
‘Morbidly obese' Samsung exec's boss suggested he get chemotherapy to lose weight: lawsuit
A morbidly obese Samsung executive claims his manager relentlessly fat-shamed him in front of colleagues, belittling him with cruel remarks about his 'big ass,' as well as, among other things, repeated suggestions that he 'use 'chemo' as a weight-loss technique.'
Joseph DeRosa, a former senior director of sales at the South Korean tech behemoth's U.S. Networks Division, says the experience was 'humiliating and hurtful,' particularly because his boss was well aware that DeRosa 'lost his mother to cancer and the side effects of chemotherapy treatment,' according to a newly filed federal lawsuit reviewed by The Independent.
Body Mass Index (BMI) over 30 is considered obese; anything above 40 'suggests morbid obesity,' DeRosa's complaint states. It says DeRosa at the time had a BMI of 43, which qualifies as 'extreme obesity,' per NIH guidelines.
Beyond disparaging the 58-year-old DeRosa about his weight, the complaint says Samsung SVP Magnus Ojert referred to DeRosa at teamwide meetings as a 'failed male prostitute,' insisting more than once that DeRosa – a top performer who landed a $6.7 billion contract one higher-up called the 'deal of the century' – achieved success by performing 'sexual favors' for clients.
But when DeRosa complained to higher-ups, the complaint contends Ojert iced him out of meetings, unilaterally altered his remote-work arrangements, and gave him 'an unjustified negative performance review,' after which DeRosa was fired as part of a 'purported restructuring.'
'There was no legitimate reason to fire someone with DeRosa's stellar track record,' according to the complaint, which says DeRosa has since been replaced by someone without any prior sales experience.
In an email on Thursday, a Samsung spokesperson told The Independent, 'It is our policy not to comment on personnel matters.'
Ojert, who the complaint says remains employed at Samsung, did not respond to emails, voicemails, and texts seeking comment. Samsung is listed as the sole defendant in DeRosa's suit; Ojert is identified throughout as DeRosa's alleged workplace tormentor but is not being sued personally.
DeRosa's is 'an accomplished sales leader with decades of experience in telecommunications,' nine years of which he spent at Samsung, according to his complaint. It says his first stint at Samsung began in February 2016, working under Ojert. But, even though DeRosa generated more than $150 million in revenue over the next 22 months, his complaint alleges Ojert treated him poorly, and DeRosa left Samsung in November 2017 for a new job elsewhere.
In January 2019, DeRosa's then-employer underwent a restructuring and eliminated his role, according to the complaint.
'Despite the discrimination [DeRosa] faced during his first stint at Samsung, [he] was out of work and needed income,' the complaint states. 'Samsung re-hired DeRosa as a Senior Director of Sales, once again reporting to Ojert, a Senior Vice President.'
As before, DeRosa 'consistently brought in lucrative deals that drew accolades from the highest ranks of the company,' and his performance reviews were 'overwhelmingly positive,' the complaint goes on. It says he received juicy bonuses for his efforts, including 'performance-based retention bonuses that Samsung only gave to its key employees.'
Yet, Ojert allegedly ignored DeRosa's contributions and refused to promote him, according to the complaint, which maintains Ojert's 'motivations… were no mystery.'
'Throughout DeRosa's employment, Ojert consistently made demeaning comments about DeRosa's body and weight and treated him 'markedly differently' than DeRosa's non-disabled teammates,' the complaint states.
Ojert is said to have repeatedly told DeRosa that he should try losing weight by undergoing chemotherapy, since a client of theirs who was also a breast cancer survivor had lost significant pounds during treatment.
Ojert's comments 'suggested that [the client], like DeRosa, was obese and [Ojert] denigrated both of them for their body sizes,' the complaint states.
DeRosa, who is Hispanic, also accuses Ojert of racial discrimination, saying he treated him less well than white and Asian employees.
'Ojert repeatedly yelled at and used abusive language towards [DeRosa] and his Hispanic colleagues,' according to the complaint, which says Ojert 'did not subject [non-Hispanic staffers] to similar abuse.'
DeRosa reported the situation to upper management, after which things got even worse, the complaint alleges. It says Ojert's 'hostility towards [DeRosa] only escalated' in the aftermath, prompting DeRosa to take his grievances to HR. In late 2023, DeRosa was assured the company would investigate, the complaint continues. But when DeRosa still hadn't heard anything by early 2024, he emailed Samsung North America President and CEO KS Choi.
'At this point… Samsung finally assigned its internal investigator to investigate [DeRosa's] discrimination and retaliation claims,' the complaint states.
In the meantime, Ojert's animus only intensified and in February 2024, DeRosa 'requested and received a leave of absence so that he could avoid Ojert's retaliatory conduct, which had become intolerable,' according to the complaint.
It says DeRosa subsequently met several times with Samsung's internal investigator, providing detailed evidence of ongoing bias. But, the complaint alleges, Samsung 'never intended to investigate DeRosa's complaints in good faith.'
For starters, the investigator told DeRosa from the very beginning that he 'would not be happy' with the outcome of the probe, the complaint asserts. In May 2024, it says Samsung notified DeRosa's attorney that it had concluded its investigation and would not be taking 'serious corrective action' against Ojert. Two months later, while DeRosa was still on leave, Samsung told him he was being laid off 'as part of a purported restructuring,' according to the complaint.
This, DeRosa argues, was simply an excuse to get rid of him. While some others in the division were also let go, the complaint says a majority were engineering employees, not 'revenue-generating sales employees.' To that end, DeRosa was his unit's leading salesperson in 2023, his last full year of work at Samsung, securing 'close to $1 billion in revenue, by far exceeding any other Sales director on the account or division.'
'Samsung, on information and belief, shoehorned [DeRosa] into the restructuring because of its continued discrimination and retaliation against him,' the complaint alleges.
DeRosa is asking the court to force Samsung to rehire him, and to bar the company from engaging in similar practices going forward.
He is seeking back pay and benefits, attorneys' fees, compensatory damages for emotional distress, humiliation, and pain and suffering, and punitive damages to be determined by a jury.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Elon Musk calls Trump's big bill ‘utterly insane and destructive' as senate debates
The billionaire tech entrepreneur Elon Musk on Saturday criticized the latest version of Donald Trump's sprawling tax and spending bill, calling it 'utterly insane and destructive. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' Musk wrote on Saturday as the Senate was scheduled to call a vote to open debate on the nearly 1,000-page bill. 'Utterly insane and destructive,' Musk added. 'It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' Passing the package, Musk said, would be 'political suicide for the Republican Party.' Musk's comment reopens a recent fiery conflict between the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) and the administration he recently left. They also represent yet another headache for Republican Senate leaders who have spent the weekend working overtime to get the legislation through their chamber so it can pass by Trump's Fourth of July deadline. Earlier this month, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO also came out against the House version of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill', denouncing that proposal as a 'disgusting abomination'. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it, he wrote at the time. Musk's forceful denouncement of Trump's spending plans triggered a deep and public rift between the billionaire and the president, though Musk in recent weeks has been working to mend relations. On Saturday, Musk posted a series of disparaging comments about the senate version of the bill, which argued the legislation would undermine US investments in renewable energy. Musk boosted several comments from Jesse Jenkins, a macro-scale energy systems engineer who teaches at Princeton. After Jenkins wrote, 'The energy provisions in the Republicans' One Big Horrible Bill are truly so bad! Who wants this? The country's automakers don't want it. Electric utilities don't want it. Data center developers don't want it. Manufacturers in energy intensive industries don't want it.' Musk replied: 'Good question. Who?' Musk's continued criticism of Trump's budget proposals comes as the bill faces a rocky path in the senate. Republicans are hoping to use their majorities to overcome Democratic opposition, but several Republican senators are concerned over provisions that would reduce spending on Medicaid and food stamps to help cover the cost of extending Trump's tax breaks. Meanwhile, fiscal conservatives are worried about the nation's debt are pushing for steeper cuts.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Warren Buffett is donating $6 billion to these five foundations
Famed investor Warren Buffett is donating $6 billion worth of his company's stock to five foundations, bringing the total he has given to them since 2006 to roughly $60 billion, based on their value when received. Buffett said late Friday that the shares of Berkshire Hathaway will be delivered on Monday. Berkshire Hathaway owns Geico, Dairy Queen and a range of other businesses, and Buffett is donating nearly 12.4 million of the Class B shares of its stock. Those shares have a lower and easier-to-digest price tag than the company's original Class A shares, and each of the B shares was worth $485.68 at their most recent close on Friday. The largest tranche is going to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust, which will receive 9.4 million shares. The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation will receive 943,384 shares, and the Sherwood Foundation, Howard G. Buffett Foundation and NoVo Foundation will each receive 660,366 shares. Buffett made waves a year ago when he said he plans to cut off donations to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation after his death and let his three children decide how to distribute the rest of his fortune. Berkshire Hathaway's Class B stock has climbed 19.1 percent over the last 12 months, topping the broad U.S. stock market's return of 14.1 percent, including dividends. Buffett is famous on Wall Street for buying companies at good prices and being more conservative when prices look too high. The bargain-hunting approach has helped him amass a fortune worth about $145 billion, with basically all of it in Berkshire Hathaway's stock. 'Nothing extraordinary has occurred at Berkshire; a very long runway, simple and generally sound decisions, the American tailwind and compounding effects produced my current wealth,' Buffett said in a statement. 'My will provides that about 99½% of my estate is destined for philanthropic usage.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Wall Street rocked by heavyweight slugfest as investment titan lays down massive bet against $100bn company
Two billionaire Wall Street titans have gone to war over the rise of Bitcoin in the financial markets. The ongoing clash between cryptocurrency investor Michael Saylor and renowned financial skeptic James Chanos has sent shockwaves through the stock market. Saylor, the executive chairman of MicroStrategy, has built what he refers to as a 'treasury' of the cryptocurrency by amassing a huge stockpile of more than 500,000 Bitcoins over the past five years, reports the Washington Post. The investor has made billions out of the move as his company bought the currency through issuing stock and bonds, and he has seen his fortune skyrocket since President Trump was elected. Trump was once a crypto skeptic, but he has since become a keen supporter of the financial tool, even launching his own cryptocurrency, $TRUMP coin, in January. In May, Trump Media & Technology Group echoed Saylor's tactics by announcing it would raise $2.5 billion to build its own 'Bitcoin treasury.' Stocks in Saylor's company have risen an astronomic 1,500 percent since 2020, and his 'treasury' of Bitcoin is currently valued at almost double that of Bitcoin itself. The massive surge in price could have an impact on wallets across the country, as MicroStrategy is expected to join the S&P 500 - and many 401ks - at some point this year. But Chanos, a legendary Wall Street player known for betting against other companies, has gambled against Saylor's investments in a feud that could crater the stock market. Chanos announced at the Sohn Investment Conference in May that he was 'selling MicroStrategy stock and buying Bitcoin,' alleging in a subsequent CNBC interview that Saylor's 'treasury' is 'ridiculously' overvalued so he was shorting his firm. Chanos described his play of buying Bitcoin and shorting Saylor's company as the equivalent of buying something for $1 and selling it for $2.50. Jim Osman, founder of financial analysis firm Edge, told the Washington Post that the battle between the two titans has gripped traders on Wall Street, and is seen by many as a litmus test for the strength of the cryptocurrency industry at large. 'It's a poker game with very high stakes,' he said. 'One man has put everything on Bitcoin, predicting that it's the future of money. And the other man is saying it's all smoke and mirrors and that he is blinding you with science.' Osman said the clash comes down to one fundamental question: 'Do you want to bet on a dream, or do you want to bet against it?' Saylor's stockpile of over 500,000 Bitcoin is valued at around $59 billion. Chanos has long been a skeptic of cryptocurrency, and in 2018 he described it as a 'libertarian fantasy' to Cointelegraph. He has doubted the stability of Bitcoin because it is not backed by any major currency, and has labelled it 'the dark side of finance' due to its links to illegal activities. Take Compound ₿ — Michael Saylor (@saylor) June 26, 2025 Jim Chanos lays out his MSTR short strategy. 'I'm doing what Saylor is advocating. I'm selling MSTR securities to buy Bitcoin.' — Bitcoin News (@BitcoinNewsCom) June 14, 2025 Chanos has built his reputation, and net worth of around $2 billion, on shorting companies, and most famously bet against Enron before the company's accounting scandal in 2001. When Chanos laid down his gamble against Saylor in May, he said MicroStrategy's approach to cryptocurrency could lead other, less stable firms to follow suit, and ultimately lose money if he is correct. He said his trade is 'a good barometer of not only just the arbitrage itself, but I think of retail speculation', per Cointelegraph. Earlier this month, the feud between the two billionaires escalated as Saylor criticized Chanos on Bloomberg TV, warning that 'if our stock rallies up, he's going to get liquidated and wiped out.' The next day, Bloomberg showed Saylor's warning to Chanos, to which he responded: 'I always love it when management says: 'He just doesn't understand our business.' 'Michael Saylor is a wonderful salesman, but that's what he is: He's a salesman. … I call it financial gibberish.'