
Welsh Labour told to focus on young people, councils and tourism to win election
The political scene in Wales is facing increasing examination as North Wales Live readers share their thoughts on Labour's record and future outlook. There's a significant sense of discontent among the public, especially concerning the Senedd, the Welsh Assembly.
It's clear that Labour in Wales holds a unique position, having maintained power for a prolonged period and still commanding substantial backing. Nonetheless, beneath the "Welsh Labour" label lies a diverse group of individuals rather than a cohesive unit.
The party's leadership in Wales is headed by a figure who wasn't the first choice among numerous elected members and didn't win a ballot of party members. Simultaneously, at the national level, the party leader, although triumphant in the leadership contest, is experiencing dwindling approval ratings.
These dynamics are critical, as Labour prepares for a demanding year ahead, confronting challenges on two primary fronts: the rising appeal of Reform's populist stance and the long-standing rivalry with Plaid Cymru.
One reader, Alwyn67 believes: "Personally, I think Labour will perform poorly in the next Senedd elections, primarily due to the party's unpopularity in Westminster. The vast majority of people I speak to barely know what the Assembly does, let alone name any of its successes over the past 25 years. To be fair, there have been some achievements; new primary school buildings, better covid response, free school meals, improved transport for example. However, policies like the Senedd expansion, the 20mph speed limit, and declining performance in NHS and education are areas where Labour seems unwilling to be honest about the shortcomings or acknowledge lessons learned.
"At Westminster, Labour is really struggling with the difficult realities the country faces - an ageing population, long-term issues caused by Covid, stubborn inflation, a massive public sector deficit (£120 bn per year), and an economy projected to shrink by another 5% over the next five years, on top of the 5% hit already caused by Brexit. Regardless of political leaning; Plaid or Reform voters, left or right, i can't see any easy way out of this. Things are likely to get worse before they get better. Just look at the debate currently going through Parliament on health-related benefits have risen from £20 bn in 2020 to £40 bn in 2025 and are projected to reach £66 bn by 2030. To manage that alone, spending would need to be cut by £26 billion over the next five years. And labour are trying to push through reforms that reduce that only reduce this by 3bn to 23 bn per year."
Dye feels: "There are probably less opportunities for young people in Wales than other parts of the UK. Wales' biggest asset is probably tourism. This current Welsh assembly has needlessly spent money on vanity projects to put themselves on the map instead of focusing on the Welsh economy. The poor infrastructure of getting to tourist locations, high level of parking charges, double Council tax rates for 2nd homes is destroying tourist businesses all over Wales. Poor funding to Councils has resulted in higher Council tax rates with less or poorer services. It's time to let someone else have a go of putting Wales back on its feet."
Expatboyo says: "After so many years of browbeating the people of Wales with their dictatorial ways, the consequences for Labour are becoming clear."
Jonesey1 writes: "Difficult choices to be made at the next election : Welsh Tories have little to no chance. Welsh Labour have mucked it up for a quarter of a century. Plaid Cymru are untested but are unassailably Welsh which might swing it for them. Welsh Liberal Democrats, maybe. Reform UK, no policies other than 'stop the foreigners'. Soooo, decisions, decisions, incapables or no-hopers."
Ofcourseitis comments: "A party on the edge hmm let's analyse why - 20mph, article 4, NHS, Pisa education results tourist tax, 10% hikes in council tax, Cardiff Airport, alcohol tax, meddling with school holidays, cancelling all road projects, meal deal bans, mandatory Welsh lessons, trees in Africa, fields for concerts, active travel routes, net zero everything, anything else?"
SCATHINGPEN thinks: "If Labour retain control of the Assembly (sic) after next year's elections in Wales then Wales is finally and irrevocably finished. If it's bad now, wait and see a few years down the line if Labour continue to hold power."
Toxteth O'Grady thinks: "North Wales is an afterthought in both Cardiff and Westminster. We would be better off aligning with our closest neighbours over the border. They are also hard done by by the London based and obsessed political parties."
Weneedpie questions: "It will be interesting to see how the new polling system work in Wales, and whether with the 'closed proportional list system' it more closely resembles voting cast. In other countries a voting system such as this tends to lead to closer outcomes, with no party gaining enough seats for overall control. Plaid Cymru and Labour in alliance maybe? There is still a long way to go and a week is a long time in politics, but I hope people vote on the issues, and the policies and are not persuaded by a social media party with its cult leader and no costed policies nor yet a party leader for Wales. We really do not need an overlord from Clacton telling us what to do."
Do you feel that the Welsh Labour party's days are numbered? Comment below or HERE to join in the conversation.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
28 minutes ago
- Times
Jeremy Corbyn confirms new party but left-wing allies not joining
Jeremy Corbyn has confirmed plans for a new political party to challenge Sir Keir Starmer on the left in a bungled launch that has failed to secure the backing of the former Labour leader's traditional allies. Corbyn said discussions were ongoing and that 'the democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape'. Zarah Sultana, the former Labour MP, announced on Thursday night that she would 'co-lead the founding of a new party' with Corbyn. But the former Labour leader was said to be angry with the intervention, which he saw as premature. In a statement on Friday, he did not confirm Sultana's co-leadership role, only saying that she 'will help us build a real alternative'. Some of Corbyn 's most senior backers during his time as Labour leader are understood not to be interested in joining the new party. John McDonnell, the former shadow chancellor, Diane Abbott, the former shadow home secretary, and Clive Lewis, the former shadow defence secretary, have all indicated they will not be resigning from the Labour Party to join the new project. Polling from More in Common suggests a hypothetical new party with Corbyn as leader could receive 10 per cent of the vote and become the most popular single party among 18 to 24-year-olds. Labour's overall vote would decrease from 23 per cent to 20 per cent, the polling suggests, and cut the Green Party's support from 9 per cent to 5 per cent. Corbyn has been building a network of former Labour and pro-Gaza independent councillors for months, in a bid to stand formal candidates in time for the May local elections next year. He said on Friday: 'Real change is coming. One year on from the election, this Labour government has refused to deliver the change people expected and deserved. Poverty, inequality and war are not inevitable. Our country needs to change direction, now. • 'Congratulations to Zarah Sultana on her principled decision to leave the Labour Party. I am delighted that she will help us build a real alternative. The democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape. 'Discussions are ongoing, and I am excited to work alongside all communities to fight for the future people deserve. Together, we can create something that is desperately missing from our broken political system: hope.' Sultana said on Thursday night that she was quitting Starmer's party, accusing the government of 'wanting to make disabled people suffer', and being an 'active participant in genocide' in Gaza. In a dig at the government's much-revised welfare reform, Sultana accused the government of wanting to 'make disabled people suffer; they just can't decide how much'. Four of the seven MPs who had the Labour whip suspended last summer for supporting an amendment to the King's Speech relating to the two-child benefit cap had it restored earlier this year. The three who remain as independents are McDonnell, Sultana and Apsana Begum. McDonnell said he was 'dreadfully sorry' to see Sultana quit the party. Last year Corbyn formed an independent alliance with four others who were elected as independents in the general election, all standing on a pro-Palestine ticket in heavily Muslim inner-city areas. Sultana's departure makes her the sixth MP in the alliance, alongside Corbyn, giving the group a bigger presence in the Commons than the Greens and Plaid Cymru. The creation of a new party would consolidate independents but could also splinter the vote on the left. But Zack Polanski, the favourite to win the Green leadership contest, suggested he could work with the new party. 'Anyone who wants to take on the Tories, Reform and this failing Labour government is a friend of mine', he said. 'Looking forward to seeing what this looks like in practice.' George Galloway, whose Workers Party candidate came within 700 votes of unseating Jess Phillips, the Home Office minister, said he would not be joining up because of 'significant differences on the issues of trans and LGBTQ+, the Russia-Ukraine war, net zero and other things'. But, he added, 'we are open to an electoral agreement which avoids us both fighting each other for the benefit of Starmer'. Corbyn was suspended from Labour in 2020 after he refused to fully accept the Equality and Human Rights Commission's findings that the party had broken equality law when he was in charge, and said antisemitism had been 'dramatically overstated for political reasons'. He was blocked from standing for Labour at last year's general election and expelled in the spring of 2024 after announcing he would stand as an independent candidate in his Islington North constituency, which he won with a majority of more than 7,000.

The National
44 minutes ago
- The National
Protesters stage demonstration inside Reform UK's London HQ
Campaigners who wore masks of Farage along with the faces of other well-known billionaires like Elon Musk, Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos, held books with slogans like 'profit over people' and 'the art of hoarding wealth'. Signs were also erected outside the Reform headquarters, which read 'fast track: tax breaks super rich only' and 'wait here: NHS delays, housing crisis, rising bills, extreme weather'. READ MORE: Court bid to block Palestine Action terrorist ban fails Along with the pictures of the demonstration, GNDR posted a statement on Instagram which read: 'Kicking off the PAY UP Day of Action in style this morning. 'In LONDON we're at Reform UK's HQ where Nigel Farage is rolling out the red carpet for the super-rich - promising tax breaks for his billionaire mates like Nick Candy while the rest of us pay the price with crumbling schools, hospitals and homes.' View this post on Instagram A post shared by Green New Deal Rising (@gndrising) The protest comes after Farage said last month his party would reinstate non-dom status for wealthy individuals in exchange for a £250,000 one-off fee, which would be given to Britain's poorest workers. However, experts have warned that the policy could cost the UK around £34 billion and that some highly skilled and highly paid professionals would not be able to afford the £250,000. Farage has also previously been criticised for cosing up with billionaires, as Musk's father said in December, the Reform leader would get a $100 million donation if it is needed to ensure that the party wins the next General Election.


South Wales Guardian
44 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
MPs back move to protect llamas and alpacas from dog attacks
Dog owners already face a fine if their pet attacks or worries farm animals listed in the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953, such as cattle, sheep, pigs and horses. But after a Commons debate, MPs have agreed to add 'camelids' to this list, giving llamas and alpacas in England and Wales similar protections as they have in Scotland. The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill, which now faces further scrutiny in the Lords at a later date, will also see unlimited fines rolled out in dog attack cases, lifting a £1,000 cap. 'They're no laughing matter, alpacas and llamas,' Labour MP Peter Lamb said. 'The Inca empire never developed the wheel. 'The entirety of that empire was built off the back of alpacas and llamas and, as a result, they are an animal that's worthy of great respect.' Mr Lamb said he had heard of 'pretty harrowing cases of what happened to that livestock' at a centre in Tilgate Park in Crawley, West Sussex, where he was the borough council leader. 'In one case, a sheep was just literally set on fire whilst still alive and while the Bill does not directly deal with that, I think some of the mentality that goes into disrespecting these animals is worthy of note,' he said. 'But what we have done is very often, far more often than that, had dogs set on these animals, or at least, people have not been in control of these. 'And we've eventually had to remove the sheep entirely from the publicly accessible areas on the basis of that.' Conservative MP for Chester South and Eddisbury Aphra Brandreth, who proposed the private member's Bill, told the Commons: 'Livestock worrying, as we know, has devastating consequences for both animals and farmers.' She added: 'The damage of a livestock attack can be horrific, causing brutal injuries which are tragically often fatal. 'There are instances of stress causing pregnant livestock to miscarry, and separation of mothers and young leading to hypothermia or starvation. 'I've seen pictures from farmers in my constituency where attacks have mutilated their calves beyond any hope of keeping them alive. 'The consequences, no matter what the scale of an attack, are profound.' As part of the draft new law, authorities would get the powers to treat attacking livestock as separate to 'worrying', which includes chasing farm animals in a way which could cause injury, suffering or loss or 'diminution in their produce'. The Bill would also expand the 1953 Act's scope, which applies on agricultural land, to roads and paths, where animals might be herded. Labour MP Mike Reader praised Ms Brandreth for her 'responsible and balanced approach'. The Northampton South MP said it was 'positive that this expands that definition to roads and paths, because it sets clear requirements that when someone is accessing land, particularly throughout Northamptonshire where there're so many paths that run through farmland, there's a clear definition in the law to both protect farmers but also to set clear boundaries for those who are perhaps walking their dogs… when they access farmland'. Environment minister Emma Hardy said the Government was 'fully committed to supporting this important Bill as it progresses through the other place', before the Bill cleared the Commons at third reading.