Petition Launched As Inquiry Looms
'We want central government to ban new waste incinerators at a national level because of the serious human health, climate and air pollution impacts. The proposal in Te Awamutu would emit toxins like dioxin and heavy metals which are likely to result in premature deaths, infertility, increased rates of cancer and birth defects. There is no safe level of exposure to dioxin,' said Sue Coutts, spokesperson for the Network.
'We know that burning carbon-intensive wastes like plastics emit more greenhouse gases and pollutants than coal. The Te Awamutu proposal was cited by the EPA as having global climate implications.'
'Right now, small communities, often in provincial or rural areas, are being targeted by these incinerator companies. These communities are bearing the burden of stopping these toxic projects. This is why central government leadership is so important.'
'Environment Minister Penny Simmonds rightly called in the Te Awamutu proposal for consideration by a Board of Inquiry. This will allow a more thorough assessment of impacts than had it been considered at local government level. However, this process does not stop other projects from coming forward.'
'To get a sense of the aggressiveness of the industry, there were three projects that sought to be included under the Fast Track Approvals regime: this Te Awamutu project, one in Tolaga Bay on the East Cape, and a very large incinerator in Waimate. Only one of those projects, in Waimate, was ultimately included in the legislation's initial listing, but is now unable to proceed because the land deal fell apart.'
'For the past five years, the Zero Waste Network and our allies have successfully resisted new incinerators on the front lines. We are now taking the fight to Parliament to deliver a lasting solution. Let's keep Aotearoa incinerator free!'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
29-06-2025
- RNZ News
Where to now for Polytechs?
money education 9:10 am today Some polytech students are grappling with courses being cut or changed. This as Te Pukenga is in the process of being wound up, with individual polytechs around the country working to show whether or not they can stand on their own. Some students are finding their courses significantly changed, or are struggling to confirm they can transfer studies to a similar course, under restructuring proposals. Legislation to disestablish Te Pukenga had its first reading in May. Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds earlier this month criticised the polytechs for having too high staff-per-student ratios, saying that any institute with fewer than 18 students per staff member was in financial trouble. Third-year Whitireia performing arts student Aroha Morrison says one of the proposals is to cut the final year of her programme. She will finish hers, but current students in years behind hers would miss the final year.
RNZ News
24-06-2025
- RNZ News
Process to manage conflict of interests in fast-track approvals process 'sound'
Ministers Chris Bishop, Simeon Brown and Shane Jones. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver The Auditor General says the process to manage conflict of interests in the fast-track approvals process was "sound", but also saw opportunities to "further strengthen conflict management". A report released today showed the findings by the Auditor General from an inquiry that looked at the overall systems and processes used to identify and manage the potential and actual conflicts of interests of the ministers involved in the Fast-track Bill. The process was investigated by the office after it became aware of "concerns about the transparency" of the decision making processes for which projects would be included in the Bill. Conflicts of interest was described as "perceptions of bias, predetermination, and undue influence". The report said those concerns can be heightened when a " decision-making process gives Ministers a broad margin of discretion and the decisions benefit private businesses". "This was the case with the fast-track approvals process." It did not look at the merits of the Bill, the design of the fast-track approvals process or decisions about projects. The report stated ministers and the Cabinet Office considered a broad range of potential conflicts, including family and close associates. Campaign donations were also clearly documented as conflicts and had a management plan. While the process was considered "sound" by the Auditor General, it noted a range of options to strengthen conflict management. Those included having ministers declare their conflicts of interest earlier in the process - ideally before receiving officials' advice on the applications and before they determined the list of projects to take to Cabinet. It also suggested considering whether it was appropriate for ministers to participate in Cabinet discussions given they had a conflict - even if they were not the minister responsible for the final decision. Minister Chris Bishop - one the of the key ministers in charge of fast-track - said he welcomed the findings, and thanked the Cabinet Office for its ongoing advice and support.
Newsroom
20-06-2025
- Newsroom
Cook Islands saga another test for Govt's China policy as Luxon hits Beijing
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says the 'areas of risk' in the strategic deal between the Cook Islands and China include security, defence, sovereignty and international border arrangements. These risk factors are now being worked through by officials from the two countries, and the Cook Islands foreign ministry says a new Formal Dialogue Mechanism has been set up to assess the agreement and identify risk mitigation. While a statement from the Cook Islands on Thursday says officials met in April and May, on Thursday the Cook Islands News revealed the New Zealand Government had pulled more than $18 million of development aid to the Pacific country on June 4. The timing could not have been much more awkward for the Prime Minister. The news dropped the same day Luxon held his first political talks in China, and on the eve of his high-stakes meetings with President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang in Beijing. While Luxon went out of his way to explain this retaliation was about the NZ-Cooks relationship – not China – Foreign Minister Winston Peters singled out the superpower's role in this relationship breakdown while in France just 10 days ago. 'As partners engage with our region, it is important that they do so in a manner that is transparent and supportive of good governance. 'Not all partners take this approach. Some ask Pacific partners not to publish agreements or avoid the Forum Secretariat when organising regional engagements,' he said, going on to say that 'external pushes' in the region were looking to 'coerce, cajole and constrain'. Friday's meetings between Luxon and Xi and Li would show whose version China deemed most plausible, with the potential the topic would make its way onto the agenda for the leaders' meetings. Among the other topics of disagreement between the two countries expected to be raised on Friday were China's combat exercises in the Tasman Sea and Pacific, China's actions in the Pacific more broadly, its unlawful actions in the South China Sea and human rights. Both sides acknowledged there would always be areas where the two countries disagreed, but the relationship was mature enough to talk about these issues – as long as that was done 'predictably, consistently, publicly and privately'. While the snags in the relationship were well-traversed, those in the room would be looking for the nuance in how China spoke about certain issues to get a better read of their feelings on particular matters. Beyond geopolitical issues, both countries would also raise the importance of the trading relationship – something Luxon had emphasised during the first two days of his fleeting first visit to China. While in Shanghai, members of the business delegation accompanying the Prime Minister signed deals expected to generate $871m. China is New Zealand's largest trading partner and two-way trade was worth $39 billion. But New Zealand exports accounted for just 0.3 percent of China's imports. 'So we just need a little bit more and we're doing exceptionally well for ourselves,' Luxon said. During Luxon's first political meeting with Shanghai Party Secretary Chen Jining, both sides emphasised the strong trading relationship in their opening remarks. The PM in his first major political meeting of the tour, with Shanghai party secretary Chen Jining. Photo: Pool/Thomas Manch And in the afternoon he visited Fudan University to highlight the importance of the international student market as part of his Government's growth plan. But Labour foreign policy spokesperson Phil Twyford said there was a disconnect between Luxon's security and economic policies when it came to China. 'What I'm watching with the Prime Minister's visit to Beijing is whether or not he can bring together the two straight, very divergent narrative strands on our relationship with China that he and this Government have been maintaining now for some time,' he said. 'On one hand, it's a special relationship, our most important trading partner … On the other hand, there is hardly an official foreign policy and defence document in circulation right now that doesn't basically position China as a military threat to New Zealand.' Twyford said he saw those two things as 'quite a contradiction'. China and the US have led to a pull away from the historically bipartisan approach on foreign policy, with Labour criticising the Government's stance on Aukus and questioning the state of New Zealand's foreign policy. 'I have no doubt that his Chinese hosts will be watching very carefully to try to read the Prime Minister's sense of the relationship and where New Zealand wants to go with it, but right now, I think that contradiction is a vulnerability for New Zealand's national interests.' Luxon said he disagreed with Labour's categorisation, but not before taking a swing at the party by questioning who was in charge of foreign policy: Phil Twyford, Chris Hipkins, Helen Clark? 'This is a government that's been crystal clear from day one: our economic prosperity is very much tied to our security. This is a country that wants to lift its urgency and its intensity in all of its relationships across the Indo-Pacific. 'We can do well for ourselves in the years ahead, and it requires us to build relationships at a top-to-top level and then actually have our business sectors actually engage with each other,' he said.
