eStem Public Charter Schools closing UA Little Rock campus, moving others
According to a release, the restructuring plan will become effective this fall.
'This restructuring plan aims to right-size our district while remaining committed to our current eStem students and families,' Nick Patterson, CEO of eStem Public Charter Schools said. 'These adjustments allow us to ensure that we invest our resources in our students and your children.'
Keep Arkansas Beautiful reveals mural at eStem Public Charter School in Little Rock
Here is a list of changes coming as part of the new plan:
The Downtown Elementary School and East Village Elementary School will be consolidated into eStem Elementary School, split across the old Gazette Building and the Federal Reserve Buildings. Kindergarten – 4th grade will be in the old Gazette Building at 112 W. 3rd Street. Fifth and 6th grades will be directly across the street in the old Federal Reserve Building.
eStem Downtown Junior High School, located at 123 W. 3rd Street will be renamed eStem Junior High School and will relocate to 400 Shall Avenue in downtown Little Rock's East Village neighborhood. In this new location, eStem Junior High will serve all 7th and 8th graders.
eStem High School will move from its location on the campus of UA-Little Rock, 2801 S. University Ave., to 410 Shall Ave in downtown Little Rock's East Village neighborhood. eStem High School will serve all 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th graders in East Village.
This strategic restructuring will create two eStem campuses in downtown Little Rock, an elementary campus on W 3rd St, and a secondary campus in East Village.
School officials said that in this new structure, all eStem students will be within a mile of each other in downtown Little Rock. All eStem Schools will be within a mile of the River Cities Travel Center, allowing Rock Region Metro service from across the city.
COVID-19 affecting eStem Charter School students and staff within first week
The school said that virtual and homeschool options have increased since the COVID-19 pandemic and have changed the educational landscape throughout Arkansas since eStem's expansion seven years ago.
According to the school, their number of enrolled students has steadily decreased from 3,180 in 2020-21 to 2,358 in the 2024-25 school year.
Dr. Carrie Phillips, Chief Communications and Marketing Officer for the University of Arkansas at Little Rock said that the university is exploring its opportunities with the soon to be vacant building.
To learn more about eStem Public Charter Schools, .
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
2 hours ago
- Business Upturn
With Debt Concerns Mounting, Resurfacing Presentation from Jim Rickards Suggests U.S. May Already Own What It Needs to Fund Trump's Economic Revival
Washington, D.C., July 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — As negotiations intensify over how to pay for President Trump's sweeping economic legislation—dubbed the 'Big Beautiful Bill' by those close to the administration—a released presentation from economic strategist Jim Rickards details a resource that could ensure this needed windfall does not come in the form of taxes or borrowing at all. Instead, Rickards discusses a hidden reserve of national wealth that has remained buried—both literally and politically—for generations. And now, for the first time in half a century, the doors may be opening. A Financial Resource Buried in the American West Rickards' presentation outlines the vast holdings of critical materials beneath federally owned land—resources essential for energy, defense, technology, and modern infrastructure. While the U.S. Geological Survey has long documented these deposits, Rickards says their potential value has never been fully recognized as a financial tool. According to the presentation, this resource base spans across every state, with extraordinary concentrations in key regions. '$516 billion is here in the Salton Sea area of California… $3.1 trillion is held in Nome, Alaska. And $7.35 trillion is here, in Midland, Texas' . He says that what's most remarkable isn't the size—but the fact that it's never been touched. 'The nature of this 'trust', as I call it, is such that politicians haven't been able to raid it… which has allowed it to grow untouched… for decades' . An Alternative to Debt, Hidden in Plain Sight Rather than relying on new bond issuances or foreign capital, Rickards proposes that America's next economic chapter be funded using what it already owns. 'We've had this rich 'endowment' right under our feet… yet for years, we refused to touch it'. He insists this is not a stimulus check or a new federal program. 'It's not some kind of government program like those COVID relief checks a few years back,' Rickards says. 'But it is a chance for the average American to become richer than they ever imagined'. Trump's Shift Toward Domestic Wealth The presentation positions Trump's current resource policies as a historic pivot. Rickards notes that, unlike past presidents who kept these resources off-limits, Trump is now unlocking them. 'Trump is re-opening our mineral-rich Federal Lands. And fast-tracking companies that could recover trillions of dollars' worth of resources, right here in America' . Even Trump's own comments suggest a new direction. 'There are certain areas where we have great, raw earth… and we're not allowed to use it because of the environment. I'm going to open them up,' Trump said. Projects Delayed for Generations Now Moving Forward Rickards points to specific projects—some sitting dormant for decades—as early signs of movement. 'The Resolution Copper Mine has been sitting for 29 years… Pebble Mine in Alaska has been stalled since 1990… and Thacker Pass Lithium Mine in Nevada has been blocked since 1978' . He says the barriers were never technical—they were political. 'For the past 50 years, fake-experts have strangled us from within the government,' he says. 'They tied us down with reams of regulation' . Now, that's changing. 'We know exactly where these minerals are. We know they're worth trillions of dollars. And now—for the first time in half a century—we can go get them' . A Moment of Reckoning Rickards says that this moment is not just about policy—it's about recognizing what America already has. 'America is anything BUT broke,' he writes. 'And if you understand what's bound to happen next? You could watch your own net worth soar in the years ahead' . He emphasizes that the resource isn't theoretical or abstract. It's real, verifiable, and already owned by the American public. 'It's not earmarked for any specific individual,' Rickards clarifies. 'I'm just trying to use terminology that will make the most sense to viewers' . About Jim Rickards Jim Rickards is a former advisor to the White House, CIA, Pentagon, and U.S. Treasury. He played a key role in the original Petrodollar Accord and has been involved in the federal response to numerous global crises. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash
New York Post
6 hours ago
- New York Post
Controversial push to develop former tony LI country club could finally get OK after almost a decade
A yearslong controversial push to develop the site of a former tony Long Island country club may finally get the green light. New Jersey developers Robert Weiss and Efrem Gerszberg have been battling local towns for almost a decade to build on the roughly 117-acre property that used to be the Woodmere Country Club in the town of Hempstead in Nassau County. The developers originally hoped to construct nearly 300 single-family homes at the site but have since revamped their plans and now want to build a smaller luxury senior-living facility. Advertisement A plan to create a senior-living facility at the site of the Woodmere Country Club in Hempstead may finally get approval. Dennis Clark Their reps pleaded with the town's board last week to rezone a 34-acre section so they can move forward with the smaller project — and it appears local officials may finally be ready to buy into the proposal. 'In nearly a decade, we've seen several proposals — many of which didn't align with the surrounding community,' said Woodsburgh Mayor Jake Harman, whose village is in Hempstead, at the hearing. 'This one preserves a significant amount of landscaped open space and meets the needs of our aging population.' Advertisement The current proposal was pitched last year as a compromise to settle a costly ongoing court battle between the developers and the villages of Woodsburgh, Lawrence and Woodmere, which are all in the town of Hempstead. The legal war over the property has involved 10 lawsuits — eight in state court and two in federal — and left taxpayers on the hook for a mountain of lawyers' and other fees. The developers bought the country club in 2017 with plans to close it by 2021 and develop it into housing. COVID shut the course down early in 2020. New Jersey developers Robert Weiss and Efrem Gerszberg have been pushing town officials to build housing on the 117-acre property for nearly a decade. Dennis Clark Advertisement The town had imposed a future-building moratorium at the site in 2016, the year before it was bought, to block any major construction, but that move was later struck down as unconstitutional by a judge. In 2016, the town for extra measure also created a new zoning designation — the Coastal Conservation District — to severely limit building there. The designation capped new construction on the property to 59 single-family homes while preserving 83 acres, including those that housed the nine-hole golf course and its original clubhouse. The developers sued. Tuesday's hearing drew a mix of support and skepticism over their latest plans. Advertisement The builders' lawyer, Jack Martins, said at the hearing that even the land's current designation allows '59 large homes, new roads, real infrastructure burdens' — which is 'not nothing.' Start and end your day informed with our newsletters Morning Report and Evening Update: Your source for today's top stories Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters His clients' revised plan 'offers a better outcome for traffic, parking, environmental impact, and the community as a whole,' he said. 'I would urge the board to consider this as the proper compromise, proper resolution and proper care for what's best for the community when it comes to traffic, parking, and impact,' Martins said. If the developers' latest proposal is approved, housing would be built on a 34-acre northern portion of the site while setting aside 50 acres as open space for preservation and a 5-acre park. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! That northern portion, which sits entirely within the village of Hempstead, would hold more than units of over-55 condos across two buildings linked by a private clubhouse. Harman, whose village also contains a portion of the land, said the updated plan was 'the most appropriate option' put forward in years. Advertisement But some residents are not convinced. 'While the development looks beautiful, I live there — and the road simply can't handle 160 units and over 300 cars,' Woodmere resident Steven Fuchs told the board. 'This changes the entire character [of the neighborhood.]' But once-skeptical Lawrence Mayor-elect Shlomo Nahmias called the proposal 'a good deal' that reflects community concerns. Advertisement 'There might be some small tweaks needed, but for the most part, people are receptive,' Nahmias said. 'At the end of the day, it's up to the town of Hempstead.' The Hempstead Town Board has not yet set a date to vote on whether to change the zoning to allow for the senior complex.
Axios
14 hours ago
- Axios
An increasing share of American adults are going hungry
More Americans are going hungry, per new data from Morning Consult. The big picture: It's a shocking data point for the wealthiest country in the world, and comes at a time when the stock market is hitting record highs and President Trump just signed a bill slashing food benefits. The rise is like a slow-moving train wreck, says John Leer, chief economist at Morning Consult. "There's such a disconnect now between record highs on Wall Street and elevated levels of food insecurity." Zoom in: The share of adults who tell Morning Consult in monthly surveys that they sometimes or often don't have enough to eat — or are food insecure — has been creeping up over the past several years. In May, 15.6% of adults were food insecure, almost double the rate in 2021. At that time Congress had beefed up SNAP benefits and expanded the Child Tax Credit driving down poverty rates, and giving people more money for food. Zoom out: The rate appears higher than pre-pandemic levels. Morning Consult's data only goes back to 2021. However, federal data that measures food insecurity, and roughly lines up with Morning Consult's findings, shows the numbers were already above pro-COVID levels back in 2023. Demand for food is up 120% from three years ago at the Philadelphia-area food bank network where George Matysik is executive director. As soon as the government support pulled back in 2022, "we started to see the numbers go up," says Matysik, who is with the Share Food Network, which serves hundreds of thousands of people. Demand just continued to rise from there, along with grocery prices. Between the lines: Congress just passed a huge cut to food benefits, or SNAP, that is likely to make the situation far worse, says Matycik. The "big, beautiful bill" pushes states to provide more funding for SNAP, and tightens work requirements for benefits. Before, adults over age 54 weren't required to work; now the age limit is 64. And fewer parents are exempted from working, as well. It's expected that millions will lose benefits, and more would receive less. People will have less money for food, further driving folks to food banks, which had already been dealing with different spending cuts from the White House. Reality check: Some of the cuts to SNAP, involving state funding, don't take effect until 2028 — raising the possibility that they might not happen. The data also looks a bit volatile, bouncing around quite a bit — it spiked at the end of 2024, and it's not clear why. It is likely a reflection of how precarious it is to make ends meet for folks at the lower end of the wage scale — some are in hourly jobs with fluctuating schedules, which can be rough on one's personal finances. The other side: The White House and congressional Republicans argue that cuts to these benefits are a way to push more people into the labor market and reduce dependence on government assistance, as well as an effort to reduce waste, fraud and abuse.
