logo
Welcome to the Deepfake Economy

Welcome to the Deepfake Economy

Sometime last year, Ian Lamont's inbox began piling up with inquiries about a job listing. The Boston-based owner of a how-to guide company hadn't opened any new positions, but when he logged onto LinkedIn, he found one for a "Data Entry Clerk" linked to his business's name and logo.
Lamont soon realized his brand was being scammed, which he confirmed when he came across the profile of someone purporting to be his company's "manager." The account had fewer than a dozen connections and an AI-generated face. He spent the next few days warning visitors to his company's site about the scam and convincing LinkedIn to take down the fake profile and listing. By then, more than twenty people reached out to him directly about the job, and he suspects many more had applied.
Generative AI's potential to bolster business is staggering. According to one 2023 estimate from McKinsey, in the coming years it's expected to add more value to the global economy annually than the entire GDP of the United Kingdom. At the same time, GenAI's ability to almost instantaneously produce authentic-seeming content at mass scale has created the equally staggering potential to harm businesses.
Since ChatGPT's debut in 2022, online businesses have had to navigate a rapidly expanding deepfake economy, where it's increasingly difficult to discern whether any text, call, or email is real or a scam. In the past year alone, GenAI-enabled scams have quadrupled, according to the scam reporting platform Chainabuse. In a Nationwide insurance survey of small business owners last fall, a quarter reported having faced at least one AI scam in the past year. Microsoft says it now shuts down nearly 1.6 million bot-based signup attempts every hour. Renée DiResta, who researches online adversarial abuse at Georgetown University, tells me she calls the GenAI boom the "industrial revolution for scams" — as it automates frauds, lowers barriers to entry, reduces costs, and increases access to targets.
The consequences of falling for an AI-manipulated scam can be devastating. Last year, a finance clerk at the engineering firm Arup joined a video call with whom he believed were his colleagues. It turned out that each of the attendees was a deepfake recreation of a real coworker, including the organization's chief financial officer. The fraudsters asked the clerk to approve overseas transfers amounting to more than $25 million, and assuming the request came through the CFO, he green-lit the transaction.
Business Insider spoke with professionals in several industries — including recruitment, graphic design, publishing, and healthcare — who are scrambling to keep themselves and their customers safe against AI's ever-evolving threats. Many feel like they're playing an endless game of whack-a-mole, and the moles are only multiplying and getting more cunning.
Last year, fraudsters used AI to build a French-language replica of the online Japanese knives store Oishya, and sent automated scam offers to the company's 10,000-plus followers on Instagram. The fake company told customers of the real company they had won a free knife and that all they had to do was pay a small shipping fee to claim it — and nearly 100 people fell for it. Kamila Hankiewicz, who has run Oishya for nine years, learned about the scam only after several victims contacted her asking how long they needed to wait for the parcel to arrive.
It was a rude awakening for Hankiewicz. She's since ramped up the company's cybersecurity and now runs campaigns to teach customers how to spot fake communications. Though many of her customers were upset about getting defrauded, Hankiewicz helped them file reports with their financial institutions for refunds. Rattling as the experience was, "the incident actually strengthened our relationship with many customers who appreciated our proactive approach," she says.
Her alarm bells really went off once the interviewer asked her to share her driver's license.
Rob Duncan, the VP of strategy at the cybersecurity firm Netcraft, isn't surprised at the surge in personalized phishing attacks against small businesses like Oishya. GenAI tools now allow even a novice lone wolf with little technical know-how to clone a brand's image and write flawless, convincing scam messages within minutes, he says. With cheap tools, "attackers can more easily spoof employees, fool customers, or impersonate partners across multiple channels," Duncan says.
Though mainstream AI tools like ChatGPT have precautions in place when you ask them to infringe copyright, there are now plenty of free or inexpensive online services that allow users to replicate a business's website with simple text prompts. Using a tool called Llama Press, I was able to produce a near-exact clone of Hankiewicz's store, and personalize it from a few words of instructions. (Kody Kendall, Llama Press's founder, says cloning a store like Oshiya's doesn't trigger a safety block because there can be legitimate reasons to do so, like when a business owner is trying to migrate their website to a new hosting platform. He adds that Llama Press relies on Anthropic's and OpenAI's built-in safety checks to weed out bad-faith requests.)
Text is just one front of the war businesses are fighting against malicious uses of AI. With the latest tools, it takes a solo adversary — again with no technical expertise — as little as an hour to create a convincing fake job candidate to attend a video interview.
Tatiana Becker, a tech recruiter based in New York, tells me deepfake job candidates have become an "epidemic." Over the past couple years, she has had to frequently reject scam applicants who use deepfake avatars to cheat on interviews. At this point, she's able to discern some of their telltale signs of fakery, including a glitchy video quality and the candidate's refusal to switch up any element of their appearance during the call, such as taking off their headphones. Now, at the start of every interview she asks for the candidates' ID and poses more open-ended questions, like what they like to do in their free time, to suss out if they're a human. Ironically, she's made herself more robotic at the outset of interviews to sniff out the robots.
Nicole Yelland, a PR executive, says she found herself on the opposite end of deepfakery earlier this year. A scammer impersonating a startup recruiter approached her over email saying he was looking for a head of comms, with an offer package that included generous pay and benefits. The purported person even shared with her an exhaustive slide deck, decorated with AI-generated visuals, outlining the role's responsibilities and benefits. Enticed, she scheduled an interview.
During the video meeting, however, the "hiring manager" refused to speak, and instead asked Yelland to type her responses to the written questions in the Microsoft Teams chat section. Her alarm bells really went off once the interviewer started asking her to share a series of private documents, including her driver's license.
Yelland now runs a background check with tools like Spokeo before engaging with any stranger online. "It's annoying and takes more time, but engaging with a spammer is more annoying and time-consuming; so this is where we are," she says.
While videoconferencing platforms like Teams and Zoom are getting better at detecting AI-generated accounts, some experts say the detection itself risks creating an vicious cycle. The data these platforms collect on what's fake is ultimately used to train more sophisticated GenAI models, which will help them get better at escaping fakery detectors and fuel "an arms race defenders cannot win," says Jasson Casey, the CEO of Beyond Identity, a cybersecurity firm that specializes in identity theft. Casey and his company believe the focus should instead be on authenticating a person's identity. Beyond Identity sells tools that can be plugged into Zoom that verify meeting participants through their device's biometrics and location data. If it detects a discrepancy, the tools label the participants' video feed as "unverified." Tramèr Florian, a computer science professor at ETH Zurich, agrees that authenticating identity will likely become more essential to ensure that you're always talking to a legitimate colleague.
It's not just fake job candidates entrepreneurs now have to contend with, it's always fake versions of themselves. In late 2024, scammers ran ads on Facebook for a video featuring Jonathan Shaw, the deputy director of the Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute in Melbourne. Although the person in it looked and sounded exactly like Dr. Shaw, the voice had been deepfaked and edited to say that metformin — a first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes — is "dangerous," and patients should instead switch to an unproven dietary supplement. The fake ad was accompanied by a fake written news interview with Shaw.
Several of his clinic's patients, believing the video was genuine, reached out asking how to get a hold of the supplement. "One of my longstanding patients asked me how come I continued to prescribe metformin to him, when 'I' had said on the video that it was a poor drug," Shaw tells me. Eventually he was able to get Facebook to take down the video.
Then there's the equally vexing and annoying issue of AI slop — an inundation of low-quality, mass-produced images and text that is flooding the internet and making it ever-more difficult for the average person to tell what's real or fake. In her research, DiResta found instances where social platforms' recommendation engines have promoted malicious slop — where scammers would put up images of items like nonexistent rental properties, appliances, and more that users were frequently falling for it and giving away their payment details.
On Pinterest, AI-generated "inspo" posts have plagued people's mood boards — so much so that Philadelphia-based Cake Life Shop now often receives orders from customers asking them to recreate what are actually AI-generated cakes. In one shared with Business Insider, the cake resembles a moss-filled rainforest, and features a functional waterfall. Thankfully for cofounder Nima Etemadi, most customers are "receptive to hearing about what is possible with real cake after we burst their AI bubble," he says.
Similarly, AI-generated books have swarmed Amazon and are now hurting publisher sales.
Pauline Frommer, the president of the travel guide publisher Frommer Media, says that AI-generated guidebooks have managed to reach the top of lists with the help of fake reviews. An AI publisher buys a few Prime memberships, sets the guidebook's ebook price to zero, and then leaves seemingly "verified reviews" by downloading its copies for free. These practices, she says, "will make it virtually impossible for a new, legitimate brand of guidebook to enter the business right now." Ian Lamont says he received an AI-generated guidebook as a gift last year: a text-only guide to Taiwan, with no pictures or maps.
While the FTC now considers it illegal to publish fake, AI-generated product reviews, official policies haven't yet caught up with AI-generated content itself. Platforms like Pinterest and Google have started to watermark and label AI-generated posts, but since it's not error-free yet, some worry these measures may do more harm than good. DiResta fears that a potential unintended consequence of ubiquitous AI labels would be people experiencing "label fatigue," where they blindly assume that unlabeled content is therefore always "real." "It's a potentially dangerous assumption if a sophisticated manipulator, like a state actor's intelligence service, manages to get disinformation content past a labeler," she says.
For now, small business owners should stay vigilant, says Robin Pugh, the executive director of Intelligence for Good, a non-profit that helps victims of internet-enabled crimes. They should always validate they're dealing with an actual human and that the money they're sending is actually going where they intend it to go.
Etemadi of Cake Life Shop recognizes that for as much as GenAI can help his business become more efficient, scam artists will ultimately use the same tools to become just as efficient. "Doing business online gets more necessary and high risk every year," he says. "AI is just part of that."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Celtics offseason tracker: A closer look at how the roster has changed via trades, signings, and salary cap moves
Celtics offseason tracker: A closer look at how the roster has changed via trades, signings, and salary cap moves

Boston Globe

time26 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Celtics offseason tracker: A closer look at how the roster has changed via trades, signings, and salary cap moves

Boston still has some work to do with Al Horford yet to sign a new deal, but any move for Horford will require shifting another contract — perhaps either Anfernee Simons or Georges Niang, the returns from the two June trades — to be under the second apron. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Read on for a breakdown of the Celtics' cap situation and a recap of all the moves this offseason, which will be updated throughout the summer. Advertisement Acquisitions: Departures: Advertisement Unsigned free agents: Al Horford (unrestricted) Celtics 2025-26 salary (as of July 2): $208,444,487 First apron space (as of July 2): -$12,499,487 Second apron space (as of July 2): -$620,487 June 23 — Celtics trade Jrue Holiday to Portland for Anfernee Simons, picks The Celtics' offseason revamp kicked into gear during NBA Draft week, as news broke late on the night of June 23 that Boston was trading guard Jrue Holiday to Portland in exchange for Anfernee Simons and two second-round draft picks. It was the first of two expected trades for the Celtics to cut salary, with Boston getting out from the $72 million owed to Holiday over the next two seasons while absorbing Simons's expiring $27.7 million deal. The move saved the Celtics just under $5 million in salary, which in turn saved around $40 million in luxury tax penalties with the team so far above the second apron. June 24 — Celtics trade Kristaps Porzingis to Hawks for Georges Niang, swap picks The second of two trades that had been speculated on since the Celtics' unexpected playoff exit, Brad Stevens managed to get the team under the second apron in the space of less than 24 hours when he traded Kristaps Porzingis to the Hawks. The deal brought back Lawrence native Georges Niang and also saw Boston trade the lesser of its two second-round picks in 2026 while receiving a 2031 second-rounder. By shifting Porzingis's $30.8 million salary for next season and taking on just Niang's expiring $8.2 million, Boston was able to shed $22.6 million in salary. Advertisement June 25-26 — Celtics draft Hugo González, Amari Williams, and Max Shulga The Celtics stayed pretty quiet on the trade front through the draft, shuffling around a couple of picks but otherwise holding firm with their assets. Boston made three selections: Spanish wing Hugo González (first round, 28th), Kentucky center Amari Williams (second round, 46th), and VCU guard Max Shulga (second round, 57th). While Williams and Shulga will likely sign two-way deals, González's rookie deal will pay him $14.3 million over four years, and a $2.8 million salary next season. June 30 — Luke Kornet signs with Spurs in free agency, Celtics sign Luke Garza The Celtics had two unrestricted free agents to try to retain in free agency, and one of them walked within hours of the negotiating period opening. Center Luke Kornet, a fan favorite who had a breakout season and earned significant playing time in the postseason for the first time, signed a four-year, $41 million deal — a number Boston couldn't come close to matching without dipping back into the second apron. With Kornet gone, Boston made a move to shore up its depth down low, adding former Minnesota big man Luka Garza on a two-year, $5.5 million deal that will pay him around $2.4 million next season July 1 — Celtics sign Josh Minott, move back above second apron The Celtics made a second free agent signing of a former Timberwolves player, adding Josh Minott on a two-year, $5 million contract. Minott's deal not only fills out Boston's roster at 15, but it also moves the Celtics back over the second apron (by less than $1 million), meaning any move to retain Al Horford will requite Boston to shift another contract. Advertisement Amin Touri can be reached at

Fast-food restaurants are using their wealth of data to harness AI in their supply chains
Fast-food restaurants are using their wealth of data to harness AI in their supply chains

Business Insider

time27 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Fast-food restaurants are using their wealth of data to harness AI in their supply chains

Fast-food chain Juici Patties, which operates more than 70 locations in Florida, New York, and Jamaica, started on the island nation as a family kitchen in 1978. When the chain expanded into the US last year, it experienced stockouts. Executives knew they needed a different strategy — one with advanced technology to scale their business, manage franchises, and sell thousands of patties each day, Stuart Levy, the company's chief technology officer, told Business Insider. Today, Juici Patties uses AI's predictive and proactive features to prevent disruptions before they occur. "AI is helping to keep our distribution centers stocked with enough of our branded packaging to meet demand," Levy said. Indeed, AI technology is making its way into quick-service and fast-casual restaurant operations. AI can use data to form predictions about customer orders, then generate insights for leaders on how to manage inventory and operations. Domino's Pizza and Microsoft teamed up to create a generative-AI assistant that saves managers time on inventory management and ingredient ordering. Starbucks also inked a deal with Microsoft to use genAI in its product development. And Yum Brands, the parent company of KFC, Taco Bell, and others, partnered with Nvidia on AI for internal tasks such as labor management and analytics processing. For many quick-service restaurants, "their entire brand is built on speed and efficiency," said Spencer Michiel, the restaurant technology advisor at Back of House, a resource for restaurant tech solutions. "If there's anything that can help them with speed, efficiency, and lower cost, they're going to jump all over it." Data-rich restaurants layer on AI Restaurants are "extremely data-rich," Michiel said, which makes them well-suited to adopt AI. Major fast-food chains already have standard operating procedures to purchase based on demand, but AI takes that to the next level with forecasting abilities that more accurately predict demand and inform supply. With AI's forecasting capabilities, restaurants can predict what customers might order and use this data to buy ingredients, a notoriously tricky part of restaurant supply chain management. "The biggest thing that restaurants do badly is purchase," said Stephen Zagor, a consultant focused on restaurants and food businesses and an adjunct assistant professor of business at Columbia Business School. AI draws from quick-service restaurants' internal point-of-sale data, such as sales trends and which products customers tend to buy at the same time. Then, an AI algorithm combines this data with external factors like the weather or local events. "The beauty of AI is it's taking forecasted demand and turning that into a reaction all the way through the supply chain," Zagor said. For example, AI can deliver granular data by location. For a restaurant right off an interstate, AI could predict that travel will slow down on certain days. Seeing that prediction, restaurant managers could decide to drop their inventory levels and purchase fewer items, Zagor said. He named McDonald's as one quick-service restaurant that uses AI to maximize everything from its point-of-sale to its supply chain. The fast-food giant has partnered with Google Cloud and IBM on various AI solutions. When it comes to data and AI, the level of standardization across major chains puts them at an advantage over smaller franchises and independent restaurants. A mom-and-pop restaurant may not have "the time, the bandwidth, the skills, the knowledge" to gather data and create an action plan, Michiel said. Subscribing to software can cost hundreds of dollars each month, presenting financial barriers to small businesses. Any new back-of-house or supply chain software would need to integrate with existing point-of-sale systems. If done incorrectly, the result could be data loss or lag, "and it's going to be frustrating," Michiel said. Serving up efficiency and financial gains AI's predictive power can also help minimize waste in restaurant supply chains. If a restaurant orders too much, it could have to discard unused or expired food. This could require the business to increase meal costs to compensate for the loss, according to Michiel. "Food waste is just a killer," Michiel said. "Over-ordering is straight loss. There's no way you're going to recover that cost." Controlling costs is especially critical for fast-food chains, which order at scale and sell low-priced products. Making just 5 cents more on an item, or making 5 cents fewer, "is a big deal," Zagor said. AI can also promote cost savings by flagging if a particular ingredient swap could result in higher profits without sacrificing taste or quality. The technology "smooths out" a restaurant's ability to purchase inventory while still keeping customer satisfaction top of mind, Zagor said. "You can get good profit, and the customer is going to be happy," Zagor said. "It's win-win." Levy said Juici Patties' AI implementation into its point-of-sale system and supply chain was time-consuming, involved some growing pains, and sparked fears about replacing the workforce with AI. He acknowledged that "AI isn't flawless." Now that the technology is in place, though, Juici Patties has seen a boost in operational efficiency, Levy said. In one instance, the AI revealed that customers wanted to purchase food earlier in the day, before Juici Patties locations were open. "We were missing potential sales during earlier hours of the day," Levy said. The restaurant chain acted upon that information and adjusted its opening times. The result: "a consistent increase in daily sales," Levy said.

Is Nvidia Stock a Buy After Its Red-Hot 6-Day Win Streak?
Is Nvidia Stock a Buy After Its Red-Hot 6-Day Win Streak?

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is Nvidia Stock a Buy After Its Red-Hot 6-Day Win Streak?

Nvidia (NVDA) — the poster child of Wall Street's artificial intelligence (AI) mania — is revered as the chip king powering the generative AI explosion, and its role has become bigger than ever. Last week, NVDA stock reminded everyone why. Nvidia blazed through a red-hot six-day win streak, rallying more than 10% and notching fresh all-time highs. It reclaimed its throne as the world's most valuable company, edging past Microsoft (MSFT). Investors shrugged off China jitters, bolstered by CEO Jensen Huang's AI and robotics vision and optimism at the annual shareholder meeting. Michael Saylor Says 'You'll Wish You'd Bought More' Bitcoin as MicroStrategy Doubles Down Is Microsoft Stock About to Go Nuclear? Wolfspeed Is Surging After Filing for Bankruptcy. Is It Too Late to Touch WOLF Stock Here? Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Loop Capital analyst Ananda Baruah helped reignite the rally, lifting the price target to a Street-high $250 and hailing Nvidia as the epicenter of a wave in AI spending. Meanwhile, Nvidia's new Blackwell chips and AI-fueled demand paint a bold path to a $6 trillion valuation. Sure, insiders have offloaded more than $1 billion in stock over the past one year, but investor confidence hasn't flinched. So, after a fiery six-day surge and bullish upgrades, is NVDA stock still worth buying? Nvidia hardly needs an introduction. It is the undisputed powerhouse behind the AI chip revolution. Boasting a market capitalization of $3.7 trillion, it earned its crown by building graphics processing units (GPUs), the brains of modern AI. Initially famed for fueling gaming and graphics, Nvidia rose to global prominence by pivoting early into AI, becoming the go-to supplier for Big Tech's data-center ambitions. Now, CEO Jensen Huang has his sights on a new power play: sovereign AI. As countries push to build AI ecosystems free from Silicon Valley's grip, Nvidia is arming them with the tools — Blackwell GPUs, AI factories, and more. From Europe to the Middle East, billion-dollar deals are stacking up. Nvidia kicked off 2025 with storm clouds overhead. China export curbs, rising tariffs, and geopolitical heat weighed heavily on investors' sentiment. CEO Jensen Huang warned about potential fallout from losing access to a $50 billion market, and for a while, NVDA stock faltered. But momentum flipped fast. The AI chip king roared back, surging over 40% in just the past three months and climbing 14% over the past month. In fact, NVDA stock touched a fresh high of $158.71 on June 27. Loop Capital's Street-high price target lit the fuse, but Huang's talk of multi-trillion-dollar AI frontiers is what's keeping the bulls charged. Additionally, confidence is rising that China's export limits won't unseat Nvidia's AI dominance, especially as global demand for compute power continues to break records. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is now above 76, firmly in overbought territory. That signals red-hot momentum but simultaneously flashes a red flag that a breather may be near. NVDA stock currently trades at 39 times forward earnings and 29 times forward sales, a premium to the sector median and hardly cheap on the surface. But it's a discount compared to its historical average. Digging deeper, with earnings projected to grow by double digits this year and next and margins holding strong, NVDA stock's valuation looks more balanced than bloated. Its PEG ratio of 1.4 times even leans attractive. Free cash flow (FCF) rose 75% annually, and management is utilizing it, spending over $14 billion on buybacks in Q1 alone. The dividend remains tiny with a 0.03% yield, but capital returns are clearly gaining steam. When you combine explosive AI demand, disciplined capital allocation, and a runway for growth, the premium feels less speculative and more like a calculated bet on long-term dominance. On May 28, Nvidia reported its first-quarter fiscal 2026 earnings, and it was nothing short of impressive. Revenue surged to $44.1 billion, climbing 12% sequentially and 69% year-over-year (YOY), beating even the most bullish Street estimates. The firepower came from Nvidia's data center segment, which pulled $39.1 billion, a blistering 73% YOY surge. Data center revenue accounted for a dominant 88% of total revenue. Gaming wasn't asleep either, clocking a record $3.8 billion, up 48% sequentially and 42% YOY. But it wasn't all clean lines and green candles. U.S. export restrictions on H20 AI chips to China delivered a $4.5 billion body blow, tied to excess inventory and purchase commitments. That charge dragged GAAP gross margin down to 60.5%, with non-GAAP settling at 61%. Strip out the charge, and Nvidia's non-GAAP gross margin hit a far healthier 71.3%. Non-GAAP EPS landed at $0.81, up 33% annually. That figure would have soared to $0.96 without the China hit. Even so, the market gave its nod, and NVDA stock rose 3.3% on May 29, signaling investor confidence despite the headwinds. Looking ahead, management expects approximately $45 billion in Q2 revenue. That's with a potential $8 billion punch from H20 export curbs already factored in. With AI appetite surging worldwide, Nvidia's vision remains sharply focused, even if the road now includes navigating geopolitical turbulence alongside record-breaking growth. Analysts monitoring Nvidia remain upbeat about the company's growth. For Q2, they expect profits to climb 43% YOY to $0.93 per share. Looking further ahead, fiscal 2026 EPS is forecast to rise 36% annually to $4, followed by another surge of 32% to $5.29 in fiscal 2027. Loop Capital is betting big on Nvidia's future. Analyst Ananda Baruah recently boosted his NVDA price target to $250 from $175, reaffirming a 'Buy' rating. The analyst's bullish stance stems from what he calls a 'Golden Wave' of generative AI, with Nvidia sitting firmly at the center. According to Loop, AI compute spending could skyrocket to $2 trillion by 2028, fueled by hyperscalers, sovereign AI initiatives, and the accelerating buildout of AI factories. Nvidia's upcoming Blackwell chips, designed for high-intensity reasoning models, are expected to hit full production by the October quarter, another growth catalyst. Despite Nvidia's massive rally, the analyst sees more runway ahead. In his view, Nvidia isn't peaking — it's just getting warmed up. Meanwhile, Wedbush analyst Dan Ives is also bullish, calling Nvidia the backbone of the AI revolution. With sovereign AI investments ramping and chip demand hitting escape velocity, Ives sees Nvidia becoming the world's first $4 trillion company this year. Ives reaffirmed his 'Outperform' rating and a $175 price target on the AI chip stock. Overall, analysts are optimistic about NVDA, giving the stock a 'Strong Buy' consensus rating. Of the 44 analysts covering the stock, 37 advise a 'Strong Buy' while three suggest a 'Moderate Buy,' three advise a 'Hold,' and one suggests a 'Strong Sell" rating. The average analyst price target for NVDA stock is $176.62, indicating potential upside of more than 12%. Loop Capital's Street-high target price of $250 suggests that shares could rally as much as 59% from here. Nvidia's six-day rally and soaring valuation may look like a victory lap, but this is not without warning signs. Wall Street remains enamored as price targets rise and bulls view sovereign AI as the next trillion-dollar goldmine. But insiders are quietly cashing out, and competitors are rewriting the rules, shifting AI's future from brute-force GPU scaling to leaner, smarter architectures. Meanwhile, China's market has effectively closed to the U.S. industry. Sure, Nvidia still leads the charge. Its chips remain the backbone of AI infrastructure. But markets priced for perfection leave little room for detours. With valuation multiples high and forward growth tied to long-cycle plays, the path ahead demands more than just dominance. It demands reinvention. After this red-hot streak, the real question is not whether Nvidia is a giant. It's whether Nvidia's next leap will outpace the growing weight of its own story. On the date of publication, Sristi Suman Jayaswal did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store