Nigel Farage throws support behind campaign to stop introduction of racing tax
Nigel Farage has thrown his support behind racing's campaign to stop the government carrying out a tax raid which the industry claims will threaten the sport's future.
The Treasury last month completed a public consultation over plans to harmonise remote gambling duties which would treat horse racing on the same level as other forms of gambling. The British Horseracing Authority has launched a petition and urged participants and punters to lobby their MPs to argue that racing should be taxed at a lower rate.
The BHA has produced economic analysis which has estimated that racing could lose at least £66 million if the tax is set on a par with online games of chance, putting tens of thousands of jobs at risk.
Reform leader Farage was at Goodwood on Friday where he was attending as a guest of leading racehorse owners Dr Jim and Fitri Hay. Last year former Prime Minister Liz Truss was among their entourage.
Speaking to ITV Racing, Farage said: 'I love racing, be it Flat, be it jumps. It's a really important part of what we do as a country, and there are some concerns around it.
'I think there is an ignorance here. There is an an assumption from members of Parliament that all gambling is bad, all gambling leads to ruin, and look, some of those machines where you can go and lose your entire money in an afternoon are pretty addictive.
'I do think horse racing is different. You are making an individual decision each time to have a bet. There are checks and safeguards in place.'
Asked if he thought that was the majority view in government, he replied: 'No. I think I'm in a minority.
'It's worrying for the racing industry because what they are proposing to put in is going to do the most enormous amount of damage.
'And I see this again and again and again, people with little understanding of what they are legislating on making decisions for everybody else. I will certainly be fighting.
Don't miss a FREE £2 William Hill shop bet inside your Mirror every day of Glorious Goodwood Festival
Pick up your Mirror every day of the Goodwood festival to get your hands on 12 page pullouts packed with insight from the punters you trust, plus FREE William Hill shop bets every day of the festival from Tuesday July 29 until Saturday August 2, 2025. Find out more here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
John Curtice: SNP majority in 2026 ‘extremely unlikely'
"What is [[John Swinney]] doing? He is saying to people: if you want independence, vote [[SNP]]. Do not vote for Alba, do not vote for the Greens." READ MORE The First Minister's plan has proved controversial in the party, with rebels set to attempt to amend it at conference in October. One change that has the backing of 43 branches is to make a majority of list votes for pro-independence parties in 2026 a mandate for independence negotiations with the UK Government. "[[John Swinney]] does not want there to be a fragmented list vote," Prof Curtice told the audience in Edinburgh's Summerhall. "He wants people to vote for the SNP. The challenge facing the SNP — the thing that has not changed in Scottish politics despite the turbulence of the last two and a half years — is support for independence. We are still around 50/50 on the independence question. "Although you hear a lot of talk of people not being concerned about independence anymore, just tell that to most unionist voters. Most unionist voters are deeply concerned about independence. "Very few people now are willing to vote for the SNP if they are opposed to independence. That is in complete contrast to the position in 2011." Professor Sir John Curtice at The Herald's Unspun Live (Image: Colin Mearns/NQ) Then, he said, around 40% of people who supported devolution but not independence voted for the SNP. But now the party was not picking up any new No voters and was only winning around three-fifths of independence supporters. Even if the SNP were to win a majority of seats, the academic said it was unlikely the UK Government would agree to a referendum. Last week's comments from the First Minister marked a change in strategy. Previously, the party said a "democratic majority" of pro-independence MSPs after the 2026 election should pave the way to a new vote. Mr Swinney said: "The necessity of independence is absolutely paramount and we have got to make that case in the 2026 Scottish Parliament elections. "But there is a logjam and we have got to break that logjam. "We demonstrated how we break the logjam in the past, by electing a majority of SNP MSPs in 2011, and that led to an independence referendum in 2014." He invited supporters of independence to back his party in the constituency vote and to "demand independence" in the regional vote. Asked about how popular the First Minister is, Prof Curtice said Mr Swinney numbers had "been kind of steady since he became First Minister." "He is not as popular now as he was when he was Deputy First Minister," he added. "In an era of fragmented politics, that is still good enough to make him the least unpopular politician in Scotland." He added: "Anas Sarwar is still suffering from the shadow of Sir Keir Starmer. Kemi Badenoch — who is she? Nigel Farage is very strong and popular among a section of Scottish and British society." He said around 40% of Leave voters in Scotland were set to vote for Reform next year. Asked for predictions for next year's election, Prof Curtice said he thought it would be "child's play" for Reform to win at least 10 seats. Prof Curtice and Kevin McKenna and the Herald's Hannah Brown in conversation (Image: Colin Mearns/NQ) "I think Kemi Badenoch is becoming more effective, but it is very much a work in progress. The problem the Tories face is that Reform are not just taking voters, they are taking donors, they are taking people. "It is very difficult to see any outcome other than the SNP still providing government. What remains highly uncertain is how strong it will be. It could be as low as 45 seats. I think the maximum at the moment is 55 seats. "But 55 seats — you have only got to find one party to make a deal. With 45 you have got to find two, and that becomes much more difficult. "I think at the moment it is a race between Reform and Labour over who comes second, and unless the popularity of the Labour government improves, Labour may find themselves in much the same position as they are at the moment." "The lesson of the last Westminster parliament is not to presume that the outcome of the last election is going to determine what happens at the next one," he added. READ MORE Prof Curtice was also asked about Kate Forbes's decision to stand down at the next election. He described the outgoing Deputy First Minister as "one of the most talented politicians within the current parliament". "Some of us are old enough to remember those promises 25 years ago of a family-friendly parliament," he added. "She is not the only person who has found it difficult to combine parenthood with being an MSP. To that extent, I think the Parliament should reflect back on whether or not it is going to make it possible for people with young children, particularly those in rural constituencies, to be MSPs."
Daily Record
4 hours ago
- Daily Record
Anfield evacuated ahead of Liverpool vs Athletic Bilbao friendly double-header
Fans were asked to leave ahead of the 5pm kick off for the friendly with the Spanish outfit. Anfield was evacuated ahead of this evening's friendly against Athletic Bilbao. Liverpool's game with the Spanish side was due kick off at 5pm, with a further fixture against the same opposition at 8pm. Fans had already begun to take their seats in the stadium when an alarm sounded and supporters were asked to leave the stadium. The reason for the evacuation is so far unclear at this stage. After a short period, supporters were allowed to re-enter Anfield huge queues formed at the turnstiles, reports the Mirror. The Reds are preparing for the 2025/26 Premier League season with a mixture of first-team and youth fixtures set to appear against their Spanish opponents in two separate matches. Darwin Nunez, Alexis Mac Allister, Curtis Jones, Harvey Elliott, Kostas Tsimikas and Andy Robertson are among the first-team regulars to be named to play in the first fixture. The friendly double-header marks the first return to Anfield for Liverpool since the tragic death of Diogo Jota. The Portuguese star, 28, was killed in a car crash alongside brother Andre Silva in Spain last month. In his programme notes, skipper Virgil van Dijk said: "It has, of course, been a very challenging time. "First and foremost for Diogo and Andre's family, for Rute and the kids. They are the people who must always come first in all of this. We must never forget that, and we cannot imagine their pain in this moment. "It is still a bit surreal, to be honest, but we are coping in the best way possible as a team, and we are all trying to do the best job we can in order to get through this really difficult time. "With everything that happened, it has been strange having to now try to carry on with work, with football. We will never forget Diogo, of course, but we just have to try to honour his memory. That's what we try to do each and every day. "I always come back to the fact that we have to look after Diogo's family, his parents, and that's the main thing. You think about so many different things, and it's difficult to process. You can't imagine the pain, the feeling that they have. That's why we try to be there as much as we can, and for each other as well. "That's also why it is very important that we honour and carry on his legacy, not only for now and the next couple of months, but for as long as we can, because that is what he deserves."
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
George Osborne is right – Britain can't afford to ignore the new cryptocurrencies
When it comes to cryptocurrencies, Britain's on the slow train to nowhere. That, at least, is the view of former chancellor George Osborne, and despite being a moderate crypto sceptic myself, I'm beginning to think he might have a point. Writing in the FT, Osborne tells the story of how he used Britain's first crypto ATM, handing the 'coin' he withdrew to the Treasury. All right and proper. But financially, not so smart. The Bitcoin he withdrew is now worth 200 times what it was then. All of his successors have subsequently made the same promises he made: to put Britain at the centre of the financial revolution that was then just getting underway. But their bombastic talk of making the nation 'a leader' wasn't backed by any meaningful action. In the absence of political direction, regulators got scared, putting up restrictions designed to protect – for which read nanny – retail investors, while stymieing the wholesale market's development. Now phase two is upon us – stablecoins – and it looks like Britain is again going to miss the boat. Stablecoins are much more interesting to me than Bitcoin and its chums, because their value is linked to an underlying asset. Take a guess what that asset is in the vast majority of cases. If you said 'the dollar', give yourself a gold star. Or a gold stablecoin. America's openness to this stuff – which Donald Trump put into overdrive – has put it at the head of the pack. Warren Buffett, the legendary 'Sage of Omaha' who has forgotten more about investment than most asset managers will ever learn, once said: 'If you told me you own all of the Bitcoin in the world and you offered it to me for $25, I wouldn't take it – because what would I do with it? I'd have to sell it back to you one way or another. It isn't going to do anything.' However, what sustains crypto is the power of the idea underpinning it during an epoch in which ideas have unusual power. Unless every holder loses faith all at once – and they won't – it will continue to have value as a tradable commodity. Even Berkshire Hathaway has taken a sip of what Buffett likened to 'rat poison' by investing in Nu Holdings, a Brazilian digital banking company with its own crypto platform. In Britain, however, regulators have wrinkled their noses, grabbed our hands and dragged us off. ' Rachel Reeves rightly says we've all become too risk-averse,' Osborne writes. 'We became the world's financial centre because we weren't afraid of change. On crypto and stablecoins, as on too many other things, the hard truth is this: we're being completely left behind. It's time to catch up.' The Treasury's response can best be summarised as 'but, but, but, we're doing stuff', while looking all hurt at Osborne's criticism. But he's right. If you live in New York or Nebraska, you can buy an exchange-traded fund (a type of collective investment vehicle) issued by, say, BlackRock, a giant asset manager. If you live in Newcastle, you can't. Consumer 'protection' rules mean you have a 24-hour wait before being allowed to buy Bitcoin; in the US, you're good to go. British crypto bros can still get in – but only after they and their mates run the regulatory gamut first. No wonder they take their business overseas. Here's the thing: crypto is going to cause a scandal. You can see it coming a mile off. It's new(ish), it's volatile, and the crypto kids have a habit of getting over-excited while forgetting what they were taught about Newtonian physics in school. What goes up must come down. Tick, tick, tick: boom. The end result will be messy and people are going to lose a lot of money. They're going to cry about it. The BBC will trot out interviewers who will look all concerned and sympathetic while the losers moan and demand that someone pay compo. This helps to explain why people like Andrew Bailey, the governor of the Bank of England – who won't even countenance a digital pound – want to stay out of the water when the rest of the world is jumping into online pools of digital cash. This means any chance of shaping this emerging market will be lost, and London will continue to decline as a financial centre in the process – becoming more and more irrelevant as time goes on. Scandals happen. They're endemic to the City, to Wall Street and the rest. When they do, you pick yourself up, sort out the mess, try to learn the right lessons, and move on. It's the cost of doing business. Osborne's views are obviously informed by his sitting on the global advisory council for Coinbase, a crypto platform. But that doesn't make him wrong. To the contrary. I've many differences with the former chancellor, but the government really does need to grasp this nettle – even if it stings a bit. It's slightly bizarre that many of the reforms that protected consumers and brought some sanity to the banking industry after it nearly broke the world economy are being jettisoned – and yet crypto is viewed as too toxic to touch. The former chancellor says it is 'lame' to blame regulators like Bailey for the problem. He's right about that too. Rachel Reeves is the boss and Parliament is sovereign. She should get to work. There is – if she can but see it – a potential win for her here. It's risky, to be sure. But so is getting out of bed in the morning.
