
MK Party Chief Whip vote confusion
The 2025 and 2026 Appropriation Bill was passed on Wednesday night.
There was confusion when MK Party Chief Whip Colleen Makhubele voted 'YES' to the Appropriation Bill, despite her party maintaining it would reject the bill.
But she says she thought they were voting on another matter.
Makhubele then changed the party's vote and was heckled by MPs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Eyewitness News
a few seconds ago
- Eyewitness News
Zuma, MK Party to challenge Ramaphosa's decision to place Mchunu on special leave
JOHANNESBURG - A presidential battle will play out in the Constitutional Court on Wednesday morning as the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party and its leader, former President Jacob Zuma, are set to challenge President Cyril Ramaphosa's recent decision to place Minister of Police Senzo Mchunu on special leave. The MK Party approached the apex court on an urgent basis, wanting Mchunu's suspension, the appointment of an acting minister, and the institution of a judicial commission of inquiry set aside. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa defends decision to appoint Firoz Cachalia as acting police minister Earlier in July, Ramaphosa made the decision based on an explosive media briefing by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. The MK Party will argue that while the Constitution is clear on the president's powers to appoint and fire ministers, there is no provision for placing a member of Cabinet on special leave. They said the only rational reason that Ramaphosa could have decided this for Mchunu is so that he keeps his salary and perks as a minister. But the president argues that while there is no explicit mention of special leave in the supreme law, he has implied ancillary powers. He said he cannot simply fire Mchunu based on untested allegations. Because Zuma and the MK Party are separate applicants in the matter, different lawyers will argue on their behalf before the bench.


Eyewitness News
17 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Ramaphosa defends decision to appoint Firoz Cachalia as acting police minister
CAPE TOWN - President Cyril Ramaphosa has defended his decision to appoint Firoz Cachalia as the acting police minister, saying it's to protect the integrity of law enforcement agencies and to safeguard public trust. In papers filed with the country's top court, Ramaphosa said the costs involved in extending his Cabinet by another member are also justifiable for these reasons. ALSO READ: - Ramaphosa expresses commitment to accelerate prosecutions in high-profile graft cases - MK Party challenge against Ramaphosa appointment of acting police minister looms - Ramaphosa says firing Mchunu based on untested allegations would be unfair, 'create a dangerous precedent' The president's recent decisions to place Minister of Police Senzo Mchunu on special leave, replace him with Cachalia and establish a commission of inquiry into allegations of corruption with the police are the subject of a legal challenge by the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party, which is due to be heard in the Constitutional Court on Wednesday. Ramaphosa has denied treating Mchunu as an ally in forming his decision to place him on special leave, rather than firing him as suggested by the MK Party. Ramaphosa said to do so on untested allegations would destabilise the executive. He said he's acting within his constitutional powers to place a minister who's facing serious allegations on leave and not to assign him any powers. Ramaphosa added that placing a minister on special leave is not unprecedented, and that former Minister of Health Zweli Mkhize received the same treatment following allegations of impropriety related to COVID-19 procurement. 'Were I not empowered to suspend a minister pending the outcome of an investigation of allegations against him or her, I would be compelled in all cases, regardless of the circumstances, to dismiss that minister simply on the basis of allegations against him or her, even if they may, on investigation, turn out to be unfounded. This would unduly limit my powers to exercise my judgement on the merits of each case and to determine, based on the circumstances of each case, the appropriate course of action.' Ramaphosa said that appointing Cachalia using his executive powers, permitting a parliamentary outsider to serve in Cabinet, rather than to appoint an existing member to the job, is to protect the legitimacy and integrity of the criminal justice system.

IOL News
31 minutes ago
- IOL News
This is how Parliament approves the National Budget
As the NCOP moves toward its critical vote, the implications of the Appropriation Bill are vast, influencing service delivery and development across the country's provinces. This decision will ultimately shape the economic and social landscape in South Africa for the financial year ahead. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers The stage is set for a pivotal moment in South Africa's budget process as the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) gears up to consider and vote on the Appropriation Bill on Wednesday This action comes on the heels of the National Assembly's (NA) adoption of the bill on July 23, 2025, marking a significant step in the nation's fiscal planning for the coming year. The NCOP's role is integral in ensuring that provincial interests are adequately represented in the national budget, particularly in the allocation and utilisation of public funds. As a Section 77 money bill originating from the NA, the Appropriation Bill serves as an essential framework allowing the government to utilise specified public funds across various departments and services. The budget process and the Appropriation Bill The budget process kicks off each February with the Minister of Finance's presentation of budget documents to Parliament, which includes: The Fiscal Framework and Revenue Proposals, detailing the country's economic outlook and tax policies. The Division of Revenue Bill, outlining the distribution of funds among national, provincial, and local governments. The Appropriation Bill, which allocates specific monetary amounts to each national department. Following the tabling of the budget, Parliament must approve the Fiscal Framework within 16 days, after which the Division of Revenue Bill is passed. This sets the stage for the introduction of the Appropriation Bill, essential for funding the operational goals of government departments. Stages within the NCOP The NCOP's consideration of the Appropriation Bill unfolds in three main stages, allowing for a thorough examination: Consideration by Select Committee: The bill is referred to the Select Committee on Appropriations, where its implications on service delivery and provincial impact are scrutinised. The committee will prepare a report recommending the bill's adoption. The bill is referred to the Select Committee on Appropriations, where its implications on service delivery and provincial impact are scrutinised. The committee will prepare a report recommending the bill's adoption. Consideration of Department Votes and Schedule: Members will assess the budget allocation for each department, referred to as 'Votes.' Political parties can express their intentions through declarations of Vote. A total of 90 votes are possible, with each delegate from the provinces holding one vote. Members will assess the budget allocation for each department, referred to as 'Votes.' Political parties can express their intentions through declarations of Vote. A total of 90 votes are possible, with each delegate from the provinces holding one vote. Final Consideration: After all departmental Votes are adopted, the Select Committee's report on the Appropriation Bill is presented to the House, where a final vote on the bill as a whole occurs. While the NCOP cannot amend the Appropriation Bill, it may propose amendments. If the bill is rejected, it will be returned to the NA, which possesses the authority to override the NCOP's decision by passing the bill once again. The finalisation process The Appropriation Bill will only be regarded as passed once both Houses of Parliament – the NCOP and the NA – have approved it. Upon agreement, the bill is sent to the President for assent, becoming an Act of Parliament. This Act then officially authorises government departments to allocate and spend public funds in line with the budget approved by Parliament. IOL