
Summer of Our Discontent by Thomas Chatterton Williams review – the liberal who hates leftists
His 2010 debut memoir Losing My Cool was the story of – as the subtitle had it – Love, Literature and a Black Man's Escape from the Crowd. Rap, he declared, was not so much a genre as a subculture, seducing young black men into a world of crime. That, apparently, would have been Williams's fate (when he physically attacks his girlfriend, for instance, hip-hop lyrics shoulder the blame) had it not been for Pappy, his disciplinarian father, who foisted 15,000 books on him.
The classics beat crime in the end, and we leave Williams on his happy road to intellectualdom, absorbing Sartre in Parisian cafes. But it wasn't enough for him to merely present his own story; Williams elected to hold up his life as an example for black Americans. 'See, you can be just like me' is the breathless gist of Losing My Cool. It never struck him that he might have had certain class advantages – a father with a PhD in sociology; a mixed-race heritage; an upbringing in white, bourgeois, suburban New Jersey – that make him somewhat unrepresentative as a role model.
Self-Portrait in Black and White: Unlearning Race, Williams's second memoir, published just before the pandemic, served up more hyper-agentic advice. The springboard for these post-racial reflections was the birth of his daughter. Bearing, as babies tend to do, a resemblance to her mother, who is white and French, Williams's child is blond. It follows that there is an arbitrariness to the whole business of race, from which Williams swiftly emancipates himself. Then comes the counsel: black Americans would do well to follow in his footsteps by 'transcending' race themselves. Conceding that this may be an easier proposition for him and his white-passing daughter, he exhorts mixed-race people to 'form an avant garde when it comes to rejecting race'.
Williams's grand subject being himself, now we have a third memoir. Summer of Our Discontent takes a caustic look at Black Lives Matter from the lofty vantage point of his Parisian garret. At the outset, he tells us that the self-preening, race-mad identity politics of left-leaning liberals has fostered atomisation and precluded solidarity. As a consequence, the illiberal, unhinged right, now united behind Trump, has stolen a march on them. But from this not unreasonable edifice, Williams throws up a enormous scaffolding of enemies, which comes to encompass anyone and everyone engaging in some form or another of collective action. Ultimately, by the end, it appears that Williams's beef is not so much with Trump as with his leftwing critics.
This is a strange, muddled book. On the one hand, Williams emphasises the primacy of class over race in the US. George Floyd, he says, was not your average African American: he was poor, unemployed, and had a criminal record. Horrific as his killing by a white policeman was, it was unduly racialised by BLM. Fewer than 25 unarmed black civilians are killed by police annually. Most black people will never find themselves in Floyd's shoes, Williams contends.
While class is important for Williams, class politics isn't. There is only so much that initiatives to lift the poor from poverty can achieve, we are told, because 'the fundamental political unit, going back to Aristotle, remains the family'. The left has got it all wrong, obsessing over the 'macro level' when real change apparently happens at the individual level.
Williams's strategy is to cherrypick the most ludicrous examples of 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' to smear the entire left. Sympathy from a few celebrities for the actor Jussie Smollett – who was accused of faking a hate-crime against himself, which he denied – is taken as evidence of the left's crumbling 'moral authority and credibility'. BLM, he claims, was driven by 'an ascendant raider class' of middle-class and not always black activists seizing institutional power – such as when a 'multi-ethnic mob of junior employees' ousted New York Times opinion editor James Bennet for publishing Senator Tom Cotton's call to deploy troops against BLM protests.
Williams's other objections appear to be mostly aesthetic. He expends much energy pillorying the performative activism of such BLM 'allies' as 'the official Twitter account of the wildly popular British children's cartoon Peppa Pig', which tweeted a black square in solidarity. Later, visiting BLM-ravaged Portland, he mourns that 'a beloved statue of an elk has been toppled'. This in a town with a 'well-deserved reputation' for 'exquisite gastronomy'. Quelle horreur.
He concludes by suggesting that the left and right are just as odious as one another. The storming of the Capitol in 2021, he says, had a mimetic quality, the populist right 'aping' the 'flamboyant reflex' of the unruly left. With such invidious comparisons, and with such a dim view of collective action, Williams is unable to make the case as to how precisely his homeland is to move towards a post-racial utopia. Excelling in sending up bien-pensant opinion, he has no answers. Fixated on slagging off the left, he has marooned himself on an island of vacuity. So when he articulates a positive vision of the future, all he offers are new age nostrums such as 'reinvestment in lived community' and 'truth, excellence, plain-old unqualified justice'.
His plea for perspective is similarly misplaced. Young black Americans, Williams whinges, have been seduced by the race pessimism of the likes of Ta-Nehisi Coates, his more popular nemesis. He enjoins us to look on the bright side: the racial wage gap is closing; black school attainment rates are nearing white levels.
Williams's Panglossian outlook is, I suspect, a form of American parochialism. His homeland, he says, is a 'society that is frankly more democratic, multi-ethnic, and egalitarian than any other in recorded history'. The Gini coefficient and Democracy Index beg to differ. There are eminently sensible reasons for race pessimism in America. Segregation and ghettoisation are facts of life. The wage gap between black and white people is still a staggering 21% (in Britain, it's under 6%). White Americans live three-and-a-half years longer than black Americans on average (black Britons outlive white Britons).
Collectively, it was not the complacent optimists (who declared we had never had it so good) but rather the do-gooding pessimists (that demanded change at the dreaded 'macro level') who overthrew slavery and fought for civil rights. Individually, too, pessimism pays. For someone who sets great store by personal agency, Williams will no doubt appreciate Billy Wilder's melancholy observation – occasioned by losing three relatives at Auschwitz – that 'the optimists died in the gas chambers; the pessimists have pools in Beverly Hills'.
Summer of Our Discontent: The Age of Certainty and the Demise of Discourse by Thomas Chatterton Williams is published by Constable (£25). To support the Guardian, order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
21 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Bride branded 'delusional ' for message to her sister before wedding as people say 'this is not normal behaviour'
A young woman has revealed how her older sister failed to invite her to her wedding because it's 'childfree' - but is still expecting a gift. The 19-year-old, who appeared to be from the US, took to Reddit to vent her frustration and share a tense message exchange between her and her half-sister. The post, shared on the popular Wedding Shaming subreddit, quickly racked up thousands of comments and over 92,000 upvotes. The bride defined 'adults' as only 21 and over, leaving her younger sibling on the uninvited list. Despite not getting an invite, her sister still insisted on sending her wedding registry details for a gift. Baffled, the 19-year-old questioned why she should be expected to buy a gift when she wasn't even invited, only to be told by her sister that 'it's super common for people who can't make it to send a small gift anyway'. To which she pointed out that she can make the wedding but she was not invited, despite being a 'fully grown adult.' Her sister hit back with: 'You are under 21', to which the sibling replied: 'You're having a dry wedding, why does that matter?' The bride then went onto say her teenage sister was too immature to 'attend an adult event or exist in adult spaces.' The teen shared a slew of screen grabs from the awkward conversation with her sister, who called her 'immature' and 'unsupportive'. Social media users quickly branded the bride's behaviour as 'entitled', 'delusional' and claimed she was a 'bridezilla'. Many also highlighted the glaring hypocrisy of the bride branding her sister too young and 'immature' to attend the wedding, yet still considering her grown-up enough to cough up for a gift. One person said: 'And she called OP a child despite being a young adult. Ok then, why is sis insisting on making a 'child' buy her a gift from her wedding registry??? 'How is the 'child' supposed to have enough adult money to buy something on there? Sis is delusional.' Another said: 'This right here. 'I consulted Reddit. The general consensus was that it is wholly unreasonable to expect children to purchase wedding gifts. That is their parents' responsibility. 'As a child who is not invited to your wedding, I can't imagine any circumstance where it is my responsibility to buy a wedding gift.' Someone else claimed she should say: 'I looked into wedding gift etiquette. Children are not expected to purchase wedding gifts. 'So which is it? Am I a child, or do you so desperately need a gift from a university student?' Another added: 'Two of my cousins had child free weddings and I was invited at ages 16 and 17. 'Childfree' usually means no one whose bedtime is before the wedding will end lol.' Someone else said: 'Right, kids tend to get amped up during weddings, running around and making noise. 'Understandable if that's not the vibe the couple wants. But a 19 year-old? A person old enough to sign contracts, own property, join the military....? 'I assumed the bridezilla didn't want anyone under the drinking age but there's not even any alcohol so excluding OP is just mean.'


Reuters
a day ago
- Reuters
Alleged 'Hollywood Con Queen' loses fight against extradition from UK to US
LONDON, July 29 (Reuters) - An Indonesian national dubbed the "Hollywood Con Queen" by the media for allegedly impersonating top female movie industry executives in a seven-year fraud on Tuesday lost his bid to block his extradition from Britain to stand trial in the U.S. Hargobind Tahilramani is wanted in California on charges of wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and aggravated identity theft for allegedly defrauding around 300 people out of a total of approximately $1 million between 2013 and 2020. The 45-year-old is accused of tricking people into travelling to Indonesia and paying exorbitant fees for non-existent film work, before he was arrested in a hotel in Manchester, England, in November 2020. Tahilramani's extradition was approved by a judge and then British ministers in 2023, but he challenged the decision to send him to the U.S. to stand trial, arguing prison conditions would breach his human rights due to his mental health. His lawyer Edward Fitzgerald told London's High Court in April that Tahilramani, who has applied for asylum in Britain, was also at risk of being attacked in prison as a gay man. Fitzgerald said this meant Tahilramani was likely to be held in isolation while in pre-trial detention, which put him at high risk of suicide given his underlying mental health issues. But Tahilramani's appeal was dismissed by Judge Derek Sweeting, who said in a written ruling that the lower court was not wrong when it ordered his extradition to stand trial.


Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
I met my husband when I was 22 and he was 38 - but now I'm older, our love story gives me the ick
A woman has revealed how she is 'starting to regret' her 'age gap marriage', just two years after tying the knot. The 27-year-old, who is believed to be from the US, took to Reddit to anonymously share that she has gotten 'the ick' from her 43-year-old partner and regrets marrying him. They met when she was just 22 years old, and he was in his late 30s, although she said he acted much younger. The coupe wed when she was 25, and from the outside their relationship seemed great, with the woman describing their lifestyle as 'pretty comfy' and insisting they were in sync on many values and goals. However, she claimed now that her 'frontal lobe is fully developed' she has outgrown him and probably wouldn't have picked him as a partner if they met at this age. At the heart of her unease is a growing resentment towards the circumstances under which the relationship began, saying the fact he pursued her when she was aged just 22 is an 'ick'. The post read: 'When I first met him and he came along and offered security, I jumped on it! I knew it was weird dating a guy so much older, but I've always had a rebellion-ish mindset. 'I don't know, I thought it was kinda hot, I blame Lana Del Rey and people in my life for not telling me it was a questionable relationship. We married when I was 25 and everything has been pretty alright on paper so I feel bad complaining.' As a dual-income, no-kids couple, they have spent years building what she calls 'a solid foundation together'. She added: 'We show affection to each other, though sometimes it feels like he's just a roommate or a parental figure. Our sex life is boring and that's also a big part of it.' Financially, a divorce would mean giving up her current quality of life and she dreads the idea of returning to the dating pool. She added: 'Anyways, even though I'd say our marriage is like, 80 per cent good and I feel a deep love for him, I also realise now that my frontal lobe is fully developed I'm growing out of this container of him making all the decisions. 'I probably wouldn't chose him as a partner if I had met him now. Really the core of it all is that I'm carrying this resentful/ ick feeling that he pursued me when I was so young. 'So what if I was mature for my age? I couldn't even imagine dating a 22-year-old now and I'm only 27.' She later clarified: 'The ick from the age gap didn't come from social media, it came from me growing up and seeing relationship dynamics more clearly.' The post, which racked up over 4,000 likes, saw a flurry of supportive commenters offering the woman some advice. One person said: '27 is a really great age to start over. So is 28, so is 29 and so is 30. Who cares if you couldn't live how and where you want, that's kind of the beauty in messing it all up and getting to start again.' Another said: 'Can confirm. Even 43 and 48 are great ages to start again. I've done it and I'm 52 now. Never been happier in a relationship. 'With every year you know yourself better and importantly, know what is and definitely isn't okay for you in a relationship and partner. Don't be held back by putting yourself in a box. 'There's a risk that resentment builds as your doubt floods your head and you see the evidence that the doubts are justified. Seriously consider what that looks like as a future and then decide for yourself if it's jumping off time or if you're having a wobble. 'If you suppress your agency or sexual needs, you can pretty much guarantee that you'll be resentful. Disaster and pain then become inevitable. The strangers on the internet can't and shouldn't decide for you.' Another added: 'My mom is starting over at 59 and she's happier than I've ever seen her in my life! It's never too late to choose yourself.' A fourth added: 'OP, 27 is when I got divorced from my 8-years-older ex (married at 20, he was 28). It's unequivocally the BEST decision I've ever made. My life is mine, I'm so happy now (31).'