CIVI DEADLINE ALERT: ROSEN, TRUSTED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Civitas Resources, Inc. Investors with Losses in Excess of $100K to Secure Counsel Before Important July 1 Deadline in Securities Class Action
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 28, 2025) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Civitas Resources, Inc. (NYSE: CIVI) between February 27, 2024 and February 24, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), of the important July 1, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Civitas Resources securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Civitas Resources class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=36337 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 1, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose that: (1) Civitas was highly likely to significantly reduce its oil production in 2025 as a result of, among other things, declines following the production peak at the DJ Basin in the fourth quarter of 2024 and low TIL count at the end of 2024; (2) increasing its oil production would require Civitas to acquire additional acreage and development locations, thereby incurring significant debt and causing Civitas to sell corporate assets to offset its acquisition costs; (3) Civitas' financial condition would require it to implement disruptive cost-reduction measures including a significant workforce reduction; (4) accordingly, Civitas' business and/or financial prospects, as well as its operational capabilities, were overstated; and (5) as a result, Civitas' public statements were false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
To join the Civitas Resources class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=36337 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/257116
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans face a ferocious ad campaign surrounding Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
A ferocious advertising campaign is underway with passage of President Donald Trump's landmark policy bill hanging in the balance, as political groups and business interests spent at least $35 million just this month to try to sway key members of Congress and their constituents. Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina was facing the pressure from both sides before he announced Sunday that he wouldn't seek reelection in 2026. Americans for Prosperity, an arm of the conservative megadonor Charles Koch's political network, spent nearly $2 million this month in key media markets such as Charlotte and Raleigh-Durham. 'Trump's tax cuts put money back in my pocket, and they're helping young families save for their first homes,' says a woman featured in one of the ads from AFP. 'Congress needs to save our tax cuts and protect prosperity.' At the same time, the Democratic-aligned group Unrig Our Economy spent nearly $1 million hammering Tillis over Medicaid cuts in the bill. 'Sen. Thom Tillis could vote to take away our health care and give tax breaks to billionaires,' an ad from the group warns. Other Republicans in swing districts face the same dynamic heading into a midterm campaign in which they will need to reach at least some voters who don't back Trump without angering the president or his core supporters. In Tillis' case, he announced he wouldn't seek reelection hours after Trump called for him to face a primary challenge because he didn't support a procedural vote on the 'big, beautiful bill.' 'We so often hear of members concerned about their general reelection efforts, but that is all for naught if you can't get through a primary,' said John Thomas, a Republican strategist and ad maker. 'To add even more pressure, the GOP base is extremely supportive of President Trump, much more than their individual federal representative. Break rank with Trump and there is a price to pay.' Nebraska Rep. Don Bacon, a Republican from a battleground district who last week announced plans to retire, commented Friday on the advertising blitz surrounding the legislation. 'I think the other guys, look, they put $500,000 on me this week saying 'Don Bacon's cutting Medicaid,'' he told CNN's Manu Raju. 'There's a lot of goodness here, but we gotta talk about it and show the voters.' In June alone, according to data from the ad-tracking firm AdImpact, a sprawling collection of large PACs and interest groups spent more than $35 million on dozens of ads about the bill, which contains a range of Trump administration policy priorities on taxes, spending and immigration. Republicans account for about half of that spending, while Democrats account for about a quarter and independent and business PACs for another quarter. Hundreds of thousands of dollars more have been spent on ads not explicitly mentioning the sweeping legislation but referencing looming policy changes and parochial interests, backed by other business and lobbying groups. Late Saturday night, after intense negotiations, the sweeping bill narrowly cleared a major procedural hurdle in the Senate by a 51-49 vote, backed by several key swing votes — among those buffeted by ad campaigns — in the spotlight, such as Maine Sen. Susan Collins, Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley. Major challenges for the giant tax and spending bill remain, however, as it still faces amendments and a final vote in the Senate. The House will have to vote to accept a significantly changed piece of legislation from the Senate after only narrowly approving its own version of the bill weeks ago. A group aligned with Trump's political network, 'Securing American Greatness,' has spent more than $7.7 million on ads in June, leading all advertisers with a broad campaign, much of it aimed at shoring up support among House members. 'Mariannette Miller-Meeks just voted for President Trump's working family tax cuts that mean higher wages and lower taxes for working families,' says an ad from the group targeting the key battleground representative from Iowa who won her last reelection by 798 votes. At the same time, the pro-Trump group is hammering congressional Democrats in competitive districts for their opposition to the bill, raising the prospect of higher taxes if an extension of 2017 tax cuts, included in the legislation, fails to pass. 'It's Washington's game, taxing us to bankroll their liberal waste,' says an ad from the group targeting California Democratic Rep. Josh Harder, reelected in 2024 by a margin of about 9,000 votes. 'Tell Josh Harder we can't afford his tax hikes.' With the key procedural hurdle cleared on Saturday, Republican Sen. Kevin Cramer underscored the political challenges would get easier once the bill was passed. 'Well, it doesn't get easier,' the North Dakota senator said. 'I just think, at some point, you just have to take what you know — all the data, all the analysis, all the discussion, all the hearings — and apply them to a vote. Pass the bill. And the sooner we do that, the sooner all the good things will kick in, and that will alleviate, I think, people's concerns.'
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Parents Of Future College Students Lose Big With Higher Ed Changes
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 28: The U.S. Capitol on June 28, 2025 in Washington, DC. Senate Republicans ... More overnight released a new version of the "One, Big, Beautiful Bill," as they approach U.S. President Donald Trump's July 4 deadline. (Photo by) Parents trying to help their children pay for college may soon find themselves struggling to navigate the updated Federal student loan rules. The massive overhaul of student loans in the One Big Beautiful Bill sets new caps on Parent PLUS Loans, while also cutting off access to affordable income-driven repayment plans. These changes impacting parents, along with no changes to make college easier to afford for undergraduates, simply puts pressure on parents who are already struggling to help their children pay for college. Under current rules, Parent PLUS borrowers can take out loans up to the full cost of attendance. However, starting July 1, 2026, parents can only borrow up to $20,000 per student per year, with a lifetime cap of $65,000. While there is a three year grace period for parents who've already borrowed a Parent PLUS loan prior to 2026, that doesn't help new parent borrowers next year. That may seem like a sizable amount, but with the average cost of college climbing, many parents (and students) may not be able to close the gap without private student loans. How Families Pay For College Today, many families use a combination of both savings, current income, and student loans to pay for college. Roughly two-thirds of college graduates have student loans, and parents play a big role in this. Parent PLUS Loans make up almost 10% of the total Federal student loan portfolio, and there are over 3.7 million parent PLUS loan borrowers today, according to the most recent data. This issue at hand is that undergraduate students are extremely limited in what they can borrow for college. The current limits range from $5,500 to $7,500 per year for dependent students. These caps have not kept pace with inflation, and have not changed since 2008 - over 15 years ago. Once the student borrows to their limit, parents are usually the ones making up the shortfall. And they have a choice: Parent PLUS Loans or private student loans. And both options have pros and cons - but the Big Beautiful Bill is tilting the scales significantly towards private loans. Parent PLUS Loans Become Worse Than Private Loans For Many There were a few major reasons why families would want to choose Parent PLUS Loans over private student loans: However, the Big Beautiful Bill is eliminating the last two options. Future Parent PLUS Loans will only be able to be repaid via the new Standard Repayment Plan. The will not have access to the new Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP). The result of that change is that future Parent PLUS Loans also cannot access PSLF. PSLF requires borrowers to repay their student loans under specific eligible repayment plans. The current ICR plan is eligible, and the new RAP plan is eligible. Technically, the Standard 10 Year plan is eligible - but that's moot, because a borrower would fully repay their student loan before receiving any loan forgiveness. These changes take away some of the biggest benefits of Parent PLUS Loans. And when you combine the loss of benefits with the high interest rate - 8.94% for 2025-26 and the 4.228% origination fee required for these loans - private loans suddenly look a lot more appealing. The lowest private student loan rates hover around 3.24% APR, and while they don't offer income-driven repayment or loan forgiveness, neither do Parent PLUS Loans in the future. Families that have decent credit could reduce their interest rate by 50% or more by looking at private loans, and be left with effectively the same repayment options. Families Will Be Faced With Tough Choices With federal borrowing limits tightening for parents, and not increasing for students, families will be faced with tough choices. What college do you attend? Can you afford it? Are you credit-worthy enough to get private loans, or will you be stuck with the higher interest and origination fee Parent PLUS Loans that now offer no benefits? For parents of multiple children with limited savings, this is even a tougher conversation. Generally, I think parents should avoid borrowing for their children's college. But the reality is many parents will. Many families still hold the belief that colleges is worth it at any cost, but the truth is that there are limits on the value of a four year degree. Parents should get ahead of the conversation and make sure that their student knows exactly what a parent can afford before the college admissions process starts. Students should be crafting a college list based on schools they know they can attend financially. Final Thoughts While Parent PLUS Loans have historically been left out of income-driven repayment for a variety of reasons, they have also been the most profitable student loans for the government. It's odd they would make it more difficult to borrow, as the revenue from these loans offsets other losses in the student loan portfolio. Regardless, the end result is that parents and families will likely look at private loans more in the next year, since the key benefits of Parent PLUS loans have been eliminated.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US energy firms eye new Northeast natgas pipelines, buoyed by Trump and demand outlook
By Scott DiSavino (Reuters) -U.S. energy companies are eying renewed opportunities to build natural gas pipelines to tap in to Appalachia shale formations in Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia, buoyed by U.S. President Donald Trump's pro-energy policies and expectations that demand for the fuel will rise in coming years. The U.S. is already the world's top gas producer and exporter of liquefied natural gas. While the country helps meet fuel demand around the world, many consumers in the U.S. Northeast do not have access to gas due to a lack of pipeline infrastructure and instead continue to use heating oil in their homes and businesses. The Appalachia shale fields, which cover the Marcellus and Utica formations, have the largest gas reserves in the U.S., but energy companies have limited ability to move more of that fuel to the rest of the country because most existing pipelines are already near full. In addition, companies have found it tough to build new projects in the region due to legal and regulatory pushback from states and local and environmental groups. Output growth in the region, which produces about a third of the nation's gas, has stalled in recent years after some firms lost billions on delayed or canceled pipes. But now, as Trump rolls back regulations to boost domestic energy production, several U.S. firms, including Williams Cos, Boardwalk Pipeline, DT Midstream and EQT, have proposed building or expanding pipelines and other infrastructure in the Northeast. "We are actively evaluating opportunities to expand infrastructure," Amy Rogers, spokeswoman at EQT, the nation's second-biggest gas producer with operations in Appalachia, told Reuters. "Enhancing pipeline capacity is essential to unlocking Appalachian supply," she said. LNG EXPORTS BOOST GAS DEMAND In 2024, the U.S. produced about 103.2 billion cubic feet per day (bcfd) of gas and consumed a record 90.5 bcfd of the fuel, according to U.S. Energy Information Administration data. One billion cubic feet of gas is enough to supply about 5 million U.S. homes for a day. Analysts expect that new LNG export plants and electric generation facilities to power artificial intelligence at data centers will push U.S. power and gas demand to record highs in 2025 and 2026 and beyond. Output from Appalachia has increased every year since at least 2009 when the region produced just 1.7 bcfd of gas. Lack of pipeline capacity, however, has slowed that growth to an average of just 2% a year from 2020 to 2024 versus an average of 15% a year from 2015 to 2019, according to EIA data. Looking forward, output in the region is expected to grow by an average of only 1% a year in 2025 and 2026 - to 36.2 bcfd and 36.6 bcfd, respectively - according to EIA projections. New infrastructure, coupled with growing energy needs in the U.S., could add up to 5 bcfd of new demand for Appalachia gas supplies through 2030, said Jack Weixel, an analyst with consultancy East Daley Analytics. "That is definitely a lot more than anyone was expecting from Appalachia just a mere 12 months ago," he said. CONSTITUTION AND OTHER PIPES Support from the Trump administration has already prompted pipeline operator Williams to begin reviving two canceled projects to transport gas from Pennsylvania: the 0.65 bcfd Constitution Pipeline to New York and the 0.4 bcfd Northeast Supply Enhancement to New Jersey and New York. "The NESE and Constitution projects are essential to address persistent natural gas supply constraints in the Northeast, constraints that have led to higher energy costs for consumers," said a spokesperson for Williams. During the winter of 2024-2025, it cost about twice as much to heat a home with oil than with gas, according to federal energy estimates. More than 80% of the roughly 4.6 million U.S. homes still using heating oil as their primary heating fuel in 2024 were located in the Northeast region. Williams canceled Constitution in 2020 and NESE in 2024 after years of fighting for permits, especially water permits, from state regulators. State environmental regulators in New York and New Jersey did not comment directly on Williams filings to revive the NESE project, which runs through both states. In New York, Millennium Pipeline, meanwhile, said it plans to begin negotiations for binding commitments for a proposed expansion that could add up to 0.5 bcfd of capacity to its existing 2.0 bcfd pipe. High interest from shippers underscored the need for additional pipeline capacity in the region, Millennium said, which anticipates that the expansion, if approved by its owners, could start service by late 2029. Millennium is owned by units of DT Midstream and Canadian energy firm TC Energy. Meanwhile, EQT and partners want to extend their existing 2.0 bcfd Mountain Valley Pipeline from West Virginia to Virginia into North Carolina with the proposed 0.55 bcfd Southgate expansion project. The $7.85 billion Mountain Valley Pipeline, which entered service in 2024 and whose construction cost was more than twice the amount originally planned, was the last big pipeline to enter service in the Northeast region after years of delays. In Ohio, Boardwalk Pipelines said it is evaluating interest for its proposed Borealis pipeline project, which could create up to 2.0 bcfd of incremental transportation to markets from Ohio to Louisiana. Still, despite Trump's pro-energy policies, some of the same headwinds pipeline projects faced in the past are likely to resurface. Several organizations, including the Sierra Club environmental group, have already filed protests against Williams' NESE with the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which oversees federal permitting of gas pipeline projects. "The Northeast does not need more gas pipelines that pollute our neighborhoods and leave us vulnerable to price spikes from global volatility, especially as gas demand locally is already beginning to wane," Jasmine Vazin, director of the Beyond Dirty Fuels campaign at the Sierra Club, told Reuters in an email. The following table lists the gas pipes in various stages of development in recent years that could move more fuel from the Appalachia region. Company Proposed State(s) Esti Possi Pipeline mate ble d in Size Servi in ce Bcfd Date Williams - Transco Northeast Supply PA, NJ, 0.40 Nov Enhancement NY 2027 (NESE) Williams / Coterra Constitution PA, NY 0.65 Q3 2027 Williams - Transco Southeast Supply VA, NC, 1.60 Q4 Enhancement SC, GA, 2027 AL EQT - Mountain Mountain Valley VA, NC 0.55 mid Valley Pipeline Pipeline - 2028 Southgate DT Midstream/TC Millennium NY 0.50 Nov Energy expansion 2029 Williams - Transco Power Express VA 0.95 Q3 2030 Boardwalk Borealis OH 2.00 Pipelines - Texas Gas Transmission EQT Mountain Valley WV, VA 0.50 Pipeline expansion
