
Tradition meets AI in Nishijinori weaving style from Japan's ancient capital
The revered colorful weaving style associated with 'The Tale of Genji' of the 11th-century Heian era, has gone through its share of ups and downs. But its survival is more perilous than ever today, as demand for kimonos nose-dives among Japanese grappling with modernization.
Hironori Fukuoka, the fourth-generation successor to his Nishijinori business, is determined to keep alive the art he's inherited, even if that means turning to AI.
'I want to leave to legacy what my father has left for me,' he said in his rickety shop in the Nishijin district of Kyoto, a city with statue-filled temples and sculpted gardens that never seems to change.
'I've been pondering how the art of Nishijinori can stay relevant to the needs of today,' said Fukuoka.
Besides the AI project, Fukuoka is also working on using his weaving technique to make super-durable materials for fishing rods and aircraft.
Where tradition and technology meet
Giant looms clatter at his shop, called Fukuoka Weaving. The patterns on the gorgeous fabric, slowly turning out from the loom, are repetitive and geometric, which makes it conducive to translating into digital data. Deciding which hand-dyed color thread goes where to make the patterns is much like the on-or-off digital signals of a computer.
Such similarity is what Fukuoka focuses on in exploring how AI might work for Nishijinori, with the help of Sony Computer Science Laboratories, an independent research arm of electronics and entertainment company Sony Corp.
AI only makes suggestions for the designs and doesn't do any of the actual production work. But that doesn't bother Fukuoka or the researchers.
'Our research stems from the idea that human life gets truly enriched only if it has both what's newly innovated and what never changes,' said Jun Rekimoto, chief science officer at Sony CSL, which is also studying how AI can be used to document and relay the moves of a traditional Japanese tea ceremony.
'We don't believe AI can do everything. Nishijinori is a massive, complicated industry and so it starts with figuring out where AI can help out,' said Rekimoto, also a professor at the University of Tokyo.
What has come of it is a startling but logical turn in thinking, fitting of the art adorning kimonos worn by Japan's imperial family.
The AI was fed various Nishijinori patterns that already existed and instructed to come up with its own suggestions. One was a bold pattern of black and orange that seemed to evoke a tropical motif.
Striking a balance
To Fukuoka, some of AI's ideas are interesting but simply off. The difference between AI and the human effort is that the former can come up with multiple suggestions in a matter of seconds.
Fukuoka immediately gravitates toward the one that uses a motif of a leaf to define the angular lines of a traditional pattern, something he says a human wouldn't have thought of. He finds that ingenious.
The kimono the AI collaboration has produced is a luscious soft green, although it doesn't have a price tag and isn't in production yet.
The weaving is carried out by the old-style machine under the guidance of the human artist in the traditional way.
Nishijinori kimonos sell for as much as a million yen ($6,700). Many Japanese these days don't bother buying a kimono and may rent it for special occasions like weddings, if at all.
Putting one on is an arduous, complicated affair, often requiring professional help, making kimonos even less accessible.
A creative partnership
Dr. Lana Sinapayen, associate researcher at Sony CSL, believes AI often gets assigned the creative, fun work, leaving tedious tasks to people, when it should be the other way around.
'That was my goal,' she said in an interview at Fukuoka Weaving, of her intent to use AI in assistant roles, not leadership positions.
Digital technology can't automatically represent all the color gradations of Nishijinori. But AI can figure out how to best do that digitally, and it can also learn how the human artist fixes the patterns it has produced.
Once that's all done, AI can tackle arduous tasks in a matter of seconds, doing a pretty good job, according to the researchers.
Artificial intelligence is being used widely in factories, offices, schools and homes, because it can do tasks faster and in greater volume, and is usually quite accurate and unbiased, compared to human efforts. Its spread has been faster in the U.S. and other Western nations than in Japan, which tends to be cautious about change and prefers carefully made, consensus-based decisions.
But the use of AI in arts and crafts is promising, such as text-to-image generative AI for the creation of visual images from text prompts, according to a study by Henriikka Vartiainen and Matti Tedre, who looked at the use of AI by craft educators in Finland.
'As computers have taken over many routine-like and boring tasks that were previously performed by people, the computer revolution has also been said to liberate time and offer new opportunities for human imagination and creativity,' they said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Steady Dividends from Industrial Strength: Pentair (PNR) in Focus
Pentair plc (NYSE:PNR) is included among the Top 10 Safest Dividend Stocks in the UK. A factory worker with protective goggles and a hardhat inspecting a water filtration system. Pentair plc (NYSE:PNR) is an American company focused on water treatment solutions. While its headquarters are in the United States, the company is legally registered in Ireland and has its tax residence in the United Kingdom. Piper Sandler recently identified Pentair plc (NYSE:PNR) as a leading contender in the artificial intelligence surge. The firm started covering the software company with an Overweight rating and set a price target of $175, indicating a potential upside of around 13% from Palantir's closing price on Thursday. Pentair plc (NYSE:PNR) recently reported its earnings for the second quarter of 2025 and demonstrated a strong cash position. The company's operating cash flow was $607 million, and its free cash flow was $596 million. It also paid $82.4 million to shareholders through dividends. In addition, PNR has been rewarding its shareholders with growing dividends for the past 49 years. Currently, it pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.97%, as of July 25. While we acknowledge the potential of PNR as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio


Tom's Guide
11 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
I tested Call Screening on iOS 26 vs Android 16 — and there's a clear winner
Apple's making a lot of noise surrounding its iOS 26 public beta release, which is filled with new features that make using any of the best iPhones even better. If there's one iOS 26 feature you absolutely need to try, it has to be Call Screen, In fact, it's what my colleague Philip Michaels specifically calls out as being 'one of the most exciting' new things he's experienced in his iOS 26 preview. I have to agree because it gives you more control of how to approach phone calls going forward. However, I can't neglect to remind you about Google's similar feature — also called Call Screen — that leans on Google Assistant to take phone calls on your behalf. When I first tested it with my Pixel 8 Pro a couple of years ago, I said it was the most impressive smartphone feature I tested out. The two competing features are fundamentally the same, tasked to reduce spam calls and inquire about their reason to call you. I've been testing out the iOS 26 beta for some time now, so I want to share how the iOS 26 Call Screen feature compares to how Android 16 with the Pixel 9 lineup. For this test, I asked AI to generate a phone call script for three different phone call conversations to two phones — an iPhone 16 Pro Max running iOS 26 beta and a Pixel 9 Pro running the Android 16 beta. For this first test, I used another phone to place a phone call pretending to be a package delivery courier. Here's the message I left: Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. 'I'm calling because I need to drop off a package for John Velasco. It's a medium sized box that needs to be signed for and I need to know if someone could come down and sign it.' With Call Screen in iOS 26, I'm greeted by the assistant who tells me to leave a message on what I'm calling about. What I like about Call Screen in iOS 26 is that I can see the transcript in real time as they're leaving the message, but since this feature isn't tied to Apple Intelligence, it messes up by thinking that the caller is me. Regardless, I gave a response to send me more details, but Call Screen proceeded to tell them to leave a message. That's pretty much the extent of the interaction with iOS 26. In contrast, the Call Screen in Android 16 is much more reliable in my opinion. After leaving the same message, Google Assistant intelligently provides me with contextual responses that I can select directly from my Pixel 9 Pro. What makes this better is that these responses are generated automatically, which shows how AI is really working behind the scenes to understand what the conversation is about. Winner: Android 16 Although both platforms are improving the way they block spam calls, you might still find one come through every now and then. For this next test, I pretended to be a salesperson — you know — the stuff you're likely to hang up for right away. Here's my pitch: "This is John Smith calling from Sparkle Clean Solutions. We're a local company dedicated to helping homeowners like yourself achieve truly pristine living spaces. And the reason for my call today is a quick question about your home cleaning." Again, Call Screen in iOS 26 asks to leave a message that's automatically shown on my iPhone 16 Pro Max. While it's convenient that I can type my response to have the assistant relay it, I wish I could be given smarter responses to choose from like Call Screen on Android 16, but it doesn't. At least the assistant politely responds by telling them 'no thanks' and to leave a more detailed message. The Pixel 9 Pro, along with the Pixel 9 Pro XL and Pixel 9 Pro Fold, proves a point of how helpful AI could be. This interaction with Call Screen in Android 16 is a perfect example because right after the message is left, Google Assistant instantly identifies it as a spam call — which I find hilarious to be the first option in its list of actions. They don't even get the chance to leave a message because once I tap 'report as spam,' it ends the phone call and it's identified as a suspicious call. Winner: Android 16 For this final test, I pretended to be someone calling on behalf of someone who's in the hospital seeking medical help. This is the kind of call I'd want to answer, so I was really interested to see how Call Screen handles it. Here's the message I left: "Listen, I'm calling because Jimmy is in the hospital. He was admitted to Good Enough Medical Center at about 3:00 pm today. The reason I'm calling is because I really need some help. Jimmy needs someone to bring over a change of clothes and their glasses, and he's not able to communicate clearly right now, and the doctors are asking questions about his medical history." Call Screen in iOS 26 simply cannot provide meaningful actions or responses other than telling the caller to leave a more detailed message. In a real-life situation, I would pick up the call right away after reading the message on my iPhone — but the only thing they can do is to leave another message. Meanwhile, I think Android 16 has trouble with this one as well because it doesn't give me as much variety with the responses as the other two conversations. I asked them to tell me more about why they're calling, but the only options at my disposal were to simply thank them for letting me know. Still, it's an acknowledgement and goes one extra step further than iOS 26. Winner: Android 16 I said it before, I'll say it again. Call Screen in Android 16 is one of the best smartphone features around — and it shows why Google has some of the best AI phones around. The ability for Google Assistant to listen and generate intelligent responses is proof of how AI is making a big impact. Even though the feature didn't get a boost with the release of the Pixel 9, I'm hoping that Google refines it in such a way with the forthcoming Pixel 10 reveal at its next Made by Google event next month. For Apple, it's a good first step with Call Screen in iOS 26. Although it's basic in what it offers in its current iteration, I'm hoping that it's somehow injected with some Apple Intelligence love later on. Despite not revealing any new Apple Intelligence features at its iOS 26 reveal during WWDC 2025, the company's reportedly working on bringing new ones at a later time. I hope it involves Call Screen because it'd be nice if the assistant could make proper responses.


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
The Current Stupid CEO Flex: Everybody's Replaceable (Including Them)
caucasian senior businessman - spooky portrait The Wall Street Journal had an interesting recent article about a change in the way executives talk about workers. What they think of as artificial intelligence has given them the confidence to say that everyone is replaceable. Wholesale elimination of jobs has been developing for at least the last decade — much longer if you consider the broader development of automation. Will new AI technologies enable even more job destruction? Certainly, but it will come at a cost and likely spread further than prudent and intelligent business strategies would allow. Possibly including their own jobs. The Myth Of Profit Maximization Chief executives typically look to improve the fortunes of a company and returns to shareholders. Many take to heart the argument Milton Friedman made in a 1970 New York Times op-ed that the 'social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.' That has been further interpreted as meaning the responsibility to maximize return on investment to shareholders. This is both legally incorrect and strategically troubling and mistaken. Experts in corporate governance have, across many years, tried to find a legal basis for the prescription. It has yet to appear. In the 2014 Supreme Court decision in 'Burwell, Secretary of Health and Huma Services, et. al. v. Hobby Lobby Stores,' the Court addressed whether a for-profit corporation could give money to religious causes. 'While it is certainly true that a central objective of for-profit corporations is to make money, modern corporate law does not require for-profit corporations to pursue profit at the expense of everything else, and many do not do so,' Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the Court.' Corporate law and governance also recognize that a company's board and executives have duties to the company. They are charged with strategy and operations for the company's benefit, with the shareholder's benefit being an offshoot. In basic calculus, math students learn that you cannot maximize for more than one variable at a time. That doesn't necessarily mean one factor cannot benefit while another does as well, but maximization mathematically means something has to come first. Everything becomes subject to that desire. Confusing People And Machines There is a peculiar attitude among executives, which has been around for a long time, that people are infinitely extensible. The signs come up with every wave of layoffs, and if you've ever been one of the people who survived a round of staff cuts, you have likely experienced this. Those left are expected to pick up and complete the extra work with neither additional pay nor schedule adjustments. Everything is supposed to be compressible. Employees are expected to contort themselves, making operations look as though they were normal. Forbes contributor Bryan Robinson discussed a study last year that noted 88% of layoff survivors experience burnout, and 25% suffer from mental and physical exhaustion. A developing and increasing trend is the desire to replace people with actual machines. Bring in not only the robots to do everything physical, but software to do everything mental. Chief executives want to make shareholders happy, which drives up share prices and the CEO's own holdings. Replace people with mechanisms to drive labor costs down and profits up. Ten years ago, I wrote about how automation was already coming for white collar jobs, including professional ones. A study at the same time said 'highly creative' professionals would remain safe. That didn't last long. When all work becomes something to be done by mechanisms — robots, artificial intelligence, or people — human needs become unimportant. Ultimately, there is only the need to cut costs, to increase profits. Three Rising Risks The decisions may seem obvious to the MBA crowd, but they bring three risks to business. One is the loss of institutional knowledge. It is people who hold the understanding of how processes work, the things a company needs to know about its customers. Again, this has been known for many decades. Lose people and you lose understanding. In theory, a company could use technology to capture and store much of this, but they don't tend to. Next is the risk of mediocrity, which is particularly true of large language model software that works on complex statistical algorithms. These products don't think. Instead, they're trained on vast examples of how words connect and then respond accordingly. What seems like intelligence is clever repetition, in a way. This brings up average responses. Furthermore, increasingly repeating what others have done undercuts creativity and innovation. The third and biggest risk is the undermining of the jobs and incomes of a growing portion of the populace. What happens when fewer and fewer people can make a good living? Who's going to buy all the products and services that companies need to sell to make their growing profits?