'A hard one for us': Calgary Wild FC battle but fall to Halifax Tides FC
Halifax's ace midfielder, Megumi Nakamura, chipped one past Wild FC goalkeeper Stephanie Bukovec at the 36-minute mark of the opening half and the Tides held on for their second Northern Super League victory of the season.
'It was a hard one for us tonight. I think overall the team played with great spirit, and togetherness,' said Wild FC head coach Lydia Bedford. 'It could have quite easily finished as a nil-nil draw, but we were quite unfortunate to concede on the second phase of a set piece which we will go away and reflect on.'
The first match following a two-week international break combined with a banged-up Calgary roster made it difficult for the Wild Roses to mount an offensive attack.
'Right now, we are riding a little patch where player availability is a struggle for us. You saw tonight that we had five on the bench and four of them were senior players,' said Bedford. 'We are trying to make sure the players who are unavailable are getting back to fitness, but in the meantime, we have to stick together and be competitive. Overall, the team can be pleased that we didn't concede an open play goal, but we need more to try and make sure that we can not only be defensively sound but that we can also catch teams.'
Using nearly every player available to them in hopes of having fresh legs on the pitch, Wild FC controlled possession for 54 per cent of the time, but most of it was at the back end.
'I feel like we look after the ball at the back end, but it is just that final pass and final shot that we seem to be lacking on,' said Bedford. 'We will keep working on it and the players will keep giving everything. Hopefully it will click for us over the next couple of weeks.'
Playing in front of their parents and grandparents who call Nova Scotia home, the feisty teenage Stewart twins were poised to find a breakthrough moment in front of the boisterous Bluenose crowd.
'I think we stuck together well as a team and kept trying to fight through it tonight,' said Taegan Stewart, who started the match. 'We had one or two chances that we could have put in the back of the net, but I think we were just one second slow in the movement.'
Putting the pressure on late in the match in hopes of trying to convert a shot on target, the Wild FC weren't able to push through the force of the Tides and dropped to a 3-5-2 record.
'It's a tradeoff (late in the game). You can push for more and end up conceding one. It was good that when we were pushing, we didn't get hurt but now it's just needing that final pass in those final moments,' said Bedford. 'I think we showed that we can be resilient tonight but just didn't have enough quality in front of the goal. We might have to keep tweaking the way we are playing to create more chances.'
Calgary Wild FC will have a short week to adjust their plan of attack. They will ride into McMahon Stadium during Stampede week for a home match against the Vancouver Rise FC on Saturday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Featured As Cover Athlete For NBA 2K26
NBA 2K26 | Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Cover Athlete NBA 2K PR It's been a historic year for Oklahoma City Thunder superstar Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. Following an impressive run as the headliner for Canada at the 2024 Olympics in Paris last summer, he set his sights on the 2024-25 NBA season, which proved to be a campaign full of accolades for Gilgeous-Alexander. On his way to leading the Thunder to its first-ever NBA Championship, he won the NBA's Most Valuable Player Award, along with a scoring title, an All-Star nod, All-NBA honors, Western Conference Finals MVP and NBA Finals MVP. And now, Gilgeous-Alexander will earn yet another prestigious honor, but this time off the court. The 26-year-old will officially be the cover athlete on the standard edition of NBA 2K26. When the game releases in September, the Thunder star will be the face of this year's game. Gilgeous-Alexander will be the first Thunder player to grace the cover of the game since NBA 2K15, when Kevin Durant held that honor. While it isn't surprising to see the Thunder superstar get the nod for this iteration of the game given how quickly he's risen in becoming a face of the NBA, there has been some level of foreshadowing about this potentially happening. "The guys that we work with, are people that authentically play and are historians of 2K. He is just a delight to work with, he is a really good dude and he obviously aligns with a lot of the things that we align with with fashion and music,' said Ronnie 2K last August when discussing Gilgeous-Alexander. "I'd like to say he is a future cover athlete, one day I hope that happens.' That day has officially come. To further quantify the impact Gilgeous-Alexander has on the modern game and the following he has worldwide, he now joins a short but elite list of players to be featured as NBA 2K cover athletes. While NBA 2K26 won't release until September, several weeks before the start of the 2025-26 season, pre-orders will begin tomorrow. Furthermore, Gilgeous-Alexander will be part of a larger group of cover athletes, as the gaming franchise is expected to release several editions alongside the standard that features the Thunder star. This game series is a yearly release that is always highly anticipated and one of the biggest sports games of the year. Gilgeous-Alexander was rated a 96 overall when NBA 2K25 released last year, but finished the season with a 98 rating. It will be fascinating to see where he sits for the release of NBA 2K26. He's now in the conversation as the best player in the entire world, especially given he's gotten it done on the biggest stage. This is just the beginning for Gilgeous-Alexander, who is just now entering his prime, coming off a championship win and a new record-breaking contract and a signature shoe set to release this fall. At the rate he's progressing both on and off the court, he's headed toward being an all-time great in the sport of basketball.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Toronto Marlies Sign Five Players To AHL Contracts
The Toronto Marlies announced they have signed forwards Gunnerwolfe Fontaine, Ben King, Nick Rheaume, Marko Sikic, and defenseman Ryan McCleary to one-year AHL contracts for the 2025-26 season. McCleary recorded 12 points in 69 games for the Marlies' ECHL affiliate Cincinnati Cyclones in 2024-25, his first professional season. Advertisement The 21-year-old was originally a seventh round selection of the Pittsburgh Penguins in 2021. Sikic notched 18 points in 64 games with the Cyclones and went pointless in four games with the Marlies last season. The 22-year-old joined the Marlies' then ECHL affiliate Newfoundland Growlers in 2024 after wrapping up his OHL career. Fontaine had 17 goals and 40 points in 40 games with the NCAA's Ohio State University Buckeyes last season before joining the Iowa Wild on an ATO. He went pointless in five AHL games. The 24-year-old was a seventh round selection of the Nashville Predators in 2020 and attended Maple Leafs development camp in 2019. King recorded 26 points in 64 games with the Manitoba moose last season, he has 56 points in 125 career AHL games. Advertisement The 23-year-old was a fourth round selection of the Anaheim Ducks in 2022. Rheaume had four points in 37 games with the Northeastern University Huskies last season. The 23-year-old posted 21 points in 98 NCAA games over three seasons. Check out The Hockey News' Toronto Maple Leafs team site for more updates. Make sure you bookmark The Hockey News' AHL Page for the latest news, exclusive interviews, breakdowns and so much more. Photo Credit: © Perry Nelson-Imagn Images
New York Times
6 hours ago
- New York Times
Vancouver Canucks mailbag, part 2: Centre trade options? Quinn Hughes vs. Gavin McKenna?
Let's move beyond the free-agent frenzy and settle in for a long Vancouver Canucks offseason. Last week we put out the call for Canucks questions recapping the offseason. Of course, because the VIPs always deliver, we received an overwhelming volume of queries. We broke the mailbag into two parts and tried to get into some of the most interesting questions we received in exhaustive detail. Advertisement Part 1 of our offseason recap mailbag ran yesterday, and we'll finish it off with some Man versus Machine, Quinn Hughes versus Gavin McKenna and some other real and hypothetical Canucks topics that you were wondering about. Here is your Canucks offseason mailbag. Note: Submitted questions may be edited for clarity and style. Drancer, if you could only choose one, which one would you choose and why? 1. Signing Quinn Hughes to an extension (7-8 years) 2. Being able to draft Gavin McKenna — John W. This is a very fun, if not especially realistic, hypothetical. While I might not have a ton of faith in Vancouver's odds of contending this upcoming season, I'm fairly confident that they won't be poor enough to be in range of winning the draft lottery and moving up far enough to select Gavin McKenna at the apex of the 2026 NHL Draft. So it's not as if the Canucks has a choice between two paths, one of which leads to retaining Quinn Hughes and the other of which leads to McKenna. Most top-level NHL players remain with their current franchise well before they hit unrestricted free agency. It takes a pretty unique set of circumstances, like we saw in Calgary with Matthew Tkachuk, for a player to bolt from their current team, and that's something that was very firmly reinforced around the NHL over the past month. That said, given that both of Hughes' NHL brothers play for the same franchise, it's fair to note that he is looking at a pretty unique set of circumstances. We'll have time to dwell on that over the next 12 months, though, let's get to this specific exercise. If you could choose between getting Hughes' autograph on a long-term extension or holding the No. 1 pick at the 2026 NHL Draft, which choice would provide more value to a franchise? When it comes to preposterous hypotheticals, there's only one man to call at The Athletic, and that's Dom Luszczyszyn (who else?). Luszczyszyn, as you all know, has the Net Rating model. He's also generous enough to indulge me and the VIPs by allowing us to peer into his data set, pose a fun question and get a hard output. This way, we can see if we might be able to get an objective answer to a complicated and purely hypothetical set of considerations. Advertisement Let's start with the value of a long-term Hughes extension. Given that Hughes is now a Norris Trophy winner and is clearly the most impactful two-way defender in the sport, there's no comparison available to us in terms of what his next deal should look like. The only possible comparison would be Cale Makar, and Makar, like Hughes, becomes extension-eligible following his second contract on July 1, 2026. Until Makar signs, Hughes' third contract exists in a hypothetical marketplace that hasn't been set yet. Given that, let's just liberally assume that his next deal is going to be a seven-year pact at $14 million per season (or $98 million total), for the sake of this exercise. It's a massive number, of course, and an unprecedented one for an NHL defender. According to the Net Rating model, however, it's also an amount that Hughes is a very good bet to live up to (and more) given how freakish his abilities are at both ends: Just over the first five years of this hypothetical Hughes extension, Vancouver's captain would provide over $7 million in surplus value, according to the Net Rating model. He'd also remain one of the NHL's absolute best defenders throughout that time frame. So, how does that stack up with what we should expect from McKenna? Obviously, it's very difficult to project a player's future over a comparable time horizon based on their draft-minus-one performance at the CHL level, but we can feel very confident that McKenna is a special, special player. Recording 129 points in 56 games in the WHL in a season that McKenna entered as a 16-year-old is true supernova-level production. McKenna is reportedly planning to play NCAA hockey this upcoming season. We'll see how he fares at the college level (pretty safe bet that he will absolutely dominate), but he certainly seems to be on that sort of Connor Bedard-like can't-miss trajectory entering his draft year. Even though we should confidently be able to project that McKenna is above the level of even an average No. 1 pick, let's just conservatively plug in what we've seen historically from first overall selections over the years. Quietly, this goes to the heart of how special Hughes is. He has and looks likely to continue to provide the Canucks with a level of value commensurate with what we'd expect from a No. 1 pick. Given that the nature of hockey development means that most of the transformative superstars in this game become famous at the age of 15 or 16, that Hughes has become this level of star is an incredible accomplishment. He is truly special. For what it's worth, while this graph is just a raw average of what you'd project a No. 1 pick to provide across their first eight NHL seasons, Luszczyszyn provided us as well with a 90th percentile outcome in case we want to put our finger on the scale and assume that McKenna is somewhere in a range between Auston Matthews and Connor McDavid on entering the NHL. If that's the case, and his draft-minus-one season production implies it's certainly possible, then you'd be looking at something north of $21.5 million in average value provided across the player's first eight seasons with a Net Rating score approaching plus-25 per season. Advertisement Basically, if McKenna hits his upside case on entering the NHL, this isn't a difficult question. As incredible as Hughes is, you'd take the younger Hart Trophy candidate. It's closer, however, if McKenna performs like an average No. 1 pick. In that case, McKenna would still hold the edge in terms of his efficiency, because of the logic of his entry-level contract and restricted free agent protections. In comparison with Hughes, who will be paid at a level more closely commensurate with his actual impact and value in his unrestricted free agent seasons, McKenna would be a better bet to provide surplus value. In terms of raw impact, however, it comes down to a timeline thing. If you're poised with a high-quality, deep team that has a chance to win the Stanley Cup in the next three years, you'd rather have Hughes, an NHL superstar at the peak of his powers. If your timeline is a bit further out, however, you'd probably prefer the upside and developmental runway that a younger player like McKenna possesses. All and all, the answer here is probably '2.' That it's this close and needs to be qualified, however, is a testament to Hughes' excellence and value. How much discipline do you think management will have if the team starts off poorly? Do you think that re-signing Team America signals that they are willing to be patient, or, if there is an early injury to one of their centres, do you think they will feel pressured to make a suboptimal/short-sighted trade in pursuit of the playoffs? — Alexander M. I think we need to throw out the concept of 'discipline' as it would usually apply to a team that's in transition and needs to look toward the future. No matter what, whether the Canucks start off well or poorly, management is going to be motivated and aggressive to turn over every rock in search of centre upgrades. Regardless of what the Brock Boeser, Thatcher Demko and Conor Garland extensions signal about the posture in the big picture, the main signal to be mindful of about the Canucks' posture is that they only dealt a fourth-round pick — and held firm to all of their additional futures — despite their evident short-term needs this summer. They used all of their draft picks, and they held tight to all of their prospects. There's at least some talk internally that the Canucks have to prioritize the future. That, quietly, in any event, they are in something of a rebuilding phase in the wake of the J.T. Miller trade. To me, that means we should expect Vancouver to be pretty careful about trading its top prospects or its 2026 first-round pick unless the return is a young centre with true top-end potential. Advertisement Rank the percentage likelihood of each of the following players to make the NHL next year (based on the current roster and depth chart): Jonathan Lekkerimäki Linus Karlsson Aatu Räty Max Sasson Arshdeep Bains D-Petey Tom Willander Victor Mancini — Noah W. This is a fun exercise, so let's indulge it. For what it's worth, I'm going to interpret 'make the NHL next year' as 'spend at least 50 games on the NHL roster.' I'll assign a percentage and then give a one-sentence explanation for why I view it that way. Lekkerimäki: 60 percent. Needs to have a strong summer and add a fair bit of core strength, but has all of the tools to be a middle-six contributor with power-play utility as soon as next season. Karlsson: 50 percent. Defensively reliable and sneaky dangerous at the net front, Karlsson was definitely a favourite of Rick Tocchet, but does Adam Foote share those feelings? Räty: 95 percent. Räty would have to lose the job to not be an NHL fixture for Vancouver next season. Sasson: 40 percent. Canucks have high hopes for Sasson, but I'm not convinced they view him as a centre full-time at the NHL level and he's waiver exempt whereas Karlsson and Arshdeep Bains aren't. That makes it harder for him to win a full-time NHL job. Bains: 65 percent. Bains will require waivers and would be at very high risk of being claimed if he were exposed following training camp. He has a lot of fans among professional scouts around the league. It isn't easy to see the fit, but I just don't see the Vancouver allowing that to happen. D-Petey: 95 percent. Not only is Elias Pettersson, the defender, going to be on this roster all season, but he's going to dress on opening night. Willander: 75 percent. The Canucks flat out expect both Pettersson and Willander to make their opening-night lineup. Mancini: 40 percent. That Mancini remains waiver-exempt is a key factor to keep in mind here. That, in addition to the emergence of Pettersson, who can play the right side, and how much the Canucks have invested in Willander is going to make it difficult for Mancini to remain at the NHL level without injuries further up the lineup next season. Advertisement What are the chances this team is surprisingly good next year (much like we were pleasantly surprised two seasons ago)? — Gerry V. This depends on how you describe 'surprisingly good' next year. Based solely on their betting odds, the market handicaps Vancouver as being about 50/50 to be a playoff team. So that means they're squarely a fringe playoff team, and we shouldn't be surprised either way if they qualify for the postseason or if they miss out. If the standard is 'win the division and be a real threat to make the conference final,' the way the Canucks did in 2023-24, well, then we're talking about a more remote possibility. The oddsmakers have Vancouver priced out at 15-to-1 to win the division, which is an implied probability of about 6 percent. Given that they're 28-to-1 to win the West as the outrights markets currently have it, we can probably split the difference and assume the oddsmakers would peg it at about 20-to-1 or so that Vancouver wins the Pacific Division and gets to within a game of the conference final the way it did two years ago. Yes, Lloyd Christmas, I am telling you there's a chance. Man vs. Machine: Seeking underutilized centers with great potential, such as the J.T. Miller trade in 2019. ChatGPT suggest Marco Rossi, Anton Lundell and Dylan Cozens. What about you? — Aksel W. Those are good suggestions, but very obvious ones. I'd want to start with the Sam Bennett profile guys, the high draft pedigree players that have yet to deliver on their promise. Alex Turcotte and Jesperi Kotkaniemi are the standout bets to place in that category. I'd then move on to the players that I like based on their skating ability and doggedness, but might ultimately have some limitations. The two Winnipeg Jets restricted players — Morgan Barron and Rasmus Kupari — are standouts among this category of player for me, as is New Jersey Devils centre Paul Cotter. I'm also very high on Colorado Avalanche centre Jack Drury. Joe Veleno is another name that I'd put in this category, and he's an unrestricted free agent after being bought out by the Seattle Kraken. He could be worth a look, though I'm not sure the offence will ever play up to permit him to be a top-nine guy. Then there's the true J.T. Miller comparables, namely, players that aren't currently being used at centre but may have the chops to grow into a full-time role at centre. Another Jets player in Cole Perfetti would fit this category. I think Connor McMichael, who broke out on the wing last season in Washington, could ultimately end up as a full-time NHL centre. On the lower end, I'd also throw in Matt Rempe here as a wild-card pick. Rempe has a big reputation, but he's actually a player that I think has been a bit miscast as a heavy-only type. He had real puck skill at the WHL level, and I think he could be an interesting project as a centre. I'd love to see him given like 50 games in the AHL tasked with producing offence and improving his defensive play in the middle, because I'm convinced there could be something there. Advertisement Outside of Petey, whom amongst Canucks forwards (rostered or prospects), are the best pure passers? — Stefan R. Garland is clearly the best playmaking Canucks forward outside of Elias Pettersson. The gap between the two is real, but it's perhaps somewhat narrower than you think given that Garland has easily maintained a first-line assist rate at five-on-five and ranks among the top 65 NHL forwards over the past four years by primary assist rate. A dark horse candidate to be a legitimate NHL-level playmaker down the line is Bains. He's a legitimately gifted distributor, but rarely takes the chances required to make plays when he's been given a shot at the NHL level. Who's your biggest long shot, but still actually a possibility, to make the team out of camp? I'm not talking about Räty, Sasson, Lekkerimäki or even Willander, I want a deep cut, like a Vilmer Alriksson or someone! And what would they have to do to make the team? — Sam B. Not to toot my own horn, but I had Räty as a dark horse to make the team out of training camp last summer, and that one hit. If I had to pick a realistic dark horse for this year, and I want to qualify this by reserving the right to alter my dark horse pick in late August or early September when I'm actually projecting the 23-man roster ahead of training camp, I think I'd be leaning Braeden Cootes at this point. Cootes might not be physically ready to play in the NHL just yet, but he's got the pedigree, he plays the position at which Vancouver's need is greatest (centre), he's right-handed (which is a significant plus) and he's a mature competitor by all accounts. He's got the profile to at least force the Canucks into a difficult decision as training camp goes along, I suspect.
