Aurora Mayor John Laesch to hear from community through town hall tour
The Community Listening and Action Town Hall Tour, officially announced late Monday, will be held four Saturdays in a row beginning on July 26. The workshops will be held from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. at locations across the city designed to cover each of the 10 wards, according to a city news release.
'We want to give the community an opportunity to provide feedback on the state of Aurora,' Laesch said in the news release. 'This listening tour will help my staff and I to better understand what our residents want to see from us and the City over the next four years.'
The first stop in the series will be at Metea Valley High School, 1801 N. Eola Road, a location that city officials say will cover the 1st Ward and the 10th Ward, on July 26.
On the following Saturday, Aug. 2, a session will be held at the city's Public Works building at 2185 Liberty Street, which is for residents of the 2nd Ward, 3rd Ward and 7th Ward.
Residents of the 8th Ward and 9th Ward will get their town hall on Aug. 9 at the Eola Community Center, located at 555 S. Eola Road.
The last stop on the tour will be on Aug. 16 at the Prisco Community Center, 150 W. Illinois Avenue, for residents of the 4th Ward, 5th Ward and 6th Ward.
Translation services and devices will be available upon request, and childcare will be available at the Eola Community Center session and the Prisco Community Center session.
Residents can reserve their seat ahead of time at www.aurora.il.us/CommunityListening.
Each of the sessions will give residents the chance to work directly with city leadership, according to the city news release.
'We want to be responsive to the needs of our residents,' Aurora Chief of Staff Shannon Cameron said in the release. 'These town halls will not only assist us in serving the city, but also encourage civic engagement, helping to build towards the goal of a people-centered government.'
Laesch was talking about doing a citywide listening tour even before he was sworn in as mayor. On election night in April, he said he wanted to use the tour to introduce himself to the city's different communities and share his vision for the future of Aurora, but also to listen to residents' concerns so the city can be more responsive.
His number one goal as mayor, he said on election night, would be to respond to Aurora residents.
Already, Laesch has held listening sessions for those in downtown, specifically within the city's Special Service Area Number One.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
44 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump's modest spending cuts package survives narrow Senate vote as some Republicans break ranks
What can you get for $9.4 billion? 3G Capital recently purchased footwear giant Skechers for $9.4 billion. $9.4 billion could cover your rent for a pretty nice apartment in New York City for more than 40,000 years. Yes, it will just be you and the cockroaches by then. Or, you could pay the cost of every major disaster in the past four decades – ranging from Chernobyl to Fukushima to Hurricane Sandy. But $9.4 billion isn't a lot when cast against nearly $7 trillion in annual spending by the federal government. And it's really not much money when you consider that the U.S. is about slip into the red to the tune of $37 trillion. Which brings us to the Congressional plan to cancel spending. That is, a measure from Republicans and the Trump Administration to rescind spending lawmakers already appropriated in March. The House and Senate are now clawing back money lawmakers shoved out the door for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and foreign aid programs under USAID. The original proposal cut $9.4 billion. But that figure dwindled to $9 billion – after the Senate restored money for "PEPFAR," a President George W. Bush era program to combat AIDS worldwide. In other words, you may have a couple thousand years lopped off from your rent-controlled apartment in New York City. Of course that hinges on what Democratic mayoral nominee Zorhan Mamdani decides to do, should he win election this fall. Anyway, back to Congressional spending. Or "un-spending." The House passed the original version of the bill in June, 216-214. Flip one vote and the bill would have failed on a 215-215 tie. Then it was on to the Senate. Republicans had to summon Vice President Vance to Capitol Hill to break a logjam on two procedural votes to send the spending cancellation bill to the floor and actually launch debate. Republicans have a 53-47 advantage in the Senate. But former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., along with Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska and Susan Collins, R-Maine, voted nay – producing a 50-50 tie. Fox is told some Senate Republicans are tiring of McConnell opposing the GOP – and President Trump – on various issues. That includes the nay votes to start debate on the spending cancellation bill as well as his vote against the confirmation of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in January. "He used to be the Leader. He was always telling us we need to stick together," said one GOP senator who requested anonymity. "Now he's off voting however he wants? How time flies." Note that McConnell led Senate Republicans as recently as early January. But McConnell ultimately voted for the legislation when the Senate approved it 51-48 at 2:28 am ET Thursday morning. Murkowski and Collins were the only noes. The services of Vice President Vance weren't needed due to McConnell's aye vote and the absence of Sen. Tina Smith, D-Minn. She fell ill and was admitted to George Washington Hospital for exhaustion. As for the senior senator from Alaska, one GOP senator characterized it as "Murkowski fatigue." "She always asking. She's always wanting more," groused a Senate Republican. Murkowski secured an agreement on rural hospitals in exchange for her vote in favor of the Big, Beautiful Bill earlier this month. However, Murkowski did not secure more specificity on the DOGE cuts or help with rural, public radio stations in Alaska on the spending cut plan. "My vote is guided by the imperative of coming from Alaskans. I have a vote that I am free to cast, with or without the support of the President. My obligation is to my constituents and to the Constitution," said Murkowski. "I don't disagree that NPR over the years has tilted more partisan. That can be addressed. But you don't need to gut the entire Corporation for Public Broadcasting." In a statement, Collins blasted the Trump administration for a lack of specificity about the precision of the rescissions request. Collins, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee in charge of the federal purse strings, also criticized the administration a few months ago for a paucity of detail in the President's budget. "The rescissions package has a big problem – nobody really knows what program reductions are in it. That isn't because we haven't had time to review the bill," said Collins in a statement. "Instead, the problem is that OMB (the Office of Management and Budget) has never provided the details that would normally be part of this process." Collins wasn't the only Republican senator who worried about how the administration presented the spending cut package to Congress. Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., fretted about Congress ceding the power of the purse to the administration. But unlike Collins, Wicker supported the package. "If we do this again, please give us specific information about where the cuts will come. Let's not make a habit of this," said Wicker. "If you come back to us again from the executive branch, give us the specific amounts in the specific programs that will be cut." DOGE recommended the cuts. In fact, most of the spending reductions targeted by DOGE don't go into effect unless Congress acts. But even the $9.4 billion proved challenging to cut. "We should be able to do that in our sleep. But there is looking like there's enough opposition," said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on Fox Business. So to court votes, GOP leaders salvaged $400 million for PEPFAR. "There was a lot of interest among our members in doing something on the PEPFAR issue," said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. "You're still talking about a $9 billion rescissions package - even with that small modification." The aim to silence public broadcasting buoyed some Republicans. "North Dakota Public Radio - about 26% of their budget is federal funding. To me, that's more of an indictment than it is a need," said Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D. But back to the $9 billion. It's a fraction of one-tenth of one percent of all federal funding. And DOGE recommended more than a trillion dollars in cuts. "What does this say for the party if it can't even pass this bill, this piddling amount of money?" yours truly asked Sen. John Kennedy, R-La. "I think we're going to lose a lot of credibility. And we should," replied Kennedy. But the House needed to sync up with the Senate since it changed the bill – stripping the cut for AIDS funding. House conservatives weren't pleased that the Senate was jamming them again – just two weeks after major renovations to the House version of the Big, Beautiful Bill. But they accepted their fate. "It's disappointing that we're $37 trillion in debt. This to me was low-hanging fruit," said Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo. "At the end of the day, I'll take a base hit, right? It's better than nothing." White House Budget Director Russ Vought is expected to send other spending cancellation requests to Congress in the coming months. The aim is to target deeper spending reductions recommended by DOGE. But it doesn't auger well for future rescissions bills if it's this much of a battle to trim $9 trillion. What can you get for that much money? For Republicans, it's not much. Republicans were swinging for the fences with spending cuts. But in the political box score, this is recorded as just a base hit.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
OKC bond proposal pays for street improvements
OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) — There's $2.7 billion proposed in the upcoming bond election for Oklahoma City. Over half of that is going to street repairs, sidewalk upgrades, and more. The city has used bonds to make improvements since before statehood. 'This is the way we pay for our infrastructure in our city are these bond issues,' said Mayor David Holt, (R), Oklahoma City. The proposal funds a variety of projects from sidewalks to bridges to parks to the transit system. 'We approved one most recently in 2017 and it's time to do it again,' said Mayor Holt. LOCAL NEWS: 'Emotionally overwhelming': Architect of new OKC arena shares inspiration, addresses feedback Mayor David Holt said this is a routine vote that happens every few years and the money is something that has funded city streets and other improvements for the last half century. Voters have 11 propositions to vote on. So if one doesn't pass, like street improvements, Mayor Holt said the infrastructure will stay the same. 'If we didn't pass it, there's no more fixing of anything in Oklahoma City until we get something like this approved,' said Mayor Holt. The city said there are 547 projects within the bond proposal. 382 of those are for streets and sidewalks. 25 are for bridges. 'OKC has used bonds to pay for its core infrastructure since before statehood. When voters go to the polls on Oct. 14, they will vote on 11 separate propositions covering everything from streets and bridges to parks and drainage. If residents vote no on a proposition, the improvements listed in the bond won't be made. OKC voters rejected park bond improvements from 1974 to 1995. The disinvestment led to outdated pools, playground equipment and fewer people using the parks system for two decades.' City of Oklahoma City The city also wants to remind voters that the bond won't raise property tax. 'I'm optimistic that we will, but we're certainly here to talk about it, answer any questions, but it's been well crafted and discussed for the last year,' said Mayor Holt. The bond election is October 14th. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Fast Company
10 hours ago
- Fast Company
U.S. auto safety agency to cut more than 25% of employees
A crash test model is displayed on the floor of the New York Auto Show in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., March 29, 2018. [Photo: Shannon Stapleton/Reuters, File] BY Listen to this Article More info 0:00 / 2:19 The U.S. auto safety agency is shedding more than 25% of its employees under financial incentive programs to depart the government offered by the Trump administration, according to data provided to Congress seen by Reuters. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, part of the Transportation Department, is shrinking from 772 employees as of May 31 to 555 under the program. The Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration are also both losing more than 25% of their staff. Representative Rick Larsen, top Democrat on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, expressed concerns about the cuts, questioning how USDOT can 'expedite project delivery and advance safety with a decimated workforce.' Overall, USDOT is losing just over 4,100 employees dropping from nearly 57,000 to 52,862, with the Federal Aviation Administration shedding 2,137 and falling from about 46,250 to 44,208. Subscribe to the Daily Company's trending stories delivered to you every day SIGN UP Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said Wednesday that the department did not cut any safety-critical employees and is actively seeking to add air traffic controllers. USDOT and NHTSA did not immediately comment. It is unclear if the Transportation Department still plans to conduct a layoff program on top of the early retirement departures. NHTSA has a number of ongoing investigations into advanced driver assistance systems and self-driving vehicles involving Tesla, Alphabet's Waymo and other companies. Consumer advocacy groups on Thursday urged lawmakers to drop proposed cuts to NHTSA's budget, including cutting its operations and research account by over $10 million 'harming the agency's ability to conduct rulemaking, enforcement actions, and research and analysis.' It would also cut nearly $78 million of supplemental funds from the $1 billion 2021 infrastructure law. Groups said they were 'particularly concerned that such funding cuts may lead to further firings or forced retirements, which have decimated NHTSA.' —David Shepardson, Reuters The super-early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, July 25, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.
