffered recent significant health scares, and is presumed to live in New York, New York,' Brito wrote in the filing. 'Taken together, these factors weigh heavily in determining that Murdoch would be unavailable for in-person testimony at trial.' Trump sued Murdoch, the Journal, and a number of staffers at the paper in a federal court in Florida earlier this month after the Journal reported that Trump sent sex offender Jeffrey Epstein a 'bawdy' letter for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003. The alleged letter included an imaginary conversation between the two New Yorkers inside the Trump-illustrated outline of a naked woman. Trump has denied writing the letter, calling it 'fake.' A spokesperson for the Journal had no comment. Neither the White House, a spokesperson for Murdoch, nor Brito responded to an immediate request for comment. Trump and Murdoch have frequently sparred over coverage from outlets in Murdoch's U.S. media empire—which includes the Journal, Fox News, and the New York Post—but Trump and his allies have nonetheless relied on Murdoch for advice. Murdoch visited the White House in February, and Vice President JD Vance visited Murdoch at the billionaire's Montana ranch last month. Trump's lawyer also said Murdoch's direct involvement in the Journal's story warrants his expedited deposition, saying the president only wants Murdoch to speak to his own decisions related to the publication of the Epstein story. Trump claimed that he urged Murdoch not to publish the July 17 article, writing on Truth Social that Murdoch himself said he 'would take care of it.' The report on the letter came out hours later. 'Because Defendants published the Article after President Trump spoke directly with Murdoch and advised him that the letter referenced in the Article was fake,' Brito wrote, 'Murdoch's direct involvement further underscores Defendants' actual malice and intent behind the decision to publish the false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements about President Trump." Brito also claims Murdoch would have access to Trump's letter to Epstein if the Journal possessed it—while also claiming the letter did not exist. 'If the purported letter in the Article somehow actually exists, which it does not, and the Defendants have it in their possession, which they do not, Murdoch has easy access to it,' Brito wrote. The Journal story, written by reporters (and defendants) Khadeeja Safdar and Joe Palazzolo, said the paper had 'reviewed' the letter, indicating it did not possess it.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Ghislaine Maxwell threatens to dodge Epstein questions unless demands are met
The former accomplice and girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein is looking to delay her deposition before a House Oversight Committee, Fox News has learned. Ghislaine Maxwell was slapped with a subpoena to testify in front of Congress last week, as lawmakers are looking to pull back the curtain on the scope of Epstein's sex crimes. However, she is now attempting to delay her Aug. 11 deposition. In a letter addressed to Chairman James Comer, Maxwell's attorneys laid out three conditions hinging on their client agreeing to testify in front of Congress, which she is not compelled to agree to. The letter asks Comer to grant Maxwell formal immunity prior to her interview with the committee, pointing to both the legal and security risks that stem from her disclosing new details regarding Epstein. "The potential for leaks from such a setting creates real security risks and undermines the integrity of the process," the letter said. Additionally, Maxwell's legal team is asking Comer to provide them with the questions the committee intends to ask in advance, insisting the "process cannot become a game of cat-and-mouse." The third request outlined in the letter asks Comer to schedule any Congressional deposition until after the U.S. Supreme Court rules on Maxwell's latest bid for an appeal and her habeas petition is resolved. On Monday, Maxwell's legal team submitted a filing asking the Supreme Court to hear her appeal over her 2021 sex trafficking conviction. Her attorneys argue the federal government "has an obligation to honor" a 2007 non-prosecution agreement initially made by Epstein that they believe should have also shielded Maxwell from criminal charges. "Even more remarkably, the government advances an interpretation of its non-prosecution agreement that flips its plain meaning on its head," the brief said. "Promising 'not to prosecute' somehow meant preserving the right to prosecute. That is not contract interpretation; it is alchemy." Federal prosecutors had previously determined Epstein's agreement was only valid in Florida, therefore opening the door for both Epstein and Maxwell to face charges in New York. However, Maxwell's defense team insists the agreed-upon terms did not include any geographical restrictions. "It is not geographically limited to the Southern District of Florida, it is not conditioned on the co-conspirators being known by the government at the time, it does not depend on what any particular government attorney may have had in his or her head about who might be a co-conspirator, and it contains no other caveat or exception. This should be the end of the discussion," the brief said. The request for a later date comes after Maxwell sat down for nearly two days of interviews with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche at a Florida courthouse last week. Maxwell is currently being held in a federal prison in Tallahassee after being sentenced to 20 years behind bars for her role in procuring young girls for Epstein to sexually abuse. Maxwell's attorneys and the House Oversight Committee did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fox News expert suggests that ‘bystander apathy' is to blame for Manhattan shooting
A frequent Fox News guest, who touts himself as a law enforcement expert due to his brief tenure with the New York Police Department, groused that 'bystander apathy' led to the deaths of four people in a deadly Manhattan shooting Monday, urging citizens to 'deputize' themselves and confront gun-wielding suspects. Shane Tamura, 27, opened fire at a Midtown Manhattan skyscraper with an assault-style rifle around 6:30 p.m. after traveling to the city from Las Vegas, authorities say. He killed four people, including an NYPD officer and a senior executive at the company Blackstone, before turning the gun on himself. New York police said that Tamura had a 'documented mental health history', and wrote a suicide note claiming he suffered from a CTE brain injury, suggesting football was to blame. He appeared to have been targeting the NFL, which had offices in the building, but took an elevator to the wrong floor, Mayor Eric Adams said Tuesday. Around two hours after the shooting, 'Wild' Bill Stanton, a private investigator and one of Fox News' go-to police experts, appeared on Sean Hannity's primetime show to discuss the latest developments. Stanton is regularly referred to as a 'retired NYPD officer' during his Fox News appearances but left the department in the late 1980s after roughly two years on the job, following an accident that left him with an injured trigger finger and allowed him to collect a pension. According to Stanton, the Midtown shooting not only suggests the need for more police officers in New York City and across the nation, but also means that ordinary citizens should be prepared to stop an armed suspect. 'But we need to deputize ourselves,' he declared, before referencing Hannity's self-proclaimed martial arts expertise. 'Sean, let's take you as an example. My understanding is that you train really hard in MMA. I'm guessing you train with your firearm, as well.' After Hannity affirmed that he has been trained with guns, Stanton said that 'we each need to empower ourselves not to be a victim' because 'bystander apathy is what occurred' during this latest shooting. 'This cretin walked with a long gun down the street. No one said anything. I'd be curious to see how many 9-1-1 calls were made. We need to empower ourselves, deputize ourselves,' Stanton added. Turning back to Hannity, he reiterated that the Fox News star's fighting skills would have come in handy at the scene of Monday's massacre. 'If you would've seen that person, I guess you would've acted a lot different, as would have I,' Stanton boasted. 'These businesses that have security in the lobbies, there's a knee-jerk reaction. They may enhance it, but they do a cost-benefit analysis, and it'll go right back to the same.' Over the years, Hannity has regaled his viewers and guests with tales of his deadly martial arts training, describing himself as something of a lethal human weapon due to his 'street fighting' and 'blade' skills while sharing video footage of himself in the gym. The Fox host even touted his MMA training and 'personal security plan' when covering the 2023 Maine mass shooting. Stanton, meanwhile, also used his Fox News appearance to fume about the so-called 'defund the police' movement while claiming that it is loss of respect for law enforcement that leads to mass casualty events. 'We see this perpetrator, this sicko, as well as criminals all over Manhattan, all over the country, not respecting the law, feeling they can do what they want. Only when we collectively push back, fight back, and act will this lesson hopefully stop,' he declared. 'Yeah, it's sad,' Hannity responded. 'I do think people need situational awareness. And you know, if you see something, say something. Make the phone call. Call the police. Try and get on top of it.' Stanton's status as a security and law enforcement expert, who is regularly featured on Fox News and other networks to provide analysis, has been criticized by police accountability activists who have labeled him a 'copagandist'. It has prompted Stanton to sue several NYC civic association leaders for trying to 'cancel' him with 'defamatory' social media posts. A Bronx Supreme Court judge, however, largely dismissed Stanton's claims last year, asserting that 'cancellation' is not an actual cause of action while specifically taking issue with his argument that he's not a public figure. 'Plaintiff may not be a major 'celebrity,' but by his own admission he regularly appears on national TV to promote his security business and personal brand,' the judge stated last year. 'Plaintiff also took the step of running for and being elected to a leadership position with a local civic organization. Hence, plaintiff took purposeful steps to thrust himself into the spotlight as a security expert and local politician. Therefore, plaintiff is a limited-purpose public figure. As such plaintiff must prove by clear and convincing evidence that defendants' defamatory statements were made with actual malice to recover.'
