Family hubs to be rolled out across every council in England
The Education Secretary has said that the scheme will 'give a lifeline' to families.
Family hubs were originally rolled out across 75 local authorities at the start of 2024 by the then-Conservative government.
Officials say that the hubs will be rolled out in every local authority by April 2026, and there will be expanded so there are up to 1,000 of them by the end of 2028.
Among the services available at the locations will be birth registration, debt advice, midwifery services and support for parents who are separating or have separated.
Officials hope that the spaces will also provide families access to other services and social care.
Bridget Phillipson said: 'It's the driving mission of this government to break the link between a child's background and what they go on to achieve – our new Best Start family hubs will put the first building blocks of better life chances in place for more children.
'I saw firsthand how initiatives like Sure Start helped level the playing field in my own community, transforming the lives of children by putting in place family support in the earliest years of life, and as part of our plan for change, we're building on its legacy for the next generation of children.
'Making sure hard-working parents are able to benefit from more early help is a promise made, and promise kept – delivering a lifeline of consistent support across the nation, ensuring health, social care and education work in unison to ensure all children get the very best start in life.'
The Conservatives have said that the announcement 'brings little clarity on what's genuinely new and what simply rebrands existing services'.
Shadow education secretary Laura Trott said: 'That lack of clarity is part of a wider pattern.
'This is a Government defined by broken promises and endless U-turns.'
Charity Save The Children has said it is 'pleased' to see the Government 'making it easier for families to get the help they need'.
Dan Paskins, executive director of Policy, Advocacy and Campaigns at Save The Children UK, said: 'Focusing on family services for the under-fives will be vital in securing better outcomes for children, and we welcome the Best Start In Life announcement.
'We know from our work in local communities that bringing together parenting, healthcare and education support services in one place is an approach which works, so we are pleased to see the UK Government making it easier for families to get the help they need.
'With ministers now demonstrating an increasingly ambitious plan for children in the UK, we hope this drive for change continues when the child poverty strategy is released in autumn.
'This must include scrapping the two-child limit to Universal Credit, which is the only meaningful way to reduce the UK's record child poverty rate.'
The head of the NAHT union welcomed the move.
General secretary Paul Whiteman said: 'This is a positive step forward towards ensuring all children get the best start – and we are pleased to see tangible investment following this week's announcement of new targets for school readiness.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
25 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Experts gives DWP proposals on welfare reforms
Experts gives DWP proposals on welfare reforms The government has seen its proposed package of welfare reforms whittled away by amendments to quell an outcry from MPs and campaigners over payment cuts Experts have given the government a set of proposals for boosting employment and reducing levels of economic inactivity (Image: peplow via Getty Images ) Labour has been called upon to re-examine the welfare system as a range of innovative employment-centric initiatives have been suggested. These proposals include an idea for disability benefit applicants to participate in an employability and independence workshop prior to their claims being accepted. The government's package of reforms has been significantly diluted through amendments, following a backlash from MPs and advocates concerned about the impact of reduced payments. Nevertheless, pundits contend that alternative strategies need to be considered by the Government to decrease economic inactivity and reintegrate more individuals into employment, reports Birmingham Live. Deven Ghelani, director of Policy in Practice, a firm focusing on social policy software and analytics, has put forth recommendations urging "fundamental reforms that make the system work better for ill and disabled people." Ghelani expresses reservations about the Government's adjustments designed to safeguard current benefit recipients while imposing cuts on prospective claimants with similar health issues. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here As per Labour's forthcoming legislation, Universal Credit's additional amount for illness will remain unchanged for existing beneficiaries but will be slashed and frozen for new claimants post-next April. There was also a plan to exclude current Personal Independence Payment (PIP) recipients from more stringent upcoming criteria, yet all suggested changes related to PIP have now been scrapped from the bill, with a comprehensive review announced before any new actions are proposed. Article continues below Mr Ghelani has suggested several alternative strategies. He proposes that the DWP should incorporate new 'better-off-in-work assessments' into the claims system for long-term unemployed individuals, to clearly illustrate the financial benefits of employment. Furthermore, he suggests using DWP data on those claiming PIP and the Universal Credit sickness top-up to send text invitations for employment support and social activities. He also recommends that anyone applying for disability benefits should be required to attend an employability and/or independence workshop before they start receiving payments. According to Mr Ghelani, the waiting period before cash support is approved could save money to fund these workshops. Additionally, he urges the Government to simplify access to healthcare services like physiotherapy, and to provide the necessary disability aids and adaptations to keep people active. Lastly, he suggests that employers should strive to maintain and enhance the job market through effective management of their existing staff, providing application feedback to all candidates, and offering more work placements to students. Article continues below Schools should also play a larger role in inviting employers and successful former pupils to share their experiences in the working world, he added.
Wales Online
25 minutes ago
- Wales Online
People to be entitled to time off work if they lose baby before 24 weeks
People to be entitled to time off work if they lose baby before 24 weeks New rules will guarantee time off work to grieve if a pregnant woman loses a baby - no matter how early Parents will be entitled to bereavement leave if they lose a pregnancy before 24 weeks, under new plans to be unveiled by the Government People will be entitled to bereavement leave if they lose a pregnancy before 24 weeks, under new plans to be unveiled by the Government. Ministers are set to amend the Employment Rights Bill so that people will be entitled to protected time off in the event of a pregnancy loss, regardless of the stage at which it happens. Angela Rayner has said that the change will give 'people time away from work to grieve'. Under current rules, parents are entitled to up to two weeks of bereavement leave if a child dies before they turn 18, or they experience a stillbirth after 24 weeks of pregnancy. Amendments to the Employment Rights Bill, will see the right to 'at least one week's leave' expanded to people who lose a pregnancy before 24 weeks. The exact length of the leave will be specified in later legislation after a consultation. The Bill already makes provision to expand bereavement leave, giving employees protected time off to grieve the loss of a loved one. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said that the amendments will offer 'dignity and respect'. 'For many families, including mine, that have been affected by pregnancy loss, the decision around returning to work or taking sick leave to grieve properly can make an already painful experience even more difficult,' he said. 'Grief doesn't follow a timetable, and expanding rights to leave for pregnancy loss will ensure every family gets the time they need to heal without worrying about their job.' Deputy Prime Minister Ms Rayner similarly said that 'no-one who is going through the heartbreak of pregnancy loss should have to go back to work before they are ready'. Article continues below 'I am proud that this Government is introducing a day-one right to protected time off work after experiencing pregnancy loss, giving people time away from work to grieve and spend time with their families,' she said. Vicki Robinson, chief executive of the Miscarriage Association, welcomed the announcement, saying it was 'a hugely important step that acknowledges the often very significant impact of pre-24-week loss, not only for those experiencing the physical loss, but for their partners too'. It comes after ministers announced they would review the system of parental leave, declaring that the current system is 'not working' for families. Mr Reynolds said the Government will investigate the whole system for supporting new parents to take time off work when they have a baby, including maternity leave, paternity leave and shared arrangements.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Reeves' tears should make us rethink our worst assumptions about politicians
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Rachel Reeves has said she is "cracking on with the job" of Chancellor after her visible distress in the House of Commons last week. Reeves said she had been upset about a personal matter; the slight difference is that the Chancellor is the second most visible person in the UK Government. Her tears were widely interpreted as the result of a bust-up with the Prime Minister over the calamitous, watered-down Welfare Bill. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Had the head of His Majesty's Treasury been a male, would, in all honesty, our minds have wondered whether his boss was upsetting him so? Or would we assume that something genuinely so distressing had happened to tip them over during the most public domain TV can afford, the government front benches during Prime Minister's Questions? Chancellor Rachel Reeves crying as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaks during Prime Minister's Questions | PA The concept of the stiff British upper lip originated with the Victorians, who considered it beneath one's dignity to express emotion, a trait that Winston Churchill routinely disregarded openly. When it came to blood, toil, tears and sweat, Churchill routinely 'blubbered'. Lachrymosity was as constant a feature for Churchill as his bulldog spirit, stirring oratory, and steely resolve. Born in 1874, his patrician and aristocratic background could not suppress the man's sheer emotion. Behind the defiant V-signs, cigars, and defiant speeches was a person who wore his heart on his sleeve – but Churchill has never been decried as unmanly or irrational, and public emotion has only deepened his reputation for authenticity. Sir Winston Churchill gives his famous wartime V-sign | Getty Images The Victorian era has left us with a problematic inheritance of sentimentality and repression. The accession of the eighteen-year-old Queen Victoria in 1837 was met with cheers and applause by crowds, at which the new monarch "burst into tears, which continued, notwithstanding an evident attempt on the part of her Majesty to restrain her feelings, to flow in torrents down her now pallid cheeks, until her Majesty retired from the window". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Victoria became a model of a grieving widow but also the epitome of Britishness as Empress of India, a title conferred on her in 1876. By the time of her death in 1901, youthful pathos had been subsumed by a cultural restraint of temper, heralded as the prerequisite for maintaining a quarter of the world. In earlier periods, tearfulness did not imply a lack of manliness or self-control. The eight admirals who carried the coffin of Admiral Horatio Nelson in January 1806 at St Paul's Cathedral were in tears, as was at least half of the all-male congregation. Regency men were not expected to govern their emotions in the way that their Victorian grandsons and great-grandsons were. Deep cynicism towards politicians Emotions in our modern politicians are often dismissed as taboo or tactical, revealing how deeply our cynicism runs. In our media-saturated era, authenticity is a moving target. There is an innate feeling that politicians must be putting on an act. There's even a Japanese term - namida enjou – which critically refers to emotional displays used to attract sympathy or deflect criticism. In many Western cultures, women in politics are expected to be empathetic; however, they are often derided as "too emotional" if they openly express their emotions. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In classical antiquity, particularly in ancient Greece and Rome, Stoics believed that public displays of emotion, especially tears, indicated a lack of self-mastery. For leaders, weeping could suggest weakness or a failure to control passions. Roman emperors, military generals, and senators were expected to exude gravitas, a solemn dignity that left little room for tears. Biblical and ancient Eastern traditions often portrayed rulers and prophets crying in moments of national or spiritual crisis. King David famously wept over the death of his son Absalom. In Chinese history, emperors were sometimes praised for compassionate weeping during times of famine or war. Even in the Roman world, Julius Caesar was known to cry when Alexander the Great's accomplishments were recounted to him—a blend of ambition, envy, and historical candour. As Christianity spread throughout Europe, the concept of the "man of sorrows" gained resonance among Christian leaders, who were encouraged to emulate Christ's compassion. Monarchs and rulers could cry, but only in ways that aligned with their roles as paternalistic figures grieving for their people. Political crying became problematic with the rise of Enlightenment values in the 17th and 18th centuries. Figures like Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin emphasised rational governance - tears were considered more suitable for the cultural and literary spheres. Male leaders were expected to display firmness and rational judgment, and to cry in public would risk ridicule or accusations of instability. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Contradictory expectations In the 20th century, mass media, especially radio and television, brought politicians' emotions into living rooms. The expectations were contradictory: leaders were supposed to be human, available, and yet entirely unflappable. In 1990, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was seen with tears in her eyes as she departed from 10 Downing Street after resigning. The attitude that a senior politician 'got what they deserved' is a prevailing one: tears are seen as a sign of weakness to a baying public. Margaret Thatcher leaves Downing Street at the end of her premiership | PA Tony Blair and New Labour were considered a huge modernising force, spearheading the 'Cool Britannia' movement. He coined the term 'People's Princess' to describe Diana in her death and is thought to be the force that convinced Queen Elizabeth II and the Royal Family to change the way they grieved publicly. In the last 20 years, a total public collapse in political confidence has led to an unrelenting scepticism of our leaders' motives. In 2021, when UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock was filmed tearing up during a TV interview about COVID-19 vaccines, critics accused him of faking it for political gain. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad
