
Australian foreign aid workers fear ‘deaths and suffering' will result from Trump's halt to USAid
Workers have described 'chaos' and 'total panic' as they try to work out what the policy means. The peak body for overseas aid organisations said without intervention, the consequences of the move 'will be catastrophic'.
The United States provides about US$68bn in foreign aid a year, more than 40% of global humanitarian funding. Most of it is managed by the US Agency for International Development (USAid).
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Under president Donald Trump's orders – one of dozens he signed after being re-elected to the White House – the funding dried up for an initial period of 90 days, with some exceptions for emergency food aid, and military funding for Israel and Egypt.
USAid staff were issued 'stop work' directives, and banned from discussing the situation without approval. Funded organisations were also ordered to stop work on all contracts, grants, agreements and programs.
Elon Musk, who now runs the US government's 'department of government efficiency' (Doge), said the government was working to shut down USAid altogether with Trump's approval. On Tuesday, the administration confirmed it would shrink USAid and merge it with the state department.
A range of Australian projects have USAid funding. Some organisations receive funds directly, while others work on projects that are jointly funded by the US and other partners and it is unclear what the stop work orders mean for them. There are concerns the US has left a chasm that could be filled by China.
The Australian Council for International Development (Acfid) is the peak body for non-government organisations (NGOs) working in international development and humanitarian projects.
Acfid interim chief executive officer, Matthew Maury, said funding for climate crisis work, food, health, infrastructure and disaster programs were at risk.
'This disruption will have wide-reaching impacts, interrupting critical life-saving work, including access to food for families, basic education for children, safety for women fleeing sexual and gender-based violence, and providing medications to children and others suffering from disease,' he said.
'Australian aid organisations with USAid-funded projects are at risk, as implementing partners rely on USAid funds for part of their operating costs. This could force organisations to shut down, with some already forced to let staff go.'
Maury said NGOs were 'deeply concerned about how the immediate gaps will be addressed and the impact on communities that have relied on aid for essential services' including healthcare, education and basic necessities such as clean water.
'Without intervention, the consequences will be catastrophic. We are talking about unnecessary deaths and suffering.
'Initial data suggests that over AUD$256m worth of programs delivered by Acfid members and partners globally will be impacted, with $119m of funding impacted in the Pacific alone. These are programs at risk of not continuing,' he said.
Trump has ordered efficiency reviews be done on all US-backed programs.
He wrote in his executive order that the 'foreign aid industry and bureaucracy are not aligned with American interests and in many cases antithetical to American values'.
Last week, the administration granted a waiver for 'life-saving humanitarian assistance' but it is not clear what that covers.
Guardian Australia spoke to a range of organisations that declined to be named for fear of retaliation. Several major NGOs referred inquiries to their US headquarters.
The Australian International Development Network (Aidn) warns the policy threatens lives, and is meeting with US foundations to work out where the most urgent needs lie.
Mark Cubit co-founded Aidn, which describes itself as a collaboration of private sector individuals, philanthropists, organisations, donors, businesses and government.
Cubit confirmed people and organisations will not speak out for fear of losing funding altogether, but said Aidn does not rely on USAid funding.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'Organisations who received a sudden communication that everything must stop are left dealing with the implications of that – initially having to tell their staff,' he said. 'The second obvious effect is on the beneficiaries.
'If it's child literacy programs that's unfortunate. If it's the provision of tuberculosis medication it's life threatening.'
Cubit said Australian charities would not be able to pick up the slack without more funding from external parties.
He said he was not optimistic the Australian government would increase its foreign aid to help.
'Australia is one of the stingiest aid funders, so it will be up to the private sector and China to pick up the slack,' he said.
'China will bring issues, obviously.'
A spokesperson for the foreign minister, Penny Wong, said the decision was a matter for the US administration and that Australia's development program was 'focused on being a partner of choice for our neighbours'.
The Australian founder of the Blue Dragon Children's Foundation, Michael Brosowski, who's organisation rescues victims from slavery and human trafficking in Vietnam, said only 10% of their funding came from the US, so they would have to scale back but were not at risk of closing.
'It's a pause, and we don't know what will happen next,' he said.
'Part of the disappointment with this is that the US government has absolutely stood out as the world's leader in anti-trafficking, and I hope they don't lose that now.
'It's not clear if anyone else can step up to take the place of the US.'
An aid insider in Myanmar who has worked for Australia said it was 'total chaos' there when anyone who received US funding got a letter demanding they cease all activity. He said programs and projects with funding from the US and Australia were struggling to work out what they could do.
'Even if you think you can continue 60% of your activities, the fear is that will also be contrary to the order, so that makes it incredibly uncertain,' he said.
The Australian head of a south-east Asian organisation said people were 'absolutely panicking' but had been told not to speak publicly. 'People are terrified they're being monitored,' he said.
'It feels like an ideological attack.'
He said he imagined regional governments would be on the phone to China, to fill the void and challenge America's leadership in the region.
'People are really angry … it's going to be really hard to trust America again,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Democrats find it hard to move on when Biden and Harris keep hogging the spotlight
Donald Trump is President of the United States. Republicans control all three branches of government. And even as Democrats are planning to regroup and contest next year's midterm elections, the two people who many of them blame for last year's dismal election outcome simply will not go away. More than half a year after they left office after a single four-year term, former president Joe Biden and former vice president Kamala Harris are continuing to remain in the spotlight and allow Republicans to highlight their failures instead of letting their party move on and find a way to regain the support that was lost during their time in office. Harris, who lost all seven of the contested swing states in last year's election, recently announced an upcoming book that will focus on the 107-day campaign she waged against Trump after Biden withdrew from the 2024 race following his dismal debate performance last June. She also revealed that she won't enter the upcoming race to succeed California Governor Gavin Newsom, who must leave office in 2027 when his second four-year term ends, leaving open the possibility that she'll enter what is expected to be a crowded primary race for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination. Biden, whose 11th hour pardons of his family members and other political allies emboldened Trump to grant reprieves for the violent rioters who tried to prevent his 2020 loss from being certified, is still giving speeches in which he is attacking his predecessor-turned-successor, a stark contrast from how most former presidents have behaved after leaving office. At one such appearance, an address to the National Bar Association in Chicago on Thursday, he accused the Trump administration of 'doing its best to dismantle the Constitution,' giving right-wing media outlets plenty of fodder to use at a time when his party is trying to focus on the future and the current government's policy problems. And the president's son, Hunter Biden, is doing his best to stay in the headlines with a series of podcast appearances in which he casts blame for his father's exit from the race on a broad range of people — but not his father. The former Democratic ticket's refusal to fade away after a devastating electoral performance is ruffling feathers among party figures who are tasked with moving forward and figuring out how to escape from the wilderness in next year's midterms. A number of popular governors, including Illinois' JB Prizker and Kentucky's Andy Beshear, have been making the trek to early primary states with an eye towards 2028, and voters are increasingly eager to elect new faces rather than older establishment figures. Donna Bojarsky, a Democratic consultant, told The Washington Post that 'nobody' in the party is looking to go 'back to 2024' as they look for a way forward against the Republicans. 'The shadow of 2024 is long, and I think all perspectives in the mix believe we need something fresh,' she said. Another strategist Cooper Teboe, said the party's current predicament stems from a sclerosis that has taken hold on account of incumbents refusing to relinquish power to the next generation. 'The core reason the Democratic Party is in the position it is in today is because no new figures, no new ideas, have been allowed to rise up and take hold,' he said. But there is a group eager for Biden and Harris to remain part of the national conversation — Republicans. One GOP consultant who spoke to The Independent said Hunter Biden's recent profanity-laced podcast appearances and the former president's speeches are just what they need to keep his failures in the public eye as his party tries to regain the trust of voters. 'Hunter Biden is just what Democrats need more of going into the midterms,' he said, more than a bit sarcastically.


Telegraph
7 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's reckless nuclear performance is high-stakes but low cost
In normal times, this would be an extraordinary, epoch-changing and terror-inducing moment. Not even during the Cold War did a US president publicly move nuclear submarines towards Russian waters. Never before has a US leader chosen to engage in nuclear brinkmanship of this kind. True, the Soviet Union famously triggered a nuclear showdown in 1962 by moving nuclear warheads to within 90 miles of the US shoreline during the Cuban Missile Crisis. For 13 days, the world feared Armageddon. But given Donald Trump 's quixotic style of governing, few are panicking today. A Cuban Missile Crisis Mark II, this quite patently is not. Yet, that does not mean that what the US president has just done is risk-free. He has shifted Washington's nuclear posture towards Russia in a way that none of his predecessors dared, climbing – almost casually – the first rung of the nuclear escalation ladder. Should Vladimir Putin choose to respond in kind, a major crisis could follow. That seems unlikely – a calculation Mr Trump has presumably made. In fact, he appears to be borrowing from the Russian playbook. Putin has long used nuclear posturing as a tool of coercion. During bouts of tension with the West, he has deployed Iskander missiles, capable of firing nuclear warheads, to the exclave of Kaliningrad on the border with Poland, a Nato member. In 2023, he stationed tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus – the first time since the Cold War that Russia has placed nuclear weapons outside its own territory. He has also repeatedly hinted at using a tactical weapon in Ukraine. And on Friday, Putin announced that Russia had started producing Oreshnik hypersonic intermediate-range missiles, reaffirming plans to deploy them to Belarus this year. He boasted he had already selected sites for their deployment. In recent days, Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president and now Putin's social media attack dog, who has previously rattled the nuclear sabre, warned that Mr Trump's threats could spark war between the US and Russia. Mr Trump, who has recently tempered his admiration of Putin, made it clear that he was calling Russia's bluff. In so many words, he told Moscow he was taking its threats literally rather than figuratively – an inversion of the advice his supporters usually give about him. He wrote in a social media post directed at Mr Medvedev: 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences.' Mr Trump's threat is therefore best seen as performance – high-stakes, reckless performance, but performance all the same. Other motives may be at play. In the coming days, the US president will have to unveil how he intends to counter Russia's continuing aggression in Ukraine, underscored on Friday after an attack on Kyiv killed 31 people. Secondary sanctions on countries buying Russian energy – chiefly China, India, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates – pose a major diplomatic headache. Should Mr Trump choose to retreat on these threats, he can point to the submarine deployment as proof he is serious about Russia – a strategy whose stakes are higher but costs potentially much lower than escalating tariffs on allies Washington needs for goodwill in other arenas.


Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
VIEW Investors react to Kugler's resignation, firing of BLS commissioner
Aug 1 (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve said on Friday that Governor Adriana Kugler was resigning from the central bank effective Aug. 8. Separately, U.S President Donald Trump ordered that the commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Erika L. McEntarfer, be fired after data showed employment growth was than expected last month. COMMENTS: "Obviously, (Adriana's resignation) is a negative, and that'll probably continue to pressure the dollar. That's not a good sign, when someone resigns, unless there is a personal reason, there is always a question mark as to why. So the unknown factor of that usually adds to uncertainties. "Of course, you had a major revision in the employment numbers so it's a fact that Trump fired the Commissioner of Labour Statistics, basically questioning the accuracy of these numbers because of that huge revision that we had. So, anytime something like this happens, it always raises uncertainties." CHRISTOPHER HODGE, CHIEF US ECONOMIST, NATIXIS ,NEW YORK: 'The interim BLS Chief looks to be an accomplished technocrat, which is a great sign. Going forward, should the fidelity of the data be compromised, this would place the markets and Fed in a very precarious position. I would expect the Fed to rely more and more on the anecdotes it collects from the Beige Book. Her (Adriana Kugler's ) term was set to expire in January, so no great change in policy. I have not seen an indication that she is resigning in protest, but the timing is very curious' JODY CALEMINE, DIRECTOR OF ADVOCACY, AFL-CIO, WASHINGTON, D.C. 'Today was probably the last reliable jobs report we will ever see. This isn't good for anybody looking to see what's going on with the economy, not just for workers but for the business community in general.' 'This morning's jobs report was showing what was the first indicators of probably a coming recession…it's clear he fired her (McEntarfer) for issuing a jobs report he just didn't like.' On Kugler: 'The Fed board should be independent of the president, that's for sure. He (Trump) is wielding increasingly authoritarian control over different agencies, and clearly he wants to wield that control over the Fed. The markets have kept that impulse in check so far. He's increasingly out of control.' JUAN PEREZ, SENIOR DIRECTOR OF TRADING, MONEX USA, WASHINGTON: "The way (the market) is going to interpret (the departures) is in a very dollar-negative way." "No matter what the economic picture in the United States, the one thing that holds the U.S. dollar strong in the eyes of the world is the authority and the independence of the Federal Reserve. Whenever anything comes to potentially put that into compromise then that's when the U.S. dollar spirals down." "There will be an opening for the Trump administration to fill. It's likely he will choose somebody whose views on interest rates match his own. Then Treasury Secretary Bessent wants to have a list of possible replacements for the Fed Chair by the end of the year so, Trump is getting a bigger chance to appoint people whose views match his own." Regarding Trump's order to fire Erika L. McEntarfe, he said: "I don't like to see a bureaucrat fired just because the data that gets presented doesn't support the administration's policies. We have a president who believes the economy is strong and that interest rates should be cut . I have read nothing that suggests she was not doing a good job or conscientious. It's upsetting. We're killing the messenger here instead of trying to see what the data really says and go from there. I see no evidence that the numbers were ever manipulated. It wouldn't be big news today if it happened a lot. Certainly, it's unusual."