From Carbon Costs To Gas Gaps: NZ Energy Sector Flags Rising Pressures
The 2025 Country Issues Map is out now. The report surveyed energy leaders across the wider energy sector to get a snapshot of what keeps them awake at night, and busy during the day.
New information from the World Energy Council shows affordability, carbon pricing, and demand management are the top energy concerns in New Zealand.
The 2025 Country Issues Map is out now. The report surveyed energy leaders across the wider energy sector to get a snapshot of what keeps them awake at night, and busy during the day.
BusinessNZ Energy Council (BEC) Executive Director Tina Schirr says the map paints a clear picture of the sector's issues that still need to be addressed.
'Affordability being the dominant concern on the 2025 map is no surprise given the strain placed on the electricity sector during last year's dry winter, and the compounding issue of reduced gas availability.'
Carbon pricing ranks high on the uncertainty list, reflecting instability in the Emissions Trading Scheme, an oversupply of New Zealand Units, and investor hesitancy.
Schirr says gas users will continue to face difficulties accessing viable alternatives.
'However, there is growing acknowledgement that grid-scale storage and demand response measures can help reduce supply risks, especially during dry years.
'How New Zealand manages the energy trilemma – balancing security, sustainability, and equity – has become an increasing area of concern in these reports. Uncertainty over gas reliability is now a key threat to security of supply and affecting affordability across the wider industry.'
Schirr says that over the years, a major blind spot for New Zealand remains unchanged – community engagement.
'Engagement and energy literacy continue to rank low for both uncertainty and impact, despite their importance in building lasting public support for energy transitions.
'On the bright side, infrastructure concerns that dominated previous years have eased somewhat, but transmission grids and long-term planning remain high-priority actions. New Zealand also retains its position as a global energy innovator.
'lastly, the report reinforces that our abundant renewable energy resources and strong public-private position on collaboration will serve us well for energy transition to come.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Ex-minister hits out at pine carbon farming
A tree industry expert and former minister of forestry has condemned "lock and leave" carbon farming, but says you still can not tell farmers what to do with their land. Former Labour minister Stuart Nash said in his time with the portfolio he had a dream for how the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) would benefit the country. "With the ETS, for the first time ever there's been an economic incentive to plant up land that should have never been cleared in the first place," he said. But forestry conversions, since the incentive was introduced, where dense pines were planted with no plan to harvest the mature trees, were not good, he said. "You will end up with an ecological disaster in between 80 and 100 years," he said. He understood that some legislation was developing to help restrict the planting of pines, but said you still can not tell farmers what to do with their land and their money. "I don't know if that's the right route," he said. "Farmers get pretty p..... off ... because what it does mean is, their farm which may be worth, $10 million to a forester is now only worth $7m." The Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme-Forestry Conversions) Amendment Bill passed its first reading in June. It proposed restrictions to the quality and proportion of arable land that could be planted in trees. Mr Nash had a masters degree in forestry science and previously worked for construction, paper and forestry giants Carter Holt Harvey and Fletcher Challenge. His ideal for carbon farming was that pines would be planted low density, for no longer than 50 years, while at the same time seeding natives. Then after 50 years, the ministry would allow the grower to collect carbon credits of the native forest as the pines died off. In this ideal situation, carbon farmers would not be allowed to collect credits or money on pines past that 50-year cut-off. He said research by the sustainability charitable trust Pure Advantage showed that Mānuka could be a just as fast growing and carbon-absorbing alternative to pines. While he was the minister, he said the research needed more time to cook and the good thing about pines were that they were the most hardy. "It's the over-boiled Brussels sprouts of the trees," he said. "Not many people like it, not many [bugs and diseases] like it [either]." Coming from Napier, he had seen the devastation Cylone Gabrielle and Cyclone Hale had on the east coast of the North Island in 2023. This was where trees on farms would have come in handy, he said as roots made the ground more hardy, and would have prevented slips and other soft ground corrosion after the floods. A lot of New Zealand land should never had been cleared for farming and he said it was expensive to plant hilly, non-productive land, without incentive. He said despite seeing the benefit of forests and the ETS for the land, he by no means wanted to see highly productive farms and soil turned into carbon farms. "I'm really loathe to tell farmers what they should and shouldn't do," he said. "But I'm very happy to tell carbon farmers what they should do."
The Spinoff
28-07-2025
- The Spinoff
Butter prices are just a symptom of everything being completely rooted
Butter is the latest in a long line of individual products to be scapegoated for our crushing and ongoing cost of living reality, which shows no sign of abating. Miles Hurrell may have mentally cursed Nicola Willis for believing in him as he sweated through a barrage of media questions last Thursday. The finance minister had told the Fonterra chief executive he'd be great at this, emerging from their meeting two days prior with nothing but praise for his efforts to explain the price of butter. He was 'so good at communicating about this that I've encouraged him that he should provide that information directly to New Zealanders', she'd said. 'And I've been assured that that is something that he will be doing later this week.' Later that week had arrived, and things weren't going as well as expected. 'Do you actually understand what it's like for consumers to go to the supermarket and face these prices?' asked a reporter, her voice betraying an unmistakable hint of being extremely pissed off. 'Absolutely, I was in the supermarket last night,' hazarded Hurrell. Unfortunately, he'd omitted a small detail which may have undercut his attempt at relatability. 'What do you get paid?' the reporter asked. The answer, as it turns out, is nearly $6 million per annum, or enough to buy about 600,000 blocks of Anchor butter. The reaction to the interview wasn't universally positive. Analysts asked whether the dairy cooperative has lost its social licence. Social media users called for boycotts. On the one hand, fair enough. It feels like yesterday farmers were driving their tractors down Queen Street, complaining that climate regulations had made it impossible for them to do business. They won, with the incoming coalition government extending agriculture's exemption from the Emissions Trading Scheme. Now, after securing their own bespoke financial arrangement, they're saying they can't create another one for us sadsacks weeping in the Woolworths aisle. On the other hand, butter is only the latest disgusting boil on a massive pus-bleached body of unaffordability. When he wasn't uttering hexes on the finance minister, Hurrell's mind likely turned to Leviticus 16:21, where the high priest Aaron was commanded to place both his hands on the head of a live goat, and confess over it all the inequities of his people. The scapegoat would then be set free in the wilderness as a wandering representative for the sins of the nation. Butter is our current scapegoat. Before it came along, we had domestic airfares. Before that, fuel prices. Before that, flat whites. For one weird moment in late 2024, we had a collective freakout over the price of bean products. Before that, we had rates. Before that, avocados. All these products serve as a temporary focal point for the broader sense that everything's completely rooted. Butter is guilty of being too brazen about filching from our back pockets, with its roughly 50% price rise year on year, but most household staples are getting way out of hand. Buying enough mince for burgers costs an hour's work on the minimum wage. Cheese toasties are in 'sell your kidney' territory. Most significantly, sour coke lollies are now upwards of $2 a bag. Unless you're earning $6 million as the chief executive of Fonterra, it hurts paying for the basics. Something's got to give. The cost of living crisis has become the cost of living reality, and outside of urban upzoning and some positive noises about increasing supermarket competition, few politicians are proposing changes that could meaningfully alter the problems at the heart of our economic funk. If we want to leave a New World without feeling like we've just been mugged, we need higher wages and fairer tax settings. Instead we'll get rotating media freakouts about individual price spikes. This week a goat has been sent out into the desert, lathered in a 500g block of Anchor salted butter. But even as the castigation subsides, the underlying curse remains. A new representative for our collective failings will have to be selected soon. Have you seen the price of a block of Whittaker's Hazella lately? It's absolutely outrageous.
Scoop
28-07-2025
- Scoop
Carbon Forestry In Auckland: Regional Advice In A National Scheme
Press Release – Forest360 The Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is New Zealand's flagship policy for reducing carbon emissions, offering landowners the opportunity to earn carbon credits for eligible forest land. While the scheme applies nationwide, those in Auckland face unique considerations that often go overlooked in national discussions. Auckland's rural and peri-urban zones present both opportunity and complexity when it comes to carbon forestry. For landowners, investors, and farm managers alike, understanding the regional nuances of the ETS is now more important than ever. The Auckland Landscape: Underutilised and Overlooked? Much of Auckland's rural land sits in fragmented parcels, small-scale farms, lifestyle blocks, and marginal pastures where traditional agriculture offers low returns. With rising interest in sustainable land use and long-term passive income, many of these properties are being reassessed for their carbon potential. However, the road to ETS participation isn't as simple as planting trees and waiting for credits. The process involves digital mapping, eligibility verification, regulatory filings, and ongoing emissions reporting. Without sound regional advice, landowners risk either missing out on available income or falling into compliance traps. Regional Challenges Within a National Framework While ETS policy is set at the national level, Auckland landowners must navigate additional layers of complexity: Zoning and district plan overlays that may restrict planting or harvesting Higher land values, making land-use change decisions more financially sensitive Smaller block sizes, which complicate eligibility and carbon stock measurement Urban encroachment and infrastructure proximity, which influence long-term land strategy These factors demand a tailored approach. A carbon project that makes sense in Southland may not be viable, or even permitted, on a 5-hectare block near Pukekohe. In these cases, engaging with experienced carbon and forestry advisory services can help landowners assess eligibility, optimise their land use, and ensure long-term compliance with the ETS. Due Diligence: A Growing Necessity As awareness of the ETS grows, so too does the number of Auckland properties being sold with existing carbon obligations. This introduces another layer of risk. Purchasers may unknowingly inherit liabilities, or find that land registered for carbon sequestration cannot be used for other purposes. Due diligence is critical when buying or selling land tied to the ETS. This includes reviewing: The ETS registration status and associated carbon liabilities Forestry Rights and legal agreements The accuracy of mapped carbon areas and emission returns Any pending obligations under the Final Emissions Return (FER) process Thinking Long-Term: It's Not Just About the Carbon Price Recent price volatility in New Zealand Units (NZUs) has created both caution and confusion among prospective participants. But successful carbon forestry requires a long-term view, one that accounts for forest growth cycles, market trends, and policy shifts. For many Auckland landowners, particularly those not traditionally engaged in forestry, seeking qualified, regionally-informed guidance can ensure that decisions are made with clarity rather than speculation. This includes: Assessing ETS eligibility and projected returns over 10–30 years Understanding registration vs permanent forest status Weighing exotic vs native planting options Exploring insurance, liability, and deregistration implications Getting It Right From the Start The ETS can provide a valuable revenue stream and contribute meaningfully to climate goals, but only when approached strategically. In a region as dynamic and complex as Auckland, that strategy needs to be grounded in both policy understanding and local land-use expertise. Whether you're a farmer rethinking part of your operation, a lifestyle block owner with a vision for reforestation, or a buyer evaluating a registered property, careful planning will make the difference between risk and reward. To ensure you're making informed decisions, it's worth seeking out expert advice on carbon forestry and the NZ ETS tailored to your land and goals. As the scheme evolves and carbon markets mature, Auckland's landowners have a unique chance to be part of the solution, provided they get the right advice.
