NOAA staff cuts could threaten monitoring of Great Lakes toxic algae
Since February, NOAA has lost 16 staffers at the Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Those employees — who were either fired probationary workers or longtime staffers who took retirement — included key members of a team responsible for collecting, analyzing and communicating risks from 'harmful algal blooms,' or HABs.
That's more than a third of the 48-employee lab best known by its acronym, GLERL.
Advertisement
'This is a critical time,' said Gregory Dick, director of the Cooperative Institute for Great Lakes Research, or CIGLR, a formal partnership between NOAA and 15 academic institutions and private-sector partners that is housed within GLERL. 'I would definitely say our HABs monitoring program is very much in jeopardy for this summer.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Researchers issue warning after discovering game fish infected with parasite in California: 'These parasites are here in the US'
If you're eating freshwater fish in Southern California, you'll want to take extra precautions since fish have become infected with parasites. A study by the University of California, San Diego found that over 90% of game fish studied had been infected with a parasite. The study, published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, found "two species of [parasitic] flatworms called trematodes," which typically cause weight loss, lethargy, or gastrointestinal problems when humans get infected. In rare cases, it can cause heart attacks or strokes. Haplorchis pumilio and Centrocestus formosanus were the "two species of parasitic trematodes," identified, per UC San Diego. These parasites are typically found in Southeast Asia, but it is likely that an aquatic invasive snail, known as the Malaysian trumpet snail or red-rimmed melania, brought them to the U.S. over 10 years ago. The researchers examined 84 different species of fish in 2023 from five fishing sites in San Diego County, including bluegill and largemouth; 93% were infected with the Haplorchis pumilio parasite, and "Centrocestus formosanus, was found at two of the five locations where it occurred in 91% of the fish," per UC San Diego. UC San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography ecologist and parasitologist, and senior author of the study, Ryan Hechinger, said, "These parasites are here in the U.S., and they're infecting fish that people are eating." These parasites, which are appearing in freshwater fish, serve as an example of why invasive species can be dangerous. While not all non-native species are harmful, those that are can cause damage to the ecosystem and pose health risks, as in this case. The Asian tiger mosquito is another invasive species that can carry disease. It entered the U.S. in the mid-1980s, and some harbored the West Nile virus. The mosquito also invaded Europe in 2024, carrying the dengue fever virus. Invasive species also wreak havoc on the economy, causing damage to crops, livestock, and fish, costing the U.S. $20 billion a year for cleanup. Additionally, they are harmful to the environment because they take resources from native species, sometimes causing them to go extinct. How often do you worry about the quality of your drinking water? Never Sometimes Often Always Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Hechinger said there is "no need to panic," because you can thoroughly cook or freeze your fish "for at least one week" to kill the parasites, if you plan to eat it raw, per Food and Drug Administration guidelines, as reported by UC San Diego. There have been no reported cases yet, but researchers want the parasite to be added to the diseases that public health officials are required to report. Hechinger said, "This kind of research is so important to identifying new public health threats, and it wouldn't have been possible without NIH funding." Invasive species such as this aquatic snail that is spreading parasites are one of the critical climate issues that are vital to understand to protect the public from these threats. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research Announces Launch of Enhanced Sarcoidosis Data Registry
CHICAGO, July 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research (FSR), the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for those affected, is proud to announce the launch of a new and enhanced version of the FSR-SARC Registry, the Sarcoidosis Advanced Registry for Cures. The FSR-SARC Registry is an IRB-approved, longitudinal, patient-powered database designed to accelerate sarcoidosis research by collecting critical insights on diagnosis, organ manifestation, treatments, symptoms, and impacts on quality of life. With nearly 7,000 participants from 68 different countries to date, the Registry is a cornerstone of FSR's mission to advance understanding and treatment of this complex and often misunderstood disease. The upgraded FSR-SARC Registry introduces a new, user-friendly platform (in partnership with Across Healthcare) with expanded features to maximize the impact of patient participation. Participants can now more easily share their experiences, update their information, and contribute to a growing body of knowledge that supports both clinical research and improved patient outcomes. Key Features and Benefits of the New FSR-SARC Registry: Enhanced Data Collection: The registry now captures even more comprehensive information on patients impacted by sarcoidosis. In addition to questionnaires and surveys, participants receiving care in the U.S. can link the Registry directly to their provider's patient portal. Improved Security and Privacy: Hosted on Across Healthcare's HIPAA-compliant platform, the Registry ensures that all personal health information is encrypted, securely stored, and only shared in de-identified form with approved researchers. Empowering Patient Voices: By enabling patients and caregivers to self-report their experiences, the registry provides critical insights into the variability, progression, and burden of sarcoidosis, informing future research and care recommendations. Facilitating Research and Clinical Trials: The registry connects interested patients to IRB-approved research opportunities based on both their eligibility and proximity to trial sites, helping to stimulate hypothesis-driven research and support the development of new treatments. Commitment to Representation and Access: FSR remains dedicated to expanding the variety of Registry participants and ensuring representation of all sarcoidosis patients. 'FSR is committed to empowering patients and accelerating research through the FSR-SARC Registry. We are immensely grateful for the extraordinary commitment of the sarcoidosis community in giving of their time and insights to inform and drive sarcoidosis research,' said Mary McGowan, President and CEO of FSR. 'Now in its tenth year, the Registry has been one of our most powerful tools to elevate patient voices in the advancement of sarcoidosis research. The enhanced surveys and platform represent a significant step forward in our efforts to drive innovation elevate patient-centered drug development, and improve patient outcomes for all impacted by sarcoidosis.' Participation in the FSR-SARC Registry is voluntary, confidential, and open to all individuals living with sarcoidosis or their caregivers. By joining, participants help shape the future of sarcoidosis research and care. For more information about the FSR-SARC Registry and to sign up, please visit About Sarcoidosis Sarcoidosis is a rare inflammatory disease characterized by granulomas—tiny clumps of inflammatory cells—that can form in one or more organs. 90% of patients living with sarcoidosis have lung involvement. Despite advances in research, sarcoidosis remains challenging to diagnose, with limited treatment options and no known cure. Approximately 175,000 people live with sarcoidosis in the United States. About the Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research The Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research (FSR) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for those living with the disease through research, education, and support. For more information about FSR and its community programs, visit: Media Contact: Cathi Davis, Director of Communications and Marketing Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research cathi@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump cuts to NOAA, NASA ‘blinding' farmers to risks, scientists warn
The Trump administration's cuts to climate research and federal weather forecasting agencies are 'blinding' the U.S. to oncoming threats to its food supply — and kneecapping efforts to protect it. As Congress debates its own research and forecasting cuts, a study published Wednesday in the journal Nature suggests that fossil fuel-driven climate change poses an existential threat to key parts of the American food supply. Heat waves and drought driven by fossil fuel burning could mean a collapse of Midwestern corn and soy yields later this century, said study co-author Andrew Hultgren of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. The region, Hultgren noted, is both one of the world's richest breadbaskets and one of its most endangered. When temperatures routinely exceed 100 degrees Fahrenheit, he told The Hill, 'It starts to become a question of how tenable it is to keep farming corn.' 'You do start to wonder if the Corn Belt is going to be the Corn Belt in the future,' he said. Proper forecasting and adaptation could cut those crop failures almost in half, the study found. But those corrective measures are under direct attack from President Trump's mass staff reductions at federal agencies concerned with tracking weather and climate — and the freezing of grants to any program or study that mentions climate. The effect on U.S. forecasting will be 'like losing your eyesight: slow and torturous,' said Jonathan Martin, a professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Wisconsin. Americans who have grown up amid the 'unheralded revolution' of ever-more-precise weather forecasts will find themselves in a world growing blurrier — even as the weather grows ever more volatile, Martin added. Farmers choosing what crops to plant each season are effectively betting on the heat and rain, which determines what will survive to market — a prediction that is both harder and more vital in an era of weather whiplash, where early-season heat waves can ripen crops only for late-season ice storms to kill them. Those seasonal predictions rest on a vast, taxpayer-funded observation system that connects land, air and sea — and which current budget proposals seek to scale back or eliminate. Trump has sought, for example, to end a wide array of NASA programs that monitor changes to the atmosphere, oceans and land; eradicate the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) office that serves as the 'nerve center' of federal climate research; and cut by two-thirds the funding of the National Science Foundation (NSF). Many of those cuts appear to be replicated in the House and Senate budget proposals, which excise billions of federal dollars — and in particular target what Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) called 'climate change and environmental funding at NOAA.' This policy is based on an 'ideological' foundation, said Christopher Sellers, an environmental historian at Stony Brook University. The administration, he said, is convinced that 'climate change isn't that real or alarming, and that climate alarmism — a species of 'wokeism' — is itself the bigger problem.' In addition to Wednesday's Nature study on the oncoming corn crisis, which drew on NASA research, federal agencies have previously funded or provided data to studies that sought to create new tools to help farmers navigate a more uncertain future. That included federally supported studies that modeled future declines in the ability to grow cotton in the Texas High Plains; investigations into how quickly the groundwater that feeds California agriculture can recover after drought; and projections that sought to forecast Midwestern floods a season ahead based on changes in the salt content of the ocean. That last study depends on 'good knowledge of the ocean state a season ahead,' said lead author Laifang Li of Pennsylvania State University — which itself depends on NASA salinity-sensing satellites that are kept calibrated by the NOAA-funded Argo network, a web of 4,000 floating ocean buoys that monitor the salt and temperature of the ocean. Both the satellites and buoys are at risk under the president's budget, threatening weather forecasts for the whole U.S. — and particularly the vital farm country of the Midwest and California. Cuts to primary research and forecasting are exacerbated by cuts to the public-facing documents that make use of them and the farm adaptation programs the federal government funds — or used to. In April, the president canceled the National Climate Assessment, which distilled research like Hultgren's or Li's into actionable insights that federal and local extension agents transmitted to farmers. It also — in defiance of a court order — froze billions in conservation funding that had already been awarded to farmers and ranchers to help prepare their lands to help resist heat, flood and drought. Even if key Earth-monitoring programs survive, they will do so in an environment where staffing is dramatically reduced and where the executive branch is openly hostile to climate research. The Trump administration is aiming to cut NASA's budget by 25 percent, or more than 5,000 people, which adds to cuts earlier this year of 7 percent at NOAA and 10 percent at the NSF. The don't-say-climate campaign goes beyond weather or agriculture. In the last five months, the administration has blocked the Department of Defense from considering the security risks posed by a heating world; kept the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from modeling the northward march of tropical diseases; and yanked back funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency aimed at making flood- and storm-prone communities less prone to disaster. But cuts at NOAA pose an immediate threat because of their impact on agriculture, said John Sokich, former head of congressional affairs at the National Weather Service. With the proposed cuts, 'we're not going to be able to understand what's happening, much less predict what's happening.' In addition to giving farmers insight on what to plant, seasonal forecasting built on the NOAA and NASA networks tells Western dam managers how much water to release downstream. It also warns when low rivers could raise shipping costs. And beyond the seasonal forecasts, federally funded climate data and forecasting forms an essential element in the long-term decisions farmers make about how to use their land, said John Nielsen-Gammon, the Texas state climatologist and a professor at Texas A&M University. Farmers know the climate is changing, Nielsen-Gammon said, 'and they're trying to adapt.' But programs like the now-defunct National Climate Assessment, he said, had been essential to letting them know which changes are 'natural variability, which ones are going to accelerate? Do we need to put in a new irrigation system — or is the water going to run out anyway?' Hultgren told The Hill that he had expected to find that the U.S., like other wealthy countries, offered farmers a relative harbor from global heating. 'I thought, oh, the corn belt farmers are going to be fully protected, right? They can make all the investments they need to make to mitigate these losses.' But the cost of those investments, and the sheer toll of extreme heat pushing ever earlier into the season, meant that 'the people who have the most to lose are going to lose the most.' Hultgren is 'cautiously hopeful,' he said: He thinks that studies like his, which show how 'climate change coming home to roost in these more developed economies like the US,' will help drive action to both slow it and adapt to it. The long backlog to academic research — this study was in the works for nine years — means that such findings will continue to come out throughout Trump's second term. But if proposed cuts go through, the research pipeline that would provide the actionable insights of the 2030s risks getting cut off. 'Nature is pushing back on us,' Hultgren said. The nation risks 'blinding our eyes' to the information that would let it push back. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
